View Full Version : A different take on telepathy
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 02:27 AM
I'll start by saying this is theory and only theory. Even if I do consider this to be something beyond science fiction bordering on the paranormal magical realm. I'm a scientist first, a skeptic second and a spiritualist third. Although some people have belief only as black and white. I believe in grey. Grey meaning, anything and everything is possible.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 02:30 AM
Through out mankind as we know it from recorded history to lived experiences we've liked our world to be physical in nature. Physical in nature meaning that it has to be tangible, able to be grasped, proved and explained.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 02:32 AM
To consider the impossible one has to dream and from dreams come possibility. Possibility becomes fact and reality as we know it. I believe in reality, fact but unlike a lot of people I also believe in possibilities and the impossible.
Mojo
3rd May 2008, 02:34 AM
What do you claim to be able to do? How do you propose demonstrating it?
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 02:34 AM
So everything I'm about to talk about to some people should only be taken as a possibility. Although there are black and white, to be grey is possibility, balance. And balance is everything.
Mojo
3rd May 2008, 02:43 AM
Ah, right:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=66157
Are you planning to show up (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=2417562#post2417562) this time?
Ravenwood
3rd May 2008, 02:46 AM
Dargo, you lost any credibility you may have had on these boards after your behavior in this thread:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=2004581#post2004581
give it up already, you made a claim & ran away rather than backing it up. No one is going to listen to you now...
Edited to add: Damn, Mojo beat me to it....
wahrheit
3rd May 2008, 02:53 AM
Ah, right:
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=66157
Are you planning to show up (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=2417562#post2417562) this time?
Wow, the Australians prepared everything for a test, and then Dargo simply didn't show up, without notice.
Dargo, did you really think nobody would remember or search for your old thread?
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 02:58 AM
Great. Comments before I'd said a word. Just for your information. Your credibility can't be brought into question by the simple fact I didn't continue engaging with posters for a extended period. The absence was for a reason which I'm not going to bring to light here. This thread is for a different purpose. If and when I continue the other thread will be at my own discretion.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 03:01 AM
An attempt to disguise a previous thread was never made. The one reason I'm posting on this forum is for the simple fact you're all skeptic. I don't believe in pure blind faith.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 03:02 AM
Before I continue, I'd like to state that everything posted by myself in this thread is copyrighted by myself and has been written before this thread.
Ravenwood
3rd May 2008, 03:03 AM
You certainly don't believe in proving your claims...
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 03:03 AM
Now onto telepathy. I've at one point called this by another name and for good reason (this was my reference to another post which I was writing when someone else beat me to the punch).
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 03:07 AM
Whether I have reason to prove anything will only come later. I never stated I don't believe in proving anything. Also, in this post, this is not my endeavour at this point in time.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 03:14 AM
Although the terms "paranormal", "psychic" and "magic" are common, and could very well be attached to the theme of this thread. What I'm about to propose, I'll be looking at from a scientific point of view. For one reason, my background is heavily scientific and two, at least one point in history, many current sciences were classed as these latter terms.
Ravenwood
3rd May 2008, 03:15 AM
Deeds, not words.... Besides, if this has nothing to do with your MDC application, it is in the wrong forum...
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 03:20 AM
If anyone would like to discuss the ideas of this thread from anything other than, the scientific point of view, let me know. Create a new thread or ask me too. It would be an interesting discussion.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 03:22 AM
There is another thread concerning the MDC application that's current. I've decided to separate the two so as to not confuse discussion.
Ravenwood
3rd May 2008, 03:27 AM
This thread should be in GS&P, if it has nothing to do with your MDC application
Rasmus
3rd May 2008, 03:32 AM
Great. Comments before I'd said a word.
What are you talking about? You have posted both in this thread and the one that has been linked. So, comments are - in any sense of the word - after you've said a word.
Just for your information. Your credibility can't be brought into question by the simple fact I didn't continue engaging with posters for a extended period.
First, I understand from the linked thread that that is not what has been happening.
Secondly, why yes! Yes, it can. Your behaviour is the only basis anyone could have to question your credibility, after all. Discontinuing to talk with someone clearly is what I would label "behaviour".
The absence was for a reason which I'm not going to bring to light here. This thread is for a different purpose. If and when I continue the other thread will be at my own discretion.
See, I don't know you. I've only read a few odd posts in the other thread. Still, I will judge you and your credibility based on what I see.
wahrheit
3rd May 2008, 03:34 AM
If and when I continue the other thread will be at my own discretion.
Before I continue, I'd like to state that everything posted by myself in this thread is copyrighted by myself and has been written before this thread.
Whether I have reason to prove anything will only come later.
You've got to be kidding. We are not here to feed your delusions of grandeur.
This sub-forum is for the MDC, not for blathering about wild theories.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 04:14 AM
Very true is the fact that this and the other thread are linked. However as witnessed from many threads, the discussion usually contained two main elements. One concerning the application and one concerning the what the application is about, as well as many sub-elements, of course.
True, ones behaviour can be judged from the fact they chose to discontinue there discussion for an extended period of time. However, it is also true that many consideration must be taken into account to make such a judge about behaviour. Behaviour can be haphazardly defined in a moment or from a combination of moments. The final judgement shouldn't be made until the end, if there is an end. And there was never an end to the other thread, not yet at least.
Dargo
3rd May 2008, 04:17 AM
What I'll be conveying should neither be considered delusional or wild theories, although both are possibilities.
What I'd be suggesting will also not be included all in one post either. I'm interested in a discussion, not a one shot news piece, as per say.
chillzero
3rd May 2008, 04:39 AM
As this is not about a specific application, it has been moved to the corect forum.
Gord_in_Toronto
3rd May 2008, 09:07 AM
@Dargo
Any chance you can get to your point? I presume you have one? :confused:
Jimbo07
3rd May 2008, 09:22 AM
Before I continue, I'd like to state that everything posted by myself in this thread is copyrighted by myself and has been written before this thread.
If telepathy were real, I doubt you'd be able to seriously enforce certain aspects of your copyright (see the "Dan Brown" court case dealing with "history" ;)).
I predict that nobody's going to want to violate your claim of copyright on this one... :rolleyes:
Gate2501
3rd May 2008, 09:31 AM
Wait wait...
I've got it!
You have the psychic power to click "post" before completing your thoughts, thus resulting in many posts in a row when one would suffice.
William Smith
3rd May 2008, 10:15 AM
Great. Comments before I'd said a word. Just for your information. Your credibility can't be brought into question by the simple fact I didn't continue engaging with posters for a extended period. The absence was for a reason which I'm not going to bring to light here. This thread is for a different purpose.
You had your chance to do a controlled test.
You chose to not show up. Without notice.
Your behaviour in this regard displays a fine example of not acting in good faith, underlined by this:
If and when I continue the other thread will be at my own discretion.
Matlatzinca
3rd May 2008, 10:23 AM
Now onto telepathy. I've at one point called this by another name and for good reason (this was my reference to another post which I was writing when someone else beat me to the punch).
Seems like someone demonstrated both telepathy and precognition. Go Mojo!
nathan
3rd May 2008, 02:42 PM
Oh, I get it. Dargo's using his telepathy power to further this discussion. He's clearly not using the written word to communicate his thoughts.
Gravy
3rd May 2008, 02:52 PM
Grey meaning, anything and everything is possible.
I also believe in possibilities and the impossible.You are sadly and deeply confused.
Paul C. Anagnostopoulos
3rd May 2008, 03:46 PM
Dargo, please put your entire remark in one post, instead of splitting it up across multiple posts. This is not a warning, only a request.
Empress
4th May 2008, 07:18 AM
I count 14 posts by Dargo in this thread thus far. And s/he has yet to make a point regarding what this thread is actually about. :dig:
Dargo, please. Get. To. The. Point.
:mad:
The Atheist
4th May 2008, 11:58 AM
I'm a scientist first, a skeptic second ....
:dl:
padego
4th May 2008, 12:00 PM
This reminds me of the Monty Python skit in which John Cleese has a new theory about dinosaurs...
Gord_in_Toronto
4th May 2008, 12:05 PM
This reminds me of the Monty Python skit in which John Cleese has a new theory about dinosaurs...
I've tried looking at this thread by bending over, looking through my legs and squinting and it still does not look like Stonehenge! :boggled:
ferj
4th May 2008, 12:20 PM
I am one of the few interested in your theories but get on with it.
Beerina
4th May 2008, 12:29 PM
Before trying to explain something, first demonstrate there's something to explain. That the phenomenon exists.
ferj
4th May 2008, 12:50 PM
Before trying to explain something, first demonstrate there's something to explain. That the phenomenon exists.
String theory exists but only as a theory. It may well be a load of garbage but there have been quite a few books published. So give this guy or anyone who wants to post on this forum a chance.
Rasmus
4th May 2008, 01:02 PM
String theory exists but only as a theory. It may well be a load of garbage but there have been quite a few books published. So give this guy or anyone who wants to post on this forum a chance.
Did anyone ban him? If no, then he's every chance in the world. So far, he's used that chance for semi-coherent blathering but has failed to even clearly let us know what he was going on about. There's neither theory nor evidence so far.
Now, I don't even have a clue as to what string theory is, but I'd bet is has some links to the observable reality. I am certain it makes specific predictions or offers an explanation for real phenomenons. Someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though.
Macoy
4th May 2008, 01:13 PM
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/26334648e726eaf0f.jpg (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=5760)
Blimey, is that the time?
The Atheist
4th May 2008, 01:15 PM
String theory exists but only as a theory. It may well be a load of garbage but there have been quite a few books published. So give this guy or anyone who wants to post on this forum a chance.
Did you read the previous thread/s?
Dargo made claims that he has a telepathic ability (previously called "shamathy", apparently) and arranged to take a preliminary test.
In a complete surprise, Matt never turned up to show his stuff.
What chance do you think he should get having been such an obvious troll so far?
Should we give Sylvia Browne another chance? Or maybe another 10 chances?
Dargo - whatever happened to the affidavit from the doctor? That never turned up either.
buzz lightyear
4th May 2008, 02:44 PM
33 posts before you turned up TA.
Soon as I saw the name "Dargo" I put a bet on you showing up on this thread.
What took you so long, prang the car, again, on your way back from the pub.
EHocking
4th May 2008, 03:50 PM
33 posts before you turned up TA.Before you pull the "stalker" finger-pointing - note that it only took one post by TA before you turned up.:p
Soon as I saw the name "Dargo" I put a bet on you showing up on this thread.Hmmm, fairly typical pyschic claim there too - postnostication.
If only you'd posted this "bet" at post 32, then you'd be on to something.
buzz lightyear
4th May 2008, 08:18 PM
Before you pull the "stalker" finger-pointing - note that it only took one post by TA before you turned up.:pHmmm, fairly typical pyschic claim there too - postnostication.
If only you'd posted this "bet" at post 32, then you'd be on to something.
Wha!!!!!......."postnostication".......not me, no way. I never nosticated, in fact I never even inhaled.
Anyway EHocking, this is not about stalking, this is personal.
Early days TA claimed that I was a sock-puppet of Dargo.
Not knowing what "sock-puppet" was I wasnt sure whether to be flattered or annoyed. But now as a veteran I realise if Dargo is a stooge then I should have felt insulted.
So Dargo, old son, cut the crap and impress the ****(rule 10) out of these good folks.
I would hate to have to reignite my vendetta on my good buddy TA:D
The Atheist
5th May 2008, 01:15 AM
33 posts before you turned up TA.
Soon as I saw the name "Dargo" I put a bet on you showing up on this thread.
Might have to change my browsing habits, I don't come in here very often.
What took you so long, prang the car, again, on your way back from the pub.
Uh, as already noted, it took you one more than me. What's your excuse?
;)
Anyway EHocking, this is not about stalking, this is personal.
Early days TA claimed that I was a sock-puppet of Dargo.
Not knowing what "sock-puppet" was I wasnt sure whether to be flattered or annoyed. But now as a veteran I realise if Dargo is a stooge then I should have felt insulted.
Actually Buzz, I do owe you an apology for that, so sorry, mate.
When Dargo stopped posting just as you started and you had [initially] similar-looking claims, I did think you were one and the same. Time has shown you to be consistent in your claims, and while I think your claims are a load of fetid dingo kidneys, I do respect your ability to hold onto them and not be dissuaded by annoying things like facts or evidence. Underneath it all, I think you're an honest enough bloke.
I'd have a beer with you anyday.
(as long as you're paying!)
So Dargo, old son, cut the crap and impress the ****(rule 10) out of these good folks.
I would hate to have to reignite my vendetta on my good buddy TA:D
Vendetta? And here was me thinking were like blood-brothers.
The kind of blood-brothers where one party gives the other AIDS, but brothers nonetheless.
Dargo's just a troll.
Must go back and check out the MySpace - I'll link to it if I can find it; Dargo likes pyramids, too.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.