PDA

View Full Version : Yet Another Stupid Troofer Being Harassed By 'The Man'


Walter Ego
26th April 2008, 02:11 PM
Where do this idiots get off thinking they can get ‘up close and personal’ with heads of state, public officials, presidential candidates and first ladies? This one in San Diego is yet another constitutional scholar, and, of course it's all about her.

This will highlight a Vicente Fox protest I tried to attend, fully agreeing with the protest to make a video. Unfortunately, I had no idea it was a set up till later. This video will highlight Captain Ball of the central division w3hile him and other order takers conspire on video to commit crimes against me!

If you are a cop just doing your job, you would be protecting the rights of citizens. That is your job!

These horrible police officers PROVOKED an incident on purpose because they are NOT obeying or upholding the law!

Protect and serve...

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS RESPONSIBILITIES OF YOUR JOB!

Just following orders is not good enough.

The Constitution is the law!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9OXOfuG9Jzg



9OXOfuG9Jzg

Get over yourself, girly! :v:

Edit: Looks like the woman is not a 9/11 truther but and anti-illegal immigrant MinuteLady:

One of the people who jumped Betty was SD Minuteman President Jeff Schwilk, who was involved in a violent confrontation on February 4, 2007 with his then-girlfriend Christie Czajkowski. This confrontation was later the subject of a domestic violence complaint and restraining order litigation in the Vista courts. In February and March, 2007, San Diego police executed search warrants at both Schwilk and Czajkowski’s homes searching for evidence of vandalism at a migrant encampment in late 2006. (No charges were ever filed regarding
that crime.)

http://buildinghealthycommunities.wordpress.com/2008/03/12/march-in-san-rafael-this-saturday/#comment-31

My bad. :o

Pardalis
26th April 2008, 02:15 PM
Wait, she's being rejected by the police and the anarchists?

defaultdotxbe
26th April 2008, 02:37 PM
i got up to the point where she appears to claim "blocking her view" is a violation of her civil liberties and the offender should be arrested, i couldnt take any more after that

Pardalis
26th April 2008, 02:40 PM
i got up to the point where she appears to claim "blocking her view" is a violation of her civil liberties and the offender should be arrested, i couldnt take any more after that

Good, finally tall people with afros are going to have to sit on the back row at the theatre from now on, or they will be looking at jail time.

munki?
26th April 2008, 02:42 PM
i got up to the point where she appears to claim "blocking her view" is a violation of her civil liberties and the offender should be arrested, i couldnt take any more after that

I stopped at about the same point. There is only so much **** posturing I can take.

Tweeter
26th April 2008, 02:43 PM
Theyre all public servants, so why shouldnt you be allowed to have access to them?

T.A.M.
26th April 2008, 02:45 PM
squeaky wheel gets the oil....but!!!

SQUEAKY WHEEL ALSO ANNOYS THE HELL OUT OF EVERYONE!!!

Dear god!

TAM:)

Thunder
26th April 2008, 02:50 PM
"Go see a psychologist"?????

LOL

Why should the NWO cops protect their enemies?? LOLOL

Oh my God...this girl is annoying. The Truthers are hated by the Left...by the Right..and even by their own.

How sad...how very very sad.

Bobert
26th April 2008, 02:56 PM
LOL!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHHAHA
She got what she deserved!
She went there LOOKING and PROVOKING for a confrontation.
Does this whacko have a website/blog?

T.A.M.
26th April 2008, 02:58 PM
truthbrigade.org or .com I think.

TAM:)

johnny karate
26th April 2008, 03:04 PM
i got up to the point where she appears to claim "blocking her view" is a violation of her civil liberties and the offender should be arrested, i couldnt take any more after that

Yeah, it was right around then when she whined "Isn't anyone going to help me do my job?" that I stopped watching.

johnny karate
26th April 2008, 03:06 PM
Theyre all public servants, so why shouldnt you be allowed to have access to them?

That's a really good point. Next time the President or some other high ranking government official visits your area, you should run up to them really quickly and ask.

fullflavormenthol
26th April 2008, 03:12 PM
Theyre all public servants, so why shouldnt you be allowed to have access to them?
You're right, they are public servants. Unfortunately at that moment they were trying to contain a potentially explosive situation; which some idiot trying to get people arrested for the non-crime of blocking her view. Meanwhile those public servants are trying to keep her from getting beat to death by the angry mob, and keep a riot from breaking out.

Do you get it?

Put it this way...the SWAT team are also public servants, but that doesn't mean I should walk up and start shoving a camera in their faces when they are trying to stop a robbery.

fuelair
26th April 2008, 03:16 PM
Theyre all public servants, so why shouldnt you be allowed to have access to them?
Because if they have to talk to every rectum head who has an opinion they will never have a chance to do the work they were elected/are paid to do. Use letters/e-mail/telegrams/phone.
I am not and would never be an elected official precisely because of that expectation that so many have - without thinking through the effects of them doing it.

fuelair
26th April 2008, 03:19 PM
squeaky wheel gets the oil....but!!!

SQUEAKY WHEEL ALSO ANNOYS THE HELL OUT OF EVERYONE!!!

Dear god!

TAM:)
My rule of squeaky wheels is "the squeaky wheel gets the sand!" If not evident, that means let them squeak and wear them down. When they break continue right along with a new wheel.

Normal Dude
26th April 2008, 03:30 PM
People like this are why there's no way I would ever be a police officer.

theprestige
26th April 2008, 04:22 PM
Theyre all public servants, so why shouldnt you be allowed to have access to them?
Because granting access to you isn't the service we've contracted them to perform.

Drudgewire
26th April 2008, 04:58 PM
Theyre all public servants, so why shouldnt you be allowed to have access to them?

No they're not. Supreme Court has basically ruled the job of the police is to uphold the law, not to protect and serve... despite the motto.

mrbaracuda
26th April 2008, 04:58 PM
Haha, set up by both the police and anarchists? Poor her. :D

A W Smith
26th April 2008, 05:59 PM
I noticed a lot of other cameras pointing at her. I would love to see her frustration from their perspective.

defaultdotxbe
26th April 2008, 06:21 PM
No they're not. Supreme Court has basically ruled the job of the police is to uphold the law, not to protect and serve... despite the motto.
in theory the 2 jobs should be one and the same, but thats the legislatures job to ensure

ah, the three branch government, is anything ever anyones fault? lol, almost makes you wish it was a dictatorship, at least then youd know who to blame

fullflavormenthol
26th April 2008, 06:26 PM
No they're not. Supreme Court has basically ruled the job of the police is to uphold the law, not to protect and serve... despite the motto.
Well public servant in this sense means that ultimately they work for the public, not that they are our slaves. People confuse the ideas, and think that they can boss around the cops. They don't realise the check is that they have the ability to vote out the Mayor who in turn can shake up the police force. It is more an issue of the improper interpretation of the law on the part of those who pick fights with the cops.

Mr. Skinny
26th April 2008, 06:42 PM
Slightly off topic, but back in the day when I was a volunteer cop, I used to sorta enjoy it when someone would say something like " my taxes pay your salary" and I could say " well, I'm a volunteer and I'm protecting this community for free". Usually took the wind right out of their sails.

Drudgewire
26th April 2008, 06:56 PM
Slightly off topic, but back in the day when I was a volunteer cop, I used to sorta enjoy it when someone would say something like " my taxes pay your salary" and I could say " well, I'm a volunteer and I'm protecting this community for free". Usually took the wind right out of their sails.

That's why I could never be a cop. I'd be too tempted to punctuate the point with a good billy clubbin'. :blush:

defaultdotxbe
26th April 2008, 07:03 PM
Good, finally tall people with afros are going to have to sit on the back row at the theatre from now on, or they will be looking at jail time.
ok ive seen this and laughed each of the 3 times ive checked back on this thread, so i feel it warrants a reply, so here is your reply

kookbreaker
26th April 2008, 07:25 PM
Slightly off topic, but back in the day when I was a volunteer cop, I used to sorta enjoy it when someone would say something like " my taxes pay your salary" and I could say " well, I'm a volunteer and I'm protecting this community for free". Usually took the wind right out of their sails.

My roomates back in the early 90's were paying their tuition at college by working the desks at the various dorms. Every now and then some brash undergrad bozo would try to push his way past him and into the dorm with the comment: "My tuition fees pay your salary".

One of them did the calculation.

After that bit of math, he would always keep $.03 on his person, and when they made that comment he would toss the money on the desk and say "Here's your share back, now go **** **** yourself!"

His supervisor took it well.

fuelair
26th April 2008, 07:45 PM
That's why I could never be a cop. I'd be too tempted to punctuate the point with a good billy clubbin'. :blush:
"'Tis a foine idear yuh has there McGinty, that boyo should remember this noggin floggin' awhile, I'm thinkin'!!":D

Brainster
26th April 2008, 08:01 PM
Czajkowski came up on SLC just yesterday. She's got a room temperature IQ--if you live in an igloo.

twinstead
26th April 2008, 08:07 PM
Power to the People! Down with the Man!

Walter Ego
27th April 2008, 05:27 AM
Czajkowski came up on SLC just yesterday. She's got a room temperature IQ--if you live in an igloo.

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/search?q=Czajkowski

So she is a truther as well as an anti-'meskin' MinuteLady? :confused:

Edit: Gawd, I just watched that video of Czajkowski on SLC. What a total airhead! She reminds me of this idiot from the UK in this thread from the politics forum who has a similar 'problem' with the police.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=110855

Mr. Skinny
27th April 2008, 07:08 AM
That's why I could never be a cop. I'd be too tempted to punctuate the point with a good billy clubbin'. :blush:
Usually it would just result in turning what was initially going to be a warning into a traffic ticket (or sometimes an arrest). Some people just don't know when to keep their mouths shut.

CptColumbo
27th April 2008, 07:14 AM
That's a really good point. Next time the President or some other high ranking government official visits your area, you should run up to them really quickly and ask.And reach quickly into your jacket to pull out your ID to show that you are a US citizen.

CptColumbo
27th April 2008, 07:19 AM
No they're not. Supreme Court has basically ruled the job of the police is to uphold the law, not to protect and serve... despite the motto.

You forgot about never disobeying an officer of OCP. Or is that still secret? DAMN!

jhunter1163
27th April 2008, 08:51 AM
If I could ask Christie C. one question, it would be "Ma'am, are you aware of your nose?"

Tweeter
27th April 2008, 03:10 PM
Here we go again with attacking the arguer and not the argument.
Whats with all this name dropping crap?

Myriad
27th April 2008, 07:56 PM
Here we go again with attacking the arguer and not the argument.
Whats with all this name dropping crap?


Well, her argument is basically, "The police failed to protect my rights by not forcing protesters to allow me to harass them during their peaceful protest."

That's such a strong, unassailable, logical argument that no counter-argument is possible. We expect this matter to go all the way to the Supreme Court, resulting in a complete overhaul of police procedures nationwide. As a result, new laws will be passed. One of them will require everyone to bow down whenever a camera is pointed in their direction, to protect the universal absolute rights of photographers to an unimpeded view. Failing to dodge out of the way of a camera shoved in one's direction will be a misdemeanor, and if such failure to yield to a camera results in even the slightest physical contact with the device, it will be a felony. Also, any protesters who do not allow any person to mingle with them unimpeded, regardless of their demeanor, smell, or incompatibility of their message with the aims of the protest, will be immediately arrested or dispersed with tear gas and riot clubs.

Of course, the truth movement will complain about these "Christie's Laws" and call them "repressive" or "police state tactics," but really those new laws will just be enforcing for everyone under all circumstances the rights that Christie herself bravely stood up for for herself that day.

Respectfully,
Myriad

chillzero
28th April 2008, 08:07 AM
Here we go again with attacking the arguer and not the argument.
Whats with all this name dropping crap?

Tweeter,
before you feel the need to post this in any other CT threads, please consider the following:

It relates to arguements as posted on the forum by members, not oustide this venue.
If you feel someone has breached their memebrship agreement in relation to this you should use the report function and not discuss it in a thread.
It is a forum management issue - if you feel the need to discuss this further, please start a new thread in Forum Mgt, and do not post any further on the matter in threads.