USAFMXOfficer
1st February 2008, 08:37 PM
Yes everyone, actual quotes from YouTube video comments and the IMDB forums. I've been gathering these for some time now. Thought I'd share:
[A CTist describing the crash of Flight 93] - If thats true then that airplane and everybody on it might be dead from shock but they should be perfectly preserved because you can't have fire underground with no oxygen.But I never saw those pictures. – User SlimJim06 at YouTube
A Boeing 757 (empty) weighs 60 tons. Second: the weight of each tower was 500,000 ton. So extra weight was as low as 0.012%. Assuming man's weight 200 pounds, 0.012% is equal to 0.024 pound or third of ounce. So a pack of cigarettes in our pocket makes you fall down? So sad. Not funny. – User “psyopagent” at YouTube
atleast we (muslims) didnt take full control of your country, atleast we didnt rape you women, atleast we didnt do something and blame it on someone else!, you have no proof that muslims did 9/11, you lot are a bunch of bitches, controlled by bush face, go stick your **** up his ***. - MSHBsheikhs at IMDB
the wtc was a demolition they had bombs put in ther so the towers would fall down not fall over sidways and kill all of the other buildings – user “nobish” from YouTube
You debunkers are a bunch of pricks. People who do beleive in the truth are all nutters and *beep* to you yet you take your time on here to debunk our B.S. – mr gregson from IMDB
then how do you explain all of the expolosives inside the towers??? ..there were witnesess ...man this was just an inside job ..everybody benefited in the us gov off of this ..stop trying to oppose ..**** bush! – user “dynamki9” from YouTube
"youtube evidence" is important….all i've got is youtube evidence, interested or not? – ivan sapp from IMDB
Plus the CIA used many technologies to hinder the explosions from making larger sounds, so people falsely thought it was a natural fire demolition, which it aint was. – steffenebbesen1984 from IMDB
You debunkers can do all you want with your science and proof, it dosent change the fact that 9/11 was an inside job, "loose change" says so. – steffenebbesen1984 from IMDB
I have never even heard of this person, but if she was a capitlist she should have been delt with approprietely. – Sensitivity from IMDB
there are a lot of people on this board who are very immmature, hateful, christian and capitalists and racist as well. – Sensitivity from IMDB
Go **** yourself you fake illuminti agent scum. – Clara0618 from IMDB
And dont give me too much information. I dont have the time to verify all of this. I dont care about the smoke or the 20 story hole. That doesnt make a building come down at freefall speed. So that proofs nothing – jealousgotmestrapped from IMDB
A CTist’s highly technical description of the WTC1&2 “CD”:
“First step: Good old Las-Vegas-style controlled demolition on the top part.
Second step: More exotic stringed-firecrackers-style controlled demolition on the bottom part”. – knight-in-black-leather from IMDB
Your eyes are clouded by your reliance on science - Lizbeth87 from IMDB
[A CTist describing the crash of Flight 93] - If thats true then that airplane and everybody on it might be dead from shock but they should be perfectly preserved because you can't have fire underground with no oxygen.But I never saw those pictures. – User SlimJim06 at YouTube
A Boeing 757 (empty) weighs 60 tons. Second: the weight of each tower was 500,000 ton. So extra weight was as low as 0.012%. Assuming man's weight 200 pounds, 0.012% is equal to 0.024 pound or third of ounce. So a pack of cigarettes in our pocket makes you fall down? So sad. Not funny. – User “psyopagent” at YouTube
atleast we (muslims) didnt take full control of your country, atleast we didnt rape you women, atleast we didnt do something and blame it on someone else!, you have no proof that muslims did 9/11, you lot are a bunch of bitches, controlled by bush face, go stick your **** up his ***. - MSHBsheikhs at IMDB
the wtc was a demolition they had bombs put in ther so the towers would fall down not fall over sidways and kill all of the other buildings – user “nobish” from YouTube
You debunkers are a bunch of pricks. People who do beleive in the truth are all nutters and *beep* to you yet you take your time on here to debunk our B.S. – mr gregson from IMDB
then how do you explain all of the expolosives inside the towers??? ..there were witnesess ...man this was just an inside job ..everybody benefited in the us gov off of this ..stop trying to oppose ..**** bush! – user “dynamki9” from YouTube
"youtube evidence" is important….all i've got is youtube evidence, interested or not? – ivan sapp from IMDB
Plus the CIA used many technologies to hinder the explosions from making larger sounds, so people falsely thought it was a natural fire demolition, which it aint was. – steffenebbesen1984 from IMDB
You debunkers can do all you want with your science and proof, it dosent change the fact that 9/11 was an inside job, "loose change" says so. – steffenebbesen1984 from IMDB
I have never even heard of this person, but if she was a capitlist she should have been delt with approprietely. – Sensitivity from IMDB
there are a lot of people on this board who are very immmature, hateful, christian and capitalists and racist as well. – Sensitivity from IMDB
Go **** yourself you fake illuminti agent scum. – Clara0618 from IMDB
And dont give me too much information. I dont have the time to verify all of this. I dont care about the smoke or the 20 story hole. That doesnt make a building come down at freefall speed. So that proofs nothing – jealousgotmestrapped from IMDB
A CTist’s highly technical description of the WTC1&2 “CD”:
“First step: Good old Las-Vegas-style controlled demolition on the top part.
Second step: More exotic stringed-firecrackers-style controlled demolition on the bottom part”. – knight-in-black-leather from IMDB
Your eyes are clouded by your reliance on science - Lizbeth87 from IMDB