SFB
16th October 2003, 10:15 PM
Anyone care to comment? I just cannot wade through this but post merely part of the claim, for those who may want to read it.
"This philosophy should be of major concern to philosophical theologians and all others interested in defending their faith without divorcing themselves from reason. It is reason that provides in this philosophy, or apologetic, the strongest possible grounds for faith. It thus overturns the entirely false notion virgorously promoted and defended by empiricists and atheists that a belief or faith in God defies possible rational justification. The proof provided in this philosophical argument for the existence of a Supreme Being follows strictly rationally and logically, and by means of pure reason (the use of the word pure, for the sake of those who may question its use, is defended and explained in the Preface)."
From: http://www.philosophical-apologetic.com/
"This philosophy should be of major concern to philosophical theologians and all others interested in defending their faith without divorcing themselves from reason. It is reason that provides in this philosophy, or apologetic, the strongest possible grounds for faith. It thus overturns the entirely false notion virgorously promoted and defended by empiricists and atheists that a belief or faith in God defies possible rational justification. The proof provided in this philosophical argument for the existence of a Supreme Being follows strictly rationally and logically, and by means of pure reason (the use of the word pure, for the sake of those who may question its use, is defended and explained in the Preface)."
From: http://www.philosophical-apologetic.com/