PDA

View Full Version : What is sound? Split from: Are the real psychics hidden from us?


maatorc
10th December 2007, 03:25 PM
its a bit like if a tree falls in the wood.....
of course it makes a sound. :)

It makes a 'sound' only if it is 'heard'.

Abe_the_Man
10th December 2007, 03:30 PM
It makes a 'sound' only if it is 'heard'.

What you define is merely audible sound. Sound is actually vibration and vibrations exist even if they are out of our range of hearing or feeling them.

Sound -noun
1. the sensation produced by stimulation of the organs of hearing by vibrations transmitted through the air or other medium.
2. mechanical vibrations transmitted through an elastic medium, traveling in air at a speed of approximately 1087 ft. (331 m) per second at sea level.
3. the particular auditory effect produced by a given cause: the sound of music.
4. any auditory effect; any audible vibrational disturbance: all kinds of sounds.
5. a noise, vocal utterance, musical tone, or the like: the sounds from the next room.
6. a distinctive, characteristic, or recognizable musical style, as from a particular performer, orchestra, or type of arrangement: the big-band sound.

maatorc
10th December 2007, 05:30 PM
What you define is merely audible sound. Sound is actually vibration and vibrations exist even if they are out of our range of hearing or feeling them.

There is no such thing as 'inaudible' 'sound'.
Sound is a conscious sense perception of our nervous system.
The vibrations are the condition in nature which we interpret as 'sound' if they register on our senses.
When we do not 'hear', the vibrations of the condition in nature are still there as the thing in itself, but they are not 'sound'.

Abe_the_Man
10th December 2007, 08:09 PM
There is no such thing as 'inaudible' 'sound'.
Sound is a conscious sense perception of our nervous system.
The vibrations are the condition in nature which we interpret as 'sound' if they register on our senses.
When we do not 'hear', the vibrations of the condition in nature are still there as the thing in itself, but they are not 'sound'.

It makes a 'sound' only if it is 'heard'.

Audible sounds are sounds within our range of hearing. Inaudible sounds are those sounds outside of our range of hearing. Take for instance a dog whistle. It makes a sound outside the range of human hearing but is quite distinctly audible for dogs. Just because we can't hear it doesn't mean it isn't a sound.

maatorc
10th December 2007, 10:22 PM
Audible sounds are sounds within our range of hearing. Inaudible sounds are those sounds outside of our range of hearing. Take for instance a dog whistle. It makes a sound outside the range of human hearing but is quite distinctly audible for dogs. Just because we can't hear it doesn't mean it isn't a sound.

It is 'sound' to the dog because it 'hears' it.
We cannot 'hear' it: It is not 'sound' to us, even though we have the knowledge that the inaudible vibrations of the condition in nature exist.

That_guy
11th December 2007, 08:18 AM
If I set up a radio transmitter in the middle of a desert, and there are no receivers in range, do the radio waves no longer exist?

Dancing David
11th December 2007, 08:41 AM
It makes a 'sound' only if it is 'heard'.
Yes sound is a perception, noise is a pressure wave in air or fluid.

Dancing David
11th December 2007, 08:42 AM
If I set up a radio transmitter in the middle of a desert, and there are no receivers in range, do the radio waves no longer exist?

The EM waves would be noise, sound relates to perception. Just as a table exists but is not 'felt' unless a sentient being percieves contact with it.

That_guy
11th December 2007, 08:53 AM
The EM waves would be noise, sound relates to perception. Just as a table exists but is not 'felt' unless a sentient being percieves contact with it.

Hearing relates to perception. Sound is what you hear. Noise and sound can be used interchangeably, with the subtle distinction that noise generally refers to some unpleasant sound.

This isn't a debate about whether it's perceptible, but whether it exists; regardless of whether or not there is an ear to receive the sound wave, the sound wave still exists.

Dancing David
11th December 2007, 12:27 PM
See here is the deal, in psychology sound it what is heard. So while the conventional use may vary, in science a sound is a perception. Regardless of what the common nomenclature says.

:)

That_guy
11th December 2007, 12:35 PM
Actually, in science, sound is mechanical vibrations transmitted through an elastic medium. Hearing is the perception of a sound. Regardless of what you may want to interpret it as.

:)

Jimbo07
11th December 2007, 12:36 PM
So... is the question:

Which English words describe a perception and which describe physical phenomena?

:boggled:

ETA: That guy, in signal analysis, noise is the garbage (variations in some parameter) from which you want to separate your signal.

Which science are we using "sound" from? Psychology, DD? ;)

slingblade
11th December 2007, 12:40 PM
I wish this was all I had to worry about.

That_guy
11th December 2007, 12:41 PM
Semantic distinctions don't matter much for this question. If a tree falls in a forest, and no one is around to hear it, a sound wave is still generated.

(I knew about the alternate meaning for noise, as well; I just used the one that most pertained to the discussion.)

Jimbo07
11th December 2007, 12:42 PM
I have more than enough worries. This is a pleasant distraction... ;)

cyborg
11th December 2007, 12:47 PM
Which English words describe a perception and which describe physical phenomena?

I would have to go with "sound" for the perception and "longitudinal pressure wave" for the phenomena.

That_guy
11th December 2007, 12:59 PM
*loosens cyborg's leg bolts*

That'll show ya.

*runs away*

Abe_the_Man
11th December 2007, 01:20 PM
I would have to go with "sound" for the perception and "longitudinal pressure wave" for the phenomena.

So the question then is if a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it does it make a longitudinal pressure wave?

Jimbo07
11th December 2007, 01:50 PM
So the question then is if a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it does it make a longitudinal pressure wave?

It depends...

Is a microphone measurement equivalent to the ear in collapsing the tree's wave function?

:D

JoeEllison
11th December 2007, 03:17 PM
I think we should all agree with maatorc.

Arkan_Wolfshade
11th December 2007, 03:57 PM
Attempting to answer a koan, which by definition is a paradoxical statement, is silly.


eta: more importantly, if a tree falls in the woods and lands on a mime, does anyone really care?

slingblade
11th December 2007, 04:21 PM
Put a recorder in the woods to capture the sound of any random tree falling.

The recorder can't "hear," because it has no sensory apparatus to process the sound. It simply records vibrations in the air. Later, when you pick up the recorder and play it back, you will also hear the sound.

That's because sound exists whether or not a living being is there to process the vibrations.

Dancing David
12th December 2007, 08:51 AM
Actually, in science, sound is mechanical vibrations transmitted through an elastic medium. Hearing is the perception of a sound. Regardless of what you may want to interpret it as.

:)

depends on the science, which psychology , as practiced by some is.

So two different fields use two different jargons for sound.

That would be a 'noise' in psycholoy, just as EM waves can be light, but they are only sight/vision when they are sensed and percieved.


:)

Dancing David
12th December 2007, 08:53 AM
*loosens cyborg's leg bolts*

That'll show ya.

*runs away*

If a cyborg falls in the forest do they yell?