WTC 7 cover

[tj15]

Has anyone ever noticed that when truthers are asked what was supposed to cover the use of explosives in WTC 7, they can never answer that question? Can a truther here please give an alibi for the destruction of WTC 7 (for example, how the airplanes "cover" for the destruction of the towers)?

[twinstead]

You'd think that the collapse of the WTC1 or 2 would have been perfect covers had the WTC7 collapsed at the same time.

They really blew that one. I'll bet some NWO section chief lost his corner office over that little miscalculation.

[JCM]

What was the kink in the middle of the roof of WTC 7 from prior to its collapse?

[RedIbis]

Has anyone ever noticed that when truthers are asked what was supposed to cover the use of explosives in WTC 7, they can never answer that question? Can a truther here please give an alibi for the destruction of WTC 7 (for example, how the airplanes "cover" for the destruction of the towers)?

No plane hit WTC 7, so I don't know what you're asking here.

[JCM]

I don't know what you're asking here.
Makes two of us. Could you clarify TJ15?

[GStan]

Has anyone ever noticed that when truthers are asked what was supposed to cover the use of explosives in WTC 7, they can never answer that question? Can a truther here please give an alibi for the destruction of WTC 7 (for example, how the airplanes "cover" for the destruction of the towers)?

The huge cloud of thick smoke that was coming from the south face for seven hours covered up the demolition prep and execution, and also covered up the fact that there was hardly any fire. It was quite the ruse, as it fooled every single firefighter who was at GZ on 9/11.

[Blender Head]

The huge cloud of thick smoke that was coming from the south face for seven hours covered up the demolition prep and execution, and also covered up the fact that there was hardly any fire. It was quite the ruse, as it fooled every single firefighter who was at GZ on 9/11.

The smoke from the fog machines installed inside WTC 7 covered up the white smoke from the thermite cutter charges, duh!

[1337m4n]

No plane hit WTC 7, so I don't know what you're asking here.

Ever thought about WHY?

Seems like poor planning on the part of these otherwise flawless conspirators.

[peteweaver]

No plane hit WTC 7, so I don't know what you're asking here.

WTC 1 hit it...

[tj15]

What was the kink in the middle of the roof of WTC 7 from prior to its collapse?

Good dodge. That is not the point of this thread.

[tj15]

No plane hit WTC 7, so I don't know what you're asking here.

I am asking for what the plan was supposed to be to have an excuse for why WTC 7 fell. You know, like the planes were the alibi for the towers falling.

[Cl1mh4224rd]

I am asking for what the plan was supposed to be to have an excuse for why WTC 7 fell. You know, like the planes were the alibi for the towers falling.
WTC 1 hit it...


;)

Those evil NWO; they planned the whole thing right down to how the explosives should be planted in WTC1 to cause the resulting debris to strike WTC7...

[Brainache]

;)

Those evil NWO; they planned the whole thing right down to how the explosives should be planted in WTC1 to cause the resulting debris to strike WTC7...

So the NWO were playing an evil game of skyscraper dominoes in order to ensure the destruction of secret files?

Damn those guys think big! Most of us lesser mortals might just hack up a hard drive with an axe, but the NWO do it with bloody big buildings.
Show offs!

[MetalPig]

I'll bet some NWO section chief lost his corner office over that little miscalculation.
Imagine him waking up at 1 in the afternoon, hung-over from the pre-party: "What? 10 in the *morning*?"

[beachnut]

Has anyone ever noticed that when truthers are asked what was supposed to cover the use of explosives in WTC 7, they can never answer that question? Can a truther here please give an alibi for the destruction of WTC 7 (for example, how the airplanes "cover" for the destruction of the towers)?
9/11 truth members lack so much knowledge and have no logical capacity to understand what you said.

If they understood what you said, they would not be in 9/11 truth.

[nicepants]

So the NWO were playing an evil game of skyscraper dominoes in order to ensure the destruction of secret files?

Damn those guys think big! Most of us lesser mortals might just hack up a hard drive with an axe, but the NWO do it with bloody big buildings.
Show offs!

That's so we could collect the insurance money, of course....and you know what that means.....BONUS!

[tj15]

9/11 truth members lack so much knowledge and have no logical capacity to understand what you said.

If they understood what you said, they would not be in 9/11 truth.

Exactly. Any truther want to attempt to answer the question?

[T.A.M.]

I think, if I may play truther's advocate, that their "theory" is that the chaos of all that happened that day would make the need for a plausible cover up cause of the event moot. the bigwigs at NWO central would simply say...

"Obiviously there was damage and fires caused by the two major collapses, and this caused WTC7 to collapse."

but I am speculating...then again, I am playing "truther" advocate.

TAM;)

[1337m4n]

Truthers keep bringing up that "no plane hit the WTC7". You'd think that the perps would've had the sense to hit it with one. What's the cost of one more plane to this already grandiose conspiracy?

That no plane hit the WTC7 is evidence AGAINST conspiracy.

[JCM]

Good dodge. That is not the point of this thread.
Your right and sorry wasn't trying to derail. Any suggestion on which thread this would be a good question to ask? I searched 'kink' but didn't find threads that the question would fit in

[TheRedWorm]

You could always start your own thread, and, worse comes to worse, it'll most likely be merged with a previous one.