Harley guy ? Interview on 9/11

[Crazytimes]

A friend of mine sent me this video and says this guy is a plant. This may have been posted before but I did a search and couldnt find anything.

The video is comical and seems like his voice is dubbed but he is saying this guy is a government plant.

Anyone have any info on this guy ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0wHeekgPqk

[16.5]

A friend of mine sent me this video and says this guy is a plant. This may have been posted before but I did a search and couldnt find anything.

The video is comical and seems like his voice is dubbed but he is saying this guy is a government plant.

Anyone have any info on this guy ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0wHeekgPqk

I don't know, because is fake.

Correct me if I am wrong, but Sofia Clunkity Clunk put that together. You will note that it is not actual news reporting, rather it is video from a news report, spliced with other unrelated video, with a faked audio overlayed over both.

[Jonnyclueless]

He seems more like a ficus to me.

[Crazytimes]

I don't know, because is fake.

Correct me if I am wrong, but Sofia Clunkity Clunk put that together. You will note that it is not actual news reporting, rather it is video from a news report, spliced with other unrelated video, with a faked audio overlayed over both.

He isn't buying thst it is a fake. Do you have any info to back it up ?

[lapman]

He isn't buying thst it is a fake. Do you have any info to back it up ?
I usually start a barrage of questions like:
What is his name?
Who does he work for?
You say that he's a plant, what government agency does he work for?
Please provide his badge number.
If you don't know, how can you make that claim? (truther: It was reported so soon, how did the reporter find this guy so quickly)
How soon?
How do you know that the reporter wasn't just lucky?
How do you know that he isn't a structural engineer?

The twoofers usually shut up pretty quickly because they don't like you JAQing off. LOL

[16.5]

He isn't buying thst it is a fake. Do you have any info to back it up ?

Hell yes! Tell him to open his freaking eyes and look at the farking video.

Ask him to admit that it is obviously NOT one continous piece of video. He will have to do that.

Next ask him if he knew who spliced it together.

He won't know.

You do, It was Sofia Clunkity Clunk.

Next link him to the incredible number of web sites out there showing that Sofia is a fraud.

Here is one tying the whole story up in a neat little bow:

http://911researchers.com/node/114?page=2

[Crazytimes]

Hell yes! Tell him to open his freaking eyes and look at the farking video.

Ask him to admit that it is obviously NOT one continous piece of video. He will have to do that.

Next ask him if he knew who spliced it together.

He won't know.

You do, It was Sofia Clunkity Clunk.

Next link him to the incredible number of web sites out there showing that Sofia is a fraud.

Here is one tying the whole story up in a neat little bow:

http://911researchers.com/node/114?page=2

Thanks, although I am sure that wont be enough to him. He is a whole other level of insane.

This is his quote from an email

"Sorry, this is definitely real. This is NOT the best version of it, but this is in fact from I believe the FOX archives. I would not dare challenge me on this if I were you…. This has been used in several films and shows the stock Fox label used in their archiving of news footage."

As you can see he is lost.

[defaultdotxbe]

didnt a truther claim that was gravy once?

[dudalb]

I am telling you, the NWO Plant Hiring Division needs a good overhaul. Way too many bad hires lately.

[Crazytimes]

I have to come back to this thread because he has provided a new video and the following comments.

"Fast forward to 1hr, 2min, 45sec. Blow it up to full screen. NO DOUBT, THIS IS REAL. The audio matches what he says- PERFECTLY.
"

I provided a link to another film where this FOX footage is included raw. It is clearly FOX footage (date/time stamp, Fox ticker, reporter, etc.)."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk7htWPF874

[Crazytimes]

The link I posted is from Loose Change Final cut. I wish there was a way to know when that interview was done because it seems like it was later in the day or maybe the next day. The people around seem pretty calm.

Any help ?

[lapman]

The link I posted is from Loose Change Final cut. I wish there was a way to know when that interview was done because it seems like it was later in the day or maybe the next day. The people around seem pretty calm.

Any help ?
I've seen that clip many times and yes, the guy is saying that. However, it onus is on the twoofer to prove that the guy is a plant. This goes back to the questions in #5.

[Jonnyclueless]

Is there supposed to be something incriminating about the video? I don't get it.

[defaultdotxbe]

Is there supposed to be something incriminating about the video? I don't get it.
because this guy figured out that planes crashing intot he towers and igniting huge fires had something to do with why they collapsed means he must be a government shill, but anyone whos not a shill could see right away they were controlled demolitions

[Jonnyclueless]

My Dad said the towers would collapse form the fire before they did. Does that make him part of the conspiracy? He's an architect who designed large buildings and knew that it would be hard to withstand that kind of damage. It wasn't a scientific deduction, more so a guess based on probability and experience.

Guy sees planes hits the towers and they burn, then collapse. Not too far fetched to assume that the collapse was from the impacts and fires. Now what would be silly would be for the guy who have personally witnessed all that and said "Nah, that couldn't be it".

Sometimes I don't get the logic used by these 9/11 cultists.

[Crazytimes]

I agree....your Dad is in on it ;)

[mchapman]

I don't know, because is fake.

Correct me if I am wrong, but Sofia Clunkity Clunk put that together. You will note that it is not actual news reporting, rather it is video from a news report, spliced with other unrelated video, with a faked audio overlayed over both.

Will you withdraw your claim that it is a fake put together by sofia?

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Will you withdraw your claim that it is a fake put together by sofia?


You missed a step in the process, buddy...

[Homeland Insurgency]

So the debunking of this guy is that it's fake video? Where have I heard about fake video on 9/11 before?

Silly debunkers still can't support a case using their own standards.

[defaultdotxbe]

So the debunking of this guy is that it's fake video? Where have I heard about fake video on 9/11 before?

Silly debunkers still can't support a case using their own standards.
well thats what 16.5 says, i dont know about anyone else i dont agree

yes, the video was edited by sofia, but the audio from the interview is real, she just spliced in clips of what hes describing

to me it just sounds like a guy of average intelligence trying to sound extra smart on TV, he probably knew it was going to be interviewed a few minutes in advance so probably thought about what he was going to say, and thats why it almost sounds scripted

as for when it was, id say probably early afternoon on 9/11

[A W Smith]

a couple of points

I cannot find the harley guy interview at the fox news archives (http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=%28collection%3AFOX_TV%20OR%20med iatype%3AFOX_TV%29%20AND%20-mediatype%3Acollection&sort=-reviewdate)for that day

There is no time stamp and temperature in the fox graphic overlay

http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/harleyguygrab.jpg

http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/foxgrab.jpg


the the very beginning the VCR shows in the upper right hand corner that portions of the video may have been captured from the KTVU fox affiliate probably in the San Francisco Bay area, (note the closing of Golden Gate University)

the video contains footage taken from witnesses near battery park not yet released at that time.

[Mercutio]

Lots of people were guessing what had happened--this guy's guess happened to be later supported by the evidence.

If later evidence had shown, say, planted explosives, he'd be looking pretty silly in hindsight. But no such evidence has been found.

If later evidence had shown, say, energy beam weapons, he'd be looking pretty silly. But no such evidence has been found.

If later evidence had shown, say, the whole thing was psy-ops, and that not only were there no planes but also no towers, he'd be looking pretty silly. But no such evidence has been found.

I get the feeling that the troothers are just a bit jealous. This guy guessed better than they did; clearly, he must be a shill--he couldn't possibly just be smarter, or have been luckier, or whatever. Quick--let's mock him!

[uk_dave]

The funny thing is that some 'truthers' are lauded for being able to claim 9-11 was an inside job within hours of the event, and yet some guy in the street with a little bit of construction knowledge, understanding the vulnerability of a high rise steel structure to massive structural damage and fire, is somehow seen by 'truthers' to be suspicious

Woooooooooooooo

:boggled: