View Full Version : More comedic moments from crack researcher Ranke
Bobert
15th November 2008, 08:51 PM
Oh man someone really should advise Craig to not film himself.
Lots of good stuff here
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=SSyZRa2oIJo
Like on the Howard Stern show he gets all manic at about 3:30.
His complete lack of investigative skills is very apparent.
From the reactions of the audience it doesn't sound like he had more then 10 people in attendance.
Keep up the good work Craig!
You are forever good for a good laugh!
:dl:
Jonnyclueless
15th November 2008, 08:58 PM
He reminds me of one of those cheesy salsemen like for the Flobee, or Shamwow, etc.
njslim
15th November 2008, 09:07 PM
At least Sham Wow works....
R.Mackey
15th November 2008, 09:14 PM
Your thread title is misleading. While his claims are looney to a degree that transcends mere paranoia, I am fairly confident that Mr. Ranke is not researching crack.
A W Smith
15th November 2008, 09:18 PM
What an idiot. Oh did you notice the new NOC flightpath he draws that he refuses to provide the math for? Maybe he can get The Lonesome Bedroom in here to clear up the math for us.
http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/491f57f4.jpg
Mr.Herbert
15th November 2008, 09:20 PM
I have never seen Ranke get all worked up like that. Researching Crack? Nah, rather experimentation.
dtugg
15th November 2008, 09:21 PM
nevermind
Caper
15th November 2008, 09:37 PM
Ok. Why can't Lloyde England sue this idiot?
Reheat
15th November 2008, 09:38 PM
What an idiot. Oh did you notice the new NOC flightpath he draws that he refuses to provide the math for? Maybe he can get The Lonesome Bedroom in here to clear up the math for us.
Some quick calculations for that flight path, which ignores Morin's statements, are right on the edge of a stall at any speed below 300 KIAS. At anything over 400 KIAS it over 80 degrees of bank and from 6 to 10 G's.
dtugg
15th November 2008, 09:42 PM
Ok. Why can't Lloyde England sue this idiot?
I'm sure he could. He probably doesn't even know that Beavis and Butthead are libeling him all over the Internet. And even if he did, he might not care enough to actually sue them. They probably don't have any money anyway.
PB&J
15th November 2008, 09:51 PM
the funniest thing to me is that Ranke himself is actually posting these video's of himself wild-eyed and paranoid... clasping a Captiol Cab car-top nearly screaming the words "we're not trying to demonize this man! this isn't a witch hunt!" as if it helps his credibility.
classic.
Bobert
15th November 2008, 09:53 PM
Your thread title is misleading. While his claims are looney to a degree that transcends mere paranoia, I am fairly confident that Mr. Ranke is not researching crack.
:D
Bobert
15th November 2008, 09:56 PM
the funniest thing to me is that Ranke himself is actually posting these video's of himself wild-eyed and paranoid... clasping a Captiol Cab car-top nearly screaming the words "we're not trying to demonize this man! this isn't a witch hunt!" as if it helps his credibility.
classic.
Yes he had that demented look about him.
That was classic holding that car-top!
Man good stuff!
Brainster
15th November 2008, 11:07 PM
Yes, I think that should be "cracked" researcher Ranke in the title.
R.Mackey
15th November 2008, 11:18 PM
Against my better judgment, I actually watched that.
Now I am sad. :( Please, guys, quit antagonizing these poor fools. It only makes them cling to it harder. Think Christophera if he was a duet.
I've never actually heard anyone say "MKUltra" before, though.
UNLoVedRebel
15th November 2008, 11:21 PM
Your thread title is misleading. While his claims are looney to a degree that transcends mere paranoia, I am fairly confident that Mr. Ranke is not researching crack.
Don't be so sure....
UNLoVedRebel
15th November 2008, 11:34 PM
Oh man someone really should advise Craig to not film himself.
Lots of good stuff here
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=SSyZRa2oIJo
Like on the Howard Stern show he gets all manic at about 3:30.
His complete lack of investigative skills is very apparent.
From the reactions of the audience it doesn't sound like he had more then 10 people in attendance.
Keep up the good work Craig!
You are forever good for a good laugh!
:dl:
You need your old avatar back.
ElMondoHummus
15th November 2008, 11:42 PM
Your thread title is misleading. While his claims are looney to a degree that transcends mere paranoia, I am fairly confident that Mr. Ranke is not researching crack.
You sure he's not researching it the same way Timothy Leary researched LSD?
:D
eromitlab
16th November 2008, 12:09 AM
Ok. Why can't Lloyde England sue this idiot?
Mr. England doesn't want to get stuck with 1000 copies of "North Side Flyover" and "PentaCon" and a box of black t-shirts.
Walter Ego
16th November 2008, 03:48 AM
I have never seen Ranke get all worked up like that.
Then you haven't heard Ranke's call in on the Howard Stern Wrap Up Show.
He went off the rails on that one too.
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=QU8flH9ZdDs
Undesired Walrus
16th November 2008, 03:59 AM
It's sad to see that today (Seven years on) these people are still clinging so firmly to the past, in an attempt to reinvent it. How can you understand the way the world really operates if you are forever stuck in one hour of one day of the past?
Undesired Walrus
16th November 2008, 04:10 AM
Then you haven't heard Ranke's call in on the Howard Stern Wrap Up Show.
He went off the rails on that one too.
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=QU8flH9ZdDs
Craig: "That's an argument from incredooly."
Heh.
SPreston
16th November 2008, 04:31 AM
It's sad to see that today (Seven years on) these people are still clinging so firmly to the past, in an attempt to reinvent it. How can you understand the way the world really operates if you are forever stuck in one hour of one day of the past?
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
WildCat
16th November 2008, 06:53 AM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
Funny, but the spectacular failure of truthers to get any sort of traction shows beyond any doubt that the truth movement will never amount to more that 1% of the population playing the fool for the amusement of the other 99% of us.
But the world needs clowns, so keep at it CIT!
~enigma~
16th November 2008, 07:04 AM
US Government one party system status quo,
Who would have thought, a truther that can't count. Thanks for the comedy...
Mr.Herbert
16th November 2008, 08:07 AM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing.
It's not obsession. It's accessibility. Craig is so often used as a punching bag because everyone knows he reads these threads. At Above Top Secret, he is laughed at there too because he is an easy target and responds with his typical paranoia.
If Richard Gage was know to read the threads in here,(or send in "Turbofan's" and "SPreston's") there would be MANY more about him. If Richard Gage posted at ATS, he would get just as much if not more attention than Ranke.
CptColumbo
16th November 2008, 08:07 AM
"You forgot the first rule of the fanatic: when you become obsessed with the enemy, you become the enemy!" - Cmdr. Jeffrey Sinclair, Babylon 5
Mr.Herbert
16th November 2008, 08:19 AM
Then you haven't heard Ranke's call in on the Howard Stern Wrap Up Show.
He went off the rails on that one too.
http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=QU8flH9ZdDs
I wish he was filmed. Even ba ba booey called him "manic." Good stuff.
applecorped
16th November 2008, 08:20 AM
Against my better judgment, I actually watched that.
Now I am sad. :( Please, guys, quit antagonizing these poor fools. It only makes them cling to it harder. Think Christophera if he was a duet.
I've never actually heard anyone say "MKUltra" before, though.
The video was very realistice.
applecorped
16th November 2008, 08:28 AM
"You forgot the first rule of the fanatic: when you become obsessed with the enemy, you become the enemy!" - Cmdr. Jeffrey Sinclair, Babylon 5
Simon Wiesenthal was a Nazi?
KONRAD KWIET: I mean, he lived more or less some donations, but he was definitely not a wealthy man. He was obsessed that he had to bring war criminals to justice, and he did this, as I've said, or as you said earlier, for more than half a century.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2005/s1464706.htm
;)
X
16th November 2008, 08:51 AM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
Or, possibly, there are people here (and elsewhere) who are of the opinion that those who accuse people of complicity in mass-murder and terror attacks should be held accountable for providing evidence to support their charges.
Something CIT steadfastly refuses to do.
(like interviewing witnesses in a non-leading fashion, or providing calculations showing their flightpath is within the realm of physical possibility, etc)
So as long as Ranke and his chums accuse people without evidence (indeed, without anything more substantial than personal incredulity and ignorance) of being complicit in a horrible attack on their own country, they will be derided and chastised.
CptColumbo
16th November 2008, 08:52 AM
Simon Wiesenthal was a Nazi?
KONRAD KWIET: I mean, he lived more or less some donations, but he was definitely not a wealthy man. He was obsessed that he had to bring war criminals to justice, and he did this, as I've said, or as you said earlier, for more than half a century.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2005/s1464706.htm
;)"[J]ustice, not vengeance.." - Simon Wiesenthal
applecorped
16th November 2008, 09:11 AM
"[J]ustice, not vengeance.." - Simon Wiesenthal
Scholars for 9/11 Truth & JusticeVengeance
ElMondoHummus
16th November 2008, 09:55 AM
Think Christophera if he was a duet.
What the hell's the matter with you?? Are you trying to give me bad dreams??!! :mad:
:D;)
Jonnyclueless
16th November 2008, 10:51 AM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
Ah, the smell of denial in the morning.
16.5
16th November 2008, 10:52 AM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
Random bolding. The hallmark of an effective logician.
Hey, SP, just a quick question from a government loyalist: did you ever ask the CIT boys to give you the math that shows that aplane can fly the path that they claim it flew?
Doesn't it trouble you that they refuse to answer our questions?
A W Smith
16th November 2008, 10:53 AM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
Don't mistake our amusement for obsession. Craig emphatically claims he doesn't demonise Lloyd, But there he goes. right in that very video demonizing Lloyd. And you don't see the mental case disconnect in that? he claims to have solid irrefutable evidence of a NOC flight path. But he does not. all he has is a handful of blue collar workers who cannot judge how close a plane flying 530 MPH was to them 7 years later. he hand waves off all physical evidence as fabricated solely to support his (and your) world view. Its a clown show. I see your post count is up to 15 SPreston. No doubt you will shortly post all manner of animated gifs like on some myspace girly girl web page. But avoid the math for the screen capture of the CIT NOC flight path I posted above.
bje
16th November 2008, 11:08 AM
The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
I guess the fact that we keep asking you for all of your eyewitnesses who saw a jet fly over the Pentagon and away from it is really getting to you, Spreston.
I would go crazy too in your shoes, knowing that you have no evidence for your claims and trying to hide the fact.
Cl1mh4224rd
16th November 2008, 12:52 PM
What an idiot. Oh did you notice the new NOC flightpath he draws that he refuses to provide the math for? Maybe he can get The Lonesome Bedroom in here to clear up the math for us.
http://i294.photobucket.com/albums/mm89/AWSmith1955/491f57f4.jpg
Is it just me, or is that path even more far-fetched than his previous attempts?
A W Smith
16th November 2008, 01:06 PM
Is it just me, or is that path even more far-fetched than his previous attempts?
yes it is. The sweeping curve they used to have that was still impossible was before Morin's testimony was brought to light. So now what they are attempting to do is move Morin away from the security shack where he was just about to reach as he turned while exiting between the wings to a location deep between the annex wings. Thus they have to put the path somewhere near him but to the north just before the view blocking connecting corridor instead of directly overhead as he described. Also some (or one) of the grave diggers over at Arlington cemetery puts the plane over the annex wing just missing the building by feet. It is quite amusing seeing how these idiots have to bump around witness locations and descriptions in a failed attempt to make a conspiracy case. Much like they had to try and blow off Edward Paik's flight description right down Columbia pike just missing the VDOT radio tower simply because .. well. he doesn't speak English clearly.
T.A.M.
16th November 2008, 01:15 PM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
I literally laughed out loud at this (causing my two dogs to begin barking at the door).
So much rage against the machine in one post. So much juvenile rebel.
listen Spreston, most of us began here about 2 years ago (or about that) because at that point, the truthers were at their peak. Even then it was small, but it was vocal, and the ******** they spew actually got some press coverage. I had a friend who was taken up by it, and a sister, who was (until I talked to her) semi believing the crap. That was 2006.
Since then, the truther numbers have dwindled, their public presence (what little there was) has now dropped to next to nil. Do not mistake a cat playing with a ball of wool for OBSESSION. Most debunkers who post here now with any regularity, do so to poke fun, or point out the latest piece of truther stupidity. It just so happens, as proven above, that CIT are at the top when it comes to producing such comedy gold. I am not condoning this, but the facts are the facts...I can't remember the last time there was a new truther theory even worthy of attention, let alone an actual debate here about it.
TAM:)
Cl1mh4224rd
16th November 2008, 01:58 PM
The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts [...]
Is Jon Stewart obsessed with the Bush Administration? Does the constant mockery and highlighting of absurdities by The Daily Show indicate that the Bush Administration has been "quite successful in their efforts"?
Hell no. Stop deluding yourself.
tsig
16th November 2008, 02:03 PM
The video was very realistice.
And very propitious.
UNLoVedRebel
16th November 2008, 03:03 PM
What are SPreston's initials? SP. Which stands for Sock Puppet. Coincidence? Yeah right!
Walter Ego
16th November 2008, 04:04 PM
I wish he was filmed. Even ba ba booey called him "manic." Good stuff.
British actress Billie Whitelaw played Craig Ranke in a production of Samuel Beckett's "Not I" that was put on film. ;)
y3v5oZ-407g
Toke
16th November 2008, 04:22 PM
What annoys me the most in the video is the ages of blather between the points.
If he had just been wrong, in a shorter and more condensed manner it would not have been so bad.
Perhaps he realice that he has litle to say and string it out to hear himself talking.
Mr.Herbert
16th November 2008, 04:38 PM
British actress Billie Whitelaw played Craig Ranke in a production of Samuel Beckett's "Not I" that was put on film. ;)
y3v5oZ-407g
LMAO!
My 5 year old is going to have nightmares. I'm not sure if it will be caused from the laughing mouth, or the voice of Ranke.
Dr Adequate
16th November 2008, 06:58 PM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis? Gosh, are people really posting about 9/11 conspiracy theories in the 9/11 conspiracy theories forum?
This is most peculiar and requires intensive amateur psychoanalysis to explain it.
Perhaps you could start with a little introspection --- what are you doing here?
Dave Rogers
17th November 2008, 01:50 AM
The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America.
It never ceases to amaze me how many different ways the truth movement chooses to argue that millions of people worldwide are flocking to their cause. The only one they seem to have missed so far is evidence of the actual existence of those millions of people.
Dave
SezMe
17th November 2008, 02:15 AM
I've never actually heard anyone say "MKUltra" before, though.
Me too. That was when I closed the window, not needing to hear whatever followed.
Bobert
17th November 2008, 07:00 AM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
Where are the big red fonts and countless pictures and graphics?
SPreston please try harder.
Bobert
17th November 2008, 07:11 AM
Against my better judgment, I actually watched that.
Now I am sad. :( Please, guys, quit antagonizing these poor fools. It only makes them cling to it harder. Think Christophera if he was a duet.
I've never actually heard anyone say "MKUltra" before, though.
What is MK Ultra that Ranke refers to?
Bobert
17th November 2008, 07:14 AM
at 4:12
"Freshly waxed"
:dl:
SERIOUSLY Craig PLEAES PLEASE PLEASE keep putting out videos!!!!!!
dtugg
17th November 2008, 07:20 AM
What is MK Ultra that Ranke refers to?
It was a mind control program run by the CIA in the '50s and '60s. They used LSD (often given to people without them knowing, I love the stuff, but if you've never had it before and somebody slips it to you without your knowledge while trying to study the effects, it would be hell), hypnosis, and stuff like that to try to control people. It didn't work.
Bobert
17th November 2008, 07:31 AM
Aaaaah ok got it thanks!
Wolrab
17th November 2008, 07:40 AM
It was a mind control program run by the CIA in the '50s and '60s. They used LSD (often given to people without them knowing, I love the stuff, but if you've never had it before and somebody slips it to you without your knowledge while trying to study the effects, it would be hell), hypnosis, and stuff like that to try to control people. It didn't work.
Oh, but it did work! At least according to another crack (abusing) researcher here:
http://www.theblackvault.com/ftopict-70067.html
He has done an extensive (ly useless) study and found the link between MKUltra and the Gay Agenda.
Apparently, the use of symbols such as butterflies and rainbows in modern culture are clues to how deeply we are being controlled. There is even a link between Curt Cobain and his friendship with William Burroughs that is irrefutable evidence that the program has its tentacles firmly embedded in countless limp wrists!
There are well over 100 posts (most by the author) that drive the point homo...er... home.
The author doth protest too much, methinks.
apathoid
17th November 2008, 08:00 AM
Poor Craig. I think RMackey is right, better to just ignore him at this point. He is clearly unwell.
16.5
17th November 2008, 11:13 AM
Still waiting on that math, SPRESTON.
Bobert
17th November 2008, 11:16 AM
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:vbgEQaMBo8W4PM:http://www.billybear4kids.com/games/mapedit/math1.gif
jaydeehess
17th November 2008, 11:59 AM
A little research, very little, and I find that there are aircraft that can pull 12+ g's. They are used by competitors in international air races. The pilots are constrained by the rules to keep their climb out to under 11 g's IIRC.
So if I might help the poor CiT out a little (since they seem to not like my theory of the plane flying under the Pentagon) The aircraft that everyone saw was actually an aerobatic aircraft painted to resemble a large Boeing and flying not at 100 feet agl but at 25 feet agl so as to appear large enough (at least to the Citgo people who were directly underneath the plane - I have to work on how this would work fo those with a more profile view). As the fireball developed, drawing the attention of on lookers away from the aircraft and to the bright orange ball, the aircraft performed a 12 g pull up through the flames, inverted and pulled over the Pentagon.
He then flew directly above the C-130 which hid this small plane from sight until they were out of the area.
I have to work out how Sean Boger mistook a small, single prop aircraft for a large twin engined jet with his basically head on view and how the fireball that occured behind Boger could mask the pull up to him. Well, other than to place Boger in the 'agent' category.
A W Smith
17th November 2008, 07:23 PM
anyone notice the opening and closing music is from Adult swims "Home movies" ??
jaydeehess
17th November 2008, 09:20 PM
Oh, but it did work! At least according to another crack (abusing) researcher here:
http://www.theblackvault.com/ftopict-70067.html
He has done an extensive (ly useless) study and found the link between MKUltra and the Gay Agenda.
Apparently, the use of symbols such as butterflies and rainbows in modern culture are clues to how deeply we are being controlled. There is even a link between Curt Cobain and his friendship with William Burroughs that is irrefutable evidence that the program has its tentacles firmly embedded in countless limp wrists!
There are well over 100 posts (most by the author) that drive the point homo...er... home.
The author doth protest too much, methinks.
That thread is more apropos for the JREF thread topic concerning truther insanity. It contains posts from Thunkerdome, evutch and IAM1, three Blackvault posters who quite often display rather twisted logic. For sheer lunacy there are others in the "Government Conspiracies" section of the Blackvault who are actually worse than ChristopherA.
tomwaits
17th November 2008, 11:33 PM
Indeed. The borderline obsession with 9/11 conspiracy theorists on threads such as this one are simply amazing. The obsession is so great that a neutral observer might assume that CIT and the 9-11 Truth Movement in general were becoming quite successful in their efforts; that millions worldwide were becoming convinced that 9-11 was a military psyops mission INSIDE JOB Attack on America. The obsessive compulsive fanatics here at JREF post so many threads on these CIT folks, that it is really flooding the conspiracy forum.
But surely there is some other reason for this obsessive behavior besides a seven year long fear that the US Government one party system status quo, is rapidly sinking into the quicksand which its foundation has been rebuilt upon. Could it be just a simple fear of the truth experienced by so many citizens addicted to boob tube-itis?
(emphasis added)
So...you find it surprising that there is an overabundance of 9/11 conspiracy theories on the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories subforum? You may be on to something, Sherlock!
Bobert
18th November 2008, 10:12 AM
Maybe we should nothing but recipes poseted in the CT section?
:D
jaydeehess
18th November 2008, 11:30 AM
Maybe there should be nothing but recipes posted in the CT section?
:D
shocked, shocked I was to find conspiracies discussed on the 911 conspiracies forum.
Bobert
18th November 2008, 02:05 PM
Those bastards!!!!!!
Its a conspiracy I say!!!
dudalb
18th November 2008, 04:28 PM
shocked, shocked I was to find conspiracies discussed on the 911 conspiracies forum.
And of course you are saying that in your best Claude Rains voice?
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.