PDA

View Full Version : March Stundie Finals


Travis
1st April 2009, 02:52 AM
So, the winner, by a single vote, from February was.......................drumroll...............

here's a link to start with, http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/canola.asp The polymer chain in the oil is wrong for us and it blocks the osmosis process in our eyes and that causes pressure to build up mimicking glaucoma over a long period and kills nerves ending in blindness.

Yes, a claim that links to snopes where the pages explicitly debunks the claim.:rolleyes:

Oh thanks to you, poster, for gifting that to us. This if for you:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/1110746a2433fc6d0e.gif

So, now to the best from March.



1) If you lock a thousand anarchists in a room with money and supplies what might they do? Answer: control hurricanes, it seems.
The symbol in the eye of the hurricane is obviously the Anarchy "A". So it was created by anarchists. Who knew they were so well versed in weather control?
****
2) Let's see, space suits? Check. Superfluid Helium at -270 C? Check.
If it's not water, perhaps? Superfluid helium has no viscosity, and acts like a vacuum.
...
The main point is this - that water isn't necessarily the only liquid medium available to the Chinese for simulating a space walk. At least one alternative medium is known to exist.
****
3) Oh, they started every super terrible war....but they don't exist....and they're not evil....even though they don't exist.:boggled:
Nobody is talking about killing jews. You can't kill something that doesn't exist.

The "jews" are a Mongoloid asiatic race, descendants of cain and are responsible for WW1, WW2, the war in Iraq, 9/11, and coming soon to home near you, war with iran.

Now I do not hate so-called jews. I need to make that clear. There are just evil people. No color, creed,race, or religion. we are simply talking about evil PEOPLE. NOT evil religion, evil race, Etc.
****
4) I guess these are the same scientists who are conspiring to tell us that people can't turn invisible.
Q: "If you're not sure about the motive, why do you say there is a conspiracy?"

A: Well it's quite simple really; if the Earth is in fact flat, then the space agencies must be lying when they say it isn't.
****
5) I know when I see lots of smoke coming from a building I think, "wow, must be some smoke generators in there!"
That's a smoke generator, no error. It seems obvious to me that that smoke is being mechanically pumped out like the smoke from a locomotive.
****
6) Atoms! A heresy from the Hindus, brought to us by the Jews!
Of course, the nuclear atom is a myth on top of a myth. Atoms themselves do not exist at all. It is a false theory of Pythagoras's students Leucippus which Pythagoras learned from secret sects in India when he visited there in the sixth century BC at the behest of the jews in Babylon to spread the worst heresies of the hindus in the West.
****
7) It seems the WTC had some weightless floors at the top.
The weight of one floor was suddenly applied to the intact floor below, not the weight of 12 or 29.

****
8) Well, thank goodness this happened in Jew York and not New York.
76 Jews out of 3,000 is around 2.7%. If the Jew York Jewish population is say, 20% there should have been 600 Jews killed in those buildings. That just 76 were murdered that day (as tragic as that surely is for them and their families) simply tell me that this was an INSIDE JOB involving Jews from top to bottom and they managed to save as many of theirs as they could.
****
9) So this is why the estimate to design my new tool shed was $3 million!
I've never designed a building to resist an aircraft impact in my life.
All architects and designers normally do this, especially in areas of heavy congestions, near flight paths, in l;arge cities and towns. Civil engineering rules and regulations make this to be manadatory, in the same way as fire escapes are mandatory in public buildings.
****
10) There was a dastardly plan made fifty years ago by the NWO to have retired veterans eventually die of old age.
The truck driver also admitted “Each burial vault holds four caskets.” I took note that if caskets were not used you could fit 40 bodies or more in each one.

So if these were to hold four troops each and the truck driver did know what he was talking about; this would mean that there are plans in advance for over 4000 U.S. soldiers deaths.
****
11) It seems scientists will dismiss evidence because it's not trendy enough.
I anticipate an objection. The objection is that there are no peer reviewed scientific physical evidence of UFO’s, therefore any scientific evidence that is not peer reviewed must be dismissed. This argument is invalid, because it commit’s the fallacy of appealing to an authority of some entity(a peer group) If some authority dismisses a scientists evidence, it does not mean that the scientists evidence is false, it simply means the authority doesn't like it.
****
12) Hawaii. In the dark ages until 1961!
If baby "O" has a Hawaii BC it proves nothing. Hawaii was a brand new State in 1961 and issued BCs to just about any person that walked up to the window with a child under the age of consent. You know Hawaii is a group of islands some big others small. Well the locals on the small islands got around on dugout canoes. Sometimes it took months to paddle a kid to the main island to get some white man's paper filled out. The new states workers were probably less than efficient and could have cared less if they registered a foreigner as a Hawaiian.
****
13) So, since I can take two extra strength Tylenol I should also be able to take the whole bottle at once!
If something is toxic then it's toxic. Why would the amount matter? It's still toxic isn't it?
****
14) So the CIA was behind What Women Want!?!
Mel Gibson is a THEM. In his movie, THE PATRIOT, his first words are, when weighing a chair, in the film, are: "9 pounds, eleven ounces...perfect." This was a message to many CIA operatives and the elite, that plans were going forward. The agency constantly controls Hollywoood. They used Mel all the time, when they want to sell IT BIG. So, look at Mel's movies from '90 onward, and you'll see how this is done. Cuz when the illuminati want to do it BIG, they always say, "get Mel Gibson."
****
15) It seems someone found the Bizzarro world NIST report.
Critical thinkers will always be on the side of not just taking the lame approach "I saw a big fire ball and a jet explode" as being for that's the reason the buildings collapsed....this is why the cowards here, the people that are afraid to think, the shills that readily and easily accept the NIST report....
****
16) DNA Fairy was going to be my second guess as to where it comes from.
That is not proof, that is your faith in the DNA Fairy. He provided the DNA and remains to the lab. Do you know where the DNA and remains came from?
****
17) Real time CGI for amateur camcorders is so much more believable than compression artifacts.
Well if you look at the live pictures from amateurs 9/11 one frame at the time, you can clearly see that the plane is a CGI. You can see the building repair itself after the wings are in the building. Don't you think that's funny?
****
18) He Googled misspelled names and found nothing. That's it. There is nothing else he can do.
Has anyone investigated the alleged passengers and their occupations, etc ... I was trying to cross reference the names in the Mousawi trial flash presentation and google'ing their names and Im not getting much, some but not much. There must be an easier way than this...
****
19) Yes, high evidentiary standards have always been the bane of the "Truth."
A Truth Commission would be more likely to have the truth emerge on Bush administration policies since it would not be burdened by the high evidentiary standards needed for criminal prosecution.
****
20) So this is why Insurance Companies are going broke.
In July of 2001 the Trade Centers were sold to a private individual - Larry Silverstein, with an insurance policy for 230 billion should the towers be destroyed by a terrorist attack. Coincidence?

There you are folks. I had to leave out so many good ones this month but that just means you all are doing a great job in finding them!

Sincerely,
Lord Tyrant of the Stundies

Dave Rogers
1st April 2009, 03:12 AM
Well, I've kicked off with my four favourites, but I wish I could double vote for #6. The sheer frothing-mouthed lunacy of the thread where this one originated is practically a work of art.

Dave

funk de fino
1st April 2009, 03:51 AM
Number 6 because I can almost see the frothing at the mouth from that one.

And my friend C7's weightless floors of course.

Travis
1st April 2009, 04:51 AM
By the way, #16 should read DNA Fairies deliver.

GStan
1st April 2009, 05:02 AM
I like 13 and 17, but I had to vote for C7's weightless floors as well.

Disbelief
1st April 2009, 05:15 AM
Two months in a row my nominee made it to the finals! I would like to thank Aldo for his contribution and wish him well.

ETA: I just realized on got two this month! Now all I need to do is find that winner.

tsig
1st April 2009, 06:08 AM
I voted for 6 and 18. The denial of the atom bomb tops the list but the idea that even a google search is too difficult tells us a lot about the search effort to find the TRuth.

cwalner
1st April 2009, 07:48 AM
3, 4, & 6

3 - because I just like the idea that my people started every war in history while not existing.

4 - because it somehow pleases me know that there are still flat-earthers out there. Why? I have no idea, but it pleases me none the less.

6 - because Wow!!, just Wow!!

timhau
1st April 2009, 07:58 AM
I still don't like the way we can vote for multiple entries, but I'm having a real tough time deciding between 13, 14, and 18.

Ohnoes
1st April 2009, 09:01 AM
Yay my first ever nomination made it! :mdance:

JohnG
1st April 2009, 10:02 AM
Wow, what a lineup. It's an embarrassment of, um... embarrassments.

The only one I wouldn't vote for is #1. It sounds like they are just yanking someone's chain (I hope).

Doctor Evil
1st April 2009, 10:06 AM
A Jewtastic month indeed!

Anyway, clearly number 6 takes the cake. Heck, it also takes the table, chairs, guests and the building.

garethdjb
1st April 2009, 10:15 AM
Hmm, the more I read #12 the funnier it gets.

cwalner
1st April 2009, 10:57 AM
Hmm, the more I read #12 the funnier it gets.

I would love to read Hokulele's opionon regarding #12. That would be pure entertainment.

240-185
1st April 2009, 10:57 AM
One of my nominations won for the second time \o/

fezzic
1st April 2009, 02:08 PM
I voted for #12 though #13 I liked too. There were others but ehhhh...

So the interisland travel was [largely?] by dubout canoe as late as 1961, huh? I am sure that Matson, Young Brothers Tug and Barge, Hawaiian Airlines, and the now defunct Aloha Airlines would be very surprised. I mean you'd think that all the houses, excuse me grass shacks, were lit by coconut oil lamps rather than mostly with electric lights?

Toxic is, in fact, toxic, but the poison is often in the dose.

For instance, we all have a very small amount of carbon monoxide in our blood, I think from hemoglobin related stuff, but we don't die from it.

:)

NobbyNobbs
1st April 2009, 08:11 PM
I voted for #6 for 2 reasons.

1) If atoms don't exit, nothing does. And if nothing exists but we've been led to believe it, then atoms not existing leads directly to every other conspiracy out there.

2) It's the 1st Stundie I've ever nominated!

Travis
1st April 2009, 10:38 PM
I voted for #6 for 2 reasons.

1) If atoms don't exit, nothing does. And if nothing exists but we've been led to believe it, then atoms not existing leads directly to every other conspiracy out there.

2) It's the 1st Stundie I've ever nominated!

It's running away with it too.

Good find.

Klimax
1st April 2009, 10:42 PM
It looks like we can close poll...

NUMBER SIX FOR DA WIN! :D

Rolfe
2nd April 2009, 12:21 PM
If I could give 20 votes to 13, I would.

Rolfe.

dudalb
2nd April 2009, 01:11 PM
I voted for #6, but #3 is a close second in my book.

Slayhamlet
2nd April 2009, 04:33 PM
Uh, #1 seems quite obviously tongue-in-cheek. Why did that qualify?

Arus808
2nd April 2009, 04:51 PM
I love #13 however; maybe the guy never heard of water poisoning (aka hyper-hydration or water intoxication) . You know, in small amounts, good for you...but in LARGE amounts in a short period of time, it can be DEADLY (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hold_Your_Wee_for_a_Wii#Death_of_a_contestant_in_K DND_radio_contest).

Dave Rogers
2nd April 2009, 05:53 PM
Uh, #1 seems quite obviously tongue-in-cheek. Why did that qualify?

It looks that way to me too, but you can never be sure. When you read #6 in context and realise that the poster was completely sincere, you start to wonder.

Dave

Slayhamlet
2nd April 2009, 07:43 PM
It looks that way to me too, but you can never be sure. When you read #6 in context and realise that the poster was completely sincere, you start to wonder.

Dave

But it's not the ridiculousness of the statement or the amount of bat-poo craziness it might imply about the writer if taken at face value that tips me off; it's the style and turn of phrase. In particular I mean: "Who knew they were so well versed in weather control?" This doesn't sound like someone who's especially convinced of what he just said. It also doesn't reflect the way people typically react when they think they've discovered some kind of revelation. Instead, it sounds characteristically facetious.

Now for entry #6 Poe's law is definitely applicable, because it must either be someone pretending very hard to sound like an insane person or an actual insane person, and there's no way to tell except by contacting the person directly and asking whether it was meant to be parody (or finding out from someone else who did). Entry #1, on the other hand, has all the hallmarks of a typical joke which isn't meant to make people wonder about the teller's sanity.

Minadin
2nd April 2009, 10:16 PM
Uh, #1 seems quite obviously tongue-in-cheek. Why did that qualify?

My guess is that Travis was perhaps tired and accidentally placed the sarcastic response in the place of the actual nomination. Here's how it read originally:


Attention:

The Jews are not only involved with 911, they put their mark on the eye of the Hurricane that was off the coast of NY on 9-11.

I found this whopper of a post at ATS. Seems there is a member there who is a big fan of Dr.Judy Wood. I'm not sure who should be nominated.... the person that posted this...or Dr. Woods.

Here is what Andrew Johnson and Judy Wood claim in regards to the hurricane:

It could be hyperdimensional bleed through or a characteristic of the technology being used to manipulate the storm.

As regards the hurricane being an "energy source", some people may have said this, but it wasn't Dr Wood or myself. We have both suggested that the hurricane provided a FIELD COMPONENT - i.e. the field effect of the storm was used in conjunction with other "Hutchison Effect"-related technology to turn the towers to dust. Field Effects seem to be the principle on which the technology operates - but "deeper" details are unavailable to us, of course.

http://img02.picoodle.com/img/img02/3/3/2/kennet/f_hurricaneism_cb50036.jpg

yes I know this isn't even Hurricane Erin.

The entire post can be found here:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread443112/pg1#pid5944575 (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread443112/pg1#pid5944575)

The symbol in the eye of the hurricane is obviously the Anarchy "A". So it was created by anarchists. Who knew they were so well versed in weather control?

While I was typing this Neil Young's "Hurricane" came on the radio. That's PROOF of a conspiracy. Of some sort. Mind reading, or something. I'll figure it out and let you know.

Dave Rogers
3rd April 2009, 01:30 AM
Hellfire and damnation! That's a credible rival to #6! Travis, I'd have voted for that one in a heartbeat, if only on the principle that anybody who quotes Judy Wood as a reputable source deserves a Stundie for the citation.

Dave

Travis
3rd April 2009, 02:58 AM
Actually what happened is that I forgot to put in a #1 originally and only realized it as I was making the poll at the end. I had to scramble and find something. What's sad is that there were like three others that I should have used instead of that but that happens when your scrambling and tired.

Travis
3rd April 2009, 03:02 AM
In case anyones wondering why there was no #1 it's because I accidentally overwrote it when I inserted the results from last months Stundies and I only had a vague memory of what it had been and that it involved hurricanes.


Sorry for that Hittman.

I'll probably carry over the actual intended Stundie quote to next month.

Dave Rogers
3rd April 2009, 03:32 AM
No worries, we all make mistakes. NWO Kitty should be round soon to give you a friendly pep-talk and make it clear that the organisation doesn't hold this against you.

Dave

Klimax
3rd April 2009, 03:36 AM
In case anyones wondering why there was no #1 it's because I accidentally overwrote it when I inserted the results from last months Stundies and I only had a vague memory of what it had been and that it involved hurricanes.


Sorry for that Hittman.

I'll probably carry over the actual intended Stundie quote to next month.

Since 6. is clearly in-lead your mistake is not that bad.
Your NWO check wasn't modified.

Travis
3rd April 2009, 08:09 AM
No worries, we all make mistakes. NWO Kitty should be round soon to give you a friendly pep-talk and make it clear that the organisation doesn't hold this against you.

Dave
NWO Kitty pep talks are the best.

Since 6. is clearly in-lead your mistake is not that bad.
Your NWO check wasn't modified.

Thank goodness for atom denial.;)

Klimax
3rd April 2009, 08:29 AM
NWO Kitty pep talks are the best.



Thank goodness for atom denial.;)

And if my prognosis will be correct,no stundie poll for nearest time will be necessary. :D

Cuddles
3rd April 2009, 08:46 AM
If I could give 20 votes to 13, I would.

Rolfe.

Hmm. What's it worth?;)

Actually what happened is that I forgot to put in a #1 originally and only realized it as I was making the poll at the end. I had to scramble and find something. What's sad is that there were like three others that I should have used instead of that but that happens when your scrambling and tired.

Dude, you're doing it wrong. Just point out that you made the poll on 1st April and everyone will assume it was on purpose.

kookbreaker
3rd April 2009, 09:30 AM
I voted for #9 and #13 as they prominently show the arrogance of CTer's 'science' and how they arrogantly 'know' the way things work.

#6 is stunning, but it is more the writing of a science crank as opposed to and overstuffed CTer.

Skeptic
3rd April 2009, 12:24 PM
3 - because I just like the idea that my people started every war in history while not existing.

Just shows those goyim how sneaky we are, doesn't it?

4 - because it somehow pleases me know that there are still flat-earthers out there. Why? I have no idea, but it pleases me none the less.

6 - because Wow!!, just Wow!!

Seconded. #6 deserves to win.

Agatha
3rd April 2009, 01:25 PM
6, 13 and 17.

6 because it is wonderfully, delightfully, batpoop crazy.

12 because I never realised the dark ages were within living memory.

17 because it takes a special amount of craziness to believe that CGI is done in real time.

3bodyproblem
3rd April 2009, 02:08 PM
I was going with 12 till I read 6.

Woo is the crazyglue that binds religion and science into one wacky conspiracy.
How zen.

bob_cadaver
3rd April 2009, 02:39 PM
You have to love a good conspiracy and any conspiracy that needs to be done BIG and references 9-11 secret messages delivered via movie scripts...well, you gotta "get Mel Gibson" so you can sell IT BIG.
To me, this is just so many kinds of comedy awesome.

Mel Gibson is a THEM. In his movie, THE PATRIOT, his first words are, when weighing a chair, in the film, are: "9 pounds, eleven ounces...perfect." This was a message to many CIA operatives and the elite, that plans were going forward. The agency constantly controls Hollywoood. They used Mel all the time, when they want to sell IT BIG. So, look at Mel's movies from '90 onward, and you'll see how this is done. Cuz when the illuminati want to do it BIG, they always say, "get Mel Gibson."

Sugartits out.

patchbunny
3rd April 2009, 06:25 PM
Though #6 is resounding in its stupidity, it sounds too much like a put-on so I voted for #13.

Klimax
5th April 2009, 05:44 AM
Bump...

Travis
5th April 2009, 08:42 AM
83 voters already.

Good turnout this month.

Klimax
5th April 2009, 09:06 AM
83 voters already.

Good turnout this month.

No wonder...