PDA

View Full Version : What kind of prison is this???


Checkmite
16th March 2009, 01:13 PM
MONTAGUE, Texas – For months, perhaps longer, the Montague County Jail was "Animal House" meets Mayberry. Inside the small brick building across from the courthouse, inmates had the run of the place, having sex with their jailer girlfriends, bringing in recliners, taking drugs and chatting on cell phones supplied by friends or guards, according to authorities. They also disabled some of the surveillance cameras and made weapons out of nails.

The doors to two groups of cells didn't lock, but apparently no one tried to escape — perhaps because they had everything they needed inside.

The jailhouse escapades — some of which date to 2006, according to authorities — have rocked Montague (pronounced mahn-TAYG), a farming and ranching town of several hundred people near the Oklahoma line, about 65 miles northwest of Fort Worth.

There were whispers in the past year about an affair between a female jailer and male inmate, but folks dismissed the rumors as small-town gossip. It was not until late last month, when a Texas grand jury returned a 106-count indictment against the former sheriff and 16 others, that the inmates-gone-wild scandal broke wide open.

The indictment charged Bill Keating, sheriff from 2004 until December, with official oppression and having sex with female inmates. The others indicted include nine guards — seven women and two men — who were charged with various offenses involving sex or drugs and other contraband. Four inmates also were charged.

Linkaroony! (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090316/ap_on_re_us/animal_house_jail)

While this is truly a horrible thing, and I do hope the offenders get what they deserve, I couldn't help but notice that the fellow in the deepest of the hot water is the sheriff of Montague, Texas. If Buford T. Justice were still in charge there, surely none of this would've happened.

Cleon
16th March 2009, 01:16 PM
Maybe they'll all be sent to Joliet.

Eddie Dane
17th March 2009, 02:23 AM
Sounds like a typical weekend at my house.
Including the handcuffs.

In a weird way it sounds like we could learn something from this.
Such as: if you allow inmates to smoke dope and have a shag once in while, you don't even have to lock the doors.
Considering the highly privatised nature of the US prison system, this might make it all more cost effective and less labour intensive (apart from the sex bit).

I assume the inmates will smuggle in their own contraband at no extra cost to the taxpayer.

Ryokan
17th March 2009, 02:28 AM
Maybe they'll all be sent to Joliet.

You mean Capulet?

Ashles
17th March 2009, 04:45 AM
In a weird way it sounds like we could learn something from this.
Such as: if you allow inmates to smoke dope and have a shag once in while, you don't even have to lock the doors.
So if we remove the 'unpleasant' part of the prison experience it'll be easier to manage?

Uh yes probably but doesn't that ever so slightly defeat the point of sending people to prison in the first place?

I'm sure if you send prisoners to the Venetian at Las Vegas aad order them room service they will happily stay there wthout the doors being locked. I'm just not quite sure what incentive there then is for people not to commit crimes.

Eddie Dane
17th March 2009, 04:58 AM
So if we remove the 'unpleasant' part of the prison experience it'll be easier to manage?

Uh yes probably but doesn't that ever so slightly defeat the point of sending people to prison in the first place?

I'm sure if you send prisoners to the Venetian at Las Vegas aad order them room service they will happily stay there wthout the doors being locked. I'm just not quite sure what incentive there then is for people not to commit crimes.

There has to be a catch of course.
Maybe they can play Rick Astley's greatest hits over the speaker system 24/7?

Wildy
17th March 2009, 07:05 AM
There has to be a catch of course.
Maybe they can play Rick Astley's greatest hits over the speaker system 24/7?

Wouldn't that violate the US Constitution? I thought there was a bit that said that cruel and unusual punishment is against the law.

Ladewig
17th March 2009, 07:10 AM
There has to be a catch of course.
Maybe they can play Rick Astley's greatest hits

He had more than one?!

Gagglegnash
17th March 2009, 07:32 AM
Hi

He had more than one?!


(I think that may be the point.)

I guess it all depends on what a prison is for, right?

If it's to reeducate criminals and make them functional, productive citizens, then the current prison system is pretty much not getting the job done. Being sentenced to a US prison is little more than matriculation in a post-graduate course of study in advanced jackassulation.

If the purpose is to get the criminals out of circulation, in a very out-of-sight-out-of-mind kind of way, this would work as well as any.

Bikewer
17th March 2009, 07:38 AM
Maybe we should just go for the Escape From New York scenario. Pick an appropriate spot, and drop the convicted in as a one-way ticket. Do what you like inside.

Stacko
17th March 2009, 07:54 AM
Maybe we should just go for the Escape From New York scenario. Pick an appropriate spot, and drop the convicted in as a one-way ticket. Do what you like inside.

I suggest Austalia. Worked pretty well the first time so why not try again.

:boxedin:

Checkmite
17th March 2009, 09:19 AM
Wouldn't that violate the US Constitution? I thought there was a bit that said that cruel and unusual punishment is against the law.

The Constitution very specifically says cruel AND unusual punishment. While being forced to watch Rick Astley videos is indeed inhumanly cruel, recent developments have been such that it can no longer be considered "unusual" in any way. Thus, being sentenced to Rick Astley is constitutionally permissible.

Wildy
17th March 2009, 07:03 PM
But isn't it unusual in terms of punishment though?