Gulliamo
26th September 2003, 08:40 PM
Is the mass appeal, or part thereof, of religion do to the fact that many humans think they have to have influence on something or everything?
Example: I am in a football pool. The surviving members of the pool feel they MUST watch the game. Many feel they must go through elaborate rituals to "ensure" a victory for their team. Myself? I don’t watch football. I feel absolutely no need to start simply because I have a chance at winning a large sum of money if I pick the right teams all season. When I ask the other participants if they think the outcome may be any different whether they watch or not they respond with a resounding, "YES!"
Is this the same phenomena with religious people? "I can't control the weather. But if I pray for rain I will have influence over this weekends forecast!" Or, "I can't control the politics of the world. But if I pray for peace it just might happen!"
My question to you is: Is it "Inherent Human Nature" to want to control or have influence over all things?
And if so is this the basis of the mass appeal of religion?
Example: I am in a football pool. The surviving members of the pool feel they MUST watch the game. Many feel they must go through elaborate rituals to "ensure" a victory for their team. Myself? I don’t watch football. I feel absolutely no need to start simply because I have a chance at winning a large sum of money if I pick the right teams all season. When I ask the other participants if they think the outcome may be any different whether they watch or not they respond with a resounding, "YES!"
Is this the same phenomena with religious people? "I can't control the weather. But if I pray for rain I will have influence over this weekends forecast!" Or, "I can't control the politics of the world. But if I pray for peace it just might happen!"
My question to you is: Is it "Inherent Human Nature" to want to control or have influence over all things?
And if so is this the basis of the mass appeal of religion?