FBI say not enough evidence to Link Bin Laden with 9/11

[AndyB]

Hello! This is my first post. I have joined first and foremost because I am sceptical about the official story about 9/11. It seems the FBI are too as they do not feel that there is enough evidence to implicate Osama Bin Laden with the 9/11 attacks. Your views please.

[AndyB]

So what were the Military doing in Afghanistan immediately after the attacks?

[funk de fino]

Old stuff, use the search function please. Has been discussed to death.

Welcome to the forum AndyB.

[AndyB]

Thank you but I do not want to wade through the search. I have asked a question. Can someone else answer this please?

[DC]

taking care that the Pipeline will be build?

[AndyB]

Obviously, nicking oil, that is about the size of it. But why is Osama Bin Laden not wanted, according to the the FBI website, for orchestrating the 9/11 attacks?

[DC]

Obviously, nicking oil, that is about the size of it. But why is Osama Bin Laden not wanted, according to the the FBI website, for orchestrating the 9/11 attacks?

because they have no hard evidence linking him to 9/11.

[MikeW]

taking care that the Pipeline will be build?
And yet they've still not even started building it. Don't you think it might be time to look for another motive?

[AndyB]

So why were they in Afghanistan looking for him?

[jsiv]

The FBI was in Afghanistan trying to arrest Osama bin Laden?

[DC]

And yet they've still not even started building it. Don't you think it might be time to look for another motive?

cant be spreading freedom and democracy, didnt happen yet

cant be geting Osama didnt happen yet

cant be the UNOCAL pipeline , didnt happen yet


so what is it?

making money for the MIC?

[Totovader]

Thank you but I do not want to wade through the search. I have asked a question. Can someone else answer this please?

If you're too lazy to even use the search function and do your own research, why should anyone put forth any effort to do your work for you?

Welcome to the forums.

[AndyB]

If you're too lazy to even use the search function and do your own research, why should anyone put forth any effort to do your work for you?

Welcome to the forums.


It is not that I am lazy but I believe that when one is told to "refer to the search" then it is obviously a topic that the regulars on here want to hide away. If you do not want to answer that is fine, I would rather wait for someone who did. Thanks for the welcome, tho.

[GeeMack]

It is not that I am lazy but I believe that when one is told to "refer to the search" then it is obviously a topic that the regulars on here want to hide away. If you do not want to answer that is fine, I would rather wait for someone who did. Thanks for the welcome, tho.


You're directed towards a large volume of information on the subject of your query and you think that means people are trying to hide away? Your ability to process things logically appears to be seriously impaired. You might want to see someone about that before you make a complete fool of yourself. (Or maybe it's too late.)

[cyclonic]

So why were they in Afghanistan looking for him?

here's why

UnhJwxYsomw

if you want to know more, watch "inside 9/11:war on america"
here's part 1 of 12 parts.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=pXBH9Yblqls

[AndyB]

You're directed towards a large volume of information on the subject of your query and you think that means people are trying to hide away? Your ability to process things logically appears to be seriously impaired. You might want to see someone about that before you make a complete fool of yourself. (Or maybe it's too late.)

I am asking for an answer on this thread. If you have one, give it. If, not dont bother posting on here. Thanks.

[AndyB]

The FBI are not looking for Osama Bin Laden in relation to the 9/11 attacks, are they?

[MikeW]

cant be spreading freedom and democracy, didnt happen yet

cant be geting Osama didnt happen yet

cant be the UNOCAL pipeline , didnt happen yet


so what is it?

making money for the MIC?
I always thought it was to remove the Taliban government... But hey, that's just me.

[funk de fino]

I am asking for an answer on this thread. If you have one, give it. If, not dont bother posting on here. Thanks.

reported to mods for spamming.

Thread already open for this discussion.

Also do not try to tell people that they cannot post in threads.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=122619

[AndyB]

I always thought it was to remove the Taliban government... But hey, that's just me.


They were first and foremost looking for Osama Bin Laden. Boy, you have a short memory.

[moon1969]

Still Ahmad Shah Massoud was assassinated on September 9, 2001. Two days before the attack? Massoud warned Bush and said that Osama Bin Laden was evil. Then there is what Taliban did to Abdul Haq. There is more then enough evidence to link Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar to 9/11.

[Totovader]

It is not that I am lazy but I believe that when one is told to "refer to the search" then it is obviously a topic that the regulars on here want to hide away. If you do not want to answer that is fine, I would rather wait for someone who did. Thanks for the welcome, tho.

That doesn't even make any sense. The topic has been discussed publicly at length- the information is easily attainable by using a simple search feature... everyone has pointed you to that function, and you claim that these are the symptoms of trying to hide the information...

Can you explain that for me again, I don't want to read your post...

[AndyB]

@funk de fino

Hahaha. Go on report away. How pathetic you are.Were you like that at school, sucking up to authority? And still doing it now by whitewashing a bunch of criminals in the White House and beyond.

It must be in your DNA. :D

[moon1969]

Then there is Ramzi Yousef and his uncle Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. And what about the 9/11 hijackers? Many of them were members of Al-Qaeda? And what about Ayman al-Zawahiri?

[AndyB]

Okay, so why any of you so called 'sceptics' hahahahaha, tell me here and now, why the FBI website does not implicate Osama Bin Laden. Just do it. Stop being lazy and shady. Do it.

[funk de fino]

@funk de fino

Hahaha. Go on report away. How pathetic you are.Were you like that at school, sucking up to authority? And still doing it now by whitewashing a bunch of criminals in the White House and beyond.

It must be in your DNA. :D

reported again.

school was a long time ago, i learned to write with chalk on a slate

i am not american and i hate the bush admin, try again for an excuse to abuse me

[AndyB]

reported again.

school was a long time ago, i learned to write with chalk on a slate

i am not american and i hate the bush admin, try again for an excuse to abuse me


You act like an infant.

[Totovader]

Okay, so why any of you so called 'sceptics' hahahahaha, tell me here and now, why the FBI website does not implicate Osama Bin Laden. Just do it. Stop being lazy and shady. Do it.

That question has already been answered for you. Asking it again won't change the answer.

[funk de fino]

Okay, so why any of you so called 'sceptics' hahahahaha, tell me here and now, why the FBI website does not implicate Osama Bin Laden. Just do it. Stop being lazy and shady. Do it.

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=122619

follow and read

[AndyB]

That question has already been answered for you. Asking it again won't change the answer.

If you have nothing more to say please leave this thread alone, go and get a hobby.

[DC]

I always thought it was to remove the Taliban government... But hey, that's just me.

i have those under spreading freedom and democracy, there are still huge parts in Afghanistan that are more or less Taliban controlled.

[funk de fino]

You act like an infant.

reported again

you will be gone soon if you keep it up

however you have an option to follow the links i gave you and act like an adult and debate properly over there instead of starting threads ad nauseum about the same thing

[MikeW]

They were first and foremost looking for Osama Bin Laden. Boy, you have a short memory.
Really? And yet Bush's Presidential Address of October 7th, announcing the attacks, begins like this:

THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon. On my orders, the United States military has begun strikes against al Qaeda terrorist training camps and military installations of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan. These carefully targeted actions are designed to disrupt the use of Afghanistan as a terrorist base of operations, and to attack the military capability of the Taliban regime.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/10/20011007-8.html

He doesn't mention bin Laden once in the entire address. Why do you think that might be?

[AndyB]

It's just the sameold names on here, say in, day out, whitwashing away. Some of you paid to do it, the rest of you under a psychiatric delusion. Dear oh dear.

[funk de fino]

i have those under spreading freedom and democracy, there are still huge parts in Afghanistan that are more or less Taliban controlled.

not huge parts

[WildCat]

It is not that I am lazy but I believe that when one is told to "refer to the search" then it is obviously a topic that the regulars on here want to hide away.
Yes, it's another conspiracy. :rolleyes:

[MikeW]

i have those under spreading freedom and democracy, there are still huge parts in Afghanistan that are more or less Taliban controlled.
And yet that particular aim has still been vastly more successful than the fantasy of the pipeline, which may never be built. As I said, time for truthers to invent a new motive.

[funk de fino]

Edited - keep posts on topic, and do not personalise discussions

[Totovader]

AndyB- how can you- on the one hand call everyone lazy, and then in the other admit that you can't even be bothered to do your own research, or even use the search function in a forum which is chock full of relevant information?

[AndyB]

Really? And yet Bush's Presidential Address of October 7th, announcing the attacks, begins like this:



He doesn't mention bin Laden once in the entire address. Why do you think that might be?


A few words in a speech from the biggest LIAR on the planet and you are trying to suggest, after ALL the MEDIA had Osama Bin Laden plastered as the mastermind across televisions and newspapers worldwide, that he was not involved. Hahahaha.

[AndyB]

AndyB- how can you- on the one hand call everyone lazy, and then in the other admit that you can't even be bothered to do your own research, or even use the search function in a forum which is chock full of relevant information?

Do you only discuss things once on here?

[Totovader]

I call Pdoh

definantly a UK guy

Not even 15 posts and it's "the sameold names on here, say in, day out, whitwashing away. Some of you paid to do it, the rest of you under a psychiatric delusion."

Odd...

[Totovader]

Do you only discuss things once on here?

Read the forum rules if you have any problems with them- I am not a moderator and I'm not going to discuss forum policy here or with you.

Since you're well on your way to being suspended if not banned, I think it might be time for you to review that information immediately.

[Drudgewire]

Do you only discuss things once on here?


Not even close. If you used the search function you'd know that. :rolleyes:

[MikeW]

A few words in a speech from the biggest LIAR on the planet and you are trying to suggest, after ALL the MEDIA had Osama Bin Laden plastered as the mastermind across televisions and newspapers worldwide, that he was not involved. Hahahaha.
So your case is that bin Laden is a threat used to justify war with Afghanistan... Except, uh, Bush didn't use that as a justification, but that's just because he lied, because, uh... You've really not thought this through, have you?

[AndyB]

Not even 15 posts and it's "the sameold names on here, say in, day out, whitwashing away. Some of you paid to do it, the rest of you under a psychiatric delusion."

Odd...

I have read this forum and all it's lies for some time. I also read that this forim was set up in August 2001. How timely.:jaw-dropp

[Pinch]

Quite obviously the latest graduate of the CT/PffT/CIT School of Debate.

AndyB....get your money back. You were gypped if they gave you a certificate of completion.

[AndyB]

So your case is that bin Laden is a threat used to justify war with Afghanistan... Except, uh, Bush didn't use that as a justification, but that's just because he lied, because, uh... You've really not thought this through, have you?

I am saying that Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld were barking Osama Bin Laden like foaming dogs. Stop lying. JUST STOP LYING. OVER AND OVER.

[WildCat]

I have read this forum and all it's lies for some time. I also read that this forim was set up in August 2001. How timely.:jaw-dropp
:dl: :dl: :dl: :dl: :dl: :dl:

[sleahead]

I call Pdoh

definantly a UK guy

No and yes. A WeAreNutsUK guy trolling for the twoof. Stand by for 11 pages of nonsense.

[MikeW]

I am saying that Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld were barking Osama Bin Laden like foaming dogs. Stop lying. JUST STOP LYING. OVER AND OVER.
Might be time to take your own advice. But I'll now leave you to get banned, which is clearly your aim. Adios.

[AndyB]

Set up August, 2001.

How much do you get paid, NWO Conspirator. I must say that bit in your description is the only truth you have EVER told on here.

[Drudgewire]

I have read this forum and all it's lies for some time. I also read that this forim was set up in August 2001. How timely.:jaw-dropp


http://www.lethalwrestling.com/upload/doh.gif

[D'rok]

Wow. This one seems to be stuck on auto-destruct.

<popcorn smiley>

[twinstead]

Claiming we're all NWO conspirators is a grand way of not REALLY addressing our points. Bravo, Andy. It's almost like we've never seen that tactic before.

You may not be a clown, but you sure are wearing the suit.

[cyclonic]

Seems like a graduate of the alex jones school for the gullible.

[e^n]

Set up August, 2001.

How much do you get paid, NWO Conspirator. I must say that bit in your description is the only truth you have EVER told on here.

We get paid?!

Can you give me the details of who's supposed to pay me? I could do with the cash!

[DC]

We get paid?!

Can you give me the details of who's supposed to pay me? I could do with the cash!

goto

www.cia.nwo/shillrecruitment.html

dont forget to donate to me :D

[Drudgewire]

We get paid?!

Can you give me the details of who's supposed to pay me? I could do with the cash!


From: NWO Payroll Dept: (payroll@oppressivejerks.com)
To: e^n (ekeystrokewhichscrewsupemailsn@oppressivejerks.co m)
Subj: Payscale/timetable

Dear e^n:

We apologize for falling behind. Strippers and staff cocaine parties aren't free you know It seems to be a computer issue and will be resolved shortly.

Thank you for your patience,
The NWO Payroll Dept.

[lapman]

We get paid?!

Can you give me the details of who's supposed to pay me? I could do with the cash!Yeah! Andy reminds me of a couple of terrorist apologists on the MSNBC US News board. They accuse me of being a paid government shill all the time. Same old crap. "You don't believe me without question, so you are on their side." :rolleyes:

[Darat]

Quite a few Membership Agreement breaches in this thread, I was going to attempt to clean it up but since there is a very active thread discussing the issues raised in the OP (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=122619) I'm just going to issue a few infractions and then close it.