View Full Version : "Official 9-11 Story Unravels"
DrDisco
3rd March 2008, 04:42 PM
Could I solicit some responses to the following article?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19413.htm
In it, a twoofer claims the official 9/11 story continues to unravel. I'm such a novice at the subject that I can't pick it apart very well. Would like a hand. Particularly, what about the two commission members who have said the official report is bunk because they were stonewalled?
Thanks in advance for any insights!
DGM
3rd March 2008, 04:49 PM
Could I solicit some responses to the following article?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19413.htm
In it, a twoofer claims the official 9/11 story continues to unravel. I'm such a novice at the subject that I can't pick it apart very well. Would like a hand. Particularly, what about the two commission members who have said the official report is bunk because they were stonewalled?
Thanks in advance for any insights!
That would be Kean and Hamilton. The same ones that said they were ultimately successful. All old stuff.
Good place to start:http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home
DavidJames
3rd March 2008, 04:50 PM
When something shows up on a site not run by the lunatic fringe, I'll start to care.
cisco
3rd March 2008, 04:51 PM
The Bush admin is notorious for being secretive. The trooth movement is notorious for jumping to conclusions. Do the math.
Most rational people think the investigation was pooh-poohed to cover the administration's incompetence. There is no evidence that supports complicity.
leftysergeant
3rd March 2008, 04:51 PM
They have proof that the Bush administration is inept and unethical, that they covered up torture, which produced unreliable intelligence on which they based further misdeeds. They do not have proof that events other than what was immediately assumed happened that day.
The article mentions Steven Jones and his discovery of what he thinks are thermite residues. This forum contains several threads in which those of us who know the least bit about thermite laugh at his theories until we need to change our undies.
Unsecured Coins
3rd March 2008, 04:53 PM
hey.. some of us don't wear undies.
dudalb
3rd March 2008, 05:00 PM
So Mlle. Cotillard's statement has turned the tide?
twinstead
3rd March 2008, 05:19 PM
hey.. some of us don't wear undies.
Ah. Commando, huh? Excellent! ;)
LastChild
3rd March 2008, 05:20 PM
Could I solicit some responses to the following article?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19413.htm
In it, a twoofer claims the official 9/11 story continues to unravel. I'm such a novice at the subject that I can't pick it apart very well. Would like a hand. Particularly, what about the two commission members who have said the official report is bunk because they were stonewalled?
Thanks in advance for any insights!
This is just a couple months ago...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html?_r=1
As a legal matter, it is not up to us to examine the C.I.A.’s failure to disclose the existence of these tapes. That is for others. What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction.
Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton served as chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the 9/11 commission. January 2, 2008
twinstead
3rd March 2008, 05:20 PM
Why does the truth movement always sound like Baghdad Bob?
All your debunker base belong to us.
N.Texas
3rd March 2008, 05:30 PM
Hey Dr. Disco,
Look in the March Stundies thread. I put Mark G's post written to me there (from the OM). Of course Mark, as crazy as he is, can't compete with the nuggets some of the people here mine out.
BenBurch
3rd March 2008, 05:31 PM
hey.. some of us don't wear undies.
Then I hope you read that while sitting on the can...
johnny karate
3rd March 2008, 08:12 PM
This is just a couple months ago...
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html?_r=1
As a legal matter, it is not up to us to examine the C.I.A.’s failure to disclose the existence of these tapes. That is for others. What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction.
Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton served as chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the 9/11 commission. January 2, 2008
But wait... I thought Kean is just a Bush administration stooge and that the New York Times is just another NWO-controlled propaganda outlet... how can we possibly trust anything they tell us?
C'mon, LastChild... stop being such a sheep!
Unsecured Coins
3rd March 2008, 08:16 PM
Then I hope you read that while sitting on the can...
whatever gives you an image you can't wash out of your mind even with FIRE
jaydeehess
3rd March 2008, 09:26 PM
They have proof that the Bush administration is inept and unethical, that they covered up torture, which produced unreliable intelligence on which they based further misdeeds. They do not have proof that events other than what was immediately assumed happened that day.
.
Which I see that LastChild has illustrated nicely for us.
jaydeehess
3rd March 2008, 09:28 PM
hey.. some of us don't wear undies.
Then you have less clothing that needs washing in the case of loss of control due to laughing.:boggled:
cisco
3rd March 2008, 09:49 PM
whatever gives you an image you can't wash out of your mind even with FIRE
Fire doesn't melt thoughts you SHEEP.
jaydeehess
3rd March 2008, 10:12 PM
Fire doesn't melt thoughts you SHEEP.
Hah! a lot you know. Try not falling asleep in a comfy chair in front of a fireplace.
warm, radiant heat, mildly flickering soft orange glow, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
'nite
chillzero
4th March 2008, 02:33 AM
Can we stick to a topic here, about the article? Please? :)
Swing Dangler
4th March 2008, 12:51 PM
That would be Kean and Hamilton. The same ones that said they were ultimately successful. All old stuff.
Good place to start:http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home
Partially true. Kean and Hamilton said they were successful in telling a story (not necessarily non-fiction), not necessarily in conducting and investigation into 9/11.
Please be an honest debunker the next time you attempt to debunk the 9/11 Commission.
RedIbis
4th March 2008, 01:00 PM
But wait... I thought Kean is just a Bush administration stooge and that the New York Times is just another NWO-controlled propaganda outlet... how can we possibly trust anything they tell us?
C'mon, LastChild... stop being such a sheep!
No one claimed Kean to be a Bush administration stooge, that would be Zelikow.
DGM
4th March 2008, 01:08 PM
Partially true. Kean and Hamilton said they were successful in telling a story (not necessarily non-fiction), not necessarily in conducting and investigation into 9/11.
Please be an honest debunker the next time you attempt to debunk the 9/11 Commission.
Show me where my statement was dishonest? With facts not your opinion.
T.A.M.
4th March 2008, 02:36 PM
Partially true. Kean and Hamilton said they were successful in telling a story (not necessarily non-fiction), not necessarily in conducting and investigation into 9/11.
Please be an honest debunker the next time you attempt to debunk the 9/11 Commission.
yes and your insinuation that they were reproducing a fabrication is as obscene and dishonest as anything you accuse others of posting.
You know damn well that Kean and Hamilton believe that overall they have discovered and told the correct narrative of the 9/11 attacks.
you make it seem like attempts to stonewall an investigation is somehow unusual.
TAM
PhantomWolf
11th March 2008, 05:46 PM
Partially true. Kean and Hamilton said they were successful in telling a story (not necessarily non-fiction), not necessarily in conducting and investigation into 9/11.
You are of course aware the the 9/11 Commision was not charged with investigating 9/11, but rather tying together the investigations that were done by the the FBI and others so as to report on what happened and why it happened, right?
Jonnyclueless
11th March 2008, 06:28 PM
No one claimed Kean to be a Bush administration stooge, that would be Zelikow.
Oh right, the Jewish guy.
johnny karate
12th March 2008, 12:59 PM
No one claimed Kean to be a Bush administration stooge...
You should probably read your compatriot's post that's just above yours. He certainly seems to imply it.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.