Allen773
30th July 2008, 06:34 PM
I find that, for the most part, 9/11 conspiracy theories are simply stupid or even bizzarely hilarious (Judy Wood, David Icke, etc.).
But one type of 9/11 conspiracy I don't laugh at is the accusation that the victims, their families, their companies, and their friends were involved in the attacks.
One example is Barbara Olson. Let me make myself perfectly clear-I have no love for the Olsons politically, and I think that on TV and in her books, Mrs. Olson was a typical Clinton-hating, partisan right-wing pundit.
But none of that justifies the trampling on of her grave, the suggestions that Ted Olson lied about his wife's death, the belief that he and/or she were "in on it." Yet at websites like democraticunderground.com, there are a number of people who actually belive that many of the victims are still alive, and that they and/or their employers were involved in the attacks.
I find this this aspect of 9/11 conspiracy theories to be among the most disgusting and offensive.
But one type of 9/11 conspiracy I don't laugh at is the accusation that the victims, their families, their companies, and their friends were involved in the attacks.
One example is Barbara Olson. Let me make myself perfectly clear-I have no love for the Olsons politically, and I think that on TV and in her books, Mrs. Olson was a typical Clinton-hating, partisan right-wing pundit.
But none of that justifies the trampling on of her grave, the suggestions that Ted Olson lied about his wife's death, the belief that he and/or she were "in on it." Yet at websites like democraticunderground.com, there are a number of people who actually belive that many of the victims are still alive, and that they and/or their employers were involved in the attacks.
I find this this aspect of 9/11 conspiracy theories to be among the most disgusting and offensive.