View Full Version : The secret of the universe
Robert Oz
29th April 2009, 01:39 AM
(3^3)x3=81
Don't you mean 3^4=81? Why complicate things?
six7s
29th April 2009, 02:00 AM
Don't you mean 3^4=81?No, No and thrice No!
It's all about threes!
$$ 3^3^{\frac{3}{3}} = 81 $$
Why complicate things?Cos its a secret of the Universe!
:boxedin:
Pixel42
29th April 2009, 02:28 AM
Gligor Makedonska was famous man.
And yet my search engine can't find a single reference to him anywhere on the internet.
Aitch
29th April 2009, 04:48 AM
OK, enough already! I'll probably catch hell from the NWO for this but the secret of the universe is... There Is No Secret! It's all there on plain view, if you look closely enough.
Now stop blathering!
This has been a Public Service Announcement on behalf of the Grumpy Old Men Party.
RoboTimbo
29th April 2009, 05:12 AM
And yet my search engine can't find a single reference to him anywhere on the internet.
He's secretly famous.
Ikarus
29th April 2009, 06:48 AM
I'll see that, and raise you THIS:
QSnJ5uoyptY
Listeners, listen, 'cause this here is wisdom.
Nice try, but that one isn't exactly 3:00 minutes long, as opposed to the original cartoon version.
Mojo
29th April 2009, 07:53 AM
1. collect underpants.
2. ?
3. PROFIT!
Ikarus
29th April 2009, 04:08 PM
what doed this mean?
(snip)
Looks like an excersize in capitalization as foretold:
Now is time for re newing and capitisation[sic].
IMST
29th April 2009, 04:41 PM
For the rest of this thread, I recommend that all numbers be written using 3 3s.
1: (3/3)3
2: 3-(3/3)
3: 3(3/3)
4: 3+(3/3)
5: 3!-(3/3)
6: (3*3)-3
7: 3!-(3/3)
8: (3!/3)3
9: 3+3+3
10: 3*3.3...
11: 33/3
12: (3*3)+3
Thabiguy
30th April 2009, 02:39 AM
\scriptsize\begin{math}\begin{subequations}13: 3!+3!+\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\14: 3!+3!+\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\15: 3!+3\times3\\16: 3!\times3-\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\17: 3!\times3-\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\18: 3!+3!+3!\\19: 3!\times3+\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\20: 3!\times3+\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\21: 3!\times3+3\\22: (3+\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor)!-\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\23: (3+\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor)!-\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\24: 3^{3}-3\\25: 3^{3}-\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\26: 3^{3}-\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\27: 3\times3\times3\\28: 3^{3}+\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\29: 3^{3}+\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\30: 3^{3}+3\\31: 33-\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\32: 33-\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\33: 33\times\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\\ldots\end{subequa tions}\end{math}
six7s
30th April 2009, 02:46 AM
\scriptsize\begin{math}\begin{subequations}13: 3!+3!+\lfloor\sqrt{3}\rfloor\\14: 3!+3!+\lceil\sqrt{3}\rceil\\\end{math}Ooooooh...
And here was me, angsting over 10: 3*3.3...
I think using ⌈ceiling⌉ and ⌊floor⌋ is sorta like cheating....
ETA
Ah bollocks
I'm just jealous! :(
catbasket
30th April 2009, 03:54 AM
I think using ⌈ceiling⌉ and ⌊floor⌋ is sorta like cheating....
Especially as he didn't use |walls| ... just how does that ceiling stay up?
six7s
30th April 2009, 04:03 AM
|absolutely|
Evilgiraffe
30th April 2009, 06:13 AM
Must be the corndog gods.
Ahh, George... he was a proper numerology troll!
You just can't get the staff nowadays.
Foster Zygote
30th April 2009, 07:49 AM
And yet my search engine can't find a single reference to him anywhere on the internet.
The Googles, they do nothing!
Ikarus
30th April 2009, 08:09 AM
I think using ⌈ceiling⌉ and ⌊floor⌋ is sorta like cheating....
Cheating is \footnotesize{\={m}\={e}\={a}\={n}}
Freethinker
30th April 2009, 12:32 PM
|absolutely|
That is a pun of the worst magnitude.
sol invictus
30th April 2009, 12:50 PM
That is a pun of the worst magnitude.
Those are norm-al around here...
six7s
30th April 2009, 01:25 PM
That is a pun of the worst magnitude.
GO TO (i = 4) && × yourself;
;)
roger
30th April 2009, 02:16 PM
Okay, I'm convinced. 3 is the secret.
Now what?
Whiplash
30th April 2009, 02:24 PM
Okay, I'm convinced. 3 is the secret.
Now what?
You turn to the Trinity, isn't it obvious? All these three's everywhere show us the truth of God and the Trinity. It's God's way of giving us clues. Ignore everything else that actually doesn't support him. That's all false clues, demons testing us, etc. Be moved by the fact that three is the secret, and use that knowledge to turn to the power of the trinity! That is the way to salvation!
(no I'm not serious, but I am sure that is what the point of this discussion is for those who believe it).
six7s
30th April 2009, 02:33 PM
Okay, I'm convinced. 3 is the secret.
Now what?Go outside and find patterns that confirm the secret, and then tell others; that's how such secrets work, right?
Whiplash
30th April 2009, 06:31 PM
or...
http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc49/Whiplashr/miss_chernobyl_2004-711300.jpg
six7s
30th April 2009, 06:37 PM
Is Miracle!
KJleJbn9G6Y
prewitt81
1st May 2009, 11:09 AM
NSFW tags are our friends, and keep us from getting fired.
Whiplash
1st May 2009, 08:34 PM
Ouch, I'm sorry, I never occured me to that was a NSFW pic. She is not nude, she is in a bikini.
arthwollipot
2nd May 2009, 03:57 AM
It's FIVE!! 5kamadros has been trying to lead us astray to THREE!! Deliberate obfuscation so that we wouldn't know the true secret of the univer5e!!!!Dude. I've been saying this all along.
Why don't people listen to me?
arthwollipot
2nd May 2009, 04:03 AM
Okay, I'm convinced. 3 is the secret.
Now what?Is there an echo in here?
Whiplash
2nd May 2009, 05:16 AM
Is there an echo in here?
G2eUopy9sd8
scribbles
4th May 2009, 10:11 PM
i think 13, 14, 15, 4 simply means N O P E. right? just a guess.
i meant to write doeS earlier i can't spell lol...
but seriously i wanna figure this out.
i think somebody might be on to something
six7s
4th May 2009, 11:55 PM
Hi scribbles,
i think somebody might be on to something
5, 19, 5, 24 :)
Skamandros
5th May 2009, 02:22 PM
The force of 3 creats the universe without 3 their is not no universe. Two is not enougf and four is not needed. Proof is in the big Bang where 3 took Hubble law and made inflaton work.
Gligor Makedonska has proofen this but their is not any book to shoaw you. He died with no book but I learnd form him to tell story. When I learn more english i will rite book about law of 3. Erery body will learn form this.
IMST
5th May 2009, 02:46 PM
I feel like I'm being a bad person for this message, but I can't resist.
I learnd form him to tell story.
Evidence?
aggle-rithm
5th May 2009, 02:49 PM
The force of 3 creats the universe without 3 their is not no universe. Two is not enougf and four is not needed. Proof is in the big Bang where 3 took Hubble law and made inflaton work.
Gligor Makedonska has proofen this but their is not any book to shoaw you. He died with no book but I learnd form him to tell story. When I learn more english i will rite book about law of 3. Erery body will learn form this.
I'm sorry, but there's no way you're for real.
The Man
5th May 2009, 03:13 PM
I'm sorry, but there's no way you're for real.
What? You do not believe?
“The force of three compels you!”
“The force of three compels you!”
“The force of three compels you!”
“The force of three compels you!”
Darn it I did it one too many times.
The force of three will get you next time,
count on it.
scribbles
5th May 2009, 05:00 PM
how about the theory of the BIG BOUNCE? as it says the universe was REVERSED before it Big BANGED?
Fnord
5th May 2009, 05:42 PM
Why is this stupid thread still active?
... and why did I just contribute to its activity?
:hb:
Stupid Fnord!
Stupid, stupid Fnord!
six7s
5th May 2009, 06:20 PM
... and why did I just contribute to its activity?
:hb:
Stupid Fnord!
Stupid, stupid Fnord!The great thing about a thread like this is that, when it is finally abandoned, your head will feel better :)
paximperium
5th May 2009, 06:26 PM
Stupid Fnord!
Stupid, stupid Fnord!
Amazing...you said it three time! All blessed the three!!!
The Man
5th May 2009, 08:20 PM
Why is this stupid thread still active?
... and why did I just contribute to its activity?
:hb:
Stupid Fnord!
Stupid, stupid Fnord!
Because it is stupid3.
That is the stupid force (or farce) of 3.
aggle-rithm
5th May 2009, 09:19 PM
The force of three will get you next time,
count on it.
Bah!! A number two on your number three!!!
The Man
5th May 2009, 09:26 PM
Bah!! A number two on your number three!!!
Ouch, well you just stopped counting too soon. If we add some number one to your number two, what do we get (other then a flush of the proverbial toilet)?
Ron_Tomkins
5th May 2009, 09:32 PM
YES I HAVE THE SECERET IT IS 3. THE NUMBER 3 IS THE EVEERYTHING KEY. All things relateedness to this number. Divide and see the 3/3 is one and then 3x3 is nine and so on. there is no mysery here. The earth is the therd planet and the sun is 3/3 is one sun and so is the galaxy. Mind blowing stuff here! It is not coinceense that the trinity is also three. Divide 3/0 and get infinity __ and that is the universe.
I'm sorry, you were close... but you got it wrong by one. It's actually 4
The secret of the universe is 4. 4 sides of a TIMECUBE (http://www.timecube.com/)
arthwollipot
6th May 2009, 02:01 AM
Ron wins the thread.
six7s
6th May 2009, 02:42 AM
Ron wins the thread.(Who cares?
The coveted position is third!
Bronze is teh new gold!)3
aggle-rithm
6th May 2009, 06:21 AM
How to make the Universe fit your theory:
Theory: THREE is the magic number!
Evidence:
There are THREE STATES, Texas, Alaska, and Hawaii!
(Well, there are others, but who cares?)
There are THREE BARACK OBAMAS!!
(Two are clones in cold storage; nobody knows about them)
There are THREE SENSES: Sight, hearing, and SOMETHING ELSE!!
There are THREE PLANETS closer to the Earth than all the other planets!!
There are THREE POLES: North, South, and an additional one that I keep in a box in my garage!!
There are THREE TROLLS in this thread: Skamandros, and two of his sock puppets whose identity is a MYSTERY!!!
Evilgiraffe
6th May 2009, 06:27 AM
(Who cares?
The coveted position is third!
Bronze is teh new gold!)3
Pah! Gold is 79.
Winners medals shall henceforth be made from Lithium.
ETA. Freakily enough, bronze is 79 too. Cu (29) + Sn (50)
Whiplash
6th May 2009, 06:29 AM
Well, I was sure this was going to somehow be proof of the God Trinity.
RoboTimbo
6th May 2009, 06:38 AM
The force of 3 creats the universe without 3 their is not no universe. Two is not enougf and four is not needed. Proof is in the big Bang where 3 took Hubble law and made inflaton work.
Gligor Makedonska has proofen this but their is not any book to shoaw you. He died with no book but I learnd form him to tell story. When I learn more english i will rite book about law of 3. Erery body will learn form this.
Can you keep it down to three pages?
sol invictus
6th May 2009, 07:38 AM
I'm sorry, but there's no way you're for real.
Come on... no one could make up a name like "Gligor Makedonska".
aggle-rithm
6th May 2009, 07:46 AM
Come on... no one could make up a name like "Gligor Makedonska".
I'd say it was a clever anagram, if I had any faith at all in the author's ability to construct clever anagrams.
aggle-rithm
6th May 2009, 07:47 AM
Can you keep it down to three pages?
Three pages? He'd have to come up with two pages of filler.
sol invictus
6th May 2009, 09:10 AM
I'd say it was a clever anagram, if I had any faith at all in the author's ability to construct clever anagrams.
Nah - I think it's "Gligor" because s/he has a lisp and can't pronounce "Grigor", "Makedon-" because s/he's from FYROM, and "MakendonSKA" because s/he's a hermaphrodite (Grigor is a male name, but -ska is a feminine suffix).
jond
6th May 2009, 10:35 AM
The force of 3 creats the universe without 3 their is not no universe. Two is not enougf and four is not needed.
Five is RIGHT OUT.
Whiplash
6th May 2009, 03:34 PM
One..
Two..
Five...
IMST
6th May 2009, 03:39 PM
Three sir!
six7s
6th May 2009, 03:48 PM
The force of 3 creats the universe without 3 their is not no universe. Two is not enougf and four is not needed. Proof is in the big Bang where 3 took Hubble law and made inflaton work.
Gligor Makedonska has proofen this but their is not any book to shoaw you. He died with no book but I learnd form him to tell story. When I learn more english i will rite book about law of 3. Erery body will learn form this.Don't give up your day job
Seriously... On a thread that stretches to eight pages, Skamandros has made thirteen posts and not one of them makes sense
13/0 != an answer to anything even remotely connected to a 'secret of the Universe'
I'm unsubscribing
If anything of interest ever eventuates, please someone flick me a PM
Cheers
arthwollipot
6th May 2009, 10:44 PM
Pah! Gold is 79.
Winners medals shall henceforth be made from Lithium.
ETA. Freakily enough, bronze is 79 too. Cu (29) + Sn (50)Coincidence? I think not!
Skamandros
16th May 2009, 09:59 AM
I HAVE DISCOVER MORE PROVE:
"If elecromagnitic the waves rise exttraterresrial from the organisms three, with gratitational the waves are uncovered. Kraft three is with the interacton always."
You can calculate up prove any time this is from Gligor Makedonska.
Ron_Tomkins
16th May 2009, 10:17 AM
I HAVE DISCOVER MORE PROVE:
"If elecromagnitic the waves rise exttraterresrial from the organisms three, with gratitational the waves are uncovered. Kraft three is with the interacton always."
You can calculate up prove any time this is from Gligor Makedonska.
But wait. Hold it. Do you have the same page open? Ok, now go down to the paragraph after that. Read the line where it says "... exzept in teh case of an electromagnetic gravitation pulllz in which case it is all right folks! We were just dreaming teh whole thingz!"
If you're gonna read from the LOLcat Bible, you have to pay attention to every clause
Moochie
16th May 2009, 02:30 PM
I have it! Skamandros written backwards is sordnamakS!
M.
calebprime
16th May 2009, 02:54 PM
s, k, a, m, a, n, d, r, o, s
k, m, n, r, s, s, a, a, d, o
m, r, s, a, o, k, n, s, a, d
r, a, k, s, d, m, s, o, n, a
a, s, m, o, a, r, k, d, s, n
s, o, r, d, n, a, m, a, k, s
o, d, a, a, s, s, r, n, m, k
d, a, s, n, k, o, a, s, r, m
a, n, o, s, m, d, s, k, a, r
n, s, d, k, r, a, o, m, s, a
A, R, M, K, S, N, A, D, O, S
S, A, R, M, K, S, N, A, D, O
M, K, S, N, A, D, O, S, A, R
O, S, A, R, M, K, S, N, A, D
A, D, O, S, A, R, M, K, S, N
R, M, K, S, N, A, D, O, S, A
K, S, N, A, D, O, S, A, R, M
D, O, S, A, R, M, K, S, N, A
S, N, A, D, O, S, A, R, M, K
N, A, D, O, S, A, R, M, K, S
empeake
16th May 2009, 04:07 PM
:) 1 is the number!
Sorry to contradict you, but...
One is the loneliest number, worse than two. (http://www.threedognight.com/l_one.html)
3 reigns supreme.
Additional evidence: threesomes. :D
Skamandros
16th May 2009, 08:51 PM
Three is only number that is summ of last two numbers. 1 + 2 = 3 Their is no other licke this. It is bases of universes begining you can see for youre self. 4 + 5 = 9 not six and so on. Big bang was 1+ 2 = 3 then was that infalton that Guth made us see out of that plazma.
I HAVE DISCOVER MORE PROVE:
"If electromagnetic the waves rise extraterrestrial from the organisms three, with gravitational the waves are uncovered. Kraft three is with the interaction always."
You can calculate up prove any time this is from Gligor Makedonska.
I'm sorry.
Even allowing for your English (which, I presume, is a second language? Congrats on learning something I've never been able to), I cannot figure out what you are trying to say?
Please, try to re-word this, so we can understand the point you are making.
Three is only number that is sum of last two numbers. 1 + 2 = 3 There is no other like this.
Obviously.
If you add 1 to something, it goes up by 1.
Any other sequential combination of two numbers cannot add up to the next number. Because the next number is only 1 away. And you are adding more than one.
Bob Klase
17th May 2009, 10:07 AM
Three is only number that is summ of last two numbers. 1 + 2 = 3 Their is no other licke this. It is bases of universes begining you can see for youre self. 4 + 5 = 9 not six and so on. Big bang was 1+ 2 = 3 then was that infalton that Guth made us see out of that plazma.
Two is the only number that is the sum of the previous number added to itself. 1 + 1 = 2. There is no other like this. Therefore 2 is the basis of the universe's beginning as you can clearly see. 3 + 3 = 6, not four and so on.
But one is the only number which is the product of multiplying by itself. 1 * 1 = 1. There is no other like this. Therefore 1 is the basis of the universe. 3 * 3 = 9, not three and so on.
And since one, two and three have unique properties in all of numberdom, then there must be 3 universes- one of each. Or perhaps 6 universes because the sum of 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.
But the magic number must also be six. Six is the only number which can be obtained by both adding and multiplying 3 consecutive numbers. 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 AND 1 * 2 * 3 = 6. There is no other like this. 2 + 3 + 4 = 9, but 2 * 3 * 4 = 24, not 9! Even more important, six is the only number which is the sum of all the prime numbers which come before it and also the product of all the prime numbers which come before!!!!
The Man
17th May 2009, 02:33 PM
s, k, a, m, a, n, d, r, o, s
k, m, n, r, s, s, a, a, d, o
m, r, s, a, o, k, n, s, a, d
r, a, k, s, d, m, s, o, n, a
a, s, m, o, a, r, k, d, s, n
s, o, r, d, n, a, m, a, k, s
o, d, a, a, s, s, r, n, m, k
d, a, s, n, k, o, a, s, r, m
a, n, o, s, m, d, s, k, a, r
n, s, d, k, r, a, o, m, s, a
A, R, M, K, S, N, A, D, O, S
S, A, R, M, K, S, N, A, D, O
M, K, S, N, A, D, O, S, A, R
O, S, A, R, M, K, S, N, A, D
A, D, O, S, A, R, M, K, S, N
R, M, K, S, N, A, D, O, S, A
K, S, N, A, D, O, S, A, R, M
D, O, S, A, R, M, K, S, N, A
S, N, A, D, O, S, A, R, M, K
N, A, D, O, S, A, R, M, K, S
I think it is better if you just sing “Three me Skamandros” to the tune of Rock Me Amadeus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_Me_Amadeus) in your head while you read his posts.
“He was the third punk ever to set foot on this earth.
He was a genius the third day after his birth.
He could play the numbers like ringing three bells
And ev'rybody screamed:
Come on, three me Skamandros.
He was a superstar, he was Trinamite and however he did (it)
Seemed three, be right.
As he wrangles the math (and) the physics, all third rate,
But then the posters would shout:
Three me Skamandros,
Skamandros, Skamandros, Skamandros
Skamandros, Skamandros, Skamandros
Skamandros, Skamandros, oh oh oh Skamandros”
It is certainly no coincidence that “Rock Me Amadeus” was off the 1985 (1+9+8+5 = 23) album “Falco 3” that peaked at number 3 in the Billboard 200 album charts.
Skwinty
17th May 2009, 03:07 PM
I think it is better if you just sing “Three me Skamandros” to the tune of Rock Me Amadeus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_Me_Amadeus) in your head while you read his posts.
In afrikaans Amadeus rhymes with "I'm a doos."
"doos" in afrikaans translates to vagina or rather the crude version.
Skamandros
28th May 2009, 02:45 PM
OK, now here is proves of the 3:
"The fabric of possibility on the anti-matter could also be considered the 27th dimension when considering scenario of squaring 5 layers to be encased by the super dimensions of the fabric of possibility and the fabric of anti-possibility."
These is form good quantum physisc thinking. See this here.
http://www.haightbeat.com/?p=2120
And think people 27 is 3x3x3 = 27. So now no more funny things the tree is provved!
Hokulele
28th May 2009, 02:51 PM
What about the 5 layers?
aggle-rithm
28th May 2009, 03:03 PM
I've noticed that the Earth seems to still be in the same, dull old orbit it's always been in.
I figured something would have changed after this great discovery.
bickerer
28th May 2009, 05:36 PM
First off, I'm amazed and happy happy happy (3 times happy) that this thread is still going. But how is 3 the "secret" to the universe?? 3 isn't a secret, it's a well known and much loved number. Wouldn't the secret to the universe have to be something that is...um..well...secret? Hidden? Confidential? Wouldn't it?? (I've promised myself not to come back here again...........sigh...........but I probably will.)
Freethinker
28th May 2009, 06:34 PM
What about the 5 layers?
Easy: 5=3+3-30 It's got more threeness than three!
arthwollipot
28th May 2009, 10:44 PM
No no, it's because the equation 2 + 3 = 5 contains three numerical components!!! Three numerical components plus two symbolic components equals five (5) components in total!!
More proof: How many exclamation marks in that paragraph?
Lord Emsworth
29th May 2009, 12:33 AM
No no, it's because the equation 2 + 3 = 5 contains three numerical components!!! Three numerical components plus two symbolic components equals five (5) components in total!!
More proof: How many exclamation marks in that paragraph?
d. Some are just upside down.
No no, i[#1]t's because the equati[#2]on 2 + 3 = 5 contai[#3]ns three numeri[#4]cal components![#5]![#6]![#7] Three numeri[#8]cal components plus two symboli[#9]c components equals fi[#a]ve (5) components i[#b]n total![#c]![#d]
Lord Emsworth
29th May 2009, 12:35 AM
Oooooooooooooo ... there are THREE Powerpuff Girls!
*Strikes skeptic colours*
arthwollipot
29th May 2009, 12:55 AM
Oooooooooooooo ... there are THREE Powerpuff Girls!
*Strikes skeptic colours*Plus the Professor, plus Mojo Jojo! Five!
Lord Emsworth
29th May 2009, 01:42 AM
I know how to settle this 5 vs 3 issue:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbie
arthwollipot
29th May 2009, 01:44 AM
I know how to settle this 5 vs 3 issue:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HerbieAh, but you see 5 + 3 = 8, which is 23!
Come on, this is too easy.
Lord Emsworth
29th May 2009, 01:52 AM
Ah, but you see 5 + 3 = 8, which is 23!
Come on, this is too easy.
But what do you get if you turn 23 on its head?
Or just 23 for that matter? :jaw-dropp
arthwollipot
29th May 2009, 01:57 AM
But what do you get if you turn 23 on its head?What, you mean 32? 9, of course. Don't you know basic maths?
Or just 23 for that matter? :jaw-dropp23 is the key. You know that Jim Carrey movie? You thought it was just fiction, didn't you?
Lord Emsworth
29th May 2009, 02:12 AM
What, you mean 32? 9, of course. Don't you know basic maths?
Maths schmaths. You get 53 again! Have you realized that 53 in decimal notation is 35 in hex notation?
There need not be a conflict between 3 and 5!
arthwollipot
29th May 2009, 02:22 AM
Maths schmaths. You get 53 again! Have you realized that 53 in decimal notation is 35 in hex notation?
There need not be a conflict between 3 and 5!3 = 5 - ?
3 and 5 are two digits. That supplies the missing term in the equation.
QED.
Skamandros
29th May 2009, 05:12 PM
"The fabric of possibility on the anti-matter could also be considered the 27th dimension when considering scenario of squaring 5 layers to be encased by the super dimensions of the fabric of possibility and the fabric of anti-possibility."
So no body is understandding this because of funny things. 3x3x3=27 is the 27 demensons of quantum theiory. That is the univers people learn the true ansewrs. Stop funny things.
http://www.haightbeat.com/?p=2120
The Man
29th May 2009, 05:30 PM
So no body is understandding this because of funny things. 3x3x3=27 is the 27 demensons of quantum theiory. That is the univers people learn the true ansewrs. Stop funny things.
http://www.haightbeat.com/?p=2120
You first.
aggle-rithm
29th May 2009, 07:58 PM
You first.
Rats, beat me to it!
Hokulele
29th May 2009, 08:17 PM
So no body is understandding this because of funny things. 3x3x3=27 is the 27 demensons of quantum theiory.
No, it has 57. Or maybe it is 248.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/science/sciencetopics/largehadroncollider/3314456/Surfer-dude-stuns-physicists-with-theory-of-everything.html
Whiplash
29th May 2009, 08:24 PM
That happened to me once. I posted on a forum a very simple idea for solving something complex that stunned everyone around me. "Out of the mouths of babe's" the lines started rolling in. People were completely flabergasted. It took someone from the outside, not restricted by all their theroies and ideas, to see a simple solution they had overlooked.
I went on to great acclaim, media attention and noteriety. I was even on Oprah. Cover of Time. And soooo many groupies.
Oh wait, I'm telling that dream again, aren't I? Arg... Never mind... Must remember to bring this up with the therapist.
ETA: This was not, in any way, meant to attack the man with the new theories. In fact, it was the whole "surfer dude" does big thing that caught my attention, and reminded me that in my youth, I fantasized about that scenario. Just me, not him, in the lead role! ;)
The Man
29th May 2009, 09:12 PM
That happened to me once. I posted on a forum a very simple idea for solving something complex that stunned everyone around me. "Out of the mouths of babe's" the lines started rolling in. People were completely flabergasted. It took someone from the outside, not restricted by all their theroies and ideas, to see a simple solution they had overlooked.
I went on to great acclaim, media attention and noteriety. I was even on Oprah. Cover of Time. And soooo many groupies.
Oh wait, I'm telling that dream again, aren't I? Arg... Never mind... Must remember to bring this up with the therapist.
ETA: This was not, in any way, meant to attack the man with the new theories. In fact, it was the whole "surfer dude" does big thing that caught my attention, and reminded me that in my youth, I fantasized about that scenario. Just me, not him, in the lead role! ;)
* bolding added
I must have had the same dream, but I was in that lead role. Were you that third guy from the left in the back row at the Nobel prize ceremony?
Whiplash
29th May 2009, 09:24 PM
From your perspective? Hmm.. ya.. ya, it could have been.
Did I have a look of "why the hell am I dreaming about you winning again? Who the hell are you, and what the hell are you doing in my dreams?" ?
If so, ya, that was me.
You know, if we can just find one more person who had shared dreaming with us, we'll have three of us. Then we are onto something for sure.
ETA: and have discovered it on page 9. I'm getting shivers.
The Man
29th May 2009, 09:29 PM
From your perspective? Hmm.. ya.. ya, it could have been.
Did I have a look of "why the hell am I dreaming about you winning again? Who the hell are you, and what the hell are you doing in my dreams?" ?
If so, ya, that was me.
Actually you were snoring quite loud and an usher had to wake you up.
Whiplash
29th May 2009, 09:35 PM
Oh that's right, and I got angry and tried to kick him, but ended up kicking the wall in my bedroom instead. Hard.
The other night I had one of those dreams where an alarm is going off and you can't find it and shut it off. You keep thinking you found it, but it doesn't turn off. You try another. Still nothing. You can't quite tell where it's coming from...
Then you wake up, and find it's your alarm clock. Usually it wakes me quickly. But I must have been really sawing logs that morning.
Hokulele
29th May 2009, 10:37 PM
ETA: This was not, in any way, meant to attack the man with the new theories. In fact, it was the whole "surfer dude" does big thing that caught my attention, and reminded me that in my youth, I fantasized about that scenario. Just me, not him, in the lead role! ;)
Heh, I have actually gone surfing and mountain biking with that guy. I have no idea whether or not there is anything to his theories (he explained it to me once, I think I understood maybe 3% of it, hehehehe), but I found it interesting that new theories that may sound wacky at first can gain media exposure, but it requires some substantial backing other than just goofy posts on random internet fora.
The Man
29th May 2009, 11:53 PM
Oh that's right, and I got angry and tried to kick him, but ended up kicking the wall in my bedroom instead. Hard.
The other night I had one of those dreams where an alarm is going off and you can't find it and shut it off. You keep thinking you found it, but it doesn't turn off. You try another. Still nothing. You can't quite tell where it's coming from...
Then you wake up, and find it's your alarm clock. Usually it wakes me quickly. But I must have been really sawing logs that morning.
So that was you, wow was that usher POed when you kicked him, good thing you woke up.
I haven't used an alarm clock for over a decade myself, I just wake up. Towards the end when I was using one I would usually wake and wait for it to go off. Of course there were a couple of times I thought I woke up but was actually still asleep. Good thing they were on my days off. Funny though, when I was young I couldn’t wake up on time even with the alarm some days and never without it.
arthwollipot
31st May 2009, 07:03 AM
Heh, I have actually gone surfing and mountain biking with that guy. I have no idea whether or not there is anything to his theories (he explained it to me once, I think I understood maybe 3% of it, hehehehe), but I found it interesting that new theories that may sound wacky at first can gain media exposure, but it requires some substantial backing other than just goofy posts on random internet fora.That may be the guy about whom I received my one and only yellow card, for circumventing the autocensor when asking "is this ********?"
Skamandros
13th July 2009, 07:45 PM
The three force of that universe it is the force of vitel importince in the natur of from the start this big bang start:
here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popperian_cosmology)
Arkayik
13th July 2009, 08:54 PM
Why is 81 to be feared? Please elaborate, and provide references.
8 = H
1 = A
Red & White machine dude!
Peace-out x 3!
arthwollipot
19th July 2009, 09:15 PM
The three force of that universe it is the force of vitel importince in the natur of from the start this big bang start:
here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popperian_cosmology)I can't even parse that.
The Man
20th July 2009, 07:17 AM
I can't even parse that.
Well who can’t resist a “Cosmology” that doesn’t actually involve, well, cosmology? Sounds right up Skamandros’ alley. All parse unto the 3 (or at least 3 of those parses).
Myriad
20th July 2009, 08:58 AM
Jesus roze in tree days, ...
I know this has been addressed before, but Friday evening to Sunday morning is less than two days. The wording is that Jesus rose "on the third day" makes it sound like three days, but that's counting Friday as the first (calendar) day.
By contrast, if you take a package to UPS on Friday afternoon, and they tell you it will be delivered in three days, don't conclude it will arrive Sunday morning. Actually, it won't even go out until Monday, because you've already missed Friday's pickup. That makes Monday the first day -- oops, no it doesn't, Monday is actually day zero. Your package will be delivered (if you're lucky) three days after that, that is, on Thursday.
The lessons from this are:
1. If you want a package delivered promptly, give it to Jesus.
2. The way UPS counts delivery days is sacrilegious, and the Pope should really think about ordering an excommunication.
3. UPS has three initials in its name. That makes it more powerful than the Pope, which has four letters. That explains why there has been no excommunication, but it does not explain why a three day delivery takes a week if there's a holiday weekend in between.
3. Thursday was named after The Mighty ThorTM. Thor has 4 letters in his name (6 if you count the TM), 2 wings on his helmet, a hammer with a square (4-sided) cross section, 6 strange metallic dots on his torso, and 1 cape. This makes Thor less mighty than UPS, though more mighty than the Pope (hammer breaks crozier, crozier pokes hole in Jell-OTM, Jell-OTM tastes better than hammer).
3. There are 3 objects in the classic game of hammer-crozier-Jell-OTM.
3. There are 3 weeks in a 3-week period. This is very powerful. So powerful that we do not dare have a specific name for such a period. (Unlike "fortnight", "month", "billing cycle" and so forth.) Such a name would, if uttered, or even typed, rock the 3 foundations of the universe.
3. The 3 foundations of the universe are time, money, wire, porn, and vast reaches of space filled with hundreds of billions of galaxies that are so big and so far away as to be absolutely useless.
3. I've decided to name a three-week period a "minimunth."
3. I will soon start a new thread titled "Our Useless Universe" where we discuss ways of adequately expressing how incredibly awesomely mind-bogglingly useless the vast reaches of space and hundreds of billions of distant galaxies that make up our universe are.
Respectfully,
Myriad
Skamandros
19th August 2009, 06:10 PM
OK here is more proofs. It is deep secret of qauntum thery that partickles are from
SU(3) symmettry group. That is majic group of the unvers is three, see that? Poeple do, not see the trees and the threes bause they see only forest. Now what do the funny poeple say? One can not dispiut this fact!
Badly Shaved Monkey
19th August 2009, 11:58 PM
OK here is more proofs. It is deep secret of qauntum thery that partickles are from
SU(3) symmettry group. That is majic group of the unvers is three, see that? Poeple do, not see the trees and the threes bause they see only forest. Now what do the funny poeple say? One can not dispiut this fact!
I dispute this fact.
wollery
20th August 2009, 12:50 AM
I dispute this fact.Yeah, but you can't dispiut it! :boggled:
Badly Shaved Monkey
20th August 2009, 01:43 AM
Yeah, but you can't dispiut it! :boggled:
Fair point. I should clarify and show that I can.
I dispiut this fact.
There we go.
sol invictus
20th August 2009, 09:39 AM
OK here is more proofs. It is deep secret of qauntum thery that partickles are from
SU(3) symmettry group. That is majic group of the unvers is three, see that? Poeple do, not see the trees and the threes bause they see only forest. Now what do the funny poeple say? One can not dispiut this fact!
Last time I checked, the gauge symmetry group of the Standard Model of Particle physics was SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1).
But I guess 1+2+3 = 6 = 3(3-3/3), so Skamandros must be right!
Skamandros
20th August 2009, 02:59 PM
Last time I checked, the gauge symmetry group of the Standard Model of Particle physics was SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1).
But I guess 1+2+3 = 6 = 3(3-3/3), so Skamandros must be right!
Yes! But why so much diffiicutness with that thery of 3? When that univers was created with three thing space, time and energy. Tree was the pricniple of creativness evry thing else is detail aspects of the three. 3 gave berth to that univers and guides all thing. SU(3) and all threeness gives space time energy and resultings life.
3:woo
sol invictus
20th August 2009, 04:24 PM
Yes! But why so much diffiicutness with that thery of 3? When that univers was created with three thing space, time and energy. Tree was the pricniple of creativness evry thing else is detail aspects of the three. 3 gave berth to that univers and guides all thing. SU(3) and all threeness gives space time energy and resultings life.
3:woo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Rk3GnEs9Tg
drzeus99
20th August 2009, 08:30 PM
No, the important number is 1
But 1 is the LONELIEST number.....1 is the loneliest number.....
Richard Masters
20th August 2009, 09:45 PM
There are no mushrooms. Mars had 3 moons {one fell down people dont now this} There are tree greate citys in Republic of Macedonia the greatest is number three.How is there three braches of US goverment? Take the three gratest galaxies for example -- is there no meaning?
The most bigest mysery is the 3 forces of phisics gravity is not a force it is a negative 3 repulsion that behayves like asn attraction. Learn the mystery of nature.
That's right! 3 x 3 = 9 and if you divide by 11 that's 0.818181818... .
If you think about it further 0.818181818... = 9 / 11 or 9/11 .
There were also 3 twin towers (most people don't know this!)
The number 3 is prime, which means it can be used in encryption!
Also, computers are based on a trinary system! Coincidence!?
Also the Bible is made up an Old Testament, a New Testament, and a Newer Testament (currently in press).
Also, triangles are made up of threes!
Three stooges?
Oh, and 2 + 1 = 3
Sweet. Now, how do I use this knowledge which is the key to the universe?
Richard Masters
20th August 2009, 09:55 PM
Three Stooges! ...
Damn! you beat me by more than 3 months!
Badly Shaved Monkey
21st August 2009, 02:14 AM
Yes! But why so much diffiicutness with that thery of 3? When that univers was created with three thing space, time and energy. Tree was the pricniple of creativness evry thing else is detail aspects of the three. 3 gave berth to that univers and guides all thing. SU(3) and all threeness gives space time energy and resultings life.
3:woo
OK, let's say we accept your theory of 3, what does it do for us? What predictions can be made from it? Does it lead to a car with better fuel-efficiency? Does it tell us how to build a wormhole transporter to take us to different stars? Does it help us feed starving Africans? Does it help us cure AIDS?
Hokulele
21st August 2009, 02:20 AM
OK, let's say we accept your theory of 3, what does it do for us? What predictions can be made from it? Does it lead to a car with better fuel-efficiency? Does it tell us how to build a wormhole transporter to take us to different stars? Does it help us feed starving Africans? Does it help us cure AIDS?
Apparently, it leads us to Christianity.
No, I am not making that up, Skamandros made this claim some time back.
Skamandros
21st August 2009, 07:48 AM
OK, let's say we accept your theory of 3, what does it do for us? What predictions can be made from it? Does it lead to a car with better fuel-efficiency? Does it tell us how to build a wormhole transporter to take us to different stars? Does it help us feed starving Africans? Does it help us cure AIDS?
What makes Einstein thery gives us? So is the same for 3. univers is oganized by three. it is the deep secret of evrithing. Christianity is maybee result of three or is by mens minds of the three power in the univers. no body knows this but is conection. Gligor Makedonska did study of the powrer of tree and stayed that deep formula of physics is of three. So we have ansewrs when we study this. the univers is results of power of 3!
RoboTimbo
21st August 2009, 08:02 AM
What makes Einstein thery gives us? So is the same for 3. univers is oganized by three. it is the deep secret of evrithing. Christianity is maybee result of three or is by mens minds of the three power in the univers. no body knows this but is conection. Gligor Makedonska did study of the powrer of tree and stayed that deep formula of physics is of three. So we have ansewrs when we study this. the univers is results of power of 3!
I refiut that. 3! doesn't mean what you think it means.
catbasket
21st August 2009, 09:59 AM
Skamandros, you have now made 33 posts here! Spooky ...
Evilgiraffe
21st August 2009, 02:59 PM
Does he have the stamina to make it to 333?
Do we have the stamina to put up with it?
arthwollipot
23rd August 2009, 08:07 PM
I keep trying to convince people that it's 5, but they don't believe me.
RoboTimbo
23rd August 2009, 08:29 PM
I keep trying to convince people that it's 5, but they don't believe me.
I believe you, arth. I even credit you with it's discovery. FYROM was a dead giveaway, wasn't it?
Aitch
4th September 2009, 02:51 AM
An interesting point (well, I think so ;)) is the fact that people making post titles that are lists tend to have three items in the list; for example (and no doubt there are some that don't):
Marriage, Medical Bills, and Bankruptcy
Contraception, abortion, infanticide
Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters
Bacon/ham/processed meats...
But then, the number three has always had mystical attributes attached to it (see here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three#In_religion_and_mythology)).
Granted, it's an interesting number (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three#In_mathematics), but then again, so is 2 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two).
Sorry for resurrecting this thread, but I'm just wasting time before I go shopping. Just realised, I will be visiting the bank (http://www.lloydstsb.com/), Waitrose (http://www.waitrose.com/index.aspx) and WH Smith (http://www.whsmith.co.uk/) - that's three establishments. Coincidence or ... :eek:
arthwollipot
6th September 2009, 08:21 PM
Granted, it's an interesting number (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three#In_mathematics), but then again, so is 2 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two).And 5 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_(number)#Mathematics) is generated from them both.
fallout
6th September 2009, 08:44 PM
it´s 3
Aitch
7th September 2009, 01:22 AM
And 5 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_(number)#Mathematics) is generated from them both.
Thanks for that AW - it links to an article on Complete Graphs, which I have been interested in, but didn't know the name of, for some time. I foresee a good few hours reading up on the subject. Mmmm, a prediction - where's my $1M?
arthwollipot
7th September 2009, 01:26 AM
Interesting. I've been called Arth, Art, Arf, Wolli, and various misspellings of Arthwollipot, but I think that's the first time anyone's called me AW.
Aitch
7th September 2009, 01:59 AM
You mean you're not Arthur, 4th Earl Wolli-Pot; of the Berkshire Wolli-Pots? I do apologize! ;)
arthwollipot
7th September 2009, 02:02 AM
That depends - is there a large unclaimed inheritance in that name?
Aitch
7th September 2009, 02:31 AM
Well, I believe that the death duties, overdraft and mortgages add up to quite a lot. :)
arthwollipot
7th September 2009, 02:40 AM
Then no, that's not me.
:scarper:
Skamandros
8th September 2009, 10:40 AM
First was singularaty then, came that big bang. Three was infaltion which is the secret of that univirse. So again we have proove of the three. That was triagel of creation.
Hokulele
8th September 2009, 10:59 AM
The Big Bang is the inflation. You are down to two.
arthwollipot
9th September 2009, 12:15 AM
And three plus two is five! Like I've been saying all along!
Skamandros
24th October 2010, 09:40 PM
Their is new reserch pruving that secrit quantum number is 3. So gust like three colors of qaurks is key also in quantum cloud so is the group thery deep of the sychronisations.
Dowbters can cnow lern these things also.
Warship the three!!!
Richard Masters
25th October 2010, 02:57 AM
OMG.* 10+25+10=45; 4 +5 = 9; 9 / 3 = 3 (!)
And OMG has three letters!
* I can't believe this thread was resurrected. Skamandros must be a troll.
Kuko 4000
25th October 2010, 03:00 AM
Their is new reserch pruving that secrit quantum number is 3. So gust like three colors of qaurks is key also in quantum cloud so is the group thery deep of the sychronisations.
Dowbters can cnow lern these things also.
Warship the three!!!
I belief! Undeniable pruuv offer:
3 letters in word WOO!
CONCIENSE?? Not so FAST!!
dafydd
25th October 2010, 03:55 AM
The Welsh Triads
http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/celtic/ctexts/triads2.html
dafydd
25th October 2010, 03:56 AM
I belief! Undeniable pruuv offer:
3 letters in word WOO!
CONCIENSE?? Not so FAST!!
There are three letters in nut too! Spooky.
dafydd
25th October 2010, 04:03 AM
Their is new reserch pruving that secrit quantum number is 3. So gust like three colors of qaurks is key also in quantum cloud so is the group thery deep of the sychronisations.
Dowbters can cnow lern these things also.
Warship the three!!!
Troll.That is a very contrived post.
Mojo
25th October 2010, 04:47 AM
Their is new reserch pruving that secrit quantum number is 3.[citation needed]
:rolleyes:
Dancing David
25th October 2010, 05:35 AM
Psytaishun kneaded.
RoboTimbo
8th June 2011, 06:45 PM
Skamandros, is this yours?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004K1EYPM?tag=kiq-free-e-20
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.