Double Presidential Election Conspiracy Theory…

[Aitch]

OK. This occurred to me after reading a load of other conspiracy theories, and seeing if I could come up with one myself. IT’S NOT SERIOUS. But someone, somewhere will probably think it is.

The Republicans, having presided over a fairly disastrous time, decide to lose the election. That way, they leave, possibly, the worst part for the Democrats to deal with. A twofer:
1. the Dems get the blame for not preventing it
AND
2. they may actually take some unpopular measures to ameliorate things.

Next election, the Reps will have two extra weapons to use against them. So, they put up an old man with little chance of winning and give him a weird woman as VP candidate.

Meanwhile, the Dems, not being stupid, realise this is happening and they too try to throw the election. By putting up, as main candidates:
1. a woman (with a husband who has a bit of a reputation)
2. a black guy (with somewhat left wing views).

Let’s face it, neither would win, would they? So the Reps would be forced to preside over a worsening situation and after that probably wouldn’t be electable for years.

Wodaya think? Is it a good theory? Is it original?


BTW not sure if this should really be in Conspiracy Theories, Politics or Humour.

[Biscuit]

Not a bad effort for a sane person.:D

However it seems to me that almost all conspiracy theories come down to anti-semitism or religious bigotry of some sort. Add in something about the joos or the pope and you might have it.

[Lanzy]

It wasn't about stealing the Hope Diamond?

[CriticalThinking]

The real facts are that these two parties are owned by the same people. So, choosing a different party is percieved to be "change" when it clearly is not. If you use logic, you would see that if the democrats didn't do a good job, you would change to the republicans. But, what if the republicans didn't do a good job either? Logically, it would be foolish to go back to the democrat. We would instead choose a new ideology. But that doesn't happen.

If science found that a theory A isn't working, they would get a new theory, theory B. If theory B didn't work, they would make a theory C. They would not go back to theory A.

They (the elites) have you choose between 2 parties and candidates preselected. So you may think you this is a democracy when in reality it is all artificial.

[CurtC]

So, choosing a different party is percieved to be "change" when it clearly is not.

Ahh, the "don't blame me, I voted for Kodos" gambit.

[CriticalThinking]

Ahh, the "don't blame me, I voted for Kodos" gambit.

This post looks random. I don't know why I was quoted.:confused:

[fromdownunder]

This post looks random. I don't know why I was quoted.:confused:

It wasn't random. Don't you watch The Simpsons?

Norm

[steve s]

Double Presidential Election Conspiracy Theory

Is that anything like Double Secret Probation?

Steve S.

[TjW]

The real facts are that these two parties are owned by the same people. So, choosing a different party is percieved to be "change" when it clearly is not. If you use logic, you would see that if the democrats didn't do a good job, you would change to the republicans. But, what if the republicans didn't do a good job either? Logically, it would be foolish to go back to the democrat. We would instead choose a new ideology. But that doesn't happen.

If science found that a theory A isn't working, they would get a new theory, theory B. If theory B didn't work, they would make a theory C. They would not go back to theory A.

They (the elites) have you choose between 2 parties and candidates preselected. So you may think you this is a democracy when in reality it is all artificial.

You haven't thought this through.

This is the NWO we're talking about. They're all-powerful. If they felt the need for a third political party, they'd darn well make one happen.

So if you're thinking that all the political parties are controlled by the elites, that's just what the NWO wants you to think. The truth is far more sinister.