View Full Version : AA Flight 11 For Sale!
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 09:20 AM
Recently I was cruising some of the turther forums when I came across this.
< http://letsrollforums.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=19618&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0&sid=6140975f590069465161094598505807 >
< http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=9971&st=0 >
Naturally my curiosity peaked when I read this. Right away I knew someone was playing a very sick joke, exactly who I'm not sure. One does not get the serial number wrong for an aircraft they are supposedly selling. Not with the kind of money that is involved.
It was sort of funny reading the reactions of the truthers. They were practically falling all over each other thinking they finally found the smoking gun. Guess it did not enter their minds that someone might be playing a game. Or that in order for it to be true AA either has to be in on the conspiracy or they are totally clueless. One of my favorite posts is this.
No one should mention Flight 11 or anything to do with 9/11 if they call this guy... at some point this will be properly investigated and it is essential that the seller not have any suspicion aroused.. is that not common sense? Otherwise we risk blowing the best lead to ever emerge in 6 years.. don't blow it guys! I am having indirect discreet inquiries placed about this, and would really urge folks to sit tight and let this play out, and not blow it by a foolish phone call... 'nuf said.
The guy said this on an open forum! Way to keep a secret there smart guy!
Then it took a rather bizarre turn. Someone supposedly contacted the person who is "selling" this aircraft. They corrected themselves and said it was N330AA, the 767 that suffered a turbine failure on the number one engine at LAX last year. Then they stated that the left wing and both engines were replaced. That's when the old BS alarms started screaming. Replacing the l/h wing would require special tooling. They also fail to mention that the aft l/h part of the fuselage has significant heat damage. The final nail in the coffin is that the keel beam of the aircraft was damaged. When this happens the aircraft is considered a write off. Which it is because it's still sitting at LAX minus the engines.
Gravy
8th December 2007, 09:29 AM
The stupidest people on the face of the earth.
BenBurch
8th December 2007, 09:42 AM
Likely that will become a fire training hulk. We have several blackened hulks at the north side of O'Hare here, nigh unto the Jane Adams tollway. Several times a year some motorist sees the firemen working on one of the blazing hulks and freaks out and calls 911 and the newspapers!
Redtail
8th December 2007, 09:53 AM
Oh my... That is just epic.
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 09:59 AM
Likely that will become a fire training hulk. We have several blackened hulks at the north side of O'Hare here, nigh unto the Jane Adams tollway. Several times a year some motorist sees the firemen working on one of the blazing hulks and freaks out and calls 911 and the newspapers!
Once all the insurance issues have been sorted out all usable parts will be removed and the rest sold for scrap. Those hulks you see at airports are steel tubes made to look like an airliner. The problem with using an old airframe for firefighting training is that you would only be able to use it once.
T.A.M.
8th December 2007, 10:01 AM
how can you be anything but stupid when you think that the world begins and ends on the internet.
TAM:)
Shrinker
8th December 2007, 10:41 AM
Do you think they'll all chip in to buy it? That would be worth seeing.
Shrinker
8th December 2007, 10:48 AM
Too late...
This aircaft is no longer avilable for sale or lease by Atlas Aviation, click here to goto our Large Transport Jet category for other 767-200ER aircraft for sale.
"I'm telling you Scully, it was right here!"
cludgie
8th December 2007, 10:51 AM
Sometimes when I laugh at these kind of things I have that cruel feeling you get like you're laughing at some drunk tramp who has just wet their pants.
BenBurch
8th December 2007, 11:23 AM
Once all the insurance issues have been sorted out all usable parts will be removed and the rest sold for scrap. Those hulks you see at airports are steel tubes made to look like an airliner. The problem with using an old airframe for firefighting training is that you would only be able to use it once.
Of course you are right. I never thought about it before. :o
njslim
8th December 2007, 11:27 AM
Sometimes when I laugh at these kind of things I have that cruel feeling you get like you're laughing at some drunk tramp who has just wet their pants.
Remember parents and teachers telling me not nice to laugh and ridicule the retarded
kid because they couldn't help it. Make exception for twofers.....
Alferd_Packer
8th December 2007, 11:28 AM
Has anyone else looked at these pictures that were posted in that thread and thought the same thought that I had?
http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/AA763EngineFire-3_files/aa1.jpg
http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/AA763EngineFire-3_files/aa2.jpg
http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/AA763EngineFire-3_files/aa4.jpg
http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/AA763EngineFire-3_files/aa5.jpg
Hmmm, That rotor hub certainly doesn’t look 13’ in diameter to me. LOL
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 01:56 PM
Here are some more pictures of the LAX bird.
< http://www.flickr.com/photos/lafd/sets/72157594153722446/ >
apathoid
8th December 2007, 02:25 PM
http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/AA763EngineFire-3_files/aa1.jpg
That don't look right. If I was a conspiracy dork, I could have a field day with this picture. How did that disk manage to puncture the exhaust plug? That's unpossible. Must've been planted.
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 02:28 PM
http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/AA763EngineFire-3_files/aa1.jpg
That don't look right. If I was a conspiracy dork, I could have a field day with this picture. How did that disk manage to puncture the exhaust plug? That's unpossible. Must've been planted.
You might be onto something. ;)
DGM
8th December 2007, 02:38 PM
http://www.iasa-intl.com/folders/belfast/AA763EngineFire-3_files/aa1.jpg
That don't look right. If I was a conspiracy dork, I could have a field day with this picture. How did that disk manage to puncture the exhaust plug? That's unpossible. Must've been planted.
I read in one of the sites it is the other engine it's stuck in.
Here's the link:
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=N330AA&distinct_entry=true
apathoid
8th December 2007, 02:41 PM
My God, even after the semi-sensible idiot posted that he contacted the seller by pretending to be a potential buyer and confirmed that the seller was indeed talking about the engine fire plane(ship 330, not 334), several PfT morons still can't bring themselves to belive it was a simple typo (http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=9971&st=30). I didn't know people who know how to operate a computer can be so mind-numbingly stupid.
:jaw-dropp
Redtail
8th December 2007, 02:55 PM
My God, even after the semi-sensible idiot posted that he contacted the seller by pretending to be a potential buyer and confirmed that the seller was indeed talking about the engine fire plane(ship 330, not 334), several PfT morons still can't bring themselves to belive it was a simple typo (http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=9971&st=30). I didn't know people who know how to operate a computer can be so mind-numbingly stupid.
:jaw-dropp
Not using a computer but still stupid, should be a Darwin runner up.
**May be disturbing**
**Naughty Language**
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ2okuNS2DU
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 02:58 PM
My God, even after the semi-sensible idiot posted that he contacted the seller by pretending to be a potential buyer and confirmed that the seller was indeed talking about the engine fire plane(ship 330, not 334), several PfT morons still can't bring themselves to belive it was a simple typo (http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/index.php?showtopic=9971&st=30). I didn't know people who know how to operate a computer can be so mind-numbingly stupid.
:jaw-dropp
I think the whole thing is a huge scam. If someone was trying to sell N330AA and said it was repaired that is a total fabrication. The aircraft is beyond economic repair. And I have a hard time believing it was a typo. Also, anyone who's looking to buy an aircraft is going to know the history on that aircraft. There's a paper work trail a mile long on any commercial airliner.
apathoid
8th December 2007, 03:17 PM
I think the whole thing is a huge scam. If someone was trying to sell N330AA and said it was repaired that is a total fabrication. The aircraft is beyond economic repair.
Who decides if the airplane gets written off? AA inspection, Boeing, the owner/lessor, the insurance company..? We basically had the exact same thing happen to an MD-11 here and after about a year in limbo(the plane just sat at the Delta North ramp at ATL), they found a buyer and the plane was eventually repaired and sold to UPS.
I have a hard time believing it was a typo. Also, anyone who's looking to buy an aircraft is going to know the history on that aircraft.
I dunno about that. The airplane still had some value(we sold all of our -200s; so there is a market) and if somebody wanted to pay for a wing and 2 refurbed CF-6s - I'm sure a deal could have happened. See above.
A-Train
8th December 2007, 03:40 PM
Also, anyone who's looking to buy an aircraft is going to know the history on that aircraft. There's a paper work trail a mile long on any commercial airliner.
Speaking of that, let's change the subject to something much more interesting. How does one determine the ownership history of a given aircraft? I'd like to know how I can find out the histories of the four airplanes crashed on 9/11, including who owned them and what airlines flew them. Is that possible?
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
COPYRIGHT 2001 Reed Business Information Ltd.
Arie Egozi/TEL AVIV
El Al is planning to save money by selling its Boeing 757 and 767 fleets and boosting its 737s and 777s to reduce the number of aircraft types it operates.
The Israeli national airline operates six all-Boeing fleets - 737s, 747-200s, 747-400s, 757s, 767s and 777s - but intends to sell its eight 757s and six 767s in order to purchase more 737-800/900s and 777s. El Al operates two 737-700s, three 737-800s and one 777, with two more on order. A fifth 747-400 is also an option, while the 747-200s will be sold.
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-11489747_ITM
apathoid
8th December 2007, 03:45 PM
I read in one of the sites it is the other engine it's stuck in.
Here's the link:
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?regsearch=N330AA&distinct_entry=true
That's even more unpossible!1! Conspiracy!!1!1eleventy11
apathoid
8th December 2007, 03:50 PM
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-11489747_ITM
You just can't help yourself, can you? I wouldn't know where to start with this latest scenario of yours. Are you going to think it through, or do you need the painfully obvious pointed out to you? C'mon. Google is your friend(in this case).
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 03:52 PM
Who decides if the airplane gets written off? AA inspection, Boeing, the owner/lessor, the insurance company..? We basically had the exact same thing happen to an MD-11 here and after about a year in limbo(the plane just sat at the Delta North ramp at ATL), they found a buyer and the plane was eventually repaired and sold to UPS.
I dunno about that. The airplane still had some value(we sold all of our -200s; so there is a market) and if somebody wanted to pay for a wing and 2 refurbed CF-6s - I'm sure a deal could have happened. See above.
Who ever the lien holder is I would imagine. The word we got was that that keel beam was damaged. Add to that a wing that is unrepairable, heat damage to the fuselage and the need for two engines that adds up to a hefty repair bill. Especially when you consider that there are 767's in the desert that don't need any kind of repair work. And as I have already said it's more than just a new wing and two engines.
Maybe I'm missing something, I just don't know what.
peteweaver
8th December 2007, 04:04 PM
And before 9/11 Easyjet, Ryanair and a whole load of other european budget airlines were buying second hand airliners, as at the time, the air travel market was GROWING. Now isn't that a wacky coincidence A Train..... ?
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 04:05 PM
Speaking of that, let's change the subject to something much more interesting. How does one determine the ownership history of a given aircraft? I'd like to know how I can find out the histories of the four airplanes crashed on 9/11, including who owned them and what airlines flew them. Is that possible?
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-11489747_ITM
You're kidding me right. If I didn't know any better I would say you were trying to get a reaction out of people. After all, who could be so twisted as to try and blame the Jews by implying it was ex-El Al aircraft that were used.
Here's a news flash for you A-Train, two of the aircraft belonged to United and two belonged to American. And by the way, how do you know they actually sold them prior to 9-11? El Al still operates 757 and 767 aircraft. Is this a case of you just assuming they were actually sold?
apathoid
8th December 2007, 04:06 PM
Who ever the lien holder is I would imagine. The word we got was that that keel beam was damaged. Add to that a wing that is unrepairable, heat damage to the fuselage and the need for two engines that adds up to a hefty repair bill. Especially when you consider that there are 767's in the desert that don't need any kind of repair work. And as I have already said it's more than just a new wing and two engines.
Maybe I'm missing something, I just don't know what.
Yeah, that's understandable. But like I said, we had an airplane with similar circumstances that did sell(replaced wing, pylon, engine, reskinned fuselage section, replaced stringers, floor beams, etc..) - and if someone was looking to buy a 767 on the cheap, they might've been interested if the airplane was deemed repairable.
Also, if you do a quick googling on Atlas Aviation and Ronni Chowdry, you'll see that they have a few other aircraft (http://www.aviatorsale.com/seller/sellerAircrafts.asp?CompanyID=5101), including a couple of other 767s for sale, so they appear to be legit. Its also not clear what the status of the airplane is. Some aircraft registry database sites say it's "Stored" and some say "Written Off". My guess is the latter, which is why is the aircraft is no longer for sale.
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 04:28 PM
Yeah, that's understandable. But like I said, we had an airplane with similar circumstances that did sell(replaced wing, pylon, engine, reskinned fuselage section, replaced stringers, floor beams, etc..) - and if someone was looking to buy a 767 on the cheap, they might've been interested if the airplane was deemed repairable.
Also, if you do a quick googling on Atlas Aviation and Ronni Chowdry, you'll see that they have a few other aircraft (http://www.aviatorsale.com/seller/sellerAircrafts.asp?CompanyID=5101), including a couple of other 767s for sale, so they appear to be legit. Its also not clear what the status of the airplane is. Some aircraft registry database sites say it's "Stored" and some say "Written Off". My guess is the latter, which is why is the aircraft is no longer for sale.
With an MD-11 I could understand going the extra mile to repair it since there are so few out there. By the way, what happened with that MD-11?
With the 767 there have been almost a thousand aircraft delivered so far in it's production life. So it's not like there's a shortage. Especially now that a lot of airlines have either replaced their 767's with A330's or are gearing up for the 787 and A350. As for the repair work there's the issue of the damaged keel beam. Usually when that's mentioned people get real hinky about it.
apathoid
8th December 2007, 04:33 PM
Speaking of that, let's change the subject to something much more interesting. How does one determine the ownership history of a given aircraft? I'd like to know how I can find out the histories of the four airplanes crashed on 9/11, including who owned them and what airlines flew them. Is that possible?
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
Here you go Sherlock.
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-active-b767.htm
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-history-b757.htm
El Al never sold any of their 767s, and didn't sell any 757's to either UA or AA.
:solved2
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 04:38 PM
Here you go Sherlock.
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-active-b767.htm
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-history-b757.htm
El Al never sold any of their 767s, and didn't sell any 757's to either UA or AA.
:solved2
Do you really think facts are going to matter to him? I'm sure he's thinking up some sort of bizzare story to explain it away. Somewhere along the lines of "Mossad planted that info".
tomwaits
8th December 2007, 04:39 PM
Speaking of that, let's change the subject to something much more interesting.
"Speaking of that, let's not speak of that."
There's a Create New Thread option. I suggest you use it.
apathoid
8th December 2007, 04:40 PM
With an MD-11 I could understand going the extra mile to repair it since there are so few out there. By the way, what happened with that MD-11?
#3 had a tail pipe fire during an engine run after a C-check. Rumor has it that the fire warning and fire bottle breakers were still out. They didn't get fuel cut off until the wing was on fire.
The guys doing the run had a bad day, to say the least.
Couldn't find any pics, but here is the relevant thread from pprune:
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=112090
With the 767 there have been almost a thousand aircraft delivered so far in it's production life. So it's not like there's a shortage. Especially now that a lot of airlines have either replaced their 767's with A330's or are gearing up for the 787 and A350. As for the repair work there's the issue of the damaged keel beam. Usually when that's mentioned people get real hinky about it.
Yeah, I agree. I just don't think this is a case of someone trying to yank the twoofers chains. I'm more worried about that turbine disk....:p
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 04:55 PM
#3 had a tail pipe fire during an engine run after a C-check. Rumor has it that the fire warning and fire bottle breakers were still out. They didn't get fuel cut off until the wing was on fire.
The guys doing the run had a bad day, to say the least.
Couldn't find any pics, but here is the relevant thread from pprune:
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=112090
Yeah, I agree. I just don't think this is a case of someone trying to yank the twoofers chains. I'm more worried about that turbine disk....:p
Especially when parts of it end up going through the keel beam. ;)
To be honest I'm not sure what to think about this whole thing.
AMTMAN
8th December 2007, 04:59 PM
Here you go Sherlock.
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-active-b767.htm
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-history-b757.htm
El Al never sold any of their 767s, and didn't sell any 757's to either UA or AA.
:solved2
Doubt AA would have bought a 767 from El Al in the first place. Reason being El Al uses Pratt motors on their 767's and AA uses GE. Same goes for United and the 757, UA uses Pratt motors and El Al uses RR.
A W Smith
8th December 2007, 07:12 PM
Speaking of that, let's change the subject to something much more interesting. How does one determine the ownership history of a given aircraft? I'd like to know how I can find out the histories of the four airplanes crashed on 9/11, including who owned them and what airlines flew them. Is that possible?
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-11489747_ITM
:dl: You know you can dig yourself into a hole so deep that the dirt you are trying to throw out of the pit lands back on top of your head.
beachnut
8th December 2007, 09:40 PM
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
This one post, full of ignorance at innumerable levels.
Cl1mh4224rd
8th December 2007, 11:43 PM
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
Err... what's your point? Or are you just throwing out random irrelevancies again?
gumboot
9th December 2007, 02:07 AM
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
This one seems to have slipped past most people. I must confess, A-Train, I'm curious. Tell me more.
-Gumboot
tomwaits
9th December 2007, 02:36 AM
The stupidest people on the face of the earth.
This is absolutely hilarious.
I'd like to quote the great Perry Logan (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8r8osSqiB4): "Conspiracy guys are the stupidest guys in town!"
AMTMAN
9th December 2007, 08:19 AM
Err... what's your point? Or are you just throwing out random irrelevancies again?
Just a case of someone letting their hate cloud their judgement.
JimBenArm
9th December 2007, 09:37 AM
Just a case of someone letting their hate cloud their judgement.
Don't you know if you're not posting lies about the Jews you're wasting the internet? That's why the KKK invented it, after all!
A-Train
9th December 2007, 09:49 AM
This one seems to have slipped past most people. I must confess, A-Train, I'm curious. Tell me more.
Tell you more? But I haven't told you anything. I asked a simple question: how does one determine the ownership history of a given airplane? Who were the previous owners, if any, of the four planes used on 9/11? Is it possible to determine this information? By the way, I'd like to know the airlines that flew the planes, not the name of some holding company.
Firestone
9th December 2007, 10:17 AM
Tell you more? But I haven't told you anything. I asked a simple question: how does one determine the ownership history of a given airplane? Who were the previous owners, if any, of the four planes used on 9/11? Is it possible to determine this information? By the way, I'd like to know the airlines that flew the planes, not the name of some holding company.No, you didn't just "ask a simple question".
You tried to insinuate that the planes involved in the attacks were sold by EL AL to AA and UA. :rolleyes:
As apathoid (http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=3225670&postcount=29) already posted, it is easily verified that this is utter nonsense (as usual with your claims and loaded "questions").
Here's the history of the four planes. Surprise, surprise! No El Al to see here. :rolleyes:
http://i8.tinypic.com/8brxq1g.jpg
AMTMAN
9th December 2007, 03:14 PM
Tell you more? But I haven't told you anything. I asked a simple question: how does one determine the ownership history of a given airplane? Who were the previous owners, if any, of the four planes used on 9/11? Is it possible to determine this information? By the way, I'd like to know the airlines that flew the planes, not the name of some holding company.
You were not asking a simple question A-Train. Quite the opposite, you were hoping to find some connection between the aircraft used that day and the Jews. That way you could feed your hate. In spite of the fact that apathoid provided you with information showing the status of the El Al 757 and 767's you still are trying to find something. Why is that A-Train?
As you can see in the link provided by Firestone the aircraft were delivered directly to AA and UAL and were in their custody their entire service life. Airlines like AA and UAL typically do not buy aircraft second hand. Reason being they don't have to. They have deep enough pockets to buy direct from the manufacturer. Or at least they used to have deep pockets.
Anyway here's what an aircraft that has had multiple owners would look like on airfleets.
< http://www.airfleets.net/ficheapp/plane-md80-53489.htm >
It was originally delivered to Reno Air in 1996. When AA bought Reno the aircraft was then integrated into AA's fleet. When the lease was up it was put into storage and eventually acquired by Lion Air.
BenBurch
9th December 2007, 08:59 PM
AMTMAN? Why are people like this? I have been encountering antisemites all of my life and I don't understand it any more today than I did 40+ years ago when I first heard somebody spouting off about Jewish Bankers. Why do people allow these vile ideas into their heads?
Or is it all just "the banality of evil?"
tomwaits
10th December 2007, 01:37 AM
AMTMAN? Why are people like this? I have been encountering antisemites all of my life and I don't understand it any more today than I did 40+ years ago when I first heard somebody spouting off about Jewish Bankers. Why do people allow these vile ideas into their heads?
Or is it all just "the banality of evil?"
Hmm...well I've theorized that it all comes from the "exclusive club" syndrome. That is, if there is an exclusive club that certain people belong to (especially successful people...like many jews) there are always people who think they are secretly out to get them. It's the reason why paranoid dictatorships outlaw things like freemasonry and the like. They are afraid that something secret is going on that will affect them negatively in some way. The Jews are a historical example. Somewhat of an exclusive club (can you truly be considered a jew unless you were born jewish?) seems to breed irrational hatred.
It's like what I've said before about Shriners. My grandpa is a Shriner, and all they do is get together, have silly meetings, and raise a lot of charity for their hospitals. But the meetings are secret! Therefore you can come up with a whole variety of bizarre speculations about what they do.
tomwaits
10th December 2007, 01:48 AM
Naturally my curiosity peaked when I read this. Right away I knew someone was playing a very sick joke, exactly who I'm not sure.
Admit it....you were that guy. :p
But seriously, this is one of the funniest truther things I've seen since clunkety clunk. Well...that and SLC's summary of the no-plane argument:
The "No-Planers" are commonly considered by the "Plane-Huggers" to be disinfo operatives planted inside the movement by the government to discredit the "legitimate Truthers".
AMTMAN
10th December 2007, 08:12 AM
AMTMAN? Why are people like this? I have been encountering antisemites all of my life and I don't understand it any more today than I did 40+ years ago when I first heard somebody spouting off about Jewish Bankers. Why do people allow these vile ideas into their heads?
Or is it all just "the banality of evil?"
It's a lie that has been repeated for so long now that certain people just accept it as fact. That's the only reason I can come up with.
AMTMAN
10th December 2007, 08:15 AM
Speaking of that, let's change the subject to something much more interesting. How does one determine the ownership history of a given aircraft? I'd like to know how I can find out the histories of the four airplanes crashed on 9/11, including who owned them and what airlines flew them. Is that possible?
What makes it so interesting is that I have learned that El Al, Israel's national airline, sold several 767s and 757s in the months before the 9/11 attacks. Wouldn't it be quite a coincidence if these planes, sold by a nation that benefitted immensely from the attacks, ended up being used by the terrorists on 9/11?
http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-11489747_ITM
British Airways sold off a bunch of 757's and 767's prior to 9-11. You might want to look into that.
JimBenArm
10th December 2007, 08:23 AM
I heard Boeing sold a bunch of those, too. Might need to look into that. Sounds pretty ominous to me...
apathoid
10th December 2007, 09:23 AM
British Airways sold off a bunch of 757's and 767's prior to 9-11. You might want to look into that.
I heard that they sold some to [drumroll]......Boeing. And where did AA and UA get their 757's???? That's right....Boeing. Coincedence? Better check it out A-Train. The Jooos might be behind this...
AMTMAN
10th December 2007, 09:38 AM
I heard Boeing sold a bunch of those, too. Might need to look into that. Sounds pretty ominous to me...
Field McConnell, Captainsherlock, already blew the lid off that.;)
AMTMAN
10th December 2007, 09:43 AM
I heard that they sold some to [drumroll]......Boeing. And where did AA and UA get their 757's???? That's right....Boeing. Coincedence? Better check it out A-Train. The Jooos might be behind this...
Three of the 767's were sold to US Air. So that means three 767's from Britain were were being flown by a US airline over the USA. Me thinks MI6 is behind something very sinister.:jaw-dropp
A W Smith
10th December 2007, 04:59 PM
hey do any jooos work in management at Boeing? Better get on the story ATrain a conspiracy is waiting. I hear they sold those four planes to American Airlines and United Airlines
ElMondoHummus
10th December 2007, 05:44 PM
Here you go Sherlock.
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-active-b767.htm
http://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/El%20Al-history-b757.htm
El Al never sold any of their 767s, and didn't sell any 757's to either UA or AA.
:solved2
Wow! I never would've guessed that there's an airliner equivalent to Carfax.com. :D Figured that someone who's curious would have to build the chain of ownership manually from Boeing to each airline who's owned a given jet.
Anyway, cool link. Thanks for posting it!
Firestone
11th December 2007, 12:00 AM
hey do any jooos work in management at Boeing? Better get on the story ATrain a conspiracy is waiting. I hear they sold those four planes to American Airlines and United AirlinesI think I found the perfect suspect (http://www.iscc.org/bios/silverstein.php)!
Silverstein ... was ... a Research Scientist at the Boeing Company. Dr. Silverstein was awarded the Alexander C. Williams Award of the Human Factors Society in 1983 for his work on the advanced cockpit color CRT display systems for the Boeing 757/767 aircraft and the Honeywell Corporate Technical Achievement Award in 1989 for the development of visual simulation methods for color liquid crystal displays.:boxedin:
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.