PDA

View Full Version : Jay Nordlinger on "Davos in the Desert"


Skeptic
21st May 2009, 12:02 PM
This (http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTUyMWU4NGNkNmRkNzI1NWIwMzA1NmViOTYxNDI0N2Q=) is an extremely intersting report by Jay Nordlinger.

It agrees with what I keep saying: there are many Arabs who would like to change the system and would like democracy, free market, and liberty. But they are held back by the old guard -- the kleptocratic oligarchs -- whose excuse is, naturally, to blame Israel (and the USA) for everything. Clearly, say the kleptocratic autocrats, there's no way, say, Egyptians can stop "honor killing" as long as Israel exists, nor can Kuwait be expected to lower the number of government workers from 80%, as long as the Palestinians are suffering. Bull! Say the reformers. If Israel disappears tomorrow, things in Kuwait and Egypt will be just as bad. Israel simply has nothing to do with it.

These reformers are brave men. They deserve our support, as I keep saying. They are the REAL radicals in the Arab - Muslim world, in many cases braving harassment, jail, even death for their views. But who are the best supporters, the #1 lovers, of the kleptocratic oligarchs? Not their people, who are kept down; certainly not the reformers, who are killed and arrested; and not even the Islamists who would like to pull them down to reestablish the chaliphate (and killing all Jews and other infidels, as well as gays, women who bare their arms, etc., besides.)

No, the kleptocratic oligarchs' #1 lovers are the peace-and-love USA and European "peace camp", the ones who essentially agree with the kleptocratic oligarch that, why, yes, the real reason the Arab world is so backward, corrupt, and (currently) hopelessly behind is in fact the eeeeeeeeeeeeevil USA, Israel, and (above all) Bush; and that, besides, the USA has SOME NERVE to demand change from, say, Sudan or Libya when it itself, as "everybody knows", is "really" a theocratic dictatorship.

Read the whole thing.

Dr Adequate
22nd May 2009, 01:23 AM
Your usual ravings, then?

Sword_Of_Truth
22nd May 2009, 02:28 AM
This had to be, I think, perhaps the most interesting passage in the article:

Adil Abd al-Mahdi is the vice president of Iraq. And he is huddling with a few of us journos. Mahdi is stubbly, paunchy, unassuming. He looks like an auto mechanic. And his English is heavily accented. He is a far cry from, say, Barham Salih, the deputy prime minister, who is the picture of urbanity.

Why do I mention this? To insult Mahdi? No: to say that, appearances aside, he is no one’s dummy. He is an intellectual and now he is a statesman.

At the end of our discussion, I tell him, “I have asked this question 50, 100 times since 2003, and I am tired of asking it. I am sure you are tired of hearing it, or answering it. What do you think happened to Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction? Did he cease to have them at some point?”

Mahdi: “I don’t know. He had them. They are still there somewhere. Obviously he had them. He used them. He killed thousands of people with them.”

They are still there somewhere, Mahdi has said. Interesting.

If those things turned up somewhere, somehow, it would completely rewrite the history of the last eight years.