Motlen Steel - Continuation

[Cuddles]

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=117236
This thread had been growing rather long and so has been closed to avoid causing problems with the forum database. This thread has been started to continue the discussion.

However, I also note that several off-topic subjects were being discussed towards the end. Please avoid bring those subjects here - discussions about things like explosives and the reliability of eyewitnesses should take place in their own threads.

[Sunstealer]

Please just let this one die - all the points have been discussed at least 20 times in the original thread.

[ozeco41]

Please just let this one die - all the points have been discussed at least 20 times in the original thread.

...except for "Motlen Steel" :)

[Christopher7]

Did I mention the witnesses? :rolleyes:
[please don't answer]

I agree with Sunstealer, [will wonders never cease] we've pretty well covered it the required 20 times now.

[ElMondoHummus]

...except for "Motlen Steel" :)

:hit:

[Jackanory]

Is C7 still throwing his teddy bears out of his pram. I can almost hear him stamping his feet because he cant get his own way. With icecream and chocolate dribbling down his face:rolleyes:

Us Bush lovers really know how to rock that cradle - specifically those of us from the UK, with no USA government affiliation:rolleyes:

[TheRedWorm]

C7: Your question is stupid and deserves an answer in kind.
If you have a point, make it. Don't ask stupid questions.


Me: I'll agree that the question is stupid, and that is intentional. What I want you to realize is that you are using the same stupid logic for your claims. Do you recognize this?

[twinstead]

Me: I'll agree that the question is stupid, and that is intentional. What I want you to realize is that you are using the same stupid logic for your claims. Do you recognize this?

Is C7 the only one who DOESN'T get this?

[TheRedWorm]

Is C7 the only one who DOESN'T get this?


I think he very well may get it, he just doesn't want to admit it.

[lapman]

At 1:22 there is an explosion, everyone starts screaming, the camera pans to the south tower, and then you hear the continuous rumble of the collapsing building.
The explosion is a separate sound and could not be part of a continuous bunch of floors collapsing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OQWz...eature=related

Since explosions are very low frequency, it is necessary to listen on a good stereo and crank up the bass. There is a 2 second separation between the initial explosion and the rumble of the building collapsing. What a bunch of crap. The sound of explosives covers a wide range, even from that distance.
cRaNwPGcQcM

[Bluesky]

There were more explosions reported in NY a couple of nights ago, see article in NY Post

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04102009/news/regionalnews/manhattan/death_plunge_at_penthouse_163790.htm

These explosions were caused by someone falling to their death from an 11 story building. The reports of explosions are not malicious just inaccurate; same as WTC.

Sorry I agree, molten steel has been done

[UNLoVedRebel]

There were more explosions reported in NY a couple of nights ago, see article in NY Post

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04102009/news/regionalnews/manhattan/death_plunge_at_penthouse_163790.htm

These explosions were caused by someone falling to their death from an 11 story building. The reports of explosions are not malicious just inaccurate; same as WTC.

Sorry I agree, molten steel has been done

Thanks bluesky. There are many truthers who absolutely love the "sounds of explosions" trutherism. It's seems to be the truthers' number one trutherism, other than "first time in history." I tend to argue that the "sounds of explosions" were falling parts of the buildings. It's a little less macabre.