PDA

View Full Version : CIT is protecting the 911 perps; and betraying us all


Bobert
10th April 2008, 02:19 PM
Ok this was inspired by this thread at the LCF:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/191974/1/#newSteven Jones is protecting the 9/11 perps. It’s been almost two years since Jones went on C-SPAN with his “hard evidence” of thermite. The only reason he wouldn't present this "hard evidence" to a Court of Law is to protect the perps. He has betrayed us all. Why?

If Jones isn't going to present this evidence to the court system, where the perps can be held accountable, he should give this "hard evidence" to someone who will. Short of that, Jones is betraying us. Jones is betraying our country!


Steven Jones CIT is protecting the 9/11 perps. It’s been over a year and a half since Criag Ranke went on JREF/LCFwith his “Smoking Gun” . The only reason he wouldn't present this "Smoking Gun" to a Court of Law is to protect the perps. He has betrayed us all. Why?

If CIT isn't going to present this evidence to the court system, where the perps can be held accountable, THEY should give this "Smoking Gun" to someone who will. Short of that, CIT is betraying us. CIT is betraying our country!

twinstead
10th April 2008, 02:21 PM
You could insert just about every truther I know in place of Steven Jones, actually.

Bobert
10th April 2008, 02:24 PM
That is a very valid point

realitybites
10th April 2008, 02:25 PM
Easy there Bobert.

Aldo has stated "They're working on it."

On what, I'm not exactly sure. A smoking gun, by definition, is a pretty slam dunk piece of evidence. I'm thinking he may be deciding what outfit to wear on Judge Judy.

Cobalt
10th April 2008, 02:26 PM
Because it was never about the "truth." It was, and is, about making some cash. If there were actually solid, court-worthy evidence, and they wanted something done, they'd have actually done something with it instead of just parading about the internet pretending to know everything.

What makes this all very sad is that CTs in general claim they respect the victims, and haven't made any effort to "right" these apparent "wrongs."

realitybites
10th April 2008, 02:30 PM
What makes this all very sad is that CTs in general claim they respect the victims, and haven't made any effort to "right" these apparent "wrongs."

None whatsoever.

The sad thing is that if Jim Garrison could get a JFK conspiracy on trial thanks to the false testimony of one person, the truth movement could've come up with something by now, no?

I mean, CIT's research is quadruple corroborated!!!

Bobert
10th April 2008, 02:34 PM
Trials were promised by Ranke in 07!
Geeeeeeeee Craig would never say that just to um I dont know sell a few DVD's?

Cobalt
10th April 2008, 02:48 PM
From the thread the OP linked.
can we stop with the "why didn't he bring it to court" BS....

Countless people have went to court trying to bring a 911 truth trial but the judge is always a scumbag and thinks it's anti-american and denies it.

Where? When? Who? What court? What's stopping them from trying again? If it's such good evidence, why is it being tossed as being "unamerican?"

But hey, I guess I'm just asking questions.

Gord_in_Toronto
10th April 2008, 02:51 PM
You silly people!!!

The courts are part of the conspiracy!!

Everyone but we fearless few are part of the conspiracy! Except, I'm not too sure about you.

:D :D :D :D

johnny karate
10th April 2008, 02:53 PM
From the thread the OP linked.


Where? When? Who? What court? What's stopping them from trying again? If it's such good evidence, why is it being tossed as being "unamerican?"

But hey, I guess I'm just asking questions.

And maybe someday they'll finally get courts in other countries. You know, like one of the many that also had citizens killed on 9/11.

fullflavormenthol
10th April 2008, 02:58 PM
You silly people!!!

The courts are part of the conspiracy!!

Everyone but we fearless few are part of the conspiracy! Except, I'm not too sure about you.

:D :D :D :D
I know I am. I go by the code name Omega Agent #S0345 "Mellow Yellow".

That is the only reason I could possibly ignore the mountains of evidence [sic] that the truthers bring to the table. :rolleyes:

Bobert
10th April 2008, 03:00 PM
Good point I am not sure the exact count but or where I can find it but it was like 48 countries that had people killed on 9-11.

Cobalt
10th April 2008, 03:10 PM
Good point I am not sure the exact count but or where I can find it but it was like 48 countries that had people killed on 9-11.

Maybe one of them will try to do something about it. All they have to do is shell out $19.99 or so for a shoddily made DVD that has ALL the evidence they'll ever need.

Bobert
10th April 2008, 04:10 PM
Yes the Kings of the truth movement are a Film School reject, a software salesman, and a DJ.

PB&J
10th April 2008, 10:05 PM
Yes the Kings of the truth movement are a Film School reject, a software salesman, and a DJ.

The funny thing is... I can't tell if you were talking about the loose change crew or CIT ;)

fullflavormenthol
10th April 2008, 11:06 PM
Yes the Kings of the truth movement are a Film School reject, a software salesman, and a DJ.
The real question is if Dylan Avery had just done what anyone else would have and just applied to another film school would we have been spared loose change?

Bobert
11th April 2008, 10:42 AM
The funny thing is... I can't tell if you were talking about the loose change crew or CIT ;)

Dylan, Craig, and Aldo respectively.