View Full Version : Interview with Cleveland Center Air Controller
njslim
11th September 2008, 05:31 PM
Here is article from Detroit Free Press - interview with John Werth who was
in Cleveland Center on 9/11 working United 93. Werth, now retired, heard
the hijacking over his headset. Had to clear air space around United 93 and
assist with Delta 1989, which was suspected as hijacked.
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080911/NEWS07/809110406
Very harrowing story like our friend Cheap Shot
Galileo
11th September 2008, 06:10 PM
Here is article from Detroit Free Press - interview with John Werth who was
in Cleveland Center on 9/11 working United 93. Werth, now retired, heard
the hijacking over his headset. Had to clear air space around United 93 and
assist with Delta 1989, which was suspected as hijacked.
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080911/NEWS07/809110406
Very harrowing story like our friend Cheap Shot
I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.
This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.
Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.
The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.
The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.
You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).
parky76
11th September 2008, 06:16 PM
Galileo- we would all appreciate it if you stopped lieing in your posts.
Cheap Shot
11th September 2008, 06:18 PM
Here is article from Detroit Free Press - interview with John Werth who was
in Cleveland Center on 9/11 working United 93. Werth, now retired, heard
the hijacking over his headset. Had to clear air space around United 93 and
assist with Delta 1989, which was suspected as hijacked.
Read the article. I had the chance to meet John during the making of UAL93 we overlapped a day during the filming of the movie. That was the first time I found out that he also worked DAL1989 and that we at Boston Center were feeding them bad information on DAL1989. But one frequency mishap on that day, was all it took to be determined the aircraft was a possible hijack. I wish him the best of luck in his retirement.
SDC
11th September 2008, 08:21 PM
I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.
This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.
Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.
The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.
The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.
You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).
A pile of silly and vile bilge. I suppose they'll start claiming Werth as one of their's, regardless of the facts.
Cylinder
11th September 2008, 08:33 PM
The special commandos...
Who were they and what made them special? Did they ride the short bus to commando school? Did you have a crush on them? I'm confused...
beachnut
12th September 2008, 12:38 PM
...
This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.
Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.
The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.
The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.
You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).
Wrong as usual.
9/11 truth only grows in ignorance on 9/11. As you are proving.
Do you make up insane ideas all on your own. Your lack of evidence is showing. Insane made up ideas, based on ...
7 years and the best you can do is spew lies. Why do you lack evidence? How can you remain totally clueless and ignorant of the Hijackers? All four hijackers have DNA profiles from 93. Darn, you are caught making up lies. I doubt you will understand this.
The terrorist, you are trying to apologize for, were flying 93 to WTC they headed for DC direct. You should study before making up lies that are too easy to debunk.
Galileo
12th September 2008, 03:28 PM
Here is article from Detroit Free Press - interview with John Werth who was
in Cleveland Center on 9/11 working United 93. Werth, now retired, heard
the hijacking over his headset. Had to clear air space around United 93 and
assist with Delta 1989, which was suspected as hijacked.
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080911/NEWS07/809110406
Very harrowing story like our friend Cheap Shot
"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."
This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.
DGM
12th September 2008, 03:37 PM
"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."
This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.
Are you high or just ignoring reality? Read Cheap Shot's post (he was there you know, I'm sure you don't care)
Alareth
12th September 2008, 03:41 PM
A pile of silly and vile bilge. I suppose they'll start claiming Werth as one of their's, regardless of the facts.
Why wouldn't they? They have already made attempts to claim people like Frank DeMartino as supporters despite the fact he died that day.
Cheap Shot
12th September 2008, 09:37 PM
"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."
This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.
I called NEADS and told them that DAL1989 was a hijack, NEADS called the Military Specialist at Cleveland who I imagined told the OMIC, who told Werth's supervisor that DAL1989 was the hijack not UAL93. There is your deception. I was repsonsible for that mistake. There were allot of them that day, but I had my reasons to think that DAL1989 was a hijack
Jonnyclueless
12th September 2008, 09:50 PM
"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."
This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.
Which plotters?
jaydeehess
12th September 2008, 11:28 PM
I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.
This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.
Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.
The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.
The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.
You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).
Obama: "You Can't Just Make Stuff Up,"
1337m4n
12th September 2008, 11:56 PM
I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.
This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.
Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.
The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.
The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.
You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).
I didn't realize it was possible to write this much and have every single sentence be wrong.
By the way, who is this "we" you are referring to? All I see is one crazy man who thinks he's Galileo.
Galileo
13th September 2008, 01:06 PM
I called NEADS and told them that DAL1989 was a hijack, NEADS called the Military Specialist at Cleveland who I imagined told the OMIC, who told Werth's supervisor that DAL1989 was the hijack not UAL93. There is your deception. I was repsonsible for that mistake. There were allot of them that day, but I had my reasons to think that DAL1989 was a hijack
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.
Jonnyclueless
13th September 2008, 01:08 PM
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's not his memory at fault here.
chillzero
13th September 2008, 01:11 PM
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.
Excuse me, did you just have the nerve to tell someone who was there and who's actions and reasons for those actions were recorded (iirc) that they don't know what they are talking about?
Galileo
13th September 2008, 01:14 PM
Excuse me, did you just have the nerve to tell someone who was there and who's actions and reasons for those actions were recorded (iirc) that they don't know what they are talking about?
No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.
Jonnyclueless
13th September 2008, 01:19 PM
No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.
And you are aware that the events were recorded and documented. This is done in the case of people forgetting things. So by your logic, he managed to forget and mix up in memory the flights, and a magical fairy changed his statements on tape?
chillzero
13th September 2008, 01:21 PM
No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.
Where is your evidence for this alleged mistake?
Bearing in mind that witnesses do make mistakes, but those kinds of mistakes happen less often (or at least are rectified very quickly) when the information leading to their decisions, and the decisions themselves are so heavily watched and documented.
Galileo
13th September 2008, 01:31 PM
Where is your evidence for this alleged mistake?
Bearing in mind that witnesses do make mistakes, but those kinds of mistakes happen less often (or at least are rectified very quickly) when the information leading to their decisions, and the decisions themselves are so heavily watched and documented.
Aha! So you admit witnesses make mistakes.
beachnut
13th September 2008, 01:38 PM
Aha! So you admit witnesses make mistakes.
You are messing up logic.
CheapShot is not a witness, he is the event. He is not hearsay for his words, he is his words.
you got problems
chillzero
13th September 2008, 01:40 PM
Aha! So you admit witnesses make mistakes.
I have never denied, nor has anyone else here, that witnesses can and do make mistakes.
That has nothing to do with your disgusting allegation against CheapShot, however. I see you dodged my question about what evidence you have that he made any mistake.
jaydeehess
13th September 2008, 08:57 PM
No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.
Are you just ignoring the fact that everything he did and most of what he said would have been recorded and that it corressponds with what he says now?
Witness statements backed up by direct and unambiguous empirical evidence trumps any allegation of witness mistakes.
A W Smith
13th September 2008, 09:50 PM
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.
must you lie in every single thread here (http://www.healthdiaries.com/compulsive-lying.htm)?
Cl1mh4224rd
13th September 2008, 10:31 PM
No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.
He wasn't just a witness to the events; he was a damn participant. What the hell is wrong with you?
Travis
14th September 2008, 02:47 AM
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.
Your evidence of this is that you want it to be this way? Right?:rolleyes:
Cheap Shot
14th September 2008, 06:51 AM
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.I never told anybody about UAL93, because at Boston Center no one new about UAL93. The aircraft departed Newark we don't work Newark departures to the West New York Center does. I knew about UAL93 at about 10:14 10 minures after it crashed. We knew an aircraft was heading for DC or Camp David, but never knew the call sign. Yes it was stressfull, and yes my memeroy of timelines may be off sometimes, and I have also admitted to mistakes that I had made that day, but with better research on your part you would find that pretty much everything I put here on JREF or anywhere else is factual and backed up testimony with the DOJ, and was recorded somewhere.
funk de fino
14th September 2008, 11:15 AM
I was about to say that Galileo accusation shocked me but I have realised that is untrue. Nothing that the vile trolls that pervade the 911TM post surprises me anymore.
Truly disgusting.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.