PDA

View Full Version : Philip Zelikow: 9/11 fixer


MaGZ
2nd February 2008, 05:14 AM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission. Both just happened to be Jews: Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick. This is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Book_Director_of_911_commission_secretly_0131.html
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved.

Par
2nd February 2008, 05:23 AM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission. Both just happened to be Jews: Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick. This is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Book_Director_of_911_commission_secretly_0131.html
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved.


So, the argument is this:


Two of the people involved in a certain project are Jewish.
Therefore, the project in question was merely an element of a nefarious Jewish conspiracy.

The demented ravings of a contemptibly hateful anti-Semite.

SDC
2nd February 2008, 05:26 AM
Magz, I think it is obvious. You are a Jew. It's time to man up and admit it. Everyone here can tell that you are, in any case.

Edx
2nd February 2008, 05:56 AM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission.

*SIGH* :(

proxywar
2nd February 2008, 06:02 AM
When did jref become stromfront?

jhunter1163
2nd February 2008, 06:10 AM
Are we sure we can't ban someone for being anti-Semitic?

timhau
2nd February 2008, 06:16 AM
Let's have a poll. Hands up folks, how many of us were surprised by anything in the OP?

Mine stay down.

Walter Ego
2nd February 2008, 06:18 AM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission. Both just happened to be Jews: Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick. This is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Book_Director_of_911_commission_secretly_0131.html
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved.

Mmmm... Zelikow is a 'little Jew.' (As apposed to big Jews like Kissinger?)

With MaGZ it always gets back to the Jews sooner or later.... usually sooner.

Walter Ego
2nd February 2008, 06:37 AM
Magz, I think it is obvious. You are a Jew. It's time to man up and admit it. Everyone here can tell that you are, in any case.

Probably Mossad counter-op. It's it obvious (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message98960/pg2)?

Dr Adequate
2nd February 2008, 06:58 AM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission. Both just happened to be Jews: Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick. This is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Book_Director_of_911_commission_secretly_0131.html
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved. Zelikow is actually quite a large Jew. Look how he looms over poor little goyish Jimmy Carter.

http://www.virginia.edu/insideuva/2002/22/images/zelikow_carter.jpg

P.S: All of your other opinions are also wrong.

1337m4n
2nd February 2008, 11:54 AM
JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS JEWS

Those darn Jews, with their dreidels and their yamakas and their big noses. We should do something about them.

Jonnyclueless
2nd February 2008, 12:04 PM
And don't forget the star of David seen on the missile that took down WTC 7.

SpitfireIX
2nd February 2008, 12:06 PM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission. Both just happened to be Jews: Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick. This is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Book_Director_of_911_commission_secretly_0131.html
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved.


http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/1706046ea08bbb122f.jpg

Quad4_72
2nd February 2008, 12:22 PM
Oh no! Not the jooooooos again! Go far far away Magz, and please don't come back.

MIKILLINI
2nd February 2008, 01:16 PM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission. Both just happened to be Jews: Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick. This is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Book_Director_of_911_commission_secretly_0131.html
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved.

Some people will never make it out of the basement.....Them people, such as yourself Mag, will continue to live in the "paranoia, self-destroya" dysfunctional life of "IT WAS DA JOOOOOS".

The rehashing of insanity continues....:rolleyes:

http://www.codysortore.com/images/epic.jpg

MIKILLINI
2nd February 2008, 01:22 PM
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/1706046ea08bbb122f.jpg

That picture is hilarious. Hitler Kitty!

Brainache
2nd February 2008, 01:40 PM
So did MaGZ say, "Jew Henry Kissinger" just so we wouldn't confuse him with the equally famous Hindu Henry Kissinger, or what?

Walter Ego
2nd February 2008, 02:12 PM
And don't forget the star of David seen on the missile that took down WTC7.

Fired from the Jersey shore by the high fivin’ dancing Israelis no doubt.

Architect
2nd February 2008, 04:04 PM
In a soon to be released book Philip Zelikow is revealed to have maintained political contacts with the Bush Administration while serving as the architect and main writer of the 9/11 Commission Report. This is no surprise when one realizes that the White House first wanted Jew Henry Kissinger to head the Commission. Their next plan was to place the little Jew Zelikow in Henry’s place. It should be noted that only two individuals on the Commission were allowed to see all of the classified information presented to the Commission. Both just happened to be Jews: Philip Zelikow and Jamie Gorelick. This is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Book_Director_of_911_commission_secretly_0131.html
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved.


I see. A few figures who might be vaguely connected and they're the same religion, hence it's a conspiracy.

But surely there were far, far more Prods involved? Surely it's a Lutherian and Presbyterian Conspiracy?

:jaw-dropp

Drudgewire
2nd February 2008, 04:15 PM
9/11 Commission Report: Jew approved.
Explain Barbra letting her husband say bad things about it then Mr. Smartypants. http://www.lethalwrestling.com/upload/colbert.gif

SpitfireIX
2nd February 2008, 04:22 PM
That picture is hilarious. Hitler Kitty!


Plenty more where he came from at http://www.catsthatlooklikehitler.com/cgi-bin/seigbest.pl.


We used to have one when I was a teenager; we named him Adolf. :D

RedIbis
3rd February 2008, 04:05 PM
Would it be obnoxious to start a new thread on Zelikow and a new AP article on his connections to the White House?

I just can't stomach contributing to any thread started by Magz

Alt+F4
3rd February 2008, 04:09 PM
Would it be obnoxious to start a new thread on Zelikow and a new AP article on his connections to the White House?

I just can't stomach contributing to any thread started by Magz

There was a previous thread on this:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=105266

RedIbis
3rd February 2008, 04:14 PM
There was a previous thread on this:

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=105266

I appreciate it. This guy's threads are toxic with bigotry.

beachnut
3rd February 2008, 04:20 PM
I appreciate it. This guy's threads are toxic with bigotry.
just for liars, and false information experts like you (are u a neonazi like MaGZ?)

RedIbis
3rd February 2008, 08:16 PM
just for liars, and false information experts like you (are u a neonazi like MaGZ?)

You realize your comment makes no sense whatsoever.

beachnut
3rd February 2008, 09:08 PM
You realize your comment makes no sense whatsoever.
you are right, I am sorry, i messed up

RedIbis
4th February 2008, 06:05 AM
you are right, I am sorry, i messed up

Apology accepted. We all make mistakes. I'm impressed you admitted it.

MaGZ
6th February 2008, 08:03 AM
You may not like my opening post, but you can not ignore the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report was a Jewish coverup with Jews in charge determining the final draft.
Deal with it.

peteweaver
6th February 2008, 08:22 AM
You may not like my opening post, but you can not ignore the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report was a Jewish coverup with Jews in charge determining the final draft.
Deal with it.

Don't be daft.

Totovader
6th February 2008, 08:38 AM
You may not like my opening post, but you can not ignore the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report was a Jewish coverup with Jews in charge determining the final draft.
Deal with it.

What's this about Jews?

Say Jew one more time.

Par
6th February 2008, 08:39 AM
What's this about Jews? Say Jew one more time.


I dare Jew.

twinstead
6th February 2008, 08:41 AM
You may not like my opening post, but you can not ignore the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report was a Jewish coverup with Jews in charge determining the final draft.
Deal with it.

Irrational bigots ROCK!

RedIbis
6th February 2008, 09:24 AM
You may not like my opening post, but you can not ignore the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report was a Jewish coverup with Jews in charge determining the final draft.
Deal with it.


You make it too easy for these "skeptics" and are doing them a great service.

16.5
6th February 2008, 09:28 AM
You Jews may not like my opening post about Jews, but you Jews can not ignore the fact that the Jewish 9/11 Jew Commission Report was a Jewish coverup with Jews in charge determining the final draft.
Deal with it, Jews.

Now with a 1000% more Jews!

CurtC
6th February 2008, 10:16 AM
Plenty more where he came from at http://www.catsthatlooklikehitler.com/cgi-bin/seigbest.pl.OMG that site is hilarious. When I clicked over to it, I had to struggle to suppress a laugh here at work, and I now literally have tears running down my face from laughing so much. My favorite was #4, Jean-Jack, with his right paw raised in the air.

Totovader
6th February 2008, 10:19 AM
You make it too easy for these "skeptics" and are doing them a great service.

Make sure to avoid telling him he's wrong.

It's much better if you all agree just to keep your hatred to yourselves, right?

Rika
6th February 2008, 10:20 AM
Nonsense: The Other White Meat.

RedIbis
6th February 2008, 10:22 AM
Make sure to avoid telling him he's wrong.

It's much better if you all agree just to keep your hatred to yourselves, right?

This is really pathetic. I obviously disagree with the guy, tell the guy he's doing you guys a great service and that's not good enough for you.

I guess I'm supposed to receive a directive from you on the proper thing to say.

And are you referring to my hatred of something?

Pardalis
6th February 2008, 10:30 AM
" You make it too easy for these "skeptics" and are doing them a great service."

Sounds like friendly advice to me, not criticism. :rolleyes:

aggle-rithm
6th February 2008, 10:35 AM
You may not like my opening post, but you can not ignore the fact that the 9/11 Commission Report was a Jewish coverup with Jews in charge determining the final draft.


Oh, but I believe I can.

Since this "fact" exists only in your mind, I can easily ignore it by ignoring you.

Totovader
6th February 2008, 10:50 AM
This is really pathetic. I obviously disagree with the guy, tell the guy he's doing you guys a great service and that's not good enough for you.

I guess I'm supposed to receive a directive from you on the proper thing to say.

And are you referring to my hatred of something?

No, you disagree with the guy being so obvious. Instead of actually telling him he's wrong, debunking his claims, etc- you just essentially came back with "keep your mouth shut".

That sort of tacit association comes from a position that is so desperate- that conspiracists will shake hands with these anti-Semitic fools because they need the numbers.

What's wrong with telling him that he's wrong, Red? "Debunkers" do it for each other all the time.

chillzero
6th February 2008, 01:03 PM
I think jumping on RedIbis, and in the process forgetting to address what MaGZ claimed is an excercise in futility.

I think it was clear that RedIbis disagrees with MaGZ's stance on this.

Pardalis
6th February 2008, 02:48 PM
I think jumping on RedIbis, and in the process forgetting to address what MaGZ claimed is an excercise in futility.

I think it was clear that RedIbis disagrees with MaGZ's stance on this.


I disagree. Trying to confront MaGZ is what's completely futile, since he's completely invested in his hate ideology. You just can't debate with a nazi.

RedIbis on the other hand must realize who he's associating himself with, even if indirectly.

RedIbis
6th February 2008, 03:42 PM
I disagree. Trying to confront MaGZ is what's completely futile, since he's completely invested in his hate ideology. You just can't debate with a nazi.

RedIbis on the other hand must realize who he's associating himself with, even if indirectly.

What? How am I associating with MagZ, by telling him his nonsense is playing into your hands? That's pretty sharp criticism.

Your statement is very illogical since there must be anti-semites who believe the official story. Are you responsible for their bigotry?

MaGZ
6th February 2008, 03:51 PM
I disagree. Trying to confront MaGZ is what's completely futile, since he's completely invested in his hate ideology. You just can't debate with a nazi.

RedIbis on the other hand must realize who he's associating himself with, even if indirectly.

When and where has RedIbis agreed with me? To my knowledge I have been fighting this fight on my own without allies. BTW I am no "Truther". I reject any Inside Job. Anyone who is familiar with my posts on 9/11 know this.

RedIbis
6th February 2008, 03:52 PM
I think jumping on RedIbis, and in the process forgetting to address what MaGZ claimed is an excercise in futility.

I think it was clear that RedIbis disagrees with MaGZ's stance on this.

What might be obvious to an extemely effective moderator, might not be obvious to some people here.

I welcome the discussion. I apply the same reasoning to MagZ's analysis as I do to anyone else's. I don't mind saying that if he dropped the straight bigotry and focused on research, he'd be much more effective.

My point is that mixing hatred into any factual analysis allows your opponent to dismiss the entirety of your argument. It's just bad strategy.

Pardalis
6th February 2008, 04:11 PM
I don't mind saying that if he dropped the straight bigotry and focused on research, he'd be much more effective.

So, his bigotry aside, you do think at the core he's right?

RedIbis
6th February 2008, 04:49 PM
So, his bigotry aside, you do think at the core he's right?

Right about what? Zelikow and other neo cons deserve tremendous criticism and scrutiny, but it has nothing to do with the fact that they're Jewish. The reality of anti-semitism should also not prevent legitimate criticism of certain right wing Israeli groups and the abuses of the Israeli military.

I'm able to see this distinction, a bigot is not.

Pardalis
6th February 2008, 05:04 PM
Then please do criticize Zelikow, if you have anything specific to say (which I expect you don't, you never have).

Or start another thread, as you suggested earlier, instead of placing yourself on the defensive with the nazi.

twinstead
6th February 2008, 05:06 PM
I don't mind saying that if he dropped the straight bigotry and focused on research, he'd be much more effective.


Dude. Bigotry aside, the boy thinks a missile hit the WTC7. Just how ineffective can one get?

RedIbis
6th February 2008, 05:12 PM
Dude. Bigotry aside, the boy thinks a missile hit the WTC7. Just how ineffective can one get?

I haven't seen that one, nor am I responsible for every post the guy made. For some reason that requires explanation around here.

MaGZ
6th February 2008, 05:59 PM
Right about what? Zelikow and other neo cons deserve tremendous criticism and scrutiny, but it has nothing to do with the fact that they're Jewish. The reality of anti-semitism should also not prevent legitimate criticism of certain right wing Israeli groups and the abuses of the Israeli military.

I'm able to see this distinction, a bigot is not.

The neocons would not exist if it were not for the existence of Israel.
That is not bigotry; that is a fact.

Arus808
6th February 2008, 06:49 PM
I haven't seen that one, nor am I responsible for every post the guy made. For some reason that requires explanation around here.

You have over a 1000 posts here. All you had to do is do a search on the forum using his name, in the author field or the subject field. Dont be lazy. Ignorance isn't a defense.

Cl1mh4224rd
6th February 2008, 07:07 PM
So did MaGZ say, "Jew Henry Kissinger" just so we wouldn't confuse him with the equally famous Hindu Henry Kissinger, or what?


I'm going to start prefixing "Anti-Semite" to MaGZ's name whenever I mention him from now on...

pomeroo
6th February 2008, 07:19 PM
The neocons would not exist if it were not for the existence of Israel.
That is not bigotry; that is a fact.


It is not a fact; it is an error. Liberal Democrats who were disenchanted with the pacifistic drift of the the McGovernite Democratic Party finally severed their ties and came to be called neo-conservatives. The weakness and indifference toward the Soviet Union's expansionist tendencies that characterized post-Vietnam War liberalism gave rise to neoconservatism. Except to you myopic Jew-haters, the world does not revolve around Israel.

MIKILLINI
6th February 2008, 07:28 PM
The neocons would not exist if it were not for the existence of Israel.
That is not bigotry; that is a fact.

Anti-semitism would not exist were it not for the existence of racial hatred.
It breeds ignorance and that is a fact.

chillzero
7th February 2008, 03:02 AM
I haven't seen that one, nor am I responsible for every post the guy made. For some reason that requires explanation around here.

His name stands for Missiles at Ground Zero, and he has a website and several threads here devoted to that theory.

To some other points raised here, confronting bigots is never futile - why would anyone let them stand unopposed? I think that is more to the point than sidestepping the bigotry and the topic in general to slap someone else who made a valid comment.

However, it is difficult to do this while not personalising the discussion, so I understand there's a fine balance. I just wanted to note that some posts missed that balance.

To help turn the thread back to topic, now, MaGZ, you made a claim that the commission report was a jewish coverup. Can you please back that claim up with any evidence, other than the fact that 2 people involved with it are jewish? Were they the only 2 people involved? How did they coerce all the non-jews to approve and support it?

RedIbis
7th February 2008, 06:11 AM
His name stands for Missiles at Ground Zero, and he has a website and several threads here devoted to that theory.

To some other points raised here, confronting bigots is never futile - why would anyone let them stand unopposed? I think that is more to the point than sidestepping the bigotry and the topic in general to slap someone else who made a valid comment.

However, it is difficult to do this while not personalising the discussion, so I understand there's a fine balance. I just wanted to note that some posts missed that balance.

To help turn the thread back to topic, now, MaGZ, you made a claim that the commission report was a jewish coverup. Can you please back that claim up with any evidence, other than the fact that 2 people involved with it are jewish? Were they the only 2 people involved? How did they coerce all the non-jews to approve and support it?

There are a lot of people in this forum, I certainly don't have the time to research the origins of their screen names, nor their websites or general views. There is bigotry in his posts, I called it out. What more am I supposed to do?

JimBenArm
7th February 2008, 06:19 AM
There are a lot of people in this forum, I certainly don't have the time to research the origins of their screen names, nor their websites or general views. There is bigotry in his posts, I called it out. What more am I supposed to do?
Nothing more. I am shocked, but I find myself in agreement with you. You said he was a bigot, shows you recognize the fact. That should be the end of it.
The guy gets something right, and you jump all over him! Way to go, people!

chillzero
7th February 2008, 06:40 AM
There are a lot of people in this forum, I certainly don't have the time to research the origins of their screen names, nor their websites or general views. There is bigotry in his posts, I called it out. What more am I supposed to do?

I'm sorry I seem to have been unclear.

My first paragraph was to bring you up to speed with the information you were unaware of.

The other points I addressed were raised by others, I didn't mean it to sseem that I was still addressing you at that point. Sorry. I agree with JimBenArm who made the point more succinctly than I did.

aggle-rithm
7th February 2008, 06:59 AM
When and where has RedIbis agreed with me? To my knowledge I have been fighting this fight on my own without allies.

Perhaps if you weren't so outrageously bigoted, you would have more allies.


The neocons would not exist if it were not for the existence of Israel.
That is not bigotry; that is a fact.

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it does.

aggle-rithm
7th February 2008, 07:05 AM
To help turn the thread back to topic, now, MaGZ, you made a claim that the commission report was a jewish coverup. Can you please back that claim up with any evidence, other than the fact that 2 people involved with it are jewish? Were they the only 2 people involved? How did they coerce all the non-jews to approve and support it?

They have other things in common, besides being Jewish. Maybe it's a white male conspiracy?

And, did you notice, they're both carbon-based life forms? It's been scientifically proven!

It's a carbon-based life-form conspiracy! They're taking over, I tells ya!

RedIbis
7th February 2008, 02:40 PM
I'm sorry I seem to have been unclear.

My first paragraph was to bring you up to speed with the information you were unaware of.

The other points I addressed were raised by others, I didn't mean it to sseem that I was still addressing you at that point. Sorry. I agree with JimBenArm who made the point more succinctly than I did.

Subtle shifts in tone are often lost on internet forums, but I certainly didn't take offense. I wouldn't mind seeing MaGZ answer your questions.

Alferd_Packer
7th February 2008, 02:50 PM
[QUOTE=MaGZ;3395470]SThis is why the Commission ignored the Mossad surveillance of the hijackers in Florida and the Dancing Israelis in New Jersey.
[QUOTE]

You mean New Jewsey, don't you.

MaGZ
8th February 2008, 03:54 PM
It is not a fact; it is an error. Liberal Democrats who were disenchanted with the pacifistic drift of the the McGovernite Democratic Party finally severed their ties and came to be called neo-conservatives. The weakness and indifference toward the Soviet Union's expansionist tendencies that characterized post-Vietnam War liberalism gave rise to neoconservatism. Except to you myopic Jew-haters, the world does not revolve around Israel.

The neocons are agents for the Jews. Former Trotskites (or parents who were Trots) thought they could bring about a worldwide Jewish Revolution, they switched tracks and became Zionists. Their focus on the Soviet Union was to get the Jews out of the USSR and sent to Israel and the US and nothing else.

MaGZ
8th February 2008, 04:01 PM
His name stands for Missiles at Ground Zero, and he has a website and several threads here devoted to that theory.

To some other points raised here, confronting bigots is never futile - why would anyone let them stand unopposed? I think that is more to the point than sidestepping the bigotry and the topic in general to slap someone else who made a valid comment.

However, it is difficult to do this while not personalising the discussion, so I understand there's a fine balance. I just wanted to note that some posts missed that balance.

To help turn the thread back to topic, now, MaGZ, you made a claim that the commission report was a jewish coverup. Can you please back that claim up with any evidence, other than the fact that 2 people involved with it are jewish? Were they the only 2 people involved? How did they coerce all the non-jews to approve and support it?

Yes

The Israeli Art Student spy ring–which local FBI agents are convinced had the hijackers under surveillance–never made it into the report.

Totovader
8th February 2008, 04:03 PM
The neocons are agents for the Jews. Former Trotskites (or parents who were Trots) thought they could bring about a worldwide Jewish Revolution, they switched tracks and became Zionists. Their focus on the Soviet Union was to get the Jews out of the USSR and sent to Israel and the US and nothing else.

So... you're saying Trotskyites became NeoCons?

MaGZ
8th February 2008, 04:06 PM
So... you're saying Trotskyites became NeoCons?

Many of the Jew neocons today had parents and grandparents who were followers of Leon Trotsky.

Totovader
8th February 2008, 04:07 PM
Many of the Jew neocons today had parents and grandparents who were followers of Leon Trotsky.

So... you're saying the Trotskyites became NeoCons?

Does that make any sense whatsoever?

JimBenArm
8th February 2008, 04:11 PM
Many of the Jew neocons today had parents and grandparents who were followers of Leon Trotsky.
And so did many Jew liberals and Jew conservatives and libertarians as well as a lot of non-Jewish people. Bee Eff Dee.

MaGZ
8th February 2008, 04:16 PM
So... you're saying the Trotskyites became NeoCons?

Does that make any sense whatsoever?

It is all about world power. Communist was a Jewish idea for world power. Trotskyism is the most visible form of Jew Communism. Zionism was another Jewish plot which developed as a parallel path during the 19th century. At some point in time, the Trotskite Jews decided to switch ideologies.

JimBenArm
8th February 2008, 04:20 PM
Jew. He just loves that word. Jew. Jew. Jew.

Jew Communist. Special subset of Communist. Yeah, you betcha.

Hi MaGZ!

Jew Jim

Totovader
8th February 2008, 04:22 PM
It is all about world power. Communist was a Jewish idea for world power. Trotskyism is the most visible form of Jew Communism. Zionism was another Jewish plot which developed as a parallel path during the 19th century. At some point in time, the Trotskite Jews decided to switch ideologies.

From one end of the spectrum to the other?

I suppose asking you for any shred of support for such a ridiculous theory would be an exercise in futility, huh?

Where did you come up with this stuff? Are you just mixing all the things you hate into one big cauldron and stirring until something comes out- regardless of whether it makes sense or not?

Where does country music fit into your theory? I hate country music...

Dave Rogers
8th February 2008, 04:25 PM
Where does country music fit into your theory? I hate country music...

Clearly, then, Willie Nelson is a disinfo agent.

Dave

Totovader
8th February 2008, 04:29 PM
Clearly, then, Willie Nelson is a disinfo agent.

Dave

I think he's a Jew, too...

Dave Rogers
8th February 2008, 04:34 PM
I think he's a Jew, too...

Well, let's run it by the MaGZ filter. You don't like him, and he's got more money than you. Case closed.

Dave

dudalb
8th February 2008, 05:07 PM
It is all about world power. Communist was a Jewish idea for world power. Trotskyism is the most visible form of Jew Communism. Zionism was another Jewish plot which developed as a parallel path during the 19th century. At some point in time, the Trotskite Jews decided to switch ideologies.

Spoken like a true follower of Der Fuehrer.

Kthulhut Fhtagn
8th February 2008, 05:36 PM
When and where has RedIbis agreed with me? To my knowledge I have been fighting this fight on my own without allies. BTW I am no "Truther". I reject any Inside Job. Anyone who is familiar with my posts on 9/11 know this.

Oh truther no! Such a digusting term is not acceptable! Nazi and anti-Semite however...

SezMe
8th February 2008, 07:25 PM
Are we sure we can't ban someone for being anti-Semitic?
Bad idea. But I do think there is something to be done with MaGZ.

Ignore him. Totally and completely ignore him. If he starts a thread, let the thread die with the OP. If he makes and post, no matter how outrageous, ignore it.

Is there any chance we'll learn anything from him: No.
Is there any chance he'll learn from us: No.

All that happens is that he gets to continue to spout his filthy, disgusting garbage.

Take the approach we took with Christophera. It took a while but it finally worked.

Ignore him.