PDA

View Full Version : John Kerry -- "Please permit pasta" (Gaza)


webfusion
25th February 2009, 08:18 AM
The Israelis have been given messages from US Sec'y of State Hillary Clinton to allow many more humanitarian shipments to get through than are currently being trans-shipped into Gaza at the crossing points.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1066821.html

Within the article, was this part:
When Senator John Kerry visited the Strip recently, he learned that many trucks loaded with pasta were not permitted in. When the chairman of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee inquired as to the reason for the delay, he was told by United Nations aid officials that "Israel does not define pasta as part of humanitarian aid - only rice shipments."


I would imagine that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is angry at this 'diss'.

timhau
25th February 2009, 08:31 AM
Well, Israel is a Jewish state, not a Pastafarian state.

BPSCG
25th February 2009, 08:59 AM
The Israelis have been given messages from US Sec'y of State Hillary Clinton to allow many more humanitarian shipments to get through than are currently being trans-shipped into Gaza at the crossing points.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1066821.html


Within the article, was this part:

When Senator John Kerry visited the Strip recently, he learned that many trucks loaded with pasta were not permitted in. When the chairman of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee inquired as to the reason for the delay, he was told by United Nations aid officials that "Israel does not define pasta as part of humanitarian aid - only rice shipments."

I would imagine that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is angry at this 'diss'.Why doesn't the UN ship its pasta through the Egyptian border with Gaza? Does Israel control that, too?

webfusion
25th February 2009, 09:33 AM
Why doesn't the UN ship its pasta through the Egyptian border with Gaza? Does Israel control that, too?

Israeli pasta is superb.

Egyptian pasta, not so much.


http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/2652939055_3101125f88.jpg?v=0

Doctor Evil
25th February 2009, 09:39 AM
I find that rather embarrassing. There is no logical reason (that I know of) to decide that rice is humanitarian aid but pasta is not.

webfusion
25th February 2009, 09:43 AM
Pasta, in Gaza, is considered a "specialty" ---- a food item not usually found on the menu of the average family meals.
Rice, on the other hand, is a basic component of their diet.


ETA -- I am curious if the Gazan's are fans of the Egyptian "Koushary" dish?
I would think so...
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/koshary.htm

Doctor Evil
25th February 2009, 09:45 AM
Pasta, in Gaza, is considered a "specialty" ---- a food item not usually found on the menu of the average family meals.
Rice, on the other hand, is a basic component of their diet.

And yet, if some NGO want to donate pasta, it should be possible for them to do so.

BPSCG
25th February 2009, 09:56 AM
And yet, if some NGO want to donate pasta, it should be possible for them to do so.Are Egyptian border guards shooting up UN relief trucks when they try to go into Gaza these days?

If not, what's the problem?

webfusion
25th February 2009, 10:32 AM
And yet, if some NGO want to donate pasta, it should be possible for them to do so.

Well, apparently, the trucks of (donated) pasta arrived at the Israeli checkpost, and they were sent to a 'holding area' with a low priority designation. Since the number of trucks allowed in has been limited by Israel, these lower-priority cargos just sit there on the side, and don't make it through daily.

Mr. Kerry asked for Israel to make an exception, and they did. Pasta-riffic.

The Fool
25th February 2009, 02:48 PM
"Israel is not making enough effort to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza," senior U.S. officials told Israeli counterparts last week, and reiterated Washington's view by saying that "the U.S. expects Israel to meet its commitments on this matter."


ok....back to the pasta jokes, beeps inability to understand the situation on the egyptian border and the general disinterest in Palestinians welfare.

The Fool
25th February 2009, 03:06 PM
Since the number of trucks allowed in has been limited by Israel
why?

gdnp
25th February 2009, 03:11 PM
why?

to punish the Palestinians for voting for Hamas.

BPSCG
25th February 2009, 03:16 PM
ok....back to the pasta jokes, beeps inability to understand the situation on the egyptian border and the general disinterest in Palestinians welfare.I've been asking, but nobody seems to want to explain to me. If Israel won't open the border with blatantly hostile Gaza (and I don't blame them), why doesn't Gaza get relief supplies over the border it shares with Egypt?

I was asking kinda snidely, I'll admit, but nobody has bothered to answer.

Anyone? Bueller?

gdnp
25th February 2009, 03:21 PM
I suspect Israel would like nothing better than to seal their border with Gaza permanently and dump the territory back on the Egyptians. The Egyptians do not seem particularly interested in taking responsibility for cleaning up the mess that the Palestinians and Israelis have made. Do you blame them?

Whether Israel would allow shipments in through Egypt is another question. They seem a bit concerned about the smuggling of weapons for some reason, and I'm guessing you can get more and larger weapons in with trucks than with tunnels. Same with things like cement that can be used to build houses, but can also be used to build bunkers. Israel wishes to maintain control over what goes in and out.

So take your pick. Either Egypt doesn't want it or Israel doesn't want it or both. No one seems to have asked Hamas' opinion.

Alferd_Packer
25th February 2009, 03:48 PM
This is all part of the Prince cartel to turn Wednesday into a world wide Spaghetti Day!

BPSCG
25th February 2009, 04:12 PM
I suspect Israel would like nothing better than to seal their border with Gaza permanently and dump the territory back on the Egyptians. The Egyptians do not seem particularly interested in taking responsibility for cleaning up the mess that the Palestinians and Israelis have made. Do you blame them? Nope. Mubarak has enough problems with Muslim fundies in Egypt. He'd probably be delighted if Israel actually did what E.J. thinks they want to do.

Whether Israel would allow shipments in through Egypt is another question. Does Israel have troops inside Gaza on the Egyptian border that would prevent it? Last I heard they didn't.

Does Israel have troops inside Egypt on the Gaza border that would prevent it? Last I heard they didn't.

So how would they prevent it?

They seem a bit concerned about the smuggling of weapons for some reason, and I'm guessing you can get more and larger weapons in with trucks than with tunnels. OTOH, trucks are easier to inspect.

FWIW, you'd think for all of Hamas's caterwauling about the eeeeeevil jooooz starving its people to death, they don't seem to have any trouble smuggling rockets and other weapons into the country to shoot at the jooooz. Maybe they should devote a little of that energy to smuggling food in, instead, hm?

Same with things like cement that can be used to build houses, but can also be used to build bunkers. Israel wishes to maintain control over what goes in and out. So I'm asking yet again - does Israel control what goes over the Egyptian border into Gaza? Yes or no?

So take your pick. Either Egypt doesn't want it or Israel doesn't want it or both. No one seems to have asked Hamas' opinion.I'll start caring about Hama's opinion when they start acting like civilized human beings.

As far as the rest, both Israel and Egypt are keeping relief supplies from getting into Gaza, but only the filthy joooz get blamed. Typical.

Dr Adequate
25th February 2009, 05:20 PM
Why doesn't the UN ship its pasta through the Egyptian border with Gaza? I think I found a clue.

http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7263/94899176.jpg

The Fool
25th February 2009, 05:36 PM
I've been asking, but nobody seems to want to explain to me. If Israel won't open the border with blatantly hostile Gaza (and I don't blame them), why doesn't Gaza get relief supplies over the border it shares with Egypt?

I was asking kinda snidely, I'll admit, but nobody has bothered to answer.

Anyone? Bueller?
google is your friend....get back to us when you are up to speed on the issue.

BPSCG
25th February 2009, 06:53 PM
I think I found a clue.

http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/7263/94899176.jpgSorry, but I don't see your point here. Mind sharing it?

The Fool
25th February 2009, 08:14 PM
Sorry, but I don't see your point here. Mind sharing it?
well I'm not going to help you since you refered to Israelis as filthy jooos.

quixotecoyote
25th February 2009, 08:20 PM
well I'm not going to help you since you refered to Israelis as filthy jooos.

Hi there, I'm handing out forum awards instead of being productive.

You've just won, "Most transparent evasion of the evening."

moon1969
25th February 2009, 08:58 PM
Those colonial brits sure would have ruled Palestine better than the jews I mean look at all the nice things british colonialism did in Rhodesia, India and Pakistan. :rolleyes: Irgun fought against the british colonialism.

The Fool
25th February 2009, 09:11 PM
Hi there, I'm handing out forum awards instead of being productive.

You've just won, "Most transparent evasion of the evening."

I'd like to thank My manager, my family and of course My lovely ................


Anyway....do you imagine for one moment that beeps doesn't know the answer to his own question :)

quixotecoyote
25th February 2009, 09:16 PM
I'd like to thank My manager, my family and of course My lovely ................


Anyway....do you imagine for one moment that beeps doesn't know the answer to his own question :)

Maybe he does, but I don't.

Remember, you may be arguing with Beeps, but you're performing for a wider audience.

I have no idea why Egypt is in such a hardass on the Gaza border. I can google examples of it, but the reasoning doesn't jump out. Maybe I'm too lazy. Then again, probably most of the people reading who aren't actively debating are that lazy too.

It's possible that we see BPSCG ask a reasonable question (even if used rhetorically) and see you refuse to answer based on protesting anti-semitism in his obvious mockery of anti-semitism. That looked silly.

geni
25th February 2009, 10:01 PM
Maybe he does, but I don't.

Remember, you may be arguing with Beeps, but you're performing for a wider audience.

I have no idea why Egypt is in such a hardass on the Gaza border. I can google examples of it, but the reasoning doesn't jump out. Maybe I'm too lazy. Then again, probably most of the people reading who aren't actively debating are that lazy too.

1)Mubarak has enough trouble with his own islamic extremists he doesn't need to import any more.
2)Logistics of getting there isn't to good. Could be done but would be kinda pricey.
3)Isreal gets kinda sensative over certian types of egyptian activeity in the area such as improvements to transport links that would make moveing troops less of a hastle.
4)Isreal has made it clear it is prepared to attack the gaza side of the boarder if it doesn't like what is going on.
5)Egypt is trying to develop the area as a tourist attraction. UN aid convoys lower the tone of the area.


Basicaly short of building a new sea port by far the easyest way to get stuff into gaza is via isreal.

gdnp
25th February 2009, 10:02 PM
Nope. Mubarak has enough problems with Muslim fundies in Egypt. He'd probably be delighted if Israel actually did what E.J. thinks they want to do.Mubarak and Hamas are not friends.

Does Israel have troops inside Gaza on the Egyptian border that would prevent it? Last I heard they didn't.

Does Israel have troops inside Egypt on the Gaza border that would prevent it? Last I heard they didn't.

So how would they prevent it?By bombing the hell out of the crossing, perhaps? Are you really seriously questioning whether Israel could shut down the crossing to Egypt if they chose to? :boggled:

OTOH, trucks are easier to inspect.Not unless you put Israeli inspectors inside Gaza or inside Egypt, neither of which Israel would seem to want to do. They would become prime targets.

FWIW, you'd think for all of Hamas's caterwauling about the eeeeeevil jooooz starving its people to death, they don't seem to have any trouble smuggling rockets and other weapons into the country to shoot at the jooooz. Maybe they should devote a little of that energy to smuggling food in, instead, hm?I did not know you were an expert on how much difficulty Hamas has in smuggling rockets. If I had to guess, they have considerable difficulty. These tunnels can't be easy to build and maintain, especially with Israel bombing them. The entrances must also be concealed, especially on the Egyptian side, and I suspect officials must be bribed to look the other way. I would guess the volume of goods that they can ship through is quite limited. Thus they probably focus on relatively small, high value items. Although perhaps food comes in as well.

So I'm asking yet again - does Israel control what goes over the Egyptian border into Gaza? Yes or no?Yes.

As far as the rest, both Israel and Egypt are keeping relief supplies from getting into Gaza, but only the filthy joooz get blamed. Typical.
As I said, neither Israel nor Egypt particularly wish to aid Hamas. Israel, as the occupying power, has a responsibility for the civilian population. Egypt is not the occupying power. They do not blockade Gaza's coast, therefore they do not hold legal responsibility for the Gaza residents.

BTW, during the recent Israeli incursion, every vehicle that crossed through the Egyptian crossing was cleared first with the Israelis. This was mentioned in several news reports, but not well publicized, I suspect because the Egyptians did not wish to appear the Israeli's lap dog. It doesn't help their street cred.

plumjam
25th February 2009, 10:15 PM
I saw a similar report from Ragu Omar, whose sources are usually impeccable.

(etc...)

Dr Adequate
25th February 2009, 10:20 PM
I saw a similar report from Ragu Omar, whose sources are usually impeccable.

(etc...) You think this situation is funny?

It's pasta joke.

FireGarden
26th February 2009, 03:03 AM
I've been asking, but nobody seems to want to explain to me. If Israel won't open the border with blatantly hostile Gaza (and I don't blame them), why doesn't Gaza get relief supplies over the border it shares with Egypt?

I was asking kinda snidely, I'll admit, but nobody has bothered to answer.

Anyone? Bueller?

I have criticised Egypt a few times on this forum. There were protests outside Egyptian embassies during the war.

The reason Egypt gives for keeping the border closed is that the agreement they signed doesn't allow them to open the border without monitors from the EU and PA.

That doesn't quite explain shooting at people fleeing a warzone, which is what Egyptians soldiers did back in December.

Egypt is under quite a bit of pressure to ease up on Gaza. But there is also American money to consider.


Wiki has an article on the Rafah crossing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafah_Border_Crossing


Egypt's agreements with Israel also specify the number of troops Egypt is allowed to deploy along the border. Egypt is very resistant to the idea of international troops doing a job its own soldiers could do. I think there was an agreement to increase the number of troops Egypt could deploy. But, in a quick search, I've only been able to find this article:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/958407.html


As for what is smuggled in... Everything. Including cattle:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1030242.html

FireGarden
26th February 2009, 03:10 AM
I suspect Israel would like nothing better than to seal their border with Gaza permanently and dump the territory back on the Egyptians. The Egyptians do not seem particularly interested in taking responsibility for cleaning up the mess that the Palestinians and Israelis have made. Do you blame them?

Back when Hamas broke through the border with Egypt, someone had this idea:
http://haaretz.com/hasen/spages/947858.html

A top Egyptian official said Thursday that Egypt's border with Gaza would go back to normal, and strongly rejected the idea - floated by Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai - that Israel might relinquish all responsibility for the troubled Gaza Strip.

webfusion
26th February 2009, 07:32 AM
why? (limit the amount of cargo transferred into Gaza)

The entire issue is very convoluted.

1. Cpl. Gilad Shalit: His freedom is now being negotiated, and the Israeli gov't. is attempting to link that with the Gaza crossings being opened fully.

2. Israel's representative who is dealing with the crossings and a 'cease-fire' (tadiyyeh)is/was/is Amos Gilad -- who was embroiled in a controversy over the past few days and was sacked, and then re-instated. Amos Gilad got upset that his boss (Ehud Olmert) had decided to merge two distinctly seperate negotiations (namely, the crossings and the tadiyyeh, and the other situation of Cpl. Shalit) into one ball of wax. That brouhaha is still in flux. If you are interested in the nuances, here's the latest ---
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067149.html

3. Rockets have still periodically been launched at Israeli towns since the end of Operation Cast Lead. Israel sees no value in 'rewarding' the HAMAS with pasta dinners, while violence such as this continues.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067149.html
After these barrages against Israel, the IAF flies more missions over the Gaza/Egypt border and drops 500-pounders.

FireGarden
26th February 2009, 10:34 AM
2. Israel's representative who is dealing with the crossings and a 'cease-fire' (tadiyyeh)is/was/is Amos Gilad -- who was embroiled in a controversy over the past few days and was sacked, and then re-instated. Amos Gilad got upset that his boss (Ehud Olmert) had decided to merge two distinctly seperate negotiations (namely, the crossings and the tadiyyeh, and the other situation of Cpl. Shalit) into one ball of wax. That brouhaha is still in flux. If you are interested in the nuances, here's the latest ---
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067149.html


Did you mean to post this link?:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067220.html

webfusion
26th February 2009, 12:05 PM
Thanks, fireGarden, glad someone's paying attention.

I'll see your link and raise it a linky:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1067055.html
"pasta is not a weapon" (editorial)

The Fool
26th February 2009, 02:30 PM
Maybe he does, but I don't.

Remember, you may be arguing with Beeps, but you're performing for a wider audience.

I have no idea why Egypt is in such a hardass on the Gaza border. I can google examples of it, but the reasoning doesn't jump out. Maybe I'm too lazy. Then again, probably most of the people reading who aren't actively debating are that lazy too.

It's possible that we see BPSCG ask a reasonable question (even if used rhetorically) and see you refuse to answer based on protesting anti-semitism in his obvious mockery of anti-semitism. That looked silly.
My humble apologies for the lost period of your life when you were reading my silly post.

Marc39
19th March 2009, 09:38 PM
If Israel won't open the border with blatantly hostile Gaza (and I don't blame them), why doesn't Gaza get relief supplies over the border it shares with Egypt?

Because the Egyptians have steadfastly maintained tightly sealed border closures against the Gazans, except when under extreme duress to open them occasionally. Hamas, the terrorist governing body of Gaza, is descended from the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, which is banned in Egypt for attempting to overthrow Cairo’s secular government, and, so, Hamas is too toxic for the Egyptians, even at the expense of the suffering of their Arab brethren.

gdnp
19th March 2009, 09:46 PM
Because the Egyptians have steadfastly maintained tightly sealed border closures against the Gazans, except when under extreme duress to open them occasionally. Hamas, the terrorist governing body of Gaza, is descended from the fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, which is banned in Egypt for attempting to overthrow Cairo’s secular government, and, so, Hamas is too toxic for the Egyptians, even at the expense of the suffering of their Arab brethren.

Finally, something we agree on. Although I would add that Israel still maintains de facto control over the crossing into Egypt. Nothing goes across without Israeli approval.

Marc39
19th March 2009, 10:07 PM
Finally, something we agree on. Although I would add that Israel still maintains de facto control over the crossing into Egypt. Nothing goes across without Israeli approval.

The Egyptians do not have to have their arms twisted to prevent the Palestinians from entering. Nor, the Jordanians. Nor, the Lebanese. Get the picture?

gdnp
19th March 2009, 10:11 PM
The Egyptians do not have to have their arms twisted to prevent the Palestinians from entering. Nor, the Jordanians. Nor, the Lebanese. Get the picture?

I think a more relevant statement would be that the Egyptians don't need to have their arms twisted much to support the Israeli blockade. They have no love for Hamas.

Marc39
19th March 2009, 10:25 PM
I think a more relevant statement would be that the Egyptians don't need to have their arms twisted much to support the Israeli blockade. They have no love for Hamas.

More broadly, the Egyptians have no love for the Palestinians, in general. In stark contrast, prior the Arafat intifadas, Israel was the Palestinians' largest trading partner, representing about 80% of their trade. Now, the Palestinians have bupkis and Suha Arafat is living a life of luxury with Yasir's ill-gotten $billions.

Shadowdweller
20th March 2009, 01:04 AM
Dash it all! Somebody's gone and leaked Project Great Seitan: My evil scheme to conquer the world using gluten-based explosives.