Darat
29th September 2008, 09:43 AM
Been reading up on the Bardford & Bingley takeover and it seems that for about 4 billion up-front cash the government has prevented a run on the bank and the (always predicted) knock-on effects.
To me this particular takeover/bailout/propping up the fat cats (delete as the mood takes you) seems rather a clever one with up to 15 billion of any potential shortfall in the mortgages being paid for by the banks. Am I missing something?
I did think that it may have been the banks being absolutely stupid? I.e. they could have co-operated with one another and effectively directly bought the B&B out for less than 15 billion. I presume they've calculated that they will never be called on for the full 15 billion?
So has the UK government and financial bods actually been sensible or even clever?
(Note this is based on the news reports I've been hearing all day - not had time to research the matter in any detail so if I've got the wrong end of the stick about what has happened this is a parody thread and I'm being really, really clever and not at all stupid.)
To me this particular takeover/bailout/propping up the fat cats (delete as the mood takes you) seems rather a clever one with up to 15 billion of any potential shortfall in the mortgages being paid for by the banks. Am I missing something?
I did think that it may have been the banks being absolutely stupid? I.e. they could have co-operated with one another and effectively directly bought the B&B out for less than 15 billion. I presume they've calculated that they will never be called on for the full 15 billion?
So has the UK government and financial bods actually been sensible or even clever?
(Note this is based on the news reports I've been hearing all day - not had time to research the matter in any detail so if I've got the wrong end of the stick about what has happened this is a parody thread and I'm being really, really clever and not at all stupid.)