View Full Version : It's been 2450 days Troothers - What's taking so long?
applecorped
27th May 2008, 07:12 AM
http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?month=09&day=11&year=2001&hour=&min=&sec=&p0=0
It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds
since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?
Furi
27th May 2008, 07:38 AM
Lack and Fail probably,
Patriot4life
27th May 2008, 07:50 AM
God, these types of threads are getting old
1. There is no undeniable proof
2. If there was what authorities would they take it to?
OldSchool
27th May 2008, 08:01 AM
http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?month=09&day=11&year=2001&hour=&min=&sec=&p0=0
It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds
since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?
If the truth movement is searching for such concrete proof they are doomed to fail.
Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?
What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes?
Childlike Empress
27th May 2008, 08:02 AM
You are complying to the original madness for how many days?
uk_dave
27th May 2008, 08:03 AM
God, these types of threads are getting old
1. There is no undeniable proof
2. If there was what authorities would they take it to?
So it's hopeless then?
T.A.M.
27th May 2008, 08:04 AM
I thought you were banned Oldschool? Funny I had you on ignore, but removed you. Probably because you haven't posted here in so long...oh well.
As for the OP, what is taking them so long is that they are not looking for undeniable proof. They really could care less about that kind of proof. They would much rather play around with "what ifs" and "Thats pecular" and other vague statements that sew seeds of doubt in the unprepared, naive average joe...thats all.
TAM:)
Björn Toulouse
27th May 2008, 08:05 AM
....
What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes?
They got wet.
T.A.M.
27th May 2008, 08:06 AM
So it's hopeless then?
Not really. They are all preparing for the Alex Jones lead revolution...grab yer guns boyz.
TAM;)
OldSchool
27th May 2008, 08:12 AM
I thought you were banned Oldschool? Funny I had you on ignore, but removed you. Probably because you haven't posted here in so long...oh well.
As for the OP, what is taking them so long is that they are not looking for undeniable proof. They really could care less about that kind of proof. They would much rather play around with "what ifs" and "Thats pecular" and other vague statements that sew seeds of doubt in the unprepared, naive average joe...thats all.
TAM:)
If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to.
applecorped
27th May 2008, 08:13 AM
I'll respond....LOL!!!!!!
Dave Rogers
27th May 2008, 08:14 AM
If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal.
Your purpose in life is to get people not to listen to you?
Dave
T.A.M.
27th May 2008, 08:16 AM
If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to.
don't mistake fear for what is actually annoyance. Most people I put on ignore go there because they have annoyed me to the point of avoidance. You were in that group.
TAM:)
cyclonic
27th May 2008, 08:19 AM
Not really. They are all preparing for the Alex Jones lead revolution...grab yer guns boyz.
TAM;)
Alex jones has given up on the present and now talks to "future people"
:)
RYFDIGLAX0Y
defaultdotxbe
27th May 2008, 08:20 AM
Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?
if the obvious is so apparent why is it taking 2450+ days to get anything done?
TexasJack
27th May 2008, 08:26 AM
http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?month=09&day=11&year=2001&hour=&min=&sec=&p0=0
It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds
since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?
and counting...
Patriot4life
27th May 2008, 08:32 AM
So it's hopeless then?
I guess it depends on what you consider the objective to be.
If the objective is to prove a CD in the WTC buildings that collapsed, or that there actually weren't planes that hit the trade center and pentagon, or that it really wasn't an act of terrorism by foreigners. then it is hopeless, yes.
You wanna know why?
because planes hijacked by foreign terrorists did fly into the wtc 1 and 2, and the general concensus amongst people that actually know what they are talking about conclude that this could have caused collapse (a reality that I, incidentally, never questioned until coming across the "truth movement" and after consideration continue to not question).
basically my point is the truth movement should forget about all the fringe conspiracy "theory" rhetoric and focus their energies on investigating and discussing theories that are more grounded in reality.
Of course this would shift the focus to more of a political context.
TruthByDecree
27th May 2008, 09:00 AM
http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?month=09&day=11&year=2001&hour=&min=&sec=&p0=0
It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds
since 9/11.
I don't know I was wondering the same thing. When will that WTC-7 report be out?
Drudgewire
27th May 2008, 09:04 AM
If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal.
Yeah, being a stupid bug buzzing around the ears of non-crazy people does seem to be the primary goal of the truth movement. How noble. :rolleyes:
Anyway, consider your day made.
*adds OldSchool to ignore list*
negativ
27th May 2008, 11:32 AM
2. If there was what authorities would they take it to?
Any journalist working for a major-league newspaper (NYT, Guardian, etc. etc.) would instantly become famous, prestigious, and Pulitzer-encumbered. Woodward and Bernstein would look like gossip columnists for the student council newsletter by comparison.
T.A.M.
27th May 2008, 01:10 PM
I don't know I was wondering the same thing. When will that WTC-7 report be out?
Why? If the release is tomorrow, or in the fall, you and others in the TM will cry "Fraud! NIST is in on the inside job" anyway (unless that 1:1,000,000,000,000 chance occurs and they come out on the side of the TM).
TAM:)
Cobalt
27th May 2008, 01:36 PM
http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?month=09&day=11&year=2001&hour=&min=&sec=&p0=0
It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds
since 9/11. Troothers, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof to authorities?
No gas money?
Pato2747
27th May 2008, 02:28 PM
Wrong. It's
2450 days
58821 hours
3529286 minutes
211757196 seconds
since 9/11. ;)
(Something unrelated, why didn't you put 9:03/9:04 on the time, instead of 00:00:00? Sorry to be such a puntuality nitpicker, buuuuuut...)
applecorped
27th May 2008, 03:13 PM
Wrong. It's
2450 days
58821 hours
3529286 minutes
211757196 seconds
since 9/11. ;)
(Something unrelated, why didn't you put 9:03/9:04 on the time, instead of 00:00:00? Sorry to be such a puntuality nitpicker, buuuuuut...)
You're right, my bad.
dudalb
27th May 2008, 04:03 PM
Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?
So you admit there is no proof or solid evidence to back up the 9/11 conspiracy theories,and that your belief in these theories is based exclusively on your hatred of the Bush Adminsitration and "The Establishment" (whatever the hell that is)?
Thanks for making things clear.
HENTAI DOUKYUSEI JP
27th May 2008, 06:14 PM
No allowance money?
fix it for you!
1337m4n
27th May 2008, 06:22 PM
You are complying to the original madness for how many days?
http://www.incompetech.com/movie/images/300.jpg
"Madness"...?
DC
28th May 2008, 01:27 AM
It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds
since 9/11. NIST, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof for WTC7?
defaultdotxbe
28th May 2008, 05:17 AM
It's been:
2450 days
58814 hours
3528849 minutes
211730978 seconds
since 9/11. NIST, what is taking you so long to bring your undeniable proof for WTC7?
when did NIST start working on the WTC7 report?
Almo
28th May 2008, 11:54 AM
If a member of this forum had me ignore, I have met my goal. My words strike at the heart of which you can not respond to.
Things I read on the Internet never cease to amaze me.
:hb:
Pardalis
28th May 2008, 12:02 PM
You are complying to the original madness for how many days?
And you've been complaining about our complaining for how many days?
jaydeehess
28th May 2008, 08:30 PM
If the truth movement is searching for such concrete proof they are doomed to fail.
Classified Documents perhaps? Black Magic Marker? Who needs undeniable proof when the obvious is apparent?
What ever happened to those water-boarding tapes?
The PfT claim that they have analyzed the DFDR data and that it shows that the plane did not travel along the generally accepted flightpath. When will they produce an objective paper or article and submit it to a journal or magazine instead of complaining that no one will 'debate' them on TV>
The CIT claim that their research definitively illustrates that the plane seen approaching the Pentagon was not on the generally accepted flightpath. When will they calculate whether or not the flightpath they say their witnesses have the plane on is physically possible?
Judy Woods claims a directed energy weapon took down the towers. When will she be telling us what type of beam weapon could do this?
Morgan Reynolds actually took his no-planes contention to a court of law and failed miserably to show it to be true.
When will you realize that 'it looks like' is a really bad way to make a determination of the cause of a highly complex situation? (my guess, never)
What do you believe would be on those water boarding tapes that would prove anything about what happened on 9/11/01? Does this administration lie and cheat and destroy evidence of their wrong doing? Yes, they do. How does that prove they committed mass murder of their own constituents?
applecorped
28th May 2008, 08:50 PM
The PfT claim that they have analyzed the DFDR data and that it shows that the plane did not travel along the generally accepted flightpath. When will they produce an objective paper or article and submit it to a journal or magazine instead of complaining that no one will 'debate' them on TV>
The CIT claim that their research definitively illustrates that the plane seen approaching the Pentagon was not on the generally accepted flightpath. When will they calculate whether or not the flightpath they say their witnesses have the plane on is physically possible?
Judy Woods claims a directed energy weapon took down the towers. When will she be telling us what type of beam weapon could do this?
Morgan Reynolds actually took his no-planes contention to a court of law and failed miserably to show it to be true.
When will you realize that 'it looks like' is a really bad way to make a determination of the cause of a highly complex situation? (my guess, never)
What do you believe would be on those water boarding tapes that would prove anything about what happened on 9/11/01? Does this administration lie and cheat and destroy evidence of their wrong doing? Yes, they do. How does that prove they committed mass murder of their own constituents?
Ditto.
DC
28th May 2008, 09:23 PM
when did NIST start working on the WTC7 report?
when did i start doubting 9/11 ?
beachnut
28th May 2008, 10:57 PM
when did i start doubting 9/11 ?
The 7th year of 9/11 truth, void of facts and evidence, you must be new to this not to see the false information 9/11 truth spreads. If some 9/11 truth members had ideas about 9/11 6 years ago, they could have earned a masters in engineering and not be ignorant of the concepts needed to understand 9/11.
Why do you blindly follow 9/11 truth and parrot their failed ideas? If I had questions, I would gain the knowledge to understand the events of 9/11 and answer those questions myself. Not blindly quote sources with zero understanding of what I post. Like your sig. You looked it up, but failed to explain when and where it is possible. You blindly believe 9/11 truth in the same lack of understanding way, or is it something else?
Why is taking over 6 years for 9/11 truth to publish one piece of evidence to support their conclusions?
Some of 9/11 truth is made up of lies. They claim they have "ample evidence" to blame others for 9/11, our own people, yet they fail to use this evidence. They are liars.
defaultdotxbe
29th May 2008, 05:41 AM
when did i start doubting 9/11 ?
you do not comprise the entirety of the truth movement, some of the supposed "big guns" like alex jones have been "investigating" since day 1
Pato2747
29th May 2008, 04:48 PM
http://www.incompetech.com/movie/images/300.jpg
"Madness"...?
THIS... IS...
Oh, no. This is a respetable forum. I'm not doing it.
Thunder
29th May 2008, 05:58 PM
whats taking soo long?
its called an utter and hilarious lack of public support.
Furi
5th June 2008, 03:38 AM
THIS... IS...
Oh, no. This is a respetable forum. I'm not doing it.
I Will... (I have no shame)
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.