PDA

View Full Version : WACs Stalk Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski


Walter Ego
26th September 2008, 09:49 AM
We Are Change NYC stalks MSNBC "Morning Joe" hosts in Manhatten.

From the YouTube description of the video:

We Are Change confronts Joe Scarborough & Mika Brzezinski [daughter of Zbigniew Brzezinski] on the streets of New York City. In this episode Mr. Scarborough after mocking a WTC7 question takes Matt Lepacek's $500 camera phone, removes the cover, and drops it down into the elevator shaft. The video from the phone was later recovered.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ttnea8XmLEI


Ttnea8XmLEI

16.5
26th September 2008, 10:05 AM
Jeez, these guys are hopeless.

They carry with them all of the redeeming qualities of Paparazzi.

And everybody loves Paparazzi!

DC
26th September 2008, 10:06 AM
thats just wrong

technoextreme
26th September 2008, 11:23 AM
thats just wrong
Your right. I would have defiantly made sure that the video could not be recovered.

Björn Toulouse
26th September 2008, 12:12 PM
What the WACs fail to understand is that a lot of people just want to get away from them because they think they're crazy, not because of any complicity they may have with the NWO, etc.

Love the deference they give the male, repeatedly calling him "Mister" and the female, referring to her repeatedly by her first name only.

gc051360
26th September 2008, 01:00 PM
If the WAC people REALLY believe what they claim to, wouldn't they have "bigger fish to fry" than Scarborough?

How exactly does bothering people on the way to their car, spark the revolution?

funk de fino
26th September 2008, 01:21 PM
Complete and utter morons

If they hassled me like that and my missus was there they would get a slap.

I would probably be arrested but it would be worth it.

Walter Ego
26th September 2008, 01:23 PM
What the WACs fail to understand is that a lot of people just want to get away from them because they think they're crazy, not because of any complicity they may have with the NWO, etc.


There was a video made by the WAC chapter in Ireland were the truthers were pursuing and questioning an elderly politician after a public event and the old man panicked and made a run for it and fell down while trying to escape.

Most of the truther targets have the good sense to ignore the stupid questions being hurled at them but what if someone ran into traffic to get away and was seriously injured or tumbled down a flight of stairs trying to escape these loons?

Would they put that video up on the internet or would the camera conveniently “break” at the crucial moment as it did in the Gary Talis “wheelchair assault” incident?

MarkyX
26th September 2008, 03:48 PM
There was a video made by the WAC chapter in Ireland were the truthers were pursuing and questioning an elderly politician after a public event and the old man panicked and made a run for it and fell down while trying to escape.

Most of the truther targets have the good sense to ignore the stupid questions being hurled at them but what if someone ran into traffic to get away and was seriously injured or tumbled down a flight of stairs trying to escape these loons?

Would they put that video up on the internet or would the camera conveniently “break” at the crucial moment as it did in the Gary Talis “wheelchair assault” incident?

Exactly. Reading the stories about WAC defending themselves is along the same veins as Neo-Nazis trying to justify Hitler's actions. They honestly cannot buy into the fact that they are the wrong ones and view everyone else as the enemy.

It really makes me wonder if many members of the movement, like Alex Jones, have autism.

dudalb
26th September 2008, 03:56 PM
This seems to be common behavior with Conspiracy Kooks. It reminds me of the way the Moonbats used to harass people involved with the Apollo landings.
I notice that kind of behavior happend a lot less since Buzz Aldrin took a swipe on one of the jerks.

UNLoVedRebel
26th September 2008, 03:59 PM
When the scientific community fails you, resort to Nazism.

Thunder
26th September 2008, 03:59 PM
what is it gonna take for one the victims of this harrassment to file for a restraining order or a harrassment charge????

how is a woman guilty for the unproven crimes of her father? these guys are such brownshirts.

dudalb
26th September 2008, 04:03 PM
what is it gonna take for one the victims of this harrassment to file for a restraining order or a harrassment charge????

how is a woman guilty for the unproven crimes of her father? these guys are such brownshirts.


What makes it better is that Brzesinski Senior has been a VERY harsh critic of Bush's foreign policy.
But no one ever accused the Twoofers of being smart or well informed.

dudalb
26th September 2008, 04:05 PM
When the scientific community fails you, resort to Nazism.


There is one truther who posts here who has openly said she does not care about the scientific evidence, her "political insight" is proof enough the 9/11 was an inside job.

Thunder
26th September 2008, 04:07 PM
they are just Nazis in blackshirts.

T.A.M.
26th September 2008, 04:25 PM
If the WAC people REALLY believe what they claim to, wouldn't they have "bigger fish to fry" than Scarborough?

How exactly does bothering people on the way to their car, spark the revolution?

If they REALLY believed that Scarborough, and others, were part of the NWO, or gatekeepers for it, they would also know that they would be marked men for such transgressions and exposing them...so OBVIOUSLY, none of the WACs believe in what they are doing.

They are young and stupid, rebellious, and seeking "high fives" from their fellow gomers.

TAM:)

bje
26th September 2008, 04:32 PM
We Are Change makes PETA look like the PTA.

abenja1
26th September 2008, 05:37 PM
Watching this, I didn't see any evidence Scarborough slipped the phone down the elevator. If he did, that WACoff would be screaming about it on the video. And even if he did, I don't feel sorry for the guy. He followed S & B onto private property (a hotel?) and tried to get into the elevator with them even though Joe told the guy to back off. Saying someone is part of a genocide is a real harsh charge and is harassment when they are obviously not.

MaGZ
26th September 2008, 06:06 PM
What makes it better is that Brzesinski Senior has been a VERY harsh critic of Bush's foreign policy.
But no one ever accused the Twoofers of being smart or well informed.

He has been a harsh critic of Israel.

Björn Toulouse
26th September 2008, 06:46 PM
Watching this, I didn't see any evidence Scarborough slipped the phone down the elevator. If he did, that WACoff would be screaming about it on the video. And even if he did, I don't feel sorry for the guy. He followed S & B onto private property (a hotel?) and tried to get into the elevator with them even though Joe told the guy to back off. Saying someone is part of a genocide is a real harsh charge and is harassment when they are obviously not.


The only thing for sure is the WAC's have god-awful camera operators for an enterprise that relies mostly upon its videos. This reminds me of an earlier thread here where a WAC complained that he had been assaulted by an authority figure and that they had it on tape, yet the very tape they showed missed the action involved. Surely they are aware of this.

In the Scarborough incident, I hope the WAC sues him in small claims court if he thinks he has a case. Why not? If he does, I'm sure it will be on their website. If not -we'll never hear about it again like most of their junk.