PDA

View Full Version : Netanyahu continues to sanction Israel's expansionist agenda!


Tin Foil Timothy
24th May 2009, 12:58 PM
Netanyahu continues to sanction Israel's expansionist agenda!

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ak3GxFsdVBPg&refer=home

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a plea by U.S. President Barack Obama to stop Jewish settlements in the West Bank, creating an obstacle to reviving peace talks with the Palestinians.

Netanyahu will allow new construction in existing settlements to accommodate growing families, his spokesman, Mark Regev, said in an interview today following the first Cabinet gathering since the prime minister’s initial White House meeting with Obama.

I'm sure the Israel Expansionism Deniers will continue to make us laugh by claiming Israel doesn't want the lot

Marc39
24th May 2009, 01:14 PM
Israel is allowed to the lot under international law and supported by the UN Charter. The presence of the Jewish settlers is the only reason the West Bank hasn't turned into a jungle, like Gaza.

Sword_Of_Truth
24th May 2009, 01:55 PM
Let us know when they take back the Sinai Peninsula, will you?

Tin Foil Timothy
24th May 2009, 02:11 PM
Let us know when they take back the Sinai Peninsula, will you?

Your quality of argument is really really terrible. It's telling that you're obviously not embarrassed by it.

Thunder
24th May 2009, 02:21 PM
Netanyahu is an ass. You cannot claim to be for peace, yet expand the settlements.

I am sorry, but the theft of Palestinian land and the building of Israeli-Jews only settlements, is Israel's version of terrorism.

mortimer
24th May 2009, 03:24 PM
Netanyahu is an ass. You cannot claim to be for peace, yet expand the settlements.

I am sorry, but the theft of Palestinian land and the building of Israeli-Jews only settlements, is Israel's version of terrorism.
Don't forget the roads. The mythical Jew-only roads.

Tin Foil Timothy
24th May 2009, 03:47 PM
Don't forget the roads. The mythical Jew-only roads.

I suppose the settlements are mythical as well are they? And the aparthied? I suppose that's mythical? Oh and the mythical white phosphorus that we saw falling upon innocent civilians.

I do appreciate that in Zionist Fantasy Land Israel also has the most moral army in the world ..

:dl:

and is a victim ....


:dl:

And parky is correct, Netanyahu is an ass

Marc39
24th May 2009, 03:54 PM
I suppose the settlements are mythical as well are they?

No, they're for real. And, they're very nice, too.

And the aparthied?

South Africa has abolished apartheid.

I suppose that's mythical? Oh and the mythical white phosphorus that we saw falling upon innocent civilians.

Which the ICRC said was used within legal constraints.

I do appreciate that in Zionist Fantasy Land Israel also has the most moral army in the world ..



Do you know another army that unilaterally ceased fire for three hours each day, while in the heat of battle, to allow for the administration of humanitarian aid to the enemy?

mortimer
24th May 2009, 04:06 PM
I suppose the settlements are mythical as well are they?
No, but do you think that there are Jew-only roads in Israel?
And the aparthied? I suppose that's mythical?
Debatable. I'd say no, but I wouldn't fault you for using the term, even if I feel it's more of an emotional term than a logical one in this case.
Oh and the mythical white phosphorus that we saw falling upon innocent civilians.
That they were innocent, or civilians, or that it was indeed Israel who set it off is all not proven.[/quote]

Sword_Of_Truth
24th May 2009, 04:32 PM
1974 - Israel returns captured territories to Syria
1979 - Israel returns Sinai Peninsula to Egypt
1983 - Israel withdraws to south bank of Awali river in Lebanon
1985 - Israel withdraws to buffer zone just north of Israel/Lebanon border
2000 - Israel withdraws from Lebanon, allowing Hezbollah to launch heavy artillery rockets into Israel itself 6 years later
2005 - Israel removes settlers from Gaza Strip and withdraws, allowing Hamas to initiate a more than 3 years long heavy artillery bombardment of Israeli soil.


This is what Timmeh calls "expansionism".

webfusion
24th May 2009, 04:48 PM
Just out of curiosity, what course of action is expected of the Prime Minister of Israel?
He was elected to do what he is doing.

I see nothing in the current constellation of political pressures that would cause him to take any course other than the one he is pursuing.

Certainly, the Palestinians themselves, when their leader goes to the White House, could make tremendous strides towards resuming negotiations with Israel. The ball is in their court, truth be told, as the FATAH-HAMAS Unity Government is something they need to organize already, or they will have zero credibility with Israel in any demands they make for a State.

Tin Foil Timothy
24th May 2009, 04:50 PM
No, but do you think that there are Jew-only roads in Israel?

I don't know. But it wouldn't surprise me if the Jewish settlers had priority in using some particular roads


Debatable. I'd say no, but I wouldn't fault you for using the term, even if I feel it's more of an emotional term than a logical one in this case.

I'd say something like 'jacist jerks' if I was being emotional. Apartheid is an objective description


That they were innocent, or civilians, or that it was indeed Israel who set it off is all not proven.

Zionist Fantasy Land.

Marc39
24th May 2009, 04:55 PM
I don't know.

No argument, here.

But it wouldn't surprise me if the Jewish settlers had priority in using some particular roads

Would it surprise you if Arab settlers had priority in using some particular roads?

I'd say something like 'jacist jerks' if I was being emotional. Apartheid is an objective description

Your posts indicate no knowledge of apartheid.

mortimer
24th May 2009, 04:57 PM
I don't know. But it wouldn't surprise me if the Jewish settlers had priority in using some particular roads.
:dl:

How do you imagine something like that would work?

Thunder
24th May 2009, 04:59 PM
:dl:

How do you imagine something like that would work?

The Palestinians are forbidden from using many of the roads in the West Bank. Just ask Marc39.

...and now I am sure there is a post below mine saying something about "Jew-Only road signs".

how sad.

Marc39
24th May 2009, 05:00 PM
The Palestinians are forbidden from using many of the roads in the West Bank. Just ask Marc39.

And, the reason is?

Thunder
24th May 2009, 05:03 PM
No, but do you think that there are Jew-only roads in Israel?


Israel has confiscated Arab private property to build roads that only Israelis can drive on. Since these roads connect Israeli settlements that only Jews can live in, it is fair to say that 99% of the folks that drive on them...are Jews.

mortimer
24th May 2009, 05:04 PM
The Palestinians are forbidden from using many of the roads in the West Bank. Just ask Marc39.

...and now I am sure there is a post below mine saying something about "Jew-Only road signs".

how sad.
You are aware that there are Arab citizens of Israel? You keep making this claim that there are Jew-only roads that Arab-Israelis are not permitted to use.

mortimer
24th May 2009, 05:06 PM
Israel has confiscated Arab private property to build roads that only Israelis can drive on. Since these roads connect Israeli settlements that only Jews can live in, it is fair to say that 99% of the folks that drive on them...are Jews.
And that makes them Jew-only?

Again, I have 3 other houses on my street. All three are occupied by Whites. Under your definition, the U.S. has White-only roads, right?

Marc39
24th May 2009, 05:28 PM
Originally Posted by parky76
The Palestinians are forbidden from using many of the roads in the West Bank. Just ask Marc39.

And, the reason is?

I'll answer on your behalf, if that's ok. The reason for limited road access to Palestinians in the West Bank is shootings, sniper fire and bombings that have occurred in certain areas of the West Bank, and, in the interest of protecting the safety of ALL Israeli citizens, Jews, Arabs, Muslims, Christians, Druse, whatever, roads that correspond with the locations where violence is known to have occurred are closed off. Another illustration of just knowing the effect, but, not the cause.

Marc39
24th May 2009, 05:43 PM
The Palestinians are forbidden from using many of the roads in the West Bank. Just ask Marc39.

...and now I am sure there is a post below mine saying something about "Jew-Only road signs".

how sad.

How sad that those poor souls clueless about Israeli society fabricate stories about Jew-Only roads.

Tin Foil Timothy
24th May 2009, 05:54 PM
The Palestinians are forbidden from using many of the roads in the West Bank. Just ask Marc39.

...and now I am sure there is a post below mine saying something about "Jew-Only road signs".

how sad.You are aware that there are Arab citizens of Israel? You keep making this claim that there are Jew-only roads that Arab-Israelis are not permitted to use.

Parky is talking about the West Bank NOT Israel.

Tin Foil Timothy
24th May 2009, 06:01 PM
Just out of curiosity, what course of action is expected of the Prime Minister of Israel?
He was elected to do what he is doing.

Well indeed. I wouldn't expect anything less from the racist idiot. Don't make it right though.

Marc39
24th May 2009, 06:07 PM
Parky is talking about the West Bank NOT Israel.

Ironically, you could make a more cogent case for apartheid in Israel, itself, were it true, than Israel imposing apartheid in the West Bank, given apartheid is state-imposed discrimination on its own population, and, the West Bank is not Israeli territory nor, are Pals in the West Bank part of the Israeli population.

Thunder
24th May 2009, 06:12 PM
You are aware that there are Arab citizens of Israel? You keep making this claim that there are Jew-only roads that Arab-Israelis are not permitted to use.

Israel has built roads that connect the settlements. These roads bi-sect the West Bank. Palestinians are FORBIDDEN from driving on these roads.

Is it legal for Israeli-Arabs to drive on these roads? Of course. Though I'm confused as to why they would be on roads that connect settlements that Israeli-Arabs are FORBIDDEN from living in.

Again, for the hard-of-hearing, there are NO Jew-Only roads in the West Bank. My previous assertion was wrong. But there are Israeli-Only roads through Palestinian territory, that connect the Jew-Only settlements.

Marc39
24th May 2009, 06:13 PM
Israel has built roads that connect the settlements. These roads bi-sect the West Bank. Palestinians are FORBIDDEN from driving on these roads.

Is it legal for Israeli-Arabs to drive on these roads? Of course. Though I'm confused as to why they would be on roads that connect settlements that Israeli-Arabs are FORBIDDEN from living in.

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=4744582&postcount=20

Skeptic
24th May 2009, 09:38 PM
Just out of curiosity, what course of action is expected of the Prime Minister of Israel?

Why, to completely agree with our resident "Obama had nothing to do with 9/11" mideast "analyst", of course.

Why Netanyahu doesn't do that, I cannot imagine.

He must be a racist expansionist Islamophobe, or something.

Tin Foil Timothy
24th May 2009, 11:20 PM
Why, to completely agree with our resident "Obama had nothing to do with 9/11" mideast "analyst", of course.

Why Netanyahu doesn't do that, I cannot imagine.

He must be a racist expansionist Islamophobe, or something.

Interesting view.

Sword_Of_Truth
24th May 2009, 11:23 PM
Interesting view.

You know what he meant. Stop being dishonest.

Marc39
9th June 2009, 12:11 PM
I'm sure the Israel Expansionism Deniers will continue to make us laugh by claiming Israel doesn't want the lot

Who do those Israelis think they are, the next Ottoman Empire?

Tin Foil Timothy
9th June 2009, 02:10 PM
You know what he meant. Stop being dishonest.

Apart from the hilarious hypocrisy I can't stop what I haven't started.

btw is god with Israel's expansionists and guiding their aims? Perhaps he's a qualified quantity surveyor? Or do you believe the settlements and apartheid is a secular agenda of racism?

Marc39
9th June 2009, 02:25 PM
btw is god with Israel's expansionists and guiding their aims?

Perhaps, depending on one's religious beliefs. On a more practical level, however, a few notable entities guiding their aims have been World War I Allies Britain, France, Italy and Japan, which guided their aims in establishing Palestine as the Jewish homeland, followed by all 51 members of the League of Nations who unanimously agreed to guide the formation of a Jewish homeland with the Palestine Mandate, further guided by US presidents Woodrow Wilson, Calvin Coolidge and Harry Truman and, ultimately, guided by the UN which granted international legitimacy for the reestablishment of Israel. Enough guidance?

Tin Foil Timothy
9th June 2009, 02:32 PM
Let us know when they take back the Sinai Peninsula, will you?

This one has to take the prize for the most boring, tedious, crass and fallciosu argument from the group known as Israeli Expansionist Deniers.

In fact it's on a par with the shouting of "Anti-semite!" or the common "you never complain about Chechnya or Darfur!"

Yes folks!! Israel has given back the vast expanse of the Sinai so from now on it's racist land stealing and racist persecutions of the Palestinians in the west bank during it's slow but sure contamination of the West bank is not expansionism. yes it gave back the Sinai so it can now do what it likes. Good one!!

:dl:

Marc39
9th June 2009, 02:44 PM
Yes folks!! Israel has given back the vast expanse of the Sinai so from now on it's racist land stealing and racist persecutions of the Palestinians in the west bank during it's slow but sure contamination of the West bank is not expansionism. yes it gave back the Sinai so it can now do what it likes. Good one!!



International law encourages Jewish settlement in the West Bank, which is deemed part of the Jewish homeland. That, plus God's will and the historical connection between Jews and Judea and Samaria make a legal, religious and historic trifecta for Jews living there. If the so-called Palestinians don't like living with Jews, they can move to Gaza, where Jews are prohibited.

Thunder
9th June 2009, 03:01 PM
International law encourages Jewish settlement in the West Bank. That, plus God's will and the historical connection between Jews and Judea and Samaria make a legal, religious and historic trifecta for Jews living there.


Name this "international law".

God's will???? Have you lost your mind??

Some Christians say it is "God's Will" that the Jews be tormented till the End of Days, for crucifying Jesus. "God's Will" is a horrible argument to make!!

Some Muslims think it is "God's Will" to murder all Americans and Jews. By your logic, we must accept their religious views as having merit.

Boy, did you step in it.

and btw, the International Court of Justice, which interpretes International Law, says the settlements are illegal. so there. Rostow can eat it.

Tin Foil Timothy
11th June 2009, 12:05 PM
Name this "international law".

God's will???? Have you lost your mind??

Some Christians say it is "God's Will" that the Jews be tormented till the End of Days, for crucifying Jesus. "God's Will" is a horrible argument to make!!

Some Muslims think it is "God's Will" to murder all Americans and Jews. By your logic, we must accept their religious views as having merit.

Boy, did you step in it.

and btw, the International Court of Justice, which interpretes International Law, says the settlements are illegal. so there. Rostow can eat it.

It's cowardly to use mythological figures to hide behind when proclaiming an agenda. These Islamic, Judaic and Christian extremists are only exposing there inability to think for themselves when they blindly follow some ancient prejudiced, hateful old dogma. Dogma that has no place in a civilized society!!

The settlements are most certainly illegal. But personally I could care less. They are immoral, racist and proof of Israel's continued agenda of expansionism. So their official legality matters not to me.

One the most crass and transparent settlement arguments I've heard recently from the Zionist Movement is the introduction of the phrase 'natural growth' when lamely attempting to justify this expansion.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 12:18 PM
The settlements are most certainly illegal.

Have you studied the matter? I have. But, more importantly, so, too, has the former dean of the Yale School of Law, legal advisor to the State Department for Middle East affairs and a contributor to the creation of UN Res. 242, the key resolution related to the settlements, and, he suggests the settlements are legal. Read, learn...

http://www.tzemachdovid.org/Facts/islegal1.shtml

But personally I could care less. They are immoral, racist and proof of Israel's continued agenda of expansionism. So their official legality matters not to me.

Chat room views are inconsequential. History and international law, as well as God, are on the side of the Jews.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 12:26 PM
The settlements are most certainly illegal. They are immoral, racist and proof of Israel's continued agenda of expansionism.

Forbidding Jews from living somewere, such as Judea and Samaria, merely on the basis of their religion is the very definition of racism. Such an exclusionary policy of bigotry cannot be tolerated.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 02:00 PM
the International Court of Justice, which interpretes International Law...

Really? I never would have figured this out.

... says the settlements are illegal. so there.

International Court of Justice rulings are merely advisory and are not illegally binding. The Court may sound very impressive, however, they are for all intents and purposes meaningless.

Rostow can eat it.

Rostow is deceased.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:19 PM
Israel is allowed to the lot under international law and supported by the UN Charter. The presence of the Jewish settlers is the only reason the West Bank hasn't turned into a jungle, like Gaza.

#1. According to several UN S.C. and Gen. Assem. Resolutions, the settlements are illegal. As well as according to the ICJ.

#2. The West Bank was not a "jungle" from 1948 to 1967.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:21 PM
International Court of Justice rulings are merely advisory and are not illegally binding. The Court may sound very impressive, however, they are for all intents and purposes meaningless.


Rostow is deceased.

I am gonna have to look into whether or not ICJ rulings are legally binding. I honestly do not trust anything that you post.

As far as Rostow being dead......thank God!!!!

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:23 PM
Forbidding Jews from living somewere, such as Judea and Samaria, merely on the basis of their religion is the very definition of racism. Such an exclusionary policy of bigotry cannot be tolerated.

I do not think anyone here has a problem with Jews living in the West Bank...as citizens of Palestine.

Citizens of Israel? No freaking way. Not unless it is part of a mutually agreed upon peace treaty between Israel and Palestine.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:24 PM
Chat room views are inconsequential. History and international law, as well as God, are on the side of the Jews.

lolololol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


:);):p:D:p:);):D

classic!!

Marc39
11th June 2009, 02:30 PM
I do not think anyone here has a problem with Jews living in the West Bank...as citizens of Palestine.

As citizens of a tyrannical, repressive dictatorship, where people roam in the streets like wild packs of dogs shooting each other up, like the so-called Palestinians? Nooo, nooo, nooo.

Jews have a totally different paradigm, one of democracy, civility, freedom and human rights. The so-called Palestiniains will just have to learn to accept modernity, difficult though it may be.

Citizens of Israel? No freaking way.

Way.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:33 PM
As citizens of a tyrannical, repressive dictatorship, where people roam in the streets like wild packs of dogs shooting each other up, like the so-called Palestinians? Nooo, nooo, nooo. .

Tough luck. That's the way its gonna be. They can live in those areas that are annexed to Israel...or they can become citizens of Palestine in those areas that become part of Palestine.

Live in the West Bank, in areas NOT annexed to Israel...as Israeli citizens?

Dream on. They are gonna get sent home...and the sooner the better.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 02:40 PM
Tough luck. That's the way its gonna be. They can live in those areas that are annexed to Israel...or they can become citizens of Palestine in those areas that become part of Palestine.

Live in the West Bank, in areas NOT annexed to Israel...as Israeli citizens?

Dream on. They are gonna get sent home...and the sooner the better.

The way it's "gonna" be is Jews will continue to settle the West Bank, as God, history and international law compel them to do. If the so-called Palestinians want to live in peace with the Jews, fine. If not, they have the option of moving or acting up again and getting their butts kicked on a regular basis by the Israeli military.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:44 PM
The way it's "gonna" be is Jews will continue to settle the West Bank, as God, history and international law compel them to do. .

Your "God" does not exist. And if he did, he certainly would not support one idiotic tribe over another.

Oh, and according to some Christian Theologians, the Jews are damned to walk the Earth forever, as punishment for rejecting Christ.

So be careful when you start lending weight to religious justifications for political events. Once you can do it, so can everyone else.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 02:45 PM
Your "God" does not exist. And if he did, he certainly would not support one idiotic tribe over another.

Yes, my God exists. Albert Einstein said so. Who am I going to believe, Einstein, or, an Internet chat room habitue?

scissorhands
11th June 2009, 02:45 PM
Someone is getting all excited about the idea of the West Bank being a missile launching pad against Israel, like Gaza.
Calm down Parky.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:47 PM
Someone is getting all excited about the idea of the West Bank being a missile launching pad against Israel, like Gaza.
Calm down Parky.

do you have something to contribute? or are you working on your plans to relocate the Palestinians to "the East".

Israel is such a small country. Neo-Zionists clearly need Lebensraum.

scissorhands
11th June 2009, 02:51 PM
Thirsting for the destruction of the Jewish Homeland is your issue Parky.
Im just a realist.

Sword_Of_Truth
11th June 2009, 02:54 PM
Israel is such a small country. Neo-Zionists clearly need Lebensraum.

One of the most disgustingly hateful things I think I have ever read on this forum.

DC
11th June 2009, 02:55 PM
Thirsting for the destruction of the Jewish Homeland is your issue Parky.
Im just a realist.
:dl:

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:58 PM
Thirsting for the destruction of the Jewish Homeland is your issue Parky.
Im just a realist.

I believe firmly in the Jewish State of Israel's right to exist within the 1967 borders (with 5% land exchanges with the West Bank), and West Jerusalem including the Jewish and Armenian Quarters of the Old City as the capital.

I seek the destruction of Israel? Nope. Try again.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 02:59 PM
One of the most disgustingly hateful things I think I have ever read on this forum.

Dude, Neo-Zionists are Israel's and the Jewish people's version of Neo-Nazis.

They seek fascist laws, discrimination, and even ethnic cleansing.

scissorhands
11th June 2009, 03:00 PM
:dl:


How ironic, a laughing dog from a 9/11 fantasist.:)

Marc39
11th June 2009, 03:02 PM
Dude, Neo-Zionists are Israel's and the Jewish people's version of Neo-Nazis.

They seek fascist laws, discrimination, and even ethnic cleansing.

You can't provide a legal definition of a war crime. Now, you're advancing to fascism and ethinc cleansing? Take baby steps.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 03:05 PM
You can't provide a legal definition of a war crime. Now, you're advancing to fascism and ethinc cleansing? Take baby steps.

i know very well what a war crime is.

do you? prove it.

DC
11th June 2009, 03:06 PM
How ironic, a laughing dog from a 9/11 fantasist.:)

funny it comes from a beliver in santaclaus.

scissorhands
11th June 2009, 03:10 PM
funny it comes from a beliver in santaclaus.

What does?
You believe in Santa Claus too?
Is he part of the NWO that faked the crash of flight 93?
Your credibility is zero and falling.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 03:11 PM
What does?
You believe in Santa Claus too?
Is he part of the NWO that faked the crash of flight 93?

Santa Claus is as stupid as a God that gives out perpetual land deeds.

scissorhands
11th June 2009, 03:15 PM
Santa Claus is as stupid as a God that gives out perpetual land deeds.

Best ask Allah about that.

DC
11th June 2009, 03:17 PM
Best ask Allah about that.

:eek: you do realise that Allah and God are one and the same fantasy creature?
Allah is the arabic translation of God.......

there are just 3 diffrent "Manuals" to that one fantasy, with all the diffrent translations and interpretations there are many more.

scissorhands
11th June 2009, 03:21 PM
:eek: you do realise that Allah and God are one and the same fantasy creature?
Allah is the arabic translation of God.......

there are just 3 diffrent "Manuals" to that one fantasy, with all the diffrent translations and interpretations there are many more.

No, really!
I never knew that, DC.
Thanks for the information!

DC
11th June 2009, 03:22 PM
No, really!
I never knew that, DC.
Thanks for the information!

you'r welcome.

Tin Foil Timothy
11th June 2009, 03:36 PM
do you have something to contribute? or are you working on your plans to relocate the Palestinians to "the East".

Israel is such a small country. Neo-Zionists clearly need Lebensraum.

One of the most disgustingly hateful things I think I have ever read on this forum.

It would only be hateful to the Zionist Movement ( what Parky calls neo-Zionists ) and it's supporters. In fact I'm going to start calling the Zionist Movement ( i.e the racist fascist movement started by Herzl which continues to this day) neo-Zionists so Parky and I are aligned in our nomenclature.

neo-Zionism is like Nazism. It's racist an fascist and deserves no respect.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 03:40 PM
It would only be hateful to the Zionist Movement ( what Parky calls neo-Zionists ) and it's supporters. In fact I'm going to start calling the Zionist Movement ( i.e the racist fascist movement started by Herzl which continues to this day) neo-Zionists so Parky and I are aligned in our nomenclature.

neo-Zionism is like Nazism. It's racist an fascist and deserves no respect.

No more allegations of Israeli war crimes and apartheid since I started asking for a definition of both? My work is done.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 04:07 PM
No more allegations of Israeli war crimes and apartheid since I started asking for a definition of both? My work is done.

actually, Israel is guilty of a few war crimes. collective punishment is a war crime. human shields is a war crime. the use of white phosphorous in a densily populated urban area is a war crime.

I also believe that the embargo on Gaza is a war crime, as most of the items forbidden from entering Gaza (canned foods, crayons, livestock) are not necessary for Hamas' terror campaigns.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 04:16 PM
actually, Israel is guilty of a few war crimes. collective punishment is a war crime. human shields is a war crime. the use of white phosphorous in a densily populated urban area is a war crime.

I also believe that the embargo on Gaza is a war crime, as most of the items forbidden from entering Gaza (canned foods, crayons, livestock) are not necessary for Hamas' terror campaigns.

All untrue.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 04:24 PM
All untrue.

so the use of human shields, flammable gasses in densely populated areas, and embargos on such dangerous materials as canned food, livestock, and crayons, are all NOT gregious violations of the customs of war???


spare us. if it was Serbia, or Russia, or Sudan, or Georgia, or Rwanda, or North Korea, or Iraq, who had done these things, you would be yelling "war crime!!!" till the cows came home.

you only falsely claim that they are not war crimes, cause it is Israel that did it. the agenda and bias of your posts is very clear.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 04:57 PM
so the use of human shields, flammable gasses in densely populated areas, and embargos on such dangerous materials as canned food, livestock, and crayons, are all NOT gregious violations of the customs of war???


spare us. if it was Serbia, or Russia, or Sudan, or Georgia, or Rwanda, or North Korea, or Iraq, who had done these things, you would be yelling "war crime!!!" till the cows came home.

you only falsely claim that they are not war crimes, cause it is Israel that did it. the agenda and bias of your posts is very clear.

Your "Jew-Only Road" posts were more credible.

Tin Foil Timothy
11th June 2009, 05:12 PM
actually, Israel is guilty of a few war crimes. collective punishment is a war crime. human shields is a war crime. the use of white phosphorous in a densily populated urban area is a war crime.

I also believe that the embargo on Gaza is a war crime, as most of the items forbidden from entering Gaza (canned foods, crayons, livestock) are not necessary for Hamas' terror campaigns.
removed off-topic comment
While the MA does indeed tell people not to make personal attacks, do not presume that off-topic posts which quote other members but do not mention their name or address the topic, will be ignored.

Marc39
11th June 2009, 05:24 PM
Those that indulge in Israeli War Crime Denial, Israeli Atrocity Denial, Israeli Racism Denial and Israeli Expansionism Denial have no credible argument to back up these views.

Evidence of alleged war crimes should be brought to the attention of the International Criminal Court. It is imperative, however, to actually know what a war crime is. Have you requested an investigation? War criminals must be brought to justice! Here are details...

http://www.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ICC?lan=en-GB

Marc39
11th June 2009, 05:50 PM
Thirsting for the destruction of the Jewish Homeland is your issue Parky.
Im just a realist.

Don't worry. The Arabs would never really take Israel over. They wouldn't now how to operate anything there.

Thunder
11th June 2009, 07:41 PM
Your "Jew-Only Road" posts were more credible.

ok

Tin Foil Timothy
11th June 2009, 10:50 PM
One of the most disgustingly hateful things I think I have ever read on this forum.

Yet you completely ignore the blatent ad-hom accusation by scissorhands directly above your post. ..

Thirsting for the destruction of the Jewish Homeland is your issue Parky.
Im just a realist.


... which is a really hateful thing to say. And I've reported itas it's against the forum rules.

Pardalis
12th June 2009, 07:28 AM
Those that indulge in Israeli War Crime Denial, Israeli Atrocity Denial, Israeli Racism Denial and Israeli Expansionism Denial have no credible argument to back up these views.

I've reported that one, TFT, you're doing the same thing you're complaining about others doing.

Stop it and other people will stop.

Tin Foil Timothy
12th June 2009, 06:13 PM
I've reported that one, TFT, you're doing the same thing you're complaining about others doing.

Stop it and other people will stop.

What on earth for?

Tin Foil Timothy
12th June 2009, 06:19 PM
removed off-topic comment
While the MA does indeed tell people not to make personal attacks, do not presume that off-topic posts which quote other members but do not mention their name or address the topic, will be ignored.

I wasn't making a personal attack against Parky whatsoever and was addressing his post so how could it be OT ?

:confused::confused::confused: