Zorglub
3rd May 2008, 12:17 PM
Ok, IŽll feed your ego here Heiwa. You refuse to answer what caused the collapse of WTC. But you have no problem claiming that planes, fires and structural collapse wasn't enough to bring down the towers. So far your official reason has been that the question is off topic and doesnŽt belong in whatever thread suchlike questions are asked.
So here it is. Your very own thread to answer our questions and follow-up questions. There is one rule. You donŽt get to call what is O.T or not.
And I know this is hard, but please do not answer by telling us to read you paper or that the answer is somewhere on the internet. Please put forth facts and suchlike here.
1. If crashing planes and raging fires wasnŽt enought to cause the structural. What did and how did it get there. In as much detail as possible. IE: there were explosives hidden in the towers is not a detalied answers. Schematics, logistics, blueprints things like that.
2. You have earlier stated that no planes hit the Pentagon or the WTC-towers. Is this still your viewpoint?
Here we go, the questions are not O.T and therefore I see no obstacle for you to clear up a thing or two.
So here it is. Your very own thread to answer our questions and follow-up questions. There is one rule. You donŽt get to call what is O.T or not.
And I know this is hard, but please do not answer by telling us to read you paper or that the answer is somewhere on the internet. Please put forth facts and suchlike here.
1. If crashing planes and raging fires wasnŽt enought to cause the structural. What did and how did it get there. In as much detail as possible. IE: there were explosives hidden in the towers is not a detalied answers. Schematics, logistics, blueprints things like that.
2. You have earlier stated that no planes hit the Pentagon or the WTC-towers. Is this still your viewpoint?
Here we go, the questions are not O.T and therefore I see no obstacle for you to clear up a thing or two.