View Full Version : The Missile, & WTC's 4, 5 & 6.
Martin Timothy
21st March 2008, 03:54 PM
Take a look at the hi res, wide angle shots of both WTC towers smoking in the background prior to their collapse, note there is an absence of fallout that would indicate a missile had devastated WTC’s 4, 5 & 6 simultaneous with the strike on the South Tower, then take a look at 911 The Explosive Reality vid.
As well as an armed and helmeted man with a strong Serbo Croatian accent at 1hr 09 minutes, blocking the television reporter’s camera with his hand, saying, “…Nothing informations,” and reports of bodies strewn about in the lobby of WTC 7 prior to its collapse, there is a Tomahawk Class Cruise Missile like object plummeting toward the WTC at 5 m 50 sec, in the same frame as the strike on the South Tower.
Then see the damage to WTC’s 4, 5 and 6 visible on high resolution photographs @ Killtown.com that reveal multiple cratering, said to be caused by the missile’s multiple thermonuclear warheads, one concrete panel inside the devastated WTC 6 appears to be partially vaporized, a shallow concave surface defining the event horizon of the thermonuclear fireball.
As the second jet rammed its target, “…that was an explosion,” says Stephen McArdle a tax consultant from inside the Marriot Hotel, he was taping as part of an FBI sting operation, then comes a longer and much louder explosion. The second explosion was thought to be the detonation of the missile’s warhead. Greg Smith 2002.
Jack White’s 911 Studies: Photo …a pyroclastic cloud in an inner city environment, Caption: while onlookers were distracted by the events at skyscraper level, moments after the second plane hit the South Tower, WTC 6 was torn apart by a massive explosion. The crater in the building was eight stories deep, an immense hole blasted into the sub basements… all eight stories missing… no wreckage… blown away… vaporized by the thermonuclear warhead on the missile.
So it did seem, yet there is no trace of the pyroclastic cloud in the long shots, previous posts have said the pyroclastic event did not start until simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, not when it was struck, the long shots at least disprove Jack White’s story and the masses of spam that claim otherwise.
By Christopher Bollyn @ American Free Press: A massive explosion devastated World Trade Center 6 the eight-story U.S. Customs Building, immediately after United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower at about 9:03 am. Photo caption: The flame in the photos of the mysterious burning object passing through the South Tower is almost pure white, and leaves a dark trail… Is this the burning remnant of a DU penetrator.
The flaming wreckage Bollyn says might be a DU penetrator is not, he posted shots of wreckage thought to be an engine and part of the landing gear of the plane that struck the South tower, which had a different trajectory than the alleged missile.
American Free Press contacted CNN to determine exactly when the footage was filmed: CNN’s Public Affairs Department confirmed that the explosion shown in the footage occurred immediately after the second plane had crashed into the South Tower. When asked if the footage was taken at 9:04 am, the CNN archivist said …that’s correct. When asked if CNN could offer any explanation about what might have caused the blast that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the foreground, the archivist said, …We can’t figure it out. AFP.
BS Revealed: Torrent File 911-0856-1256 WABC-CNN footage, reveals the pyroclastic cloud event occurred at 10:00 am simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, not at 9:03 am immediately after the impact on the South Tower.
The tremendous damage to WTC’s 4,5 & 6 does appear consistent with a missile strike, a multiple warhead Tomahawk Cruiser would do it easy, though as we have ascertained, the pyroclastic event did not occur till the start of the collapse of the South Tower. So where did the 9:03 am missile hit… and what precipitated the tremendous explosion that caused the upward pyroclastic event, filmed at 10:00 am coming from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6, or was that fallout from the collapse of the South Tower.
Or the missile strike was at 10:00 am and the 9:03 am missile tape was falsified.
Some 800 workers from WTC 6 were safely evacuated within 12 minutes of the first plane hitting the North Tower at about 8:46 am, according to a Sept. 18 Washington Post article by Stephen Barr.
The Barr piece is the only known article published about WTC 6. However Barr failed to mention the explosion that apparently devastated the building, just minutes after the workers had escaped with their lives. A spokesman for FEMA told AFP that because the building was considered to be very dangerous, there was no data collection from WTC 6.
The explosion on McArdle’s FBI tape recorded after the impact on the South Tower, could have been one of the explosions in the sub basement levels Willie Rodriguez talks about. NY1 an internet news service from NY had excellent long shots of the entire drama, certainly no missile was visible simultaneous with the South Tower air strike, nor was there any fallout that would have accompanied a missile strike, however the flaming wreckage identified as part of the landing gear, and one engine was visible.
When the South Tower began to disintegrate at 10:00 am the station was showing close up chromatically aberrated images, it was not till the collapse was well under way, that the long shots put back onto the screen. So we are unable to see if a missile struck at that time, or to time the emergence of the explosive cloud emanating from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6, which was a different color and texture than the collapse material.
The Readers Digest ran a story during the WTC construction stating explosives would be built into the buildings to facilitate their eventual demolition.
Update: Here's the scoop behind the "pre installed explosives" thing, Paul Laffoley worked in the early 1960's for Emery Roth and Sons, a prominent New York City architectural design firm. On Mike Hagen Radio Orbit on February 21 2007, he said he helped to design the WTC with explosive charges built into the towers, in order to take them down neatly at any time.
Check artwork on posters supposedly produced on behalf of alleged Islamic terror group Al Muhjiron, and The Magnificent Nineteen praising the virtues of the alleged nineteen 911 hijackers, as well as the artwork on the cover of Edward Hendrie’s book Antichrist Conspiracy, Inside the Devil’s Lair. Then take a look at the artwork produced of behalf of the Star Wars trilogy, the similarities indicate that the same studio produced the whole lot.
The President said he saw the first 911 strike on TV in Florida, the networks never broadcast so his own people must have provided the link, any presidential campaign built around 911 truth would probably get about ninety percent of the vote.
gc051360
21st March 2008, 03:56 PM
Wow.
TheRedWorm
21st March 2008, 03:57 PM
Wow.
Yep.
pomeroo
21st March 2008, 03:59 PM
Take a look at the hi res, wide angle shots of both WTC towers smoking in the background prior to their collapse, note there is an absence of fallout that would indicate a missile had devastated WTC’s 4, 5 & 6 simultaneous with the strike on the South Tower, then take a look at 911 The Explosive Reality vid.
As well as an armed and helmeted man with a strong Serbo Croatian accent at 1hr 09 minutes, blocking the television reporter’s camera with his hand, saying, “…Nothing informations,” and reports of bodies strewn about in the lobby of WTC 7 prior to its collapse, there is a Tomahawk Class Cruise Missile like object plummeting toward the WTC at 5 m 50 sec, in the same frame as the strike on the South Tower.
Then see the damage to WTC’s 4, 5 and 6 visible on high resolution photographs @ Killtown.com that reveal multiple cratering, said to be caused by the missile’s multiple thermonuclear warheads, one concrete panel inside the devastated WTC 6 appears to be partially vaporized, a shallow concave surface defining the event horizon of the thermonuclear fireball.
As the second jet rammed its target, “…that was an explosion,” says Stephen McArdle a tax consultant from inside the Marriot Hotel, he was taping as part of an FBI sting operation, then comes a longer and much louder explosion. The second explosion was thought to be the detonation of the missile’s warhead. Greg Smith 2002.
Jack White’s 911 Studies: Photo …a pyroclastic cloud in an inner city environment, Caption: while onlookers were distracted by the events at skyscraper level, moments after the second plane hit the South Tower, WTC 6 was torn apart by a massive explosion. The crater in the building was eight stories deep, an immense hole blasted into the sub basements… all eight stories missing… no wreckage… blown away… vaporized by the thermonuclear warhead on the missile.
So it did seem, yet there is no trace of the pyroclastic cloud in the long shots, previous posts have said the pyroclastic event did not start until simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, not when it was struck, the long shots at least disprove Jack White’s story and the masses of spam that claim otherwise.
By Christopher Bollyn @ American Free Press: A massive explosion devastated World Trade Center 6 the eight-story U.S. Customs Building, immediately after United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower at about 9:03 am. Photo caption: The flame in the photos of the mysterious burning object passing through the South Tower is almost pure white, and leaves a dark trail… Is this the burning remnant of a DU penetrator.
The flaming wreckage Bollyn says might be a DU penetrator is not, he posted shots of wreckage thought to be an engine and part of the landing gear of the plane that struck the South tower, which had a different trajectory than the alleged missile.
American Free Press contacted CNN to determine exactly when the footage was filmed: CNN’s Public Affairs Department confirmed that the explosion shown in the footage occurred immediately after the second plane had crashed into the South Tower. When asked if the footage was taken at 9:04 am, the CNN archivist said …that’s correct. When asked if CNN could offer any explanation about what might have caused the blast that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the foreground, the archivist said, …We can’t figure it out. AFP.
BS Revealed: Torrent File 911-0856-1256 WABC-CNN footage, reveals the pyroclastic cloud event occurred at 10:00 am simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, not at 9:03 am immediately after the impact on the South Tower.
The tremendous damage to WTC’s 4,5 & 6 does appear consistent with a missile strike, a multiple warhead Tomahawk Cruiser would do it easy, though as we have ascertained, the pyroclastic event did not occur till the start of the collapse of the South Tower. So where did the 9:03 am missile hit… and what precipitated the tremendous explosion that caused the upward pyroclastic event, filmed at 10:00 am coming from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6, or was that fallout from the collapse of the South Tower.
Or the missile strike was at 10:00 am and the 9:03 am missile tape was falsified.
Some 800 workers from WTC 6 were safely evacuated within 12 minutes of the first plane hitting the North Tower at about 8:46 am, according to a Sept. 18 Washington Post article by Stephen Barr.
The Barr piece is the only known article published about WTC 6. However Barr failed to mention the explosion that apparently devastated the building, just minutes after the workers had escaped with their lives. A spokesman for FEMA told AFP that because the building was considered to be very dangerous, there was no data collection from WTC 6.
The explosion on McArdle’s FBI tape recorded after the impact on the South Tower, could have been one of the explosions in the sub basement levels Willie Rodriguez talks about. NY1 an internet news service from NY had excellent long shots of the entire drama, certainly no missile was visible simultaneous with the South Tower air strike, nor was there any fallout that would have accompanied a missile strike, however the flaming wreckage identified as part of the landing gear, and one engine was visible.
When the South Tower began to disintegrate at 10:00 am the station was showing close up chromatically aberrated images, it was not till the collapse was well under way, that the long shots put back onto the screen. So we are unable to see if a missile struck at that time, or to time the emergence of the explosive cloud emanating from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6, which was a different color and texture than the collapse material.
The Readers Digest ran a story during the WTC construction stating explosives would be built into the buildings to facilitate their eventual demolition.
Update: Here's the scoop behind the "pre installed explosives" thing, Paul Laffoley worked in the early 1960's for Emery Roth and Sons, a prominent New York City architectural design firm. On Mike Hagen Radio Orbit on February 21 2007, he said he helped to design the WTC with explosive charges built into the towers, in order to take them down neatly at any time.
Check artwork on posters supposedly produced on behalf of alleged Islamic terror group Al Muhjiron, and The Magnificent Nineteen praising the virtues of the alleged nineteen 911 hijackers, as well as the artwork on the cover of Edward Hendrie’s book Antichrist Conspiracy, Inside the Devil’s Lair. Then take a look at the artwork produced of behalf of the Star Wars trilogy, the similarities indicate that the same studio produced the whole lot.
The President said he saw the first 911 strike on TV in Florida, the networks never broadcast so his own people must have provided the link, any presidential campaign built around 911 truth would probably get about ninety percent of the vote.
Your entry placed in the top three for both stupidity and insanity, but was penalized for prolixity. Don't be discouraged. You are a rare talent. Just tighten it up a bit.
VespaGuy
21st March 2008, 04:04 PM
Take a look at the hi res, wide angle shots of both WTC towers smoking in the background prior to their collapse, note there is an absence of fallout that would indicate a missile had devastated WTC’s 4, 5 & 6 simultaneous with the strike on the South Tower, then take a look at 911 The Explosive Reality vid.
As well as an armed and helmeted man with a strong Serbo Croatian accent at 1hr 09 minutes, blocking the television reporter’s camera with his hand, saying, “…Nothing informations,” and reports of bodies strewn about in the lobby of WTC 7 prior to its collapse, there is a Tomahawk Class Cruise Missile like object plummeting toward the WTC at 5 m 50 sec, in the same frame as the strike on the South Tower.
Then see the damage to WTC’s 4, 5 and 6 visible on high resolution photographs @ Killtown.com that reveal multiple cratering, said to be caused by the missile’s multiple thermonuclear warheads, one concrete panel inside the devastated WTC 6 appears to be partially vaporized, a shallow concave surface defining the event horizon of the thermonuclear fireball.
As the second jet rammed its target, “…that was an explosion,” says Stephen McArdle a tax consultant from inside the Marriot Hotel, he was taping as part of an FBI sting operation, then comes a longer and much louder explosion. The second explosion was thought to be the detonation of the missile’s warhead. Greg Smith 2002.
Jack White’s 911 Studies: Photo …a pyroclastic cloud in an inner city environment, Caption: while onlookers were distracted by the events at skyscraper level, moments after the second plane hit the South Tower, WTC 6 was torn apart by a massive explosion. The crater in the building was eight stories deep, an immense hole blasted into the sub basements… all eight stories missing… no wreckage… blown away… vaporized by the thermonuclear warhead on the missile.
So it did seem, yet there is no trace of the pyroclastic cloud in the long shots, previous posts have said the pyroclastic event did not start until simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, not when it was struck, the long shots at least disprove Jack White’s story and the masses of spam that claim otherwise.
By Christopher Bollyn @ American Free Press: A massive explosion devastated World Trade Center 6 the eight-story U.S. Customs Building, immediately after United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower at about 9:03 am. Photo caption: The flame in the photos of the mysterious burning object passing through the South Tower is almost pure white, and leaves a dark trail… Is this the burning remnant of a DU penetrator.
The flaming wreckage Bollyn says might be a DU penetrator is not, he posted shots of wreckage thought to be an engine and part of the landing gear of the plane that struck the South tower, which had a different trajectory than the alleged missile.
American Free Press contacted CNN to determine exactly when the footage was filmed: CNN’s Public Affairs Department confirmed that the explosion shown in the footage occurred immediately after the second plane had crashed into the South Tower. When asked if the footage was taken at 9:04 am, the CNN archivist said …that’s correct. When asked if CNN could offer any explanation about what might have caused the blast that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the foreground, the archivist said, …We can’t figure it out. AFP.
BS Revealed: Torrent File 911-0856-1256 WABC-CNN footage, reveals the pyroclastic cloud event occurred at 10:00 am simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, not at 9:03 am immediately after the impact on the South Tower.
The tremendous damage to WTC’s 4,5 & 6 does appear consistent with a missile strike, a multiple warhead Tomahawk Cruiser would do it easy, though as we have ascertained, the pyroclastic event did not occur till the start of the collapse of the South Tower. So where did the 9:03 am missile hit… and what precipitated the tremendous explosion that caused the upward pyroclastic event, filmed at 10:00 am coming from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6, or was that fallout from the collapse of the South Tower.
Or the missile strike was at 10:00 am and the 9:03 am missile tape was falsified.
Some 800 workers from WTC 6 were safely evacuated within 12 minutes of the first plane hitting the North Tower at about 8:46 am, according to a Sept. 18 Washington Post article by Stephen Barr.
The Barr piece is the only known article published about WTC 6. However Barr failed to mention the explosion that apparently devastated the building, just minutes after the workers had escaped with their lives. A spokesman for FEMA told AFP that because the building was considered to be very dangerous, there was no data collection from WTC 6.
The explosion on McArdle’s FBI tape recorded after the impact on the South Tower, could have been one of the explosions in the sub basement levels Willie Rodriguez talks about. NY1 an internet news service from NY had excellent long shots of the entire drama, certainly no missile was visible simultaneous with the South Tower air strike, nor was there any fallout that would have accompanied a missile strike, however the flaming wreckage identified as part of the landing gear, and one engine was visible.
When the South Tower began to disintegrate at 10:00 am the station was showing close up chromatically aberrated images, it was not till the collapse was well under way, that the long shots put back onto the screen. So we are unable to see if a missile struck at that time, or to time the emergence of the explosive cloud emanating from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6, which was a different color and texture than the collapse material.
The Readers Digest ran a story during the WTC construction stating explosives would be built into the buildings to facilitate their eventual demolition.
Update: Here's the scoop behind the "pre installed explosives" thing, Paul Laffoley worked in the early 1960's for Emery Roth and Sons, a prominent New York City architectural design firm. On Mike Hagen Radio Orbit on February 21 2007, he said he helped to design the WTC with explosive charges built into the towers, in order to take them down neatly at any time.
Check artwork on posters supposedly produced on behalf of alleged Islamic terror group Al Muhjiron, and The Magnificent Nineteen praising the virtues of the alleged nineteen 911 hijackers, as well as the artwork on the cover of Edward Hendrie’s book Antichrist Conspiracy, Inside the Devil’s Lair. Then take a look at the artwork produced of behalf of the Star Wars trilogy, the similarities indicate that the same studio produced the whole lot.
The President said he saw the first 911 strike on TV in Florida, the networks never broadcast so his own people must have provided the link, any presidential campaign built around 911 truth would probably get about ninety percent of the vote.
spam-a-lama-ding-dong.
Oh. And welcome to the forum, Martin Timothy.
DGM
21st March 2008, 04:04 PM
I really like this part:
The Readers Digest ran a story during the WTC construction stating explosives would be built into the buildings to facilitate their eventual demolition.
:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:
Confuseling
21st March 2008, 04:06 PM
At least he put references in.
Also - do thermonuclear fireballs have event horizons now?
Or is this some super sekrit hushablackholeboombomb that us sheeple never read about in the MSM?
rwguinn
21st March 2008, 04:06 PM
Call in the Billy Goats
Don't feed the Damn Trolls!
(Please?)
Confuseling
21st March 2008, 04:18 PM
Oh go on. He said that LucasArts brought down the WTC. We have to be able to play with people like that, or there's no point living.
I'll start: "an armed and helmeted man with a strong Serbo Croatian accent". I've seen several Martin Scorsese films, and my understanding is that everyone in New York is Italian. Your move.
njslim
21st March 2008, 05:19 PM
Wow - quotes from both Killtown and Chris Bolleyn. Looks like hit every branch on the
stupid tree...
Walter Ego
21st March 2008, 05:30 PM
The missiles were launched from the Woolworth Building (http://www.total911.info/2004/12/woolworth-building-as-staging-area-for.html)! :eek:
From the NY POST (08-29-03):
(http://www.911activism.info/2007/05/05/911-accessory-dietl-threatens-sheen-re-loose-change/)
"The Woolworth Building! The Woolworth Building! They're shooting at the Trade Center from the Woolworth Building!" a police officer screams...
Cl1mh4224rd
21st March 2008, 05:53 PM
Totally off-topic, but I can't help but notice these truther accounts that have been around since mid-to-late 2007 suddenly coming to life: tanabear (right after JHarrow/PDoherty's banning, too), Timothy Martin...
A W Smith
21st March 2008, 11:11 PM
Totally off-topic, but I can't help but notice these truther accounts that have been around since mid-to-late 2007 suddenly coming to life: tanabear (right after JHarrow/PDoherty's banning, too), Timothy Martin...
you might also notice one logs on to post then logs off and another troother becomes active and on-line to post, then logs off then the first one logs back on again. For instance. Watch last Child's on-line icon in the threads he posts in.
Hokulele
21st March 2008, 11:37 PM
you might also notice one logs on to post then logs off and another troother becomes active and on-line to post, then logs off then the first one logs back on again. For instance. Watch last Child's on-line icon in the threads he posts in.
Um, not to defend members of the truth movement or anything, but that is a function of vBulletin. When you are posting a response to something, it temporarily shows you as being logged out. Since many of the CTists are fairly prolific compared to everyone else, they will most likely wink in and out far more often.
Sorry to debunk your CT there. ;)
HENTAI DOUKYUSEI JP
21st March 2008, 11:55 PM
you might also notice one logs on to post then logs off and another troother becomes active and on-line to post, then logs off then the first one logs back on again. For instance. Watch last Child's on-line icon in the threads he posts in.
Remember, these morons have no life.
their latest video didn't even do anything for themat all, let alone the "uninformed" public.............
MaGZ
22nd March 2008, 04:36 AM
The missiles were launched from the Woolworth Building (http://www.total911.info/2004/12/woolworth-building-as-staging-area-for.html)! :eek:
I do not agree with the poster on a missile hitting WTC 6. It was WTC 7 that was hit by the missile; it was fired by a fighter sent to shoot down flight 175. Individuals did report seeing missiles (there were two) fly seconds after the impact of flight 175 into WTC 2. A reporter from CNN live said there were reports of a missile being seen.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Jim, I don't know whether we've confirmed that this was an aircraft, or to be more specific, some people said they thought they saw a missile. I don't know how people could differentiate, but we might keep open the possibility that this was a missile attack on these buildings.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html
The calls into police about a missile from the Woolworth Building was erroneous. People did see a missile but it came from a F -16.
leftysergeant
22nd March 2008, 04:51 AM
I do not agree with the poster on a missile hitting WTC 6. It was WTC 7 that was hit by the missile; it was fired by a fighter sent to shoot down flight 175. Individuals did report seeing missiles (there were two) fly seconds after the impact of flight 175 into WTC 2. A reporter from CNN live said there were reports of a missile being seen.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html
The calls into police about a missile from the Woolworth Building was erroneous. People did see a missile but it came from a F -16.
Oy, gewalt! There was no missile seen or photographed anywhere in New York that day. There WERE , however, at least one, possibly two engines photographed leaving the south tower after the aircraft struck. Or it may have been an engine and a landing gear. Both were found down-range. That you cannot connect these facts amy say something about you that would also account for your white nationalist leanings.
leftysergeant
22nd March 2008, 05:10 AM
Jack White’s 911 Studies: Photo …a pyroclastic cloud in an inner city environment, Caption: while onlookers were distracted by the events at skyscraper level, moments after the second plane hit the South Tower, WTC 6 was torn apart by a massive explosion. The crater in the building was eight stories deep, an immense hole blasted into the sub basements… all eight stories missing… no wreckage… blown away… vaporized by the thermonuclear warhead on the missile.
I do not understand how anyone as stupid as Jack White can even get a picture right-side up. The hole was not blown out of WTC 6. The roof was staved in by sections of the perimeter columns of the towers that weighed more than the weight the columns in WTC 6 were supposed to handle as a live load. Look at a high-res blow-up of the photographs and you will see perimeter columns have been driven into the basement of WTC 6.
The tremendous damage to WTC’s 4,5 & 6 does appear consistent with a missile strike, a multiple warhead Tomahawk Cruiser would do it easy, though as we have ascertained, the pyroclastic event did not occur till the start of the collapse of the South Tower.
There was never a pyroclastic flow in NYC. There was, however a plume of smoke from one or two vehicles burning at the base of the south tower, and an enormous turbidity flow after the collapse.
The Barr piece is the only known article published about WTC 6. However Barr failed to mention the explosion that apparently devastated the building, just minutes after the workers had escaped with their lives. A spokesman for FEMA told AFP that because the building was considered to be very dangerous, there was no data collection from WTC 6.
Erm...that sounds more like the ammunition catching fire than like an atom bomb. ANY A-bomb would have irradiated every life form for miles.
The President said he saw the first 911 strike on TV in Florida, the networks never broadcast so his own people must have provided the link, any presidential campaign built around 911 truth would probably get about ninety percent of the vote.
Not a chance of that. We have already had too many years of misgovernance by a blithering idiot.
gtc
22nd March 2008, 05:33 AM
Martin,
Can you tell us in what issue of the Reader's Digest the story about the explosives was published?
To the other posters,
Martin has posted this almost verbatim on another board (http://www.infograffiti.org/story.php?title=Remember_Remember_The_11th_of_Sept ember).
He is a real poster using his real name and he has a very NSFW home page you can google.
Alt+F4
22nd March 2008, 08:38 AM
As well as an armed and helmeted man with a strong Serbo Croatian accent at 1hr 09 minutes, blocking the television reporter’s camera with his hand, saying, “…Nothing informations,”
Of course, it was the Serbo-Crotains all along! How did we miss this?
Pato2747
22nd March 2008, 09:21 AM
A plane-shaped missile.
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrright.
chillzero
22nd March 2008, 10:54 AM
Please, everyone remember the MA.
Stay on topic, and don't attack the member; address the posts.
Thank you very much.
pomeroo
22nd March 2008, 06:46 PM
I do not agree with the poster on a missile hitting WTC 6. It was WTC 7 that was hit by the missile; it was fired by a fighter sent to shoot down flight 175. Individuals did report seeing missiles (there were two) fly seconds after the impact of flight 175 into WTC 2. A reporter from CNN live said there were reports of a missile being seen.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html
The calls into police about a missile from the Woolworth Building was erroneous. People did see a missile but it came from a F -16.
You've been caught lying again, mein Herr. No missiles were fired in the U.S. on the day of the jihadist attacks.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.