PDA

View Full Version : The Jews murdered George Carlin!!!


Thunder
21st March 2009, 10:59 AM
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/topic/1386578/1/

I love these guys. They make me feel soo...well.....normal.

:D

AStone
21st March 2009, 03:44 PM
Indeed. It is a well known fact that Zionists are able to shrink themselves (Innerspace-style) and clog the hearts of 9/11 truthers. Alex Jones had a show all about our shape-shifting Jew friends.

Gord_in_Toronto
21st March 2009, 03:56 PM
Well I don't know. Who am I to dispute reasoning like this?

However this was a man who had already had 3 non-fatal heart attacks. Heart attacks get less dangerous every time you have one so it's impossible that this is what would have killed him.

:boggled:

Thunder
21st March 2009, 03:57 PM
Indeed. It is a well known fact that Zionists are able to shrink themselves (Innerspace-style) and clog the hearts of 9/11 truthers. Alex Jones had a show all about our shape-shifting Jew friends.

Yes...we Jews are pretty sneaky!!

alfaniner
21st March 2009, 04:11 PM
Not having read the article I can't comment on it. But considering some of his routines, I'd suspect it would be the Roman Catholics who wanted to do it.

1337m4n
21st March 2009, 07:16 PM
Sometimes people actually just die from heart failure. Not everything is some sort of conspiracy.

Did...did a Truther actually say this???

I am shocked. Shocked in a good way, but shocked. This Truther shows signs of rational thought.

1337m4n
21st March 2009, 07:18 PM
Heart attacks get less dangerous every time you have one

http://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/images/jmiles/2008/07/08/sense.jpg

Thunder
21st March 2009, 08:28 PM
Did...did a Truther actually say this???

I am shocked. Shocked in a good way, but shocked. This Truther shows signs of rational thought.

Clearly a double-agent for the Illuminati.

plumjam
21st March 2009, 08:45 PM
Stuff and nonsense.

Drudgewire
21st March 2009, 08:56 PM
However this was a man who had already had 3 non-fatal heart attacks. Heart attacks get less dangerous every time you have one so it's impossible that this is what would have killed him.


It's the guy's first post. I'm going on the assumption he's a non-truther fishing for stupid.

Because otherwise... :boggled:

Myron Proudfoot
22nd March 2009, 02:07 PM
now THAT is Stundie Material!!!!!

Thunder
22nd March 2009, 04:43 PM
"Jerome Seinfeld even paid tribute to the man afterwards. Seinfeld is a top agent for the Mossad, charged with rallying support for their cause. "

This from someone on Loose Change. Classic.

Zim
22nd March 2009, 05:50 PM
this is why I don't click on links, I wish I hadn't clicked on that one, give me a refund for the 3 minutes of my life I wasted please :P

Horatius
22nd March 2009, 06:56 PM
this is why I don't click on links, I wish I hadn't clicked on that one, give me a refund for the 3 minutes of my life I wasted please :P



Granted.


You will now die three minutes later than we had planned on.


[/EvilNWOPlot]

Gord_in_Toronto
22nd March 2009, 06:59 PM
this is why I don't click on links, I wish I hadn't clicked on that one, give me a refund for the 3 minutes of my life I wasted please :P

Zim. I see you are new. Welcome and please read section 61.6 iii (a) of the secret membership agreement you automatically agreed to by posting here. It says that no one who posts in this forum ever gets a portion of their life back for any reason.

(Unless you buy the special key from me by depositing $400 to my PayPal account). :D

And don't listen to Horatius. He has no official status here what-so-ever. :duck:

Gord_in_Toronto
22nd March 2009, 07:01 PM
OOps.

Horatius
22nd March 2009, 07:12 PM
And don't listen to Horatius. He has no official status here what-so-ever. :duck:




Not Official, no. [/PowerBehindTheThrone]

MattusMaximus
22nd March 2009, 07:22 PM
The stupid! It burns!!! :flamed:

Thunder
22nd March 2009, 07:35 PM
The stupid! It burns!!! :flamed:

it freezes..it freezes!! take it off!!!

:D

1337m4n
22nd March 2009, 08:55 PM
Who is this "Jerome" Seinfeld?

JoeyDonuts
22nd March 2009, 10:27 PM
My stars, I do believe Borat's anti-semitism makes more logical sense than this drivel.

"Beware the Jooo Claw....."

Alex Libman
22nd March 2009, 10:58 PM
(1) Given billions of people with Internet access, someone is bound to say something stupid. Deal with it.

(2) The word "Jew" doesn't appear anywhere on the original thread. You're projecting.

(3) I would like to dedicate this post to the memory of all the murdered journalists everywhere.


PS: ****, piss, ****, ****, **********, ****************, tits.

JoeyDonuts
22nd March 2009, 11:07 PM
Great. Let's start with Daniel Pearl who was NOT murdered by Jews.

Although I'm certain somebody somewhere on InfoWars or ATS disagrees with me.

Alex Libman
22nd March 2009, 11:32 PM
Being Jewish myself, I am offended when my entire ethnic group is blamed for the actions of particular individuals, like the much-mythologized but none-the-less real criminal interests affiliated with the Israeli government. Not all Italians are in the Mafia...

Travis
23rd March 2009, 12:24 AM
Being Jewish myself, I am offended when my entire ethnic group is blamed for the actions of particular individuals, like the much-mythologized but none-the-less real criminal interests affiliated with the Israeli government. Not all Italians are in the Mafia...

Bah! The fun of stereotypes is always ruined by facts.

JoeyDonuts
23rd March 2009, 12:32 AM
But having a scared "Us vs Your Particular Boogeyman" worldview just saves so much time! I don't ever have to worry about learning about other cultures or listening to another person's argument. And I SURE as hell have the comfort of never having to examine my own beliefs. Plus, feeling like I'm the only goldfish swimming upstream makes me feel important and special - which is important for me because I've been fired from like, 6 jobs now. But that's all going to change when we burn the Grove to the ground and take the power back!

How exactly do we find "Them," though. That's the question really. Where do we start?




*crickets*




....crap.

Donal
23rd March 2009, 06:56 AM
(1) Given billions of people with Internet access, someone is bound to say something stupid. Deal with it.

Thanks for setting my irony meter on fire, jerk.

(2) The word "Jew" doesn't appear anywhere on the original thread. You're projecting.

I guess you missed the Mossad references.

(3) I would like to dedicate this post to the memory of all the murdered journalists everywhere.

I would like to express my disappointment to all the teachers you had growing up.

Alex Libman
23rd March 2009, 07:10 AM
How exactly do we find "Them," though. That's the question really. Where do we start?

Government. All government. If any problems exist in the world that aren't based on the "divine right of kings" delusion, those problems are trivial and easy to solve.


I guess you missed the Mossad references.

What does "Judaism with the Mossad" have to do with Jews at large?

Once again, you can blame a mafia boss without blaming all Italians.


I would like to express my disappointment to all the teachers you had growing up.

Me too. The overwhelming bulk of my intellectual growth took place independently of structured schooling.

JoeyDonuts
24th March 2009, 09:08 PM
Government. All government. If any problems exist in the world that aren't based on the "divine right of kings" delusion, those problems are trivial and easy to solve.

Okay, then solve Cold Fusion, cure cancer, regenerate spinal tissue, travel past light speed and figure out How They Cram All That Graham into Golden Grahams.

GO!

1337m4n
24th March 2009, 10:24 PM
The overwhelming bulk of my intellectual growth took place independently of structured schooling.

And look what that did to you.

Donal
25th March 2009, 07:47 AM
Thanks. So many remarks rushed into my head at that comment, I couldn't handle it all.

Alex Libman
25th March 2009, 08:48 AM
Okay, then solve Cold Fusion, cure cancer, regenerate spinal tissue, travel past light speed and figure out How They Cram All That Graham into Golden Grahams.

GO!

Those are not problems. The fact that humans are susceptible to cancer, and that medical solutions for spinal tissue regeneration don't just fall from the sky, are the reality we live in at this time. No one artificially imposed cancer on the human race, the way government has been imposed.

Many other challenges to human quality of life have been solved over time through the natural forces behind the human civilization - science and capitalism (which are really one and the same). And the forces that are contrary to civilization, most notably religion and government (which are really one and the same), have done quite a bit over the centuries to slow down the rate of economic and scientific advancement...

It takes quite a bit of education (and reeducation, if you went to a government-controlled school) to clearly recognize that non-aggression (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle) is the root of principle of civilization, and that the overwhelming majority of aggression in this world is institutionalized (i.e. government). Many people who are still stuck inside the socialist brainwashing bubble, but who recognize its contradictions, have been known to fall onto many silly theories about the source of evil in this world: "NWO", "Illuminati", a vast conspiracy by a particular ethnic group, etc. They don't see the forest for the trees.

Dave Rogers
25th March 2009, 09:08 AM
Those are not problems.

Would you please explain to my sister that her colostomy bag, poor general health, frequent hospitalisation and high probability of dying before her children are old enough to look after themselves are "not problems"?

Dave

Alex Libman
25th March 2009, 09:43 AM
We're speaking different languages here. I'm speaking in logic, you're speaking in emotional manipulation.

Dave Rogers
25th March 2009, 09:52 AM
No, you're redefining words to suit your purpose. No rational person would deny that, for an individual, suffering from cancer is, or creates, problems. However, you choose to believe that all problems are created by governments, so in support of this you have redefined the word "problem" to exclude anything that is not created by governments. And to refer to this practice as "speaking in logic" is a colossal irony; you're committing the classic logical fallacy of begging the question.

Dave

Skeptic
25th March 2009, 11:16 AM
(1) Given billions of people with Internet access, someone is bound to say something stupid. Deal with it.

True, but the chances of that happening increases quite a bit on conspiracy theory web sites.

Alex Libman
25th March 2009, 11:23 AM
[...] No rational person would deny that, for an individual, suffering from cancer is, or creates, problems. [...]

My original statement still stands, and I'll repeat it for those who are easily distracted: "If any problems exist in the world that aren't based on the 'divine right of kings' delusion, those problems are trivial and easy to solve."

Choosing to nitpick the word "problem" as a limitation of human capacity only shows the desperation of my critics. "Boo hoo hoo, we're not immortal, so let's worship government, which slows down economic growth and limits our life expectancy, but at least we don't have to think and take individual responsibility for our own lives." What's the logic in that? There is none, just an appeal to pity to distract from the topic at hand.

Our ancestors had limitations when they've just crawled out of whatever primordial goo that was, and I'm sure our descendants will have limitations a million years from now too, with so many galaxies to colonize. Those challenges are natural, they are a part of reality. You can't blame one and two for adding up to three! Government, on the other hand, is a harmful result of human action - a "problem" in the true sense of that word!


True, but the chances of that happening increases quite a bit on conspiracy theory web sites.

So don't go on conspiracy theory web sites. I don't.

Dave Rogers
25th March 2009, 11:30 AM
My original statement still stands, and I'll repeat it for those who are easily distracted:

And your argument in its favour is still circular.

Dave

Alex Libman
25th March 2009, 12:00 PM
Which argument are you referring to?

(1) That institutionalized violence (i.e. "government") is a problem. That's something we've been discussing for quite some time. Read Murray Rothbard.

(2) That the tragic reality of human mortality should not be used as a distraction when talking about real problems caused by human action. The government is hurting your life expectancy, not helping it. Read Mary Ruwart.

dudalb
25th March 2009, 02:38 PM
If any problems exist in the world that aren't based on the 'divine right of kings' delusion, those problems are trivial and easy to solve."

You actually believe that crap?

Alex Libman
25th March 2009, 03:22 PM
No, I devote my life to arguments I DON'T believe in. I'm weird like that. :rolleyes:

Your surprise comes from your ignorance. Read up on Anarcho-Capitalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-Capitalism). You might learn something.

1337m4n
25th March 2009, 10:58 PM
Which argument are you referring to?

The argument that all "problems" are caused by government.

You supported this argument by defining "problem" so as to exclude anything not created by government.

He is correct; you commit a begging the question (http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/begging-the-question.html) fallacy.








I always have to laugh at people who think that anarchy is some kind of utopia. You want to look at a real-life example of an anarchy? Knock yourself out. (http://img.4chan.org/b/imgboard.html)

1337m4n
25th March 2009, 11:51 PM
You want to look at a real-life example of an anarchy? Knock yourself out. (http://img.4chan.org/b/imgboard.html)

I recommend starting your tour of this model utopia by asking the residents for "CP". Maybe you'll find something suited to your personal tastes.

1337m4n
26th March 2009, 12:06 AM
Anarcho-Capitalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-Capitalism)

That's a misnomer if I ever saw one. Capitalism needs property rights and contract law in order to function at all; it needs a mechanism for correcting externalities in order to function at peak efficiency.

Alex Libman
26th March 2009, 07:36 AM
The argument that all "problems" are caused by government.

You supported this argument by defining "problem" so as to exclude anything not created by government.

You need to re-read what's been said and think more carefully. I said most, not all. And, as is reasonable for that context, I am defining "problem" as an impediment to human progress within the context of reality, in this dimension, here on planet Earth. Once again, the fact that we're not living on Planet X where water flows uphill and people live forever is not a "problem".


I always have to laugh at people who think that anarchy is some kind of utopia. You want to look at a real-life example of an anarchy? Knock yourself out. (http://img.4chan.org/b/imgboard.html)

Why in your mind is 4chan a better example of Anarcho-Capitalism than this forum? This forum is a privately owned resource, it doesn't have a monopoly on violence. I may disagree with the mods (and I very often do), but I am free to leave at any time and start my own skeptics forum.


I recommend starting your tour of this model utopia by asking the residents for "CP". Maybe you'll find something suited to your personal tastes.

In a free society, I'm sure there would be better CP galleries than that forum freely distributed in public domain. And if you're trying to insult me somehow, it just isn't working.


That's a misnomer if I ever saw one. Capitalism needs property rights and contract law in order to function at all; it needs a mechanism for correcting externalities in order to function at peak efficiency.

Exactly. And the government is the biggest hurdle to that. Half your property isn't yours even in the best of times, and the government can take it all away any time it so chooses.

Jontg
28th March 2009, 02:56 PM
I think you're doing a fairly good job of insulting yourself, Libman--and also being a sterling example of why humans need laws and governments in the first place.

Gord_in_Toronto
28th March 2009, 08:32 PM
I think you're doing a fairly good job of insulting yourself, Libman--and also being a sterling example of why humans need laws and governments in the first place.


;)