PDA

View Full Version : Oh God No!!


ronpaulisright
8th May 2008, 01:16 PM
I'm sorry folks but here is another youtube video. Please watch it. Ron paul could die. Admins, I'm serious about this. I am not a troll. bear with me.

HrEulRuTqco

SpitfireIX
8th May 2008, 01:23 PM
I'm sorry folks but here is another youtube video. Please watch it. Ron paul could die. Admins, I'm serious about this. I am not a troll. bear with me.

HrEulRuTqco


http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/17060472e7643296a7.jpg

elbe
8th May 2008, 01:30 PM
I disagree.

I think they're just annoyed by Ron Paul fanatics acting like they are a bigger movement than they really are.

uk_dave
8th May 2008, 01:38 PM
"Oh God No!!"

It's "The Whicker Man" again

CHF
8th May 2008, 01:52 PM
Are twoofers still unaware that Ron Paul thinks they're nuts?

Spindrift
8th May 2008, 01:59 PM
Ron Paul could die? From what? Embarrassment that Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum represent his support?

So the Trilateral Commission is this super-evil body that is secretly running the world and they can't even secure their meeting agenda from Tweedle-dee?

Gathering intelligence via over-heard conversations in bars? How did they know who they were listening to?

And they think the Republican party is going to give Ron Paul a primetime slot at the convention because he has 50 delegates? If they do let him speak it will be at 2 in the morning where his competition on TV is infomercials and the delegates will be asleep.

And the worst thing is that's 7 minutes and 10 seconds of my life gone forever.

boloboffin
8th May 2008, 02:01 PM
Don't worry. If the Tri-Lateral Commission strikes him down, he shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.

:wackyerr:

GlennB
8th May 2008, 02:08 PM
"Oh God No!!"

It's "The Whicker Man" again

Alan Whicker?? Does this involve spaghetti trees? I can't bear to watch it.

Drudgewire
8th May 2008, 02:16 PM
Are twoofers still unaware that Ron Paul thinks they're nuts?


He just says that publicly so it doesn't hurt his chances in the election.









Oh, wait... :p

Par
8th May 2008, 02:18 PM
Ron paul could die.


Something’s going to steal his carbon.

ronpaulisright
8th May 2008, 02:19 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.

JonathanClement
8th May 2008, 02:26 PM
http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/img/facepalm.jpeg

Why kill him when he doesn't stand a CHANCE of winning? God... -_-

Drudgewire
8th May 2008, 02:28 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.


Or if he is about to lead the San Diego Chargers on the winning drive as time winds down in next year's Super Bowl.

You know, since both are equally likely to happen.

WildCat
8th May 2008, 02:30 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.
I assure you that even if everything you say is correct Ron Paul will not be killed.

Because he has no chance whatsoever of ever being elected President.

Stellafane
8th May 2008, 02:32 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.

No, the key reason Ron Paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he'll have to murder 99% of the electorate before it could happen.

TexasJack
8th May 2008, 02:33 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.

Don't worry, he's safe, he's got about as much chance as getting elected President as Calvin Coolidge does this year, and he's been dead for 75 years.

Bobert
8th May 2008, 02:35 PM
UH OH American Free Press has a 4 pg pullout insert that is supposed to SHOCK the TLC!!!!!
It "tells all about their mischief"
:eek::eek::eek::eek:
What a wuss drinking lemonade in a bar!
I would have believed him had he said he was doing shots of tequila.
LOL the truth movement is awaiting "marching orders" from Ron Paul
:D

1337m4n
8th May 2008, 02:37 PM
Don't "THEY" supposedly have the ability to rig elections, like "THEY" did in 2000 and 2004?

So what's the big deal?

Myriad
8th May 2008, 02:39 PM
I was kind of hoping the link in the OP would be a rickroll.

Alas, it wasn't.

Instead it appears to be a peculiar form of fan fiction blog. Instead of making up weekly fantasy installments about life in the Rebel Alliance in post-Palpatine days, he's making up weekly fantasy installments about the activites of the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group.

Droll, but a waste of everyone else's time.

I believe that the key reason Ron Paul would be killed if he were to become President would be that, since too few people would vote for him to win any electoral votes at all, he'd be guilty of treason for seizing office unconstitutionally.

Respectfully,
Myriad

T.A.M.
8th May 2008, 02:42 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.

Since the bolded is an impossibility, I am nominating this for "super" stundie material.

TAM:)

Par
8th May 2008, 02:42 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.


You brag about the nonsense you believe in the same way that some guys brag about how many chicks they’ve screwed or how many pounds they can bench. It’s like you’re trying to out-do other conspiracy theorists.

ronpaulisright
8th May 2008, 02:43 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.

Giggywig
8th May 2008, 02:48 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.

Is he going to be assassinated even in the unlikely scenario he is not unanimously elected president in November?

Par
8th May 2008, 02:50 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.


There are just so any levels of circular reasoning and abject confusion in that post.

T.A.M.
8th May 2008, 02:51 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.

I tell you what...rpir

If he is assassinated prior to the election, I will admit I was wrong, and that I was pompous and ignorant about the matter.

HOWEVER,

If I am right, you come on this forum, and confess you are a paranoid fool.

Deal???

TAM:)

1337m4n
8th May 2008, 02:52 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.

Care to make this a bet?

http://blogs.venturacountystar.com/dennert/archives/money.jpg

I will stake my money on Ron Paul neither winning the election, nor being assassinated.

Par
8th May 2008, 02:53 PM
[The original post] appears to be a peculiar form of fan fiction blog. Instead of making up weekly fantasy installments about life in the Rebel Alliance in post-Palpatine days, he's making up weekly fantasy installments about the activites of the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group. Droll, but a waste of everyone else's time.


Sheer precision.

uk_dave
8th May 2008, 02:53 PM
Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.

Crikey. You saying Ronnie is immortal?

Drudgewire
8th May 2008, 02:53 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated?

I'll say "wow, he attracted a nut who latched on to him then felt betrayed because he never had a firm hold on reality and had created a fantasy world where they were best friends? Never saw that coming."

TexasJack
8th May 2008, 02:56 PM
I tell you what...rpir

If he is assassinated prior to the election, I will admit I was wrong, and that I was pompous and ignorant about the matter.

HOWEVER,

If I am right, you come on this forum, and confess you are a paranoid fool.

Deal???

TAM:)

It sounds like he actually want Ron Paul to be assassinated.

Stellafane
8th May 2008, 03:12 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.

Actually, most people (myself included) would probably respond more along these lines: "Who got assasinated? Ron who? Who's that? Why would anyone bother?"

sts60
8th May 2008, 03:13 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.
No, no, I will say, "RPIR was right! My grandfather was assassinated too, right after he was elected President!"

Oh, wait...

brodski
8th May 2008, 03:16 PM
"Oh God No!!"

It's "The Whicker Man" again

Summer is a coming in, loudly sing cuckoo...

Corsair 115
8th May 2008, 03:20 PM
Look, everything will be fine in the United States once Canada and Mexico finish their takeover. Okay, you'll have to get used to saying Prime Minister instead of President, and Parliament instead of Congress, but really, these are minor adjustments.

Marquis de Carabas
8th May 2008, 03:21 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated?
Nice shot.

Drudgewire
8th May 2008, 03:23 PM
Nice shot.


What a good shot, man. http://www.lethalwrestling.com/upload/rock.gif

Giggywig
8th May 2008, 03:24 PM
Look, everything will be fine in the United States once Canada and Mexico finish their takeover. Okay, you'll have to get used to saying Prime Minister instead of President, and Parliament instead of Congress, but really, these are minor adjustments.
Not to worry, those are only temporary names while Canadians are allowed to think they are equal partners in the Canada-Mexico plan to invade the US. Once Mexico takes over both, it'll be El Presidente and El Congreso.

Par
8th May 2008, 03:28 PM
What a good shot, man.


That's why I say "Hey man, nice shot".

Storm Warning
8th May 2008, 03:28 PM
Not to worry, those are only temporary names while Canadians are allowed to think they are equal partners in the Canada-Mexico plan to invade the US. Once Mexico takes over both, it'll be El Presidente and El Congreso.
Actually, Canada and Mexico will have equal power, so it'll be El President-eh and El Congres-eh :D

fezzic
8th May 2008, 03:36 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.

Probably a good thing for the most part though (IMO) not for the reasons that most might assume.

:)

Sword_Of_Truth
8th May 2008, 03:39 PM
I'm sorry folks but here is another youtube video. Please watch it. Ron paul could die. Admins, I'm serious about this. I am not a troll. bear with me.

Oh nooooo!!!

Please don't die, Ron Paul?! Please don't die... we need you! You're our only hope!

Corsair 115
8th May 2008, 03:42 PM
Not to worry, those are only temporary names while Canadians are allowed to think they are equal partners in the Canada-Mexico plan to invade the US. Once Mexico takes over both, it'll be El Presidente and El Congreso.Hey, if that means it'll be easy to go south for the winter, I'm okay with that.

SpitfireIX
8th May 2008, 03:49 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated? You'll say "hey, I guess RPIR was right." No I know EXACTLY what you guys will say, "the guy was killed in a bank robbery! my grandpa was killed in a bank robbery. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him" Or "he was 71 years old. my grandpa died when he was 71. does that mean there was a conspiracy to kill him?" stuff similar in that nature.


Republican Delegate Count (http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/06/national-delegate-count-tally/) (Associated Press):

John McCain: 1362
Mike Huckabee: 278
Mitt Romney: 260
Ron Paul: 14

Needed for nomination: 1191

Note that Huckabee and Romney have both endorsed McCain, meaning that presumably at least some of their delegates will vote for him.

So please explain, if you would, RPIR, how Ron Paul, who has ruled out a third-party candidacy, is going to be elected President of the United States.

SpitfireIX
8th May 2008, 03:54 PM
Look, everything will be fine in the United States once Canada and Mexico finish their takeover. Okay, you'll have to get used to saying Prime Minister instead of President, and Parliament instead of Congress, but really, these are minor adjustments.


Three words: War Plan Red. :p

dudalb
8th May 2008, 04:01 PM
How long until the American Free Press starts hinting that the You Know Whos are behind the plot to kill Ron Paul.....
ronpaulisright needs a little work in the critical thinking department.
I take that back.He needs a LOT of work in that department.

Corsair 115
8th May 2008, 04:04 PM
Three words: War Plan Red. :pFour words: Easier said than done. :D

Finnegan
8th May 2008, 04:09 PM
Something’s going to steal his carbon.

Reports suggest that he fits like clothes made out of wasps (http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fpBHaoA5aGc).

ihaunter
8th May 2008, 04:16 PM
I wonder if this is some kind of defense mechanism for their delusion that Ron Paul could win. Now, if he drops out, it's because he was worried about his safety, not the fact that he didn't stand a chance at even getting the nomination, much less win the election.

Par
8th May 2008, 04:24 PM
Reports suggest that he fits like clothes made out of wasps (http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fpBHaoA5aGc).


Good. I was wondering when someone would get my reference.

parky76
8th May 2008, 04:25 PM
Why would anyone kill Ron Paul? He has no hope of winning national office...let alone a church raffle. His ship has sailed..and he is still on shore.

The only way he will die from foul play, is if he stages his own assassination, inorder to jump start "the revolution".

Truthers are just crazy enough to try something like that.

dudalb
8th May 2008, 04:25 PM
I wonder if this is some kind of defense mechanism for their delusion that Ron Paul could win. Now, if he drops out, it's because he was worried about his safety, not the fact that he didn't stand a chance at even getting the nomination, much less win the election.

Just the latest delusion in a long line of delusions.
I think the Ronulans are dividied between this theory and the fantasy that they can somehow stage a coup at GOP conventions and win the nomination for Paul that way. They are off to a great start with what happened in Nevada.
I expect much amusement and laughs from the antics of the Ronuland at the GOP convention in the Twin Cities, though.

T.A.M.
8th May 2008, 04:33 PM
exactly.

Without a theory that includes RP's assassination, there is no potential climax to the exciting action novel that is the truthers world of insanity and paranoia.

TAM:)

TexasJack
8th May 2008, 04:44 PM
I think killed is the proper word here, you have to be famous to be assassinated.

boloboffin
8th May 2008, 04:45 PM
Look, everything will be fine in the United States once Canada and Mexico finish their takeover. Okay, you'll have to get used to saying Prime Minister instead of President, and Parliament instead of Congress, but really, these are minor adjustments.

We'll also have to give up calling it Canadian bacon and just say round ham. Having universal health coverage will make it worth it.

Sword_Of_Truth
8th May 2008, 04:49 PM
The NWO doesn't have to lift a finger to deal with Ron Paul.

All they have to do is give him bad directions to some conference or some such thing so that he ends up in Harlem or South Central L.A. in a car with stacks of the "Ron Paul Newsletter" plainly visible in the back seat.

He then becomes a "self rectifying" problem.

Foolmewunz
8th May 2008, 05:27 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated?

We discussed this at last week's meeting and haven't decided, yet. It's down to two choices:

1. I did it to impress Jodie Foster.
2. Hey, I wuz playing cards all night with Vinnie Pestalanzi and Sally No-Gums Minella. We got a coupla t'ree people what can say we wuz dere.

Gazpacho
8th May 2008, 05:40 PM
What are you "critical thinkers" gonna say once ron paul is assassinated?
I dunno. Maybe I'll post this:

vTEKLFlJun8

Pato2747
8th May 2008, 06:25 PM
Just a side question I was always wondering:

If the US 'election' is rigged, and it's just being modified by the global elite/whatever; how come we should vote for Ron Paul? The results would be changed by the gubmint, anyways.

Confuseling
8th May 2008, 06:35 PM
He's the black one right?

Pato2747
8th May 2008, 07:03 PM
He's the black one right?

No, that's Huckabee. Ron Paul is the blonde one.

Confuseling
8th May 2008, 07:24 PM
Was he in that film, with that girl, when they're driving? You know.

Elizabeth I
8th May 2008, 07:24 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.

He must be so relieved then that he doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected.

Oh nooooo!!!

Please don't die, Ron Paul?! Please don't die... we need you! You're our only hope!

No, that's Obi Wan.

Cl1mh4224rd
8th May 2008, 07:26 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.


That would be very suspicious indeed. A man with a statistically negligible chance of winning the presidency is suddenly elected President, and then goes on to "silence" the CIA.

Hmmm...

Drudgewire
8th May 2008, 07:46 PM
Having just re-read the OP:


Admins, I'm serious about this. I am not a troll. bear with me.


I can't believe I fell for it. :o

OK fess up. Which one of you is rpir. I know you've been giggling like a schoolgirl for the last day or so but it's time to come clean.

pomeroo
8th May 2008, 07:50 PM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.


Do you find it at all inconvenient that Ron Paul ended his campaign for the presidency months ago and is concentrating on holding his seat in Congress?

pomeroo
8th May 2008, 07:54 PM
Republican Delegate Count (http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/06/national-delegate-count-tally/) (Associated Press):

John McCain: 1362
Mike Huckabee: 278
Mitt Romney: 260
Ron Paul: 14

Needed for nomination: 1191

Note that Huckabee and Romney have both endorsed McCain, meaning that presumably at least some of their delegates will vote for him.

So please explain, if you would, RPIR, how Ron Paul, who has ruled out a third-party candidacy, is going to be elected President of the United States.



Shhhh!

I shouldn't reveal this, but I have participated in some NWO planning sessions. Without giving away too many details about the Paul assassination, I can tell you that live baboons figure prominently in it.

I Ratant
8th May 2008, 07:58 PM
The local Ron Paul supporters are living examples of the old saw:
"Out of the mouths of babies, comes babble."

Drudgewire
8th May 2008, 07:59 PM
Shhhh!

I shouldn't reveal this, but I have participated in some NWO planning sessions. Without giving away too many details about the Paul assassination, I can tell you that live baboons figure prominently in it.

Well duh. Why bring in a new crew when we've already had the baboons on Paul since they first wrote those fake newletters with Ron's signature on them YEARS ago? :D

Par
8th May 2008, 08:01 PM
Shhhh! I shouldn't reveal this, but I have participated in some NWO planning sessions. Without giving away too many details about the Paul assassination, I can tell you that live baboons figure prominently in it.


It's Mandrills now.

parky76
8th May 2008, 08:17 PM
baboons? what happened to the circus clowns??

why do they keep on changing plans on me? this sucks.

Spindrift
8th May 2008, 08:55 PM
Republican Delegate Count (http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/06/national-delegate-count-tally/) (Associated Press):

John McCain: 1362
Mike Huckabee: 278
Mitt Romney: 260
Ron Paul: 14

Needed for nomination: 1191

Note that Huckabee and Romney have both endorsed McCain, meaning that presumably at least some of their delegates will vote for him.

So please explain, if you would, RPIR, how Ron Paul, who has ruled out a third-party candidacy, is going to be elected President of the United States.
Obviously the plan is for a write-in campaign. If Ron Paul won't run as a third-party his tens of millions of supporters will simply rise up and write him in.

Of course there are two small problems with that plan.
1) There aren't tens of millions of Ron Paul supporters.
2) Of the Ron Paul supporters that actually exist only 17.9% are capable of figuring out how to write in someone. And of course that's an optimistic percentage.

Hokulele
8th May 2008, 09:04 PM
Obviously the plan is for a write-in campaign. If Ron Paul won't run as a third-party his tens of millions of supporters will simply rise up and write him in.

Of course there are two small problems with that plan.
1) There aren't tens of millions of Ron Paul supporters.
2) Of the Ron Paul supporters that actually exist only 17.9% are capable of figuring out how to write in someone. And of course that's an optimistic percentage.


3) Of that 17.9% who are capable, only 10% are old enough to vote.

SpitfireIX
8th May 2008, 09:21 PM
Obviously the plan is for a write-in campaign. If Ron Paul won't run as a third-party his tens of millions of supporters will simply rise up and write him in.

Of course there are two small problems with that plan.
1) There aren't tens of millions of Ron Paul supporters.
2) Of the Ron Paul supporters that actually exist only 17.9% are capable of figuring out how to write in someone. And of course that's an optimistic percentage.


Yep, you're right; I found a couple of sites that are advocating a write-in campaign, so they probably will use that claim. To which I cleverly respond, "if Ron Paul has enough support to win the general election as a write-in candidate, how come he's done so poorly in the Republican primaries and caucuses??

The Doc
8th May 2008, 09:34 PM
No one wants to kill Ron Paul. The only people that actually care that much about Ron Paul are Ron Paul fanboys.

Unsecured Coins
8th May 2008, 09:35 PM
Don't worry, he's safe, he's got about as much chance as getting elected President as Calvin Coolidge does this year, and he's been dead for 75 years.

Hey man... it could happen....

WildCat
8th May 2008, 09:39 PM
To which I cleverly respond, "if Ron Paul has enough support to win the general election as a write-in candidate, how come he's done so poorly in the Republican primaries and caucuses??
Duh, everyone knows that Diebold rigged the primary elections! Look at any internet poll, Ron Paul actually has the support of 76% of the population!

/paulbot

JimBenArm
8th May 2008, 09:41 PM
Assasinate Ron Paul? Not going to happen.
Gun down some idiots who post his GD campaign signs all over the place, to the point you can't even turn around without knocking 5 or 6 of them over? Now there's something I can believe in...

pomeroo
8th May 2008, 09:43 PM
baboons? what happened to the circus clowns??

why do they keep on changing plans on me? this sucks.



The baboons will work for less money.

jaydeehess
8th May 2008, 09:57 PM
I tell you what...rpir

If he is assassinated prior to the election, I will admit I was wrong, and that I was pompous and ignorant about the matter.

HOWEVER,

If I am right, you come on this forum, and confess you are a paranoid fool.

Deal???

TAM:)

Count me in on that too. IF Ron Paul is elected I'll start getting worried. Not because of the trivial matter of having to tell rpir that he was right If RP is then bumped off, but because so many people south of my nation's border suffered a mental breakdown and voted for him.

CurtC
8th May 2008, 10:10 PM
I can't believe I fell for it. :o

OK fess up. Which one of you is rpir. I know you've been giggling like a schoolgirl for the last day or so but it's time to come clean.

I'm starting to think that too. His posts are vacuous but manage to push our buttons. I mean - multiple mention of the "articles of zion" - that's someone who's playing around with this board. I don't think he's real.

Foolmewunz
9th May 2008, 12:31 AM
I sort of agree that he's yanking our chains (I better - I've been arguing that in a few threads already), but I keep being reminded of that episode of Star Trek where some omnilord turned out to be a pouty infant when you considered that beings from his galazy lived for like a katrillion years.

He(she)'s either playing us or a child.

chillzero
9th May 2008, 03:00 AM
From the video .... why would you want some guy in a bar to 'be your ass and ears' ???

Dave_46
9th May 2008, 03:29 AM
Alan Whicker?? Does this involve spaghetti trees? I can't bear to watch it.

Wasn't the spaghetti harvest Richard Dimbleby, not Alan Whicker.

(You probably have to be an ageing Brit to remember).

Dave

uk_dave
9th May 2008, 03:58 AM
It was because of the failure of the spaghetti harvest that richard dumbledore had alan whicker burned in the full size wicca trade towers on november 9th 2001.......

....or something.

Needless to say the video posted by RPIR is a couple of know nothing non-entities fantasising together about a non-event concerning a non-runner.

Now, back to brit ekl..... I mean, the whicker man...

bonavada
9th May 2008, 04:33 AM
Needless to say the video posted by RPIR is a couple of know nothing non-entities fantasising together about a non-event concerning a non-runner


And the source was a earwigging barman...they should pop into my local one night, they would get enough material to start 5 revolutions.


Now, back to brit ekl..... I mean, the whicker man...


You mean this young lady. I mean would you? Be honest. After a long night in the above establishment I might. I suppose :-]

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/8748482425f095969.jpg




BV

ronpaulisright
9th May 2008, 04:37 AM
Republican Delegate Count (http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/06/national-delegate-count-tally/) (Associated Press):

John McCain: 1362
Mike Huckabee: 278
Mitt Romney: 260
Ron Paul: 14

Needed for nomination: 1191

Note that Huckabee and Romney have both endorsed McCain, meaning that presumably at least some of their delegates will vote for him.

So please explain, if you would, RPIR, how Ron Paul, who has ruled out a third-party candidacy, is going to be elected President of the United States.

Brokered convention? Something can happen at the convention? Quick, somebody check the rules!

ronpaulisright
9th May 2008, 04:40 AM
Just a side question I was always wondering:

If the US 'election' is rigged, and it's just being modified by the global elite/whatever; how come we should vote for Ron Paul? The results would be changed by the gubmint, anyways.

That's a good point. I think the votes were already tainted in the primaries. Paul got more delegates than that I just know it. Something fishy had to have happened to get that psycho mccain as the nominee.

uk_dave
9th May 2008, 04:47 AM
That's a good point. I think the votes were already tainted in the primaries. Paul got more delegates than that I just know it. Something fishy had to have happened to get that psycho mccain as the nominee.

You have an awful lot of growing up to do.

ronpaulisright
9th May 2008, 05:11 AM
Ok. lets see If I can answer all your questions, pomeroo you are wrong he is still in the race and is still campaigning, he has been to indiana and nevada and north carolina campaigning, also the main plan for supporters is to become a delegate so that when the convention comes they can vote him in I guess. It doesn't matter to me everyone I know is writing in spongebob so I am still gonna vote for the person I voted for in the primaries, and that's ron paul. Also pato, you make a good point so I leave you people with this. 656Z5p63Y4s

fuelair
9th May 2008, 05:14 AM
"Oh God No!!"

It's "The Whicker Man" againI believe that is supposed to be "The Whackoff Man".:)

Cuddles
9th May 2008, 05:29 AM
I NOW believe that a key reason ron paul will be killed if he is elected president is because he wants to abolish the CIA.

Actually, it's exactly the other way around. Ron Paul wants to abolish the CIA because he's going to be killed. Obviously he hoped he could get them before they got him.

SpitfireIX
9th May 2008, 05:53 AM
Brokered convention? Something can happen at the convention? Quick, somebody check the rules!


Sigh. A brokered convention occurs when no candidate is able to win the nomination on the first ballot. Whether Republican delegates are required to vote for their candidates on the first ballot varies from state to state (about 80% are); however, before you get too excited about this, bear in mind that most of McCain's delegates were hand-picked by his campaign for their loyalty to him. (In most states, candidates submit slates of delegates; the better a candidate does, the more of his or her delegates are selected to go to the national convention.)

At this point, only two things can happen to deny McCain the nomination. First, he could suffer a serious health problem that would require him to withdraw from the race. Second, some gigantic skeleton could fall out of his closet, causing overwhelming pressure on him to withdraw. In either event, however, McCain's delegates still get to vote for the nominee. And, news flash, they won't be voting for Ron Paul.

mrbaracuda
9th May 2008, 06:04 AM
Don't worry. If the Tri-Lateral Commission strikes him down, he shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.

:wackyerr:

:eek:

Heh. Imagine McCain saying in their epic battle for POTUS "It's over Paul, I got the high ground!"

6pV3Z8-q3gU

:dl:

Drudgewire
9th May 2008, 07:08 AM
It doesn't matter to me everyone I know is writing in spongebob so I am still gonna vote for the person I voted for in the primaries, and that's ron paul.

Spongebob? You mean the disinfo agent who uses camera tricks to explain away how the towers were able to come down without explosives?

3JkCP42hkKc

Hehehe, that's the first time I've been to my youtube page in a while. It actually wound up getting a few comments. :D

Spindrift
9th May 2008, 08:06 AM
Brokered convention? Something can happen at the convention? Quick, somebody check the rules!

There's no chance of the Republican convention being brokered. There is a slim outside chance of the Democratic convention being brokered. Is Paul going to try to get Democratic nomination? I think Pat Buchanan has a better chance.

Yes, something can happen at the convention. But that usually involves lots of alcohol and escorts. Otherwise not much really happens.

This is what makes the Paulbots so endearing. Their downright refusal to accept reality. It's almost child-like. Well given their ages, I guess that's not surprising.

jhunter1163
9th May 2008, 08:17 AM
What if McCain were to die? Would we see a sudden resurgence in corn-dog consumption? Would "Mitt" no longer just refer to a piece of baseball equipment? And just who DID put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp? Stay tuned...

Sabrina
9th May 2008, 12:00 PM
I sort of agree that he's yanking our chains (I better - I've been arguing that in a few threads already), but I keep being reminded of that episode of Star Trek where some omnilord turned out to be a pouty infant when you considered that beings from his galazy lived for like a katrillion years.

He(she)'s either playing us or a child.

IIRC, that's the Squire of Gothos episode of ST:TOS. Trelayne was his name, I believe. And I believe they later tied him into being a member of the Q, the omnipotent beings who tried to put humanity on trial in the first episode of ST:TNG.

Sue me; I'm a Trekker geek. :p [/derail]

Elizabeth I
9th May 2008, 12:05 PM
It doesn't matter to me everyone I know is writing in spongebob so I am still gonna vote for the person I voted for in the primaries, and that's ron paul. Also pato, you make a good point so I leave you people with this. 656Z5p63Y4s

[bolding added]

This explains so much...

dudalb
9th May 2008, 02:12 PM
I am sure "something" involving Ron Paul will happen at the Natiional GOP convention.
A bunch of Ronulans will make fools of themselved on the convention floor and up getting asked to leave,that is what will happen.

ronpaulisright
9th May 2008, 04:21 PM
Sigh. A brokered convention occurs when no candidate is able to win the nomination on the first ballot. Whether Republican delegates are required to vote for their candidates on the first ballot varies from state to state (about 80% are); however, before you get too excited about this, bear in mind that most of McCain's delegates were hand-picked by his campaign for their loyalty to him. (In most states, candidates submit slates of delegates; the better a candidate does, the more of his or her delegates are selected to go to the national convention.)

At this point, only two things can happen to deny McCain the nomination. First, he could suffer a serious health problem that would require him to withdraw from the race. Second, some gigantic skeleton could fall out of his closet, causing overwhelming pressure on him to withdraw. In either event, however, McCain's delegates still get to vote for the nominee. And, news flash, they won't be voting for Ron Paul.


ok then explain warren G. harding and Lincoln and other men who were nominated via brokered convention?

parky76
9th May 2008, 04:28 PM
If Ron Paul becomes the Republican nominee, I will give "ronpaulisright" $100.

Drudgewire
9th May 2008, 04:31 PM
ok then explain warren G. harding and Lincoln and other men who were nominated via brokered convention?

Ummm... he just did. Both of those conventions had situations where nobody had a high enough majority of delegate votes to be declared the winner. Lincoln had large support going in, and Harding snuck in by being dishonest about whether there were any potential scandals were out there.

NEWSFLASH: RON PAUL ALREADY HAS A SCANDAL WEIGHING HIM DOWN!!

As dudalb said, unless McCain d... oh damnit, I forgot. You're just a gimmick.

Got me again. :o

dudalb
9th May 2008, 04:47 PM
ok then explain warren G. harding and Lincoln and other men who were nominated via brokered convention?

Now I am convinced this guy is just pushing out buttons. I have real problems that anybody could be so dumb not to understand the difference between Lincoln and Harding (where nobody had enough delegates to nominate) and McCain (who already has more then enough to nominate by a confortable margin).

ronpaulisright
9th May 2008, 04:51 PM
Now I am convinced this guy is just pushing out buttons. I have real problems that anybody could be so dumb not to understand the difference between Lincoln and Harding (where nobody had enough delegates to nominate) and McCain (who already has more then enough to nominate by a confortable margin).

It's not that I don't know I just didn't research it.

dudalb
9th May 2008, 04:55 PM
It's not that I don't know I just didn't research it.

:hb::hb::hb::hb:


You really are determined to get a Stundie,are'nt you?

Elizabeth I
9th May 2008, 05:06 PM
It's not that I don't know I just didn't research it.

You knew that Lincoln and Harding were nominated at brokered conventions but not the circumstances surrounding those occurrences?

You aren't for real, are you?

Admit it. Somebody put you up to this. You're trying to win a bet or something.

pomeroo
9th May 2008, 05:18 PM
That's a good point. I think the votes were already tainted in the primaries. Paul got more delegates than that I just know it. Something fishy had to have happened to get that psycho mccain as the nominee.


Are you saying that you have merely pretended to be crazy? Your whole schtick is just a parody of a really dumb, delusional twoofer?

pomeroo
9th May 2008, 05:24 PM
Ok. lets see If I can answer all your questions, pomeroo you are wrong he is still in the race and is still campaigning, he has been to indiana and nevada and north carolina campaigning, also the main plan for supporters is to become a delegate so that when the convention comes they can vote him in I guess. It doesn't matter to me everyone I know is writing in spongebob so I am still gonna vote for the person I voted for in the primaries, and that's ron paul. Also pato, you make a good point so I leave you people with this. 656Z5p63Y4s


Um, I'll be your straight man and point out that the Republican race ended two months ago. No one is campaigning anywhere for the Republican nomination because John McCain has won. Ron Paul is no longer running for President. He is trying to retain his congressional seat. :boggled:

SpitfireIX
9th May 2008, 05:32 PM
That's a good point. I think the votes were already tainted in the primaries. Paul got more delegates than that I just know it. Something fishy had to have happened to get that psycho mccain as the nominee.


John McCain is undoubtedly more mentally stable than you are, but any more such comments belong in the Politics forum, and not here.

SpitfireIX
9th May 2008, 05:43 PM
Um, I'll be your straight man and point out that the Republican race ended two months ago. No one is campaigning anywhere for the Republican nomination because John McCain has won. Ron Paul is no longer running for President. He is trying to retain his congressional seat. :boggled:


Actually, RP is dead, but he won't lie down. He had a campaign rally here in Fort Wayne the night before the primary. I was going to go and ask him to explicitly denounce the "truth" movement, but I had to help set up the polling place where I was working, and get to bed in time to get up at 03:30. :(

Foolmewunz
9th May 2008, 05:44 PM
If Ron Paul becomes the Republican nominee, I will give "ronpaulisright" $100.


I'll see your hundred and raise you a hundred. (I can't go much higher, I've got a million dong riding on a Martin Timothy "The End is Near" thread.)

mrbaracuda
9th May 2008, 05:47 PM
You aren't for real, are you?

Admit it. Somebody put you up to this. You're trying to win a bet or something.

Let's see:

- his name is "ronpaulisright"
- he supports Ron Paul
- he's a fan of the constitution, yet wouldn't grant the rights in there to people who "don't know their rights"
- he doesn't seem to understand simple sentences or coherent structures
- he shows off what I'd like to call "twoofer syndrome"; see "I haven't researched this"
- he somehow missed Ron Paul is out of the race for POTUS


Yes Lizzy, we better hope he's doing this for a bet, anything else would be very sad. :(
Maybe though he's got a banner on his basement wall reading "Interweb Hermits for Paul". :D

pomeroo
9th May 2008, 05:48 PM
Actually, RP is dead, but he won't lie down. He had a campaign rally here in Fort Wayne the night before the primary. I was going to go and ask him to explicitly denounce the "truth" movement, but I had to help set up the polling place where I was working, and get to bed in time to get up at 03:30. :(


I'm confused. Who is funding these "rallies" for a non-candidate in a race that has ended?

jaydeehess
9th May 2008, 05:52 PM
Let's see:

- his name is "ronpaulisright"
- he supports Ron Paul
- he's a fan of the constitution, yet wouldn't grant the rights in there to people who "don't know their rights"
- he doesn't seem to understand simple sentences or coherent structures
- he shows off what I'd like to call "twoofer syndrome"; see "I haven't researched this"
- he somehow missed Ron Paul is out of the race for POTUS


Yes Lizzy, we better hope he's doing this for a bet, anything else would be very sad. :(
Maybe though he's got a banner on his basement wall reading "Interweb Hermits for Paul". :D

Its not a basement! Its a command bunker!:boggled:

SpitfireIX
10th May 2008, 02:48 PM
I'm confused. Who is funding these "rallies" for a non-candidate in a race that has ended?


From Robert Novak's column (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/michelle_vetoes_hillary.html) appearing on Rear Clear Politics just this morning:

Not only has Rep. Ron Paul's ongoing presidential candidacy continued to record a substantial vote against John McCain in primary elections, but Paul advocates also forced an unprepared Nevada Republican Party establishment to abruptly adjourn last month's state convention in Reno selecting delegates to the national convention. The meeting has not yet been reconvened.

With a majority at the state convention supporting Paul, several national convention delegates pledged to the insurgent candidate were ready to be elected. State Sen. Bob Beers, the state convention chairman, abruptly adjourned the session. He later explained, "We were overtime on our contract for our convention space" and "were paying our stagehands and audio-video technicians overtime."

A footnote: Paul has made clear on several occasions there is no chance that he ever will endorse McCain for president. [bolding mine]


From Ron Paul's web site:

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/170604825e8c8d8063.jpg


:rolleyes:


Evidently Paul is still accepting campaign donations. Also, when I went to the Inspectors' meeting last Saturday, there were two Ron Paul bots outside the City-County Building handing out literature to people coming in for early voting. When I went back in to vote after taking my forms and machine-activation cards out to my car, they'd been relieved by two others.

Finally, to RPIR: Note the bolded statement in the above quote. Exactly how likely do you think that all of those delegates who currently support McCain would be to switch to Ron Paul if McCain were somehow forced to drop out? :pigsfly :pigsfly :pigsfly

ronpaulisright
10th May 2008, 03:24 PM
From Robert Novak's column (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/michelle_vetoes_hillary.html) appearing on Rear Clear Politics just this morning:




From Ron Paul's web site:

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/170604825e8c8d8063.jpg


:rolleyes:


Evidently Paul is still accepting campaign donations. Also, when I went to the Inspectors' meeting last Saturday, there were two Ron Paul bots outside the City-County Building handing out literature to people coming in for early voting. When I went back in to vote after taking my forms and machine-activation cards out to my car, they'd been relieved by two others.

Finally, to RPIR: Note the bolded statement in the above quote. Exactly how likely do you think that all of those delegates who currently support McCain would be to switch to Ron Paul if McCain were somehow forced to drop out? :pigsfly :pigsfly :pigsfly

being that both man are the same age, mccain could pass, which will be sad, because I will give him only two credits of merit, he is a war hero, and he has a good speech voice. other than that, he is just absolutely DREADFUL! OR, the fact that john mccain was a CLIENT to the madam who "killed herself". Don't be so foolish to think that that won't come up, because it WILL! When the public finds out that johnny was screwing whores on the side thus connecting him on the conspiracy that the D.C. madam was murdered because of the clout that these movers and shakers had. So already, without even being nominated officially for the party, there is already dirt on john mccain for the general election.

ronpaulisright
10th May 2008, 03:30 PM
they will expose mccain for the whore lover that he is, and ron paul will then get the nomination, and then, sadly, he will be assassinated. But off of that assassination, the american people will roar against the establishment and cause a HUGE conflict, maybe even a war, the war they have been executing since the 80's. a war against you. The people. The people Vs. the tyrannical state. A revolution that is NEEDED! THAT IS NECESSARY!

Alareth
10th May 2008, 03:36 PM
Is Ron Paul even a blip on the radar of public awareness anymore?

I have to take a few moments to remind myself of who he even is whenever one of the paulbots brings him up.

pomeroo
10th May 2008, 03:41 PM
From Robert Novak's column (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/05/michelle_vetoes_hillary.html) appearing on Rear Clear Politics just this morning:




From Ron Paul's web site:

http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/170604825e8c8d8063.jpg


:rolleyes:


Evidently Paul is still accepting campaign donations. Also, when I went to the Inspectors' meeting last Saturday, there were two Ron Paul bots outside the City-County Building handing out literature to people coming in for early voting. When I went back in to vote after taking my forms and machine-activation cards out to my car, they'd been relieved by two others.

Finally, to RPIR: Note the bolded statement in the above quote. Exactly how likely do you think that all of those delegates who currently support McCain would be to switch to Ron Paul if McCain were somehow forced to drop out? :pigsfly :pigsfly :pigsfly



Wow! Just--WOW!

If John McCain, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Jeb Bush, Charlie Crist, and a host of other Republican governors and senators all vanished at once, Ron Paul would still have no chance--none--zero--of getting the nomination.

pomeroo
10th May 2008, 03:44 PM
they will expose mccain for the whore lover that he is, and ron paul will then get the nomination, and then, sadly, he will be assassinated. But off of that assassination, the american people will roar against the establishment and cause a HUGE conflict, maybe even a war, the war they have been executing since the 80's. a war against you. The people. The people Vs. the tyrannical state. A revolution that is NEEDED! THAT IS NECESSARY!



I occasionally host a talk show sponsored by the N.Y. Libertarian Party and I've spent a great deal of time on libertarian discussion forums. I know exactly how strange your world is.

ronpaulisright
10th May 2008, 04:17 PM
You knew that Lincoln and Harding were nominated at brokered conventions but not the circumstances surrounding those occurrences?

You aren't for real, are you?

Admit it. Somebody put you up to this. You're trying to win a bet or something.

correct. I didn't go straight to wikipedia like you because my internet was behaving very slowly.

T.A.M.
10th May 2008, 04:43 PM
they will expose mccain for the whore lover that he is, and ron paul will then get the nomination, and then, sadly, he will be assassinated. But off of that assassination, the american people will roar against the establishment and cause a HUGE conflict, maybe even a war, the war they have been executing since the 80's. a war against you. The people. The people Vs. the tyrannical state. A revolution that is NEEDED! THAT IS NECESSARY!

Holy freakin' "Out of this world loony toon bat man!!"

I almost spit out my drink reading the above diatribe of lunacy!

TAM:)

mrbaracuda
10th May 2008, 04:46 PM
I occasionally host a talk show sponsored by the N.Y. Libertarian Party and I've spent a great deal of time on libertarian discussion forums. I know exactly how strange your world is.

That bad, eh? :covereyes

ronpaulisright
10th May 2008, 05:26 PM
Holy freakin' "Out of this world loony toon bat man!!"

I almost spit out my drink reading the above diatribe of lunacy!

TAM:)

yeah laugh about it. it's easy to say, "AH! conspiracy theorist! Truther! You're a nut" laugh at it dude. Go ahead laugh. make fun.

Make fun "critical thinkers". mccain being a whorelover could cause him to lose the nomination. you don't think this is at least 5% possible? The dirt will resurface. They can murder 500 madams, they will NOT silence the truth. The truth will always be revealed!

mrbaracuda
10th May 2008, 05:49 PM
yeah laugh about it. it's easy to say, "AH! conspiracy theorist! Truther! You're a nut" laugh at it dude. Go ahead laugh. make fun.

You're also a truther?

Make fun "critical thinkers". mccain being a whorelover could cause him to lose the nomination. you don't think this is at least 5% possible? The dirt will resurface. They can murder 500 madams, they will NOT silence the truth. The truth will always be revealed!

They?
Anyway, you don't honestly believe Paul has any chance of winning even if McCain died of a heart attack, do you? :rolleyes:

tomwaits
10th May 2008, 06:00 PM
i consider myself a libertarian with a lowercase "L", but it does make me worrisome when i see how many libertarians are actually survivalist conspiracy whackos.

T.A.M.
10th May 2008, 06:17 PM
yeah laugh about it. it's easy to say, "AH! conspiracy theorist! Truther! You're a nut" laugh at it dude. Go ahead laugh. make fun.

Make fun "critical thinkers". mccain being a whorelover could cause him to lose the nomination. you don't think this is at least 5% possible? The dirt will resurface. They can murder 500 madams, they will NOT silence the truth. The truth will always be revealed!

ok, who is this really. Even the most severe RP cultists are not this insane. Come on, confess, who are you, and why are you yanking our chains like this??

TAM:eek:

Drudgewire
10th May 2008, 06:54 PM
Anyway, you don't honestly believe Paul has any chance of winning even if McCain died of a heart attack, do you? :rolleyes:


Probably not, but he's a pretty good parody of the type of person who does. :p

pomeroo
10th May 2008, 07:01 PM
That bad, eh? :covereyes


When people are talking about how wonderful society would be if police and fire departments were privatized, you get the idea that we're not in Kansas anymore.

pomeroo
10th May 2008, 07:03 PM
yeah laugh about it. it's easy to say, "AH! conspiracy theorist! Truther! You're a nut" laugh at it dude. Go ahead laugh. make fun.

Make fun "critical thinkers". mccain being a whorelover could cause him to lose the nomination. you don't think this is at least 5% possible? The dirt will resurface. They can murder 500 madams, they will NOT silence the truth. The truth will always be revealed!


There is nothing to suggest that McCain is a "whorelover." Why do loons believe that they have some sort of right to slander people?

BenBurch
10th May 2008, 07:21 PM
When people are talking about how wonderful society would be if police and fire departments were privatized, you get the idea that we're not in Kansas anymore.

We used to do that, you know.

You would subscribe to a fire company for fire-fighting service.

They would issue you a medallion to affix to your fencepost that had their logo on it.

When there was a fire, and the fire company came out, if they found that you had no medallion, or if the medallion was one for a different fire company, they went home and let your building burn down, or if there were buildings they were hired to protect in the vicinity, they would work only to keep those from becoming involved.

pomeroo
10th May 2008, 07:29 PM
We used to do that, you know.

You would subscribe to a fire company for fire-fighting service.

They would issue you a medallion to affix to your fencepost that had their logo on it.

When there was a fire, and the fire company came out, if they found that you had no medallion, or if the medallion was one for a different fire company, they went home and let your building burn down, or if there were buildings they were hired to protect in the vicinity, they would work only to keep those from becoming involved.


Yoicks!

Brainache
10th May 2008, 07:35 PM
We used to do that, you know.

You would subscribe to a fire company for fire-fighting service.

They would issue you a medallion to affix to your fencepost that had their logo on it.

When there was a fire, and the fire company came out, if they found that you had no medallion, or if the medallion was one for a different fire company, they went home and let your building burn down, or if there were buildings they were hired to protect in the vicinity, they would work only to keep those from becoming involved.

This reminds me of of the civic policies of Havelock Vetinari as reported in the series of historical novels by Terry Pratchett.

Mr. Skinny
10th May 2008, 07:54 PM
We used to do that, you know.

You would subscribe to a fire company for fire-fighting service.

They would issue you a medallion to affix to your fencepost that had their logo on it.

When there was a fire, and the fire company came out, if they found that you had no medallion, or if the medallion was one for a different fire company, they went home and let your building burn down, or if there were buildings they were hired to protect in the vicinity, they would work only to keep those from becoming involved.
Very true. That sorta helped give rise to fire insurance companies as well.

And those fire company medallions are quite collectible....

defaultdotxbe
11th May 2008, 09:51 AM
Second, some gigantic skeleton could fall out of his closet, causing overwhelming pressure on him to withdraw.
well there is the whole being born in a navy hospital in panama thing...

uk_dave
11th May 2008, 10:33 AM
well there is the whole being born in a navy hospital in panama thing...

yeah but wasn't Ron Paul 'born' in Argentina and 'adopted' by the head of the medical institute there Dr M. Engele?

(He's younger than he looks ;))

CptColumbo
11th May 2008, 11:14 AM
yeah but wasn't Ron Paul 'born' in Argentina and 'adopted' by the head of the medical institute there Dr M. Engele?

(He's younger than he looks ;))
He's got to be better than Dr. Acula. My neck always hurts after my appointments.

Dunstan
11th May 2008, 11:21 AM
ok, who is this really. Even the most severe RP cultists are not this insane. Come on, confess, who are you, and why are you yanking our chains like this??

TAM:eek:

I think there's a sort of Poe's Law in effect for Paulista/Truther/CTers.

stateofgrace
11th May 2008, 05:24 PM
they will expose mccain for the whore lover that he is, and ron paul will then get the nomination, and then, sadly, he will be assassinated. But off of that assassination, the american people will roar against the establishment and cause a HUGE conflict, maybe even a war, the war they have been executing since the 80's. a war against you. The people. The people Vs. the tyrannical state. A revolution that is NEEDED! THAT IS NECESSARY!

Unless it is raining, of course, in which case it will be all postponed until a nice sunny day is forecast.

twinstead
11th May 2008, 05:31 PM
Irrational ideologues ROCK!

gc051360
11th May 2008, 05:44 PM
Ummm... he just did. Both of those conventions had situations where nobody had a high enough majority of delegate votes to be declared the winner. Lincoln had large support going in, and Harding snuck in by being dishonest about whether there were any potential scandals were out there.

NEWSFLASH: RON PAUL ALREADY HAS A SCANDAL WEIGHING HIM DOWN!!

As dudalb said, unless McCain d... oh damnit, I forgot. You're just a gimmick.

Got me again. :o

What scandal is weighing Ron Paul down?

eta:

i consider myself a libertarian with a lowercase "L", but it does make me worrisome when i see how many libertarians are actually survivalist conspiracy whackos.
I consider myself a conservative, with libertarian leanings. But, I have the same view as you. I will never identify myself as a Libertarian, due to the number of whack jobs that are libertarians.

pomeroo
11th May 2008, 06:00 PM
What scandal is weighing Ron Paul down?

eta:


I consider myself a conservative, with libertarian leanings. But, I have the same view as you. I will never identify myself as a Libertarian, due to the number of whack jobs that are libertarians.


Me too. I consider myself a conservative with libertarian leanings (on victimless crimes). A conservative pundit attending a libertarian convention remarked that there were a few very bright people in attendance, the sort who produce creative market analysis, but fully half of the people he met there were certifiable. Some libertarians seem to short-circuit on abstractions. They start from a reasonable premise, then stretch it beyond reason.

Drudgewire
11th May 2008, 06:21 PM
What scandal is weighing Ron Paul down?

The newletters were barely a blip on the radar because Ron Paul is barely a blip on the radar. If he was suddenly thrust into the actual spotlight so would the newletters, and then he'd really have to answer who wrote them, whether he actually read any of them, and the rest of the pieces that don't add up.

No one ever bothered to pursue it because, let's face it, who outside of the lunatic fringe ever gave a rat's patoot about Ron Paul? He wouldn't have that luxury as anything resembling a legitimate contender.

gc051360
11th May 2008, 06:28 PM
The newletters were barely a blip on the radar because Ron Paul is barely a blip on the radar. If he was suddenly thrust into the actual spotlight so would the newletters, and then he'd really have to answer who wrote them, whether he actually read any of them, and the rest of the pieces that don't add up.

No one ever bothered to pursue it because, let's face it, who outside of the lunatic fringe ever gave a rat's patoot about Ron Paul? He wouldn't have that luxury as anything resembling a legitimate contender.

I was just reading through the newsletter stuff.

Your basic point, is one I tried to make to an ardent Ron Paul supporter.

He was complaining about the lack of mainstream media attention Ron Paul got. I explained that that would be a double edged sword. Because, right now...Ron Paul's propagandists run unopposed, because nobody really cares that much about Ron Paul. So, they are free to pass out the kool-aid, make their youtube videos, and build an echo chamber where Ron Paul is better than Jesus.

Gazpacho
11th May 2008, 07:44 PM
He was complaining about the lack of mainstream media attention Ron Paul got. I explained that that would be a double edged sword. Because, right now...Ron Paul's propagandists run unopposed, because nobody really cares that much about Ron Paul. So, they are free to pass out the kool-aid, make their youtube videos, and build an echo chamber where Ron Paul is better than Jesus.
Ron Paul: His Own Best Enemy!

Sparky
11th May 2008, 07:59 PM
Or if he is about to lead the San Diego Chargers on the winning drive as time winds down in next year's Super Bowl.

You know, since both are equally likely to happen.


I find your lack of faith disturbing.

ronpaulisright
11th May 2008, 09:03 PM
There is nothing to suggest that McCain is a "whorelover." Why do loons believe that they have some sort of right to slander people?

One of the DC madams clients was john mccain!

T.A.M.
11th May 2008, 09:05 PM
One of the DC madams clients was john mccain!

You may be right on this one, as I have not followed at all who her clients were, but I will require solid proof on this accusation, not heresay, opinion, or some "out there" blog reporting.

Got any?

TAM:)

SpitfireIX
11th May 2008, 09:05 PM
I find your lack of faith disturbing.


Nah, it's going to be the Manning Bowl. :D

Actually I just responded so I could mention that your signature quote is the very first one I ever used, back in the day. :)

ronpaulisright
11th May 2008, 09:06 PM
The newletters were barely a blip on the radar because Ron Paul is barely a blip on the radar. If he was suddenly thrust into the actual spotlight so would the newletters, and then he'd really have to answer who wrote them, whether he actually read any of them, and the rest of the pieces that don't add up.

No one ever bothered to pursue it because, let's face it, who outside of the lunatic fringe ever gave a rat's patoot about Ron Paul? He wouldn't have that luxury as anything resembling a legitimate contender.

That's not it at all! wolf blitzer INTERVIEWED paul and paul explained himself CLEARLY! The newsletter doesn't incriminate him just like wright doesn't incriminate obama!

Sparky
11th May 2008, 09:14 PM
Nah, it's going to be the Manning Bowl. :D

Actually I just responded so I could mention that your signature quote is the very first one I ever used, back in the day. :)

Typical Fort Wayne resident...;)

Great movie.:D

ronpaulisright
11th May 2008, 09:27 PM
Vote ron paul 2008.

Sparky
11th May 2008, 09:31 PM
Vote ron paul 2008.

Take it to Politics.

BTW, I'm not wasting my vote on what will be a write-in candidate.

SpitfireIX
11th May 2008, 10:40 PM
One of the DC madams clients was john mccain!


Oh, yes, Wayne Madsen says he "a source very close to" Deborah Jean Palfrey who said so, so of course that proves it. :rolleyes: Wayne Madsen is a paranoid conspiraloon who now claims to have been warned that a government hit team is trying to kill him. :tinfoil

SpitfireIX
11th May 2008, 10:50 PM
Typical Fort Wayne resident...;)


Oddly enough, there are actually a fair number of Bears fans here, too. Before last year's Superbowl, one local radio station claimed that the numbers were about even, but I can't believe that, as I see considerably more Colts gear than Bears gear.


Great movie.:D


Sorry, but it has to be said:

And the pope is Catholic, a bear [rule10]s in the woods, and Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead. :)

SpitfireIX
11th May 2008, 11:09 PM
That's not it at all! wolf blitzer INTERVIEWED paul and paul explained himself CLEARLY! The newsletter doesn't incriminate him just like wright doesn't incriminate obama!


Oh, please. Paul spins just like any other politician, and he's been far from forthcoming.

A6rxts0-f9w

Further, your Jeremiah Wright analogy is specious. First, Wright's garbage didn't go out as part of The Barack Obama Political Report, and second, right or wrong, the American public at large is more forgiving of black racism than of white racism.

Finally, you have yet to explain why, even if McCain somehow gets knocked out of the race, any significant number of his delegates will vote for Ron Paul, rather than Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, or some other prominent Republican.

eromitlab
11th May 2008, 11:28 PM
It must be because Ron Paul is the only other Republican still active in the race, so therefore if McCain has to depart the race, Ron Paul wins via some manner of "last man standing" rule that likely doesn't exist in RNC by-laws.
At least that's the explanation I came up with off the top of my head in about five seconds.

ronpaulisright
11th May 2008, 11:38 PM
It must be because Ron Paul is the only other Republican still active in the race, so therefore if McCain has to depart the race, Ron Paul wins via some manner of "last man standing" rule that likely doesn't exist in RNC by-laws.
At least that's the explanation I came up with off the top of my head in about five seconds.

In the least it would be awesome!

Ron Paul as president = AWESOME!

Blender Head
12th May 2008, 12:21 AM
What if Ron Paul killed John McCain?

Y'know, motives and benefits and all...

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 12:43 AM
Mccain is old. He lived a full life. He might pass from pneumonia or something. Then Ron Paul will be elected. the others dropped out. Can they jump back in?

Brainache
12th May 2008, 12:50 AM
Mccain is old. He lived a full life. He might pass from pneumonia or something. Then Ron Paul will be elected. the others dropped out. Can they jump back in?

I don't know a lot about US politics, could you tell me why anyone in their right mind would vote for Ron Paul or why the Republican party would endorse him as a candidate for President?

gambling_cruiser
12th May 2008, 02:17 AM
I think Jimmy Carter has a better chance to be nominated as republican candidate than Ron Paul

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 02:46 AM
Ron Paul is for the people. I wish the same could be said about mccain and obama and hilary.

Ron Paul = bringing the troops home, AGAINST regulating the internet, wants to get rid of the fed, rid of the CIA, voted against the iraq war, voted against the patriot act and HATES gun control.

This is why he's MY candidate.

SpitfireIX
12th May 2008, 05:24 AM
Mccain is old. He lived a full life. He might pass from pneumonia or something. Then Ron Paul will be elected. the others dropped out. Can they jump back in?


If McCain withdraws before the convention, his delegates are free to vote for whomever they wish on the first ballot (including John McCain, if they choose). Whether the person has announced his withdrawal from the race is irrelevant. Even if this weren't the case, however, Paul would still not be able to "win by default," because Mitt Romney did not "withdraw" from the race; he only "suspended" his campaign, which allows him to retain his delegates and to continue raising money (to pay off campaign debts).

SpitfireIX
12th May 2008, 05:41 AM
Ron Paul is for the people. I wish the same could be said about mccain and obama and hilary.

Ron Paul = bringing the troops home, AGAINST regulating the internet, wants to get rid of the fed, rid of the CIA, voted against the iraq war, voted against the patriot act and HATES gun control.

This is why he's MY candidate.


Kindly take your Ron Paul infomercial to the Politics subforum. Having said that, several of the above positions, along with the newsletter scandal, ensure that Ron Paul will never be the Republican nominee, and, frankly, you ought to accept that and move on.

ETA: Another point: Mike Huckabee, who has withdrawn from the race, got about 10.0 % of the votes in the Indiana Republican primary and 12.7% of the votes in the North Carolina Republican primary last week, to Ron Paul's 7.7% and 7.5%, respectively. That should tell you something about Paul's chances.

Drudgewire
12th May 2008, 06:12 AM
I find your lack of faith disturbing.

The saddest thing is I'm a Lions fan and couldn't even make that analogy, because Paul probably has a better chance of winning the White House than Detroit does of making it to the big game.

:(

CptColumbo
12th May 2008, 07:50 AM
Mccain is old. He lived a full life. He might pass from pneumonia or something. Then Ron Paul will be elected. the others dropped out. Can they jump back in?BTW John McCain is younger than Ron Paul.

Drudgewire
12th May 2008, 07:58 AM
BTW John McCain is younger than Ron Paul.

If anyone ever asks what the definition of "pwnage" is, direct them to this post. :D

Confuseling
12th May 2008, 08:00 AM
I thought Ron Paul was immune to conventional respiratory tract infections?

Brainache
12th May 2008, 08:04 AM
[...]

This is why he's MY candidate.

I asked why would anyone in their right mind vote for him...

CurtC
12th May 2008, 08:59 AM
I don't know a lot about US politics, could you tell me why anyone in their right mind would vote for Ron Paul or why the Republican party would endorse him as a candidate for President?

To be fair, Paul is an advocate for a government with a more limited scope, and I think that's a good idea. I would like to see the Republican Party move more in that direction, explicitly saying that government should be limited in what it is allowed to do. A vote for Paul in the primaries would ideally send a message to the Republicans that they need to pay more attention to those of us who want that kind of government.

Paul takes this view to an extreme, such as dismantling the Fed. That's pretty scary and we should be very cautious about that kind of big change that's worked really well for almost a century. That's why I wouldn't like to see Paul actually be president, but it's not insane to vote for Paul in the primary. (Note: I didn't do it myself, my primary goal was to keep Huckabee and Romney out.)

Foolmewunz
12th May 2008, 09:11 AM
Oh, yes, Wayne Madsen says he "a source very close to" Deborah Jean Palfrey who said so, so of course that proves it. :rolleyes: Wayne Madsen is a paranoid conspiraloon who now claims to have been warned that a government hit team is trying to kill him. :tinfoil


Oh God No!!



I'm sorry folks but there is an important post, above. Please read it. Wayne Madsen could die. Admins, I'm serious about this. I am not a troll. bear with me.

Wayne Madsen! Say it ain't so! And he heard it from the same bleary-eyed drunks that we got the RP story from. It has to be true... It's On The Internet.

T.A.M.
12th May 2008, 09:15 AM
IIRC did Mitt Romney not SUSPEND his candidacy? I do not think he officially quit/withdrew. I am not sure if that has changed since.

If he did suspend, then he could, I presume, restart if McCain were to meet with an untimely death.

TAM:)

edit: ah, i see Spitfire mentioned the same...

Spindrift
12th May 2008, 09:24 AM
Ron Paul is for the people. I wish the same could be said about mccain and obama and hilary.

Ron Paul = bringing the troops home, AGAINST regulating the internet, wants to get rid of the fed, rid of the CIA, voted against the iraq war, voted against the patriot act and HATES gun control.

This is why he's MY candidate.

I'm quite glad there is a Ron Paul for people such as you to cling to. The last thing any real candidate wants is support from the Ron Paul supporters. Nothing will turn off voters more than getting lectured by people who have no grasp on reality.

So I hope you keep up your support of Ron Paul, so the rest of us can worry about electing a president.

Dunstan
12th May 2008, 09:25 AM
Oh God No!!



I'm sorry folks but there is an important post, above. Please read it. Wayne Madsen could die. Admins, I'm serious about this. I am not a troll. bear with me.

Wayne Madsen! Say it ain't so! And he heard it from the same bleary-eyed drunks that we got the RP story from. It has to be true... It's On The Internet.


I like the "trying" to kill him part. This guy believes the government was capable of pulling off 9/11, but can't manage to kill one journalist? Further proof that the "truth movement" is all about ego. Not only do these people see what us sheeple can't, but they can evade government assassins, too!

defaultdotxbe
12th May 2008, 09:53 AM
Ron Paul is for the people. I wish the same could be said about mccain and obama and hilary.

Ron Paul = bringing the troops home, AGAINST regulating the internet, wants to get rid of the fed, rid of the CIA, voted against the iraq war, voted against the patriot act and HATES gun control.

This is why he's MY candidate.
actually ron paul is only against the government regulating the internet, the particular law in question that he against would be the one that prevents your ISP from regulating the internet (and charging you extra for youtube and high-bandwidth sites)

but hey, to each his own

ETA: actually mccain and paul have the same position on this issue, its one of the reasons im not voting for either

Confuseling
12th May 2008, 10:16 AM
There's only one candidate who'll protect your own personal internet.

Ted Stevens for president! Of the world!

CptColumbo
12th May 2008, 11:28 AM
I think there is a confusion among Rep. Paul's suppoters between what Ron Paul says he will do as President and what the President of the United States can do.

Cthulhu for president - Why vote for the lesser evil?

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 11:48 AM
To be fair, Paul is an advocate for a government with a more limited scope, and I think that's a good idea. I would like to see the Republican Party move more in that direction, explicitly saying that government should be limited in what it is allowed to do. A vote for Paul in the primaries would ideally send a message to the Republicans that they need to pay more attention to those of us who want that kind of government.

Paul takes this view to an extreme, such as dismantling the Fed. That's pretty scary and we should be very cautious about that kind of big change that's worked really well for almost a century. That's why I wouldn't like to see Paul actually be president, but it's not insane to vote for Paul in the primary. (Note: I didn't do it myself, my primary goal was to keep Huckabee and Romney out.)

whats wrong with getting rid of the fed? A private central bank that has to answer to no one and creates inflation, and devalues the currency. It Causes all the financial problems we have today. I say good riddance!

defaultdotxbe
12th May 2008, 11:49 AM
Cthulhu for president - Why vote for the lesser evil?
No More Years!

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 11:52 AM
ETA: actually mccain and paul have the same position on this issue, its one of the reasons im not voting for either

I highly doubt that. Show a source and I will concede.

RP is for legalizing marijuana and ending the war on drugs scam.

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 11:57 AM
I'm quite glad there is a Ron Paul for people such as you to cling to. The last thing any real candidate wants is support from the Ron Paul supporters. Nothing will turn off voters more than getting lectured by people who have no grasp on reality.

So I hope you keep up your support of Ron Paul, so the rest of us can worry about electing a president.

Yeah electing a freaking president that is a CFR member, sponsored by corporate interests, will keep troops in afghanistan, iraq, and quite possibly iran! Yeah have fun electing a puppet. Left or right, it doesn't matter. The same old song and dance:(

kucinich was good I thought for the donkeys, but look what happened. Nothing!

defaultdotxbe
12th May 2008, 12:01 PM
I highly doubt that. Show a source and I will concede.
paul:

Congress has considered Net neutrality legislation, but it never became law. Do you still support the legislation that was re-introduced in 2007 (http://news.zdnet.com/%3C/SignificantUpdate%3E%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20http://www.news.com/Net-neutrality-proposal-revived-in-Senate/2100-1028_3-6148751.html) (S 215 (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S.215:)), which gives the FCC the power to punish "discriminatory" conduct by broadband providers?

Paul: No. Net neutrality legislation (http://news.zdnet.com/2006-06-08%2019:00:00%3C/SignificantUpdate%3E%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 %20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%2 0%20http://www.news.com/House-rejects-Net-neutrality-rules/2100-1028_3-6081882.html) will hamper the development of new Internet services and harm consumers in the long run. The best way to address the concerns of proponents of Net neutrality is to remove government-imposed barriers to entry into the Internet provider market.http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6224161.html

mcain:
On the only Senate vote to date on network neutrality, McCain cast his against an amendment to a comprehensive telecom reform bill in 2006 that would have required broadband carriers such as AT&T and Comcast to treat all network traffic in a nondiscriminatory manner.
"When you control the pipe you should be able to get profit from your investment," McCain told the All Things Digital conference.
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Government/John-McCain-A-Republican-Tech-Record/



they hold the same position, although it seems fro different reasons, paul seems to think big telcom companies can be trusted to treat consumers fairly, mccain thinks they should be able to do whatever they want

BTW comcast is curently testing a per-use billing plan, which will bill your internet based on how much you download, kiss youtube goodbye :)

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 12:09 PM
paul:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6224161.html

mcain:
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Government/John-McCain-A-Republican-Tech-Record/



they hold the same position, although it seems fro different reasons, paul seems to think big telcom companies can be trusted to treat consumers fairly, mccain thinks they should be able to do whatever they want

BTW comcast is curently testing a per-use billing plan, which will bill your internet based on how much you download, kiss youtube goodbye :)

OMG! buddy, keep me posted on this! This is terrible!

This is what I want... Everything to stay exactly the way it is right now. Or how it was in 2002.

Spindrift
12th May 2008, 12:11 PM
Yeah electing a freaking president that is a CFR member, sponsored by corporate interests, will keep troops in afghanistan, iraq, and quite possibly iran! Yeah have fun electing a puppet. Left or right, it doesn't matter. The same old song and dance:(

kucinich was good I thought for the donkeys, but look what happened. Nothing!

How much does it bother you that no matter what you say, no matter what do, Ron Paul will NEVER be elected president?

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 12:22 PM
What RP said was good. He wants the FCC out of the internet. That's good. Just leave the Net alone. Leave it neutral.

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 12:25 PM
How much does it bother you that no matter what you say, no matter what do, Ron Paul will NEVER be elected president?

It bothers me a lot. But there is an evil part of me that wants to see the **** hit the fan, and I think that one of these 3 stooges will make it happen:)

hitlery, obamanation, and mcsatan will bring ww3! Martial law!

Have fun dying in iran guys:) I won't be here:)

Drudgewire
12th May 2008, 12:28 PM
So has rpir backed off his position that McCain is too old to be president yet? :p

defaultdotxbe
12th May 2008, 12:32 PM
What RP said was good. He wants the FCC out of the internet. That's good. Just leave the Net alone. Leave it neutral.
well i dont agree, i dont think the big telcom corporations can be trusted to leave it neutral, and others in the government dont either, thats why the net neutrality act was introduced

and its time warner (not comcast, sorry) that is testing usage-based billing (this imposes several hidden discriminations that most people will overlook) but this is more a discussion for politics

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 12:38 PM
Keep me updated default. I'm glad you brought this to my attention.

peteweaver
12th May 2008, 12:43 PM
Nothing wrong with gun control ronpaulisright.

And before you go any further, my grandfather owned a 12 bore shotgun, its now with my uncle (who has a farm down in Gloucestershire). Recently I was offered it, because he doesn't use it. I've no use for it either.

Just because you've a constitutional 'right' to bear arms, doesn't mean you should. And it doesn't mean assault weapons made purely for mass murder should be available to any old member of the public.

Drudgewire
12th May 2008, 12:47 PM
Just because you've a constitutional 'right' to bear arms, doesn't mean you should. And it doesn't mean assault weapons made purely for mass murder should be available to any old member of the public.

I...



*just walks away patting S&W 642 in pocket, since this belongs in social issues.*

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 12:53 PM
Nothing wrong with gun control ronpaulisright.

And before you go any further, my grandfather owned a 12 bore shotgun, its now with my uncle (who has a farm down in Gloucestershire). Recently I was offered it, because he doesn't use it. I've no use for it either.

Just because you've a constitutional 'right' to bear arms, doesn't mean you should. And it doesn't mean assault weapons made purely for mass murder should be available to any old member of the public.

The one time alex jones is 100% right. 4I7s_Y-SNDY

peteweaver
12th May 2008, 01:00 PM
No one disarmed the Brits.

I could have my Grandfathers 12 bore if I wanted it. But I don't.

Mark Saunders a Barrister was shot dead for shooting his legally owned shotgun at members of the public, just days ago.

Brits have gun nuts too.

CurtC
12th May 2008, 01:01 PM
What RP said was good. He wants the FCC out of the internet. That's good. Just leave the Net alone. Leave it neutral.

You have completely misunderstood the intent of the "net neutrality" bill, and your favorite candidate's position on it.

Ron Paul is in favor of keeping the FCC out of the Internet regulation business, therefore he is against the idea of net neutrality. He wants to allow service providers to charge however you and they agree to set up a service plan, including one that charges more for users of BitTorrent or YouTube. I agree with him, BTW.

But I don't think I've ever seen a more ill-informed poster here.

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 01:08 PM
you are WRONG curt. Dead wrong. The internet needs to stay the way it is for the sake of humanity! Leave it neutral!

CurtC
12th May 2008, 01:18 PM
you are WRONG curt. Dead wrong. The internet needs to stay the way it is for the sake of humanity! Leave it neutral!

And you realize you're saying that Ron Paul is wrong?

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 01:47 PM
Ron Paul is never wrong

Spindrift
12th May 2008, 02:06 PM
Have fun dying in iran guys:) I won't be here:)
Promises, promises.

CurtC
12th May 2008, 02:16 PM
Ron Paul is never wrong
According to you (http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=3697372&postcount=196), he is "dead wrong." You want me to contact an admin to change your user name to "ronpauliswrong"?

Mr.D
12th May 2008, 09:15 PM
troops in afghanistan,

Are you suggesting that Ron Paul is pro-Taliban? :eek:





ETA: Who knew trolling could be fun?

Foolmewunz
12th May 2008, 10:07 PM
My, but this thread has proved educational. Let's see, now... just by RPiR's own stumbling in the dark, so far he's learned:

RP will unlease corporate communications giants on the unsuspecting public and will allow them to charge him for every downloaded bit torrent, thereby bankrupting RPiR's mommy and daddy.

RP is older than John McCain (man, I love it when the obvious escapes notice until just at that one bee-u-tee-ful moment when you smack 'em upside the head with it), and since John McCain might die at any second, then RP is probably already dead (not figuratively... I mean literally) by RPiR logic.

Anything else we've learned here, class?

ronpaulisright
12th May 2008, 10:14 PM
I never said john mccain is younger than paul so I don't see the pwnage.

Foolmewunz
12th May 2008, 10:22 PM
Anyone else wanna field this one? Some new blood want a crack at the total illogic of the above statement?

Cl1mh4224rd
12th May 2008, 10:24 PM
you are WRONG curt. Dead wrong. The internet needs to stay the way it is for the sake of humanity! Leave it neutral!
I never said john mccain is younger than paul so I don't see the pwnage.


Dude, seriously... enough of this ********* charade. I know you may think things need a little spicing up around here, but this little act is beyond unnecessary.

PhantomWolf
12th May 2008, 10:46 PM
I just have to say, Hillary Clinton has more chance of winning the Rep Nominee than Ron Paul does.

ronpaulisright
13th May 2008, 03:03 AM
Dude, seriously... enough of this ********* charade. I know you may think things need a little spicing up around here, but this little act is beyond unnecessary.

You don't think I knew that they wer both old decrepit men? I knew that already ! And if you think otherwise, you're an idiot!

moon1969
13th May 2008, 08:07 AM
This is so stupid. Go to Russia and see what happens there. Ramzan Kadyrov killed Anna Politkovskaya. And Putin probaly helped Kadyrov. Kadyrov allso made threats towards Garry Kasparov. Movladi Baisarov said that Kadyrov is "He acts like a medieval tyrant.". What happend to that guy? He died in Moscow.

CptColumbo
13th May 2008, 08:10 AM
My, but this thread has proved educational. Let's see, now... just by RPiR's own stumbling in the dark, so far he's learned:

RP will unlease corporate communications giants on the unsuspecting public and will allow them to charge him for every downloaded bit torrent, thereby bankrupting RPiR's mommy and daddy.

RP is older than John McCain (man, I love it when the obvious escapes notice until just at that one bee-u-tee-ful moment when you smack 'em upside the head with it), and since John McCain might die at any second, then RP is probably already dead (not figuratively... I mean literally) by RPiR logic.

Anything else we've learned here, class?

I never said john mccain is younger than paul so I don't see the pwnage.
Actually what you wrote was:
Mccain is old. He lived a full life. He might pass from pneumonia or something. Then Ron Paul will be elected. the others dropped out. Can they jump back in?

You first made the reference to John McCain's advanced age, drawing the seeming conclusion that age equals possible poor health and you then showed a complete misunderstanding of how the nomination process works.
BTW John McCain is younger than Ron Paul.

I mearly pointed out that Sen. McCain is in fact younger than Rep. Paul. (It took less than 30sec. to discover that)

One could then assume, using you logic, that the Texas Congressman would have an even better chance of not surviving the nomination process.

Viper Daimao
13th May 2008, 09:07 AM
Don't worry, he's safe, he's got about as much chance as getting elected President as Calvin Coolidge does this year, and he's been dead for 75 years.

I'd vote for Coolidge, he was a great president.

SpitfireIX
13th May 2008, 10:11 AM
Actually what you wrote was:


You first made the reference to John McCain's advanced age, drawing the seeming conclusion that age equals possible poor health and you then showed a complete misunderstanding of how the nomination process works.


I mearly pointed out that Sen. McCain is in fact younger than Rep. Paul. (It took less than 30sec. to discover that)

One could then assume, using you logic, that the Texas Congressman would have an even better chance of not surviving the nomination process.


This isn't directed just at you, CC, but in RPIR's defense (did I really just write that :confused:) he/she was attempting to articulate a basis for continuing to hope that Ron Paul might somehow gain the Republican nomination, by claiming that because McCain is old he is more likely to be forced to withdraw because of health concerns. The fact that Ron Paul might also have a similar health concern does not preclude RPIR's hoping that McCain is the one who has to drop out for health reasons, rather than Paul. Additionally, Paul is a physician, has not had cancer AFAIK, and was not brutally abused by his North Vietnamese captors for 5 1/2 years. (OTOH, McCain's 96-year-old mother has regularly campaigned with him. Note also that both of Paul's parents lived into their 90s.)

However, to reiterate, RPIR's hope is in vain; even if McCain does have to withdraw, Ron Paul will not be the party's choice for a substitute. The nominee would most likely be either Mitt Romney or Mike Huckabee.

dudalb
13th May 2008, 11:56 AM
I am now convinced that ronpaulisright is pulling our chains.

Sabrina
13th May 2008, 01:04 PM
I move this entire thread be moved to Humor and every post of RPIR's be nominated for the May Stundies. I haven't laughed so much in years.

He'd win hands down, assuming he's not yanking our chains (and the fact that he continues to spout his drivel tells me he's either EXTREMELY deluded or a d***ed good actor)

NickUK
13th May 2008, 01:16 PM
I am now convinced that ronpaulisright is pulling our chains.

Seconded.

He's quite funny :)

ronpaulisright
13th May 2008, 04:23 PM
Viper you're not serious are you?

Funny about what? That I defend RP?

Cl1mh4224rd
13th May 2008, 05:20 PM
Funny about what? That I defend RP?


I suppose what they find funny is not that you do "defend" him, but rather the ignorant and/or very poorly communicated way that you do it...

mrbaracuda
13th May 2008, 05:38 PM
IIRC did Mitt Romney not SUSPEND his candidacy? I do not think he officially quit/withdrew. I am not sure if that has changed since.

If he did suspend, then he could, I presume, restart if McCain were to meet with an untimely death.

So it's Romney who will kill McCain, but then Paul gets elected so Romney will kill Paul to become POTUS nominee. Which Tancredo does not like, so he'll kill Romney!

OH GOD NO! indeed! :D

http://politicsoffthegrid.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/ft.jpg

:D


Have fun dying in iran guys:) I won't be here:)

Just don't come to Germany.