Why can't I see CIT's witness interviews?

[1337m4n]

I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4.

[Smackety]

If you haven't been able to form an irreducible delusion from seeing the first 4, why do you think the other 9 will work any better?

[twinstead]

Because 9 is bigger than 4? ;)

[Dr Adequate]

I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4. Truther math. 13 is 1 and 3. 1 and 3 is 4.

I shall now demonstrate truther physics. For this I will need two matchboxes and an egg.

[OldTigerCub]

Truther math. 13 is 1 and 3. 1 and 3 is 4.

I shall now demonstrate truther physics. For this I will need two matchboxes and an egg.

....and some cardboard boxes...and a few misquotes from eyewitnesses, and a rabbit cage...don't forget the rabbit cage!!!:p

[eromitlab]

I'll bring the billiard balls.

[Caustic Logic]

I've kind of lost track, but let me see if i can remember the 13

Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York...

No wait...

Okay, the original 3 explicit NoC witnesses - Lagasse, Brooks, Turcios. You can see them in too much detail affirm north, north, north despite all evidence.

Terry Morin is one of them, isn't he? He couldn't possibly see it pass NoC from where he was... but Over Navy Annex (ONA) now = NoC, so he's a NoC witness. That's "4" - can't see his new account, it's CIT's word, off-the-record and stupid in so many ways.

Because ONA = NoC, maybe they finally upgraded Paik to explicit rather than implied NoC? Either that all they always called him one, I forget. He couldn't see that area either. But it IS implied... That's "5" -you can see him drawing a path ONA plain as day.

Levi Stephens is off the record, IMP not in a good spot to judge where 77 was relative to the Citgo but is said to place it north. Can't see this one, that's "6."

Sean Boger was in a great spot to see and CIT says he says it was NoC. Can't see it but I think they have a direct quote. "7."

Uh... off the top of my head, one of the NEITs. Very misread, will have to dig it up but she's a decent south path-low impact witness in reality land. That's "8" I believe.

The ret are supposed to be in that new movie i suppose I should see sometime. Thee may be another somewhere... and since they've set the precedent of X=NoC meaning non-NoC witness can be called NoC, it's only a hopnskip to calling "all" witnesses NoC.

Another hopnskip - since NoC is "PROVEN" by all these witnesses, it happened in the real world, so all people who are in reality are NoC witnesses. The very cosmos is a NoC witness. Whoa...

It's really quite simple.

[lee5]

I would like to see them; where are they? There's supposed to be 13 but I can only find 4.

Can you link to those 4 please?

[Caustic Logic]

Can you link to those 4 please?
By 13 I presume the stick man means thei recently touted "13" north path witnesses, as presumed above. Correct?

He probably has at least three of the four on this video included in his four. Correct? This is pre-101-level stuff BTW.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4196580169348087802

The expansion of this list from there is the sticky part. A 300% growth in claims with no corresponding growth in actual north-path testimony they can or will share with us (until their latest video anyway).