Big Bang Theory is not science

[Shalamar]

When science believes in ideas which violate said rules than that is not, by your words, science. It is faith.


BTW, Do you think science is a noun or a verb?


:gnome:


Do you have any evidence for your claim? Or are you just taking it on faith?

[JEROME DA GNOME]

Do you have any evidence for your claim? Or are you just taking it on faith?

Belief that the Universe came from nothing is faith.

In fact, this idea contradicts established testable science.


:gnome:

[Shalamar]

Belief that the Universe came from nothing is faith.

In fact, this idea contradicts established testable science.


:gnome:

Both false, and not true.

The Big Bangwp (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Bang)

The Big Bang Theory (Or, Horrendous Space Kablooie if you prefer) does not say that the Universe was created from nothing. The Earliest points of the Universe (The big bang) existed with all our known laws of physics and relativity intact. Anything earlier than that is pure speculation as what we know breaks down, and we don't have the science, maths, or evidence to show what existed before that point.

A better answer to 'What was before the Big Bang?' is 'We don't know.'

The Big Bang is an answer to where this Universe came from, but we don't have an answer to what came before that. The article I linked to is pretty good at explaining the Big Bang, as well as some of the problems behind it (Which are primarily what came immediately before it).

[Gate2501]

Belief that the Universe came from nothing is faith.

In fact, this idea contradicts established testable science.


:gnome:

The supposition of propositions proposing the postulate is contradictory.

Please provide evidence.