PDA

View Full Version : Will the anti-Christ will be a homosexual?


headscratcher4
29th May 2009, 05:35 AM
http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2009/05/27/faith/doc4a1b794bd0fd9907394285.txt

Some thoughts on the topic from up Palin-way....

Holler Hoojer
29th May 2009, 05:47 AM
In this era of concern about atmospheric gases, is there any way to shut off oxygen to Alaska? They seem to be wasting it.

Cavemonster
29th May 2009, 05:53 AM
As stupid as this is, in my mind, anyone who spares any amount of concern about the "anti-christ" is already over the hedge.

It's sort of like pointing into a mental institution full of guys who think they're napoleon, and saying "That guy who thinks he's napoleon has a duck shoved up his ass"

They're all guys who think they're Napoleon. Adding a bit more crazy doesn't really change the picture much.

Greediguts
29th May 2009, 05:56 AM
http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2009/05/27/faith/doc4a1b794bd0fd9907394285.txt

Some thoughts on the topic from up Palin-way....

Ick.:mad:

joobz
29th May 2009, 05:58 AM
The anti-christ will be a christian.

paximperium
29th May 2009, 05:59 AM
The anti-christ will be a christian.
Isn't that a tad incestuos?

P.J. Denyer
29th May 2009, 06:01 AM
In this era of concern about atmospheric gases, is there any way to shut off oxygen to Alaska? They seem to be wasting it.

From reading that article I'd say they're already short of oxygen.

Ladewig
29th May 2009, 06:05 AM
Wow. Fortunately there is no shortage of criticism in the comments section.

My favorite part is the beginning where the author claims that the question does not originate with himself: as if that somehow makes the whole thing less bigoted.

Darat
29th May 2009, 06:05 AM
http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2009/05/27/faith/doc4a1b794bd0fd9907394285.txt

Some thoughts on the topic from up Palin-way....

I can't see what business it is of anyone else what my sexual orientation is!

HansMustermann
29th May 2009, 06:27 AM
Well, that's a load off my mind, Darat, 'cause I was starting to feel inadequate. I mean the gays get to destroy family values, corrupt youth, poison society, emit some sort of gay field that turns everyone else within a mile gay too, drive people away from Jesus, etc, or so the bible-thumpers tell me, and all I can aspire to is a quiet mid-life crisis with teenage bimbos and overpriced cars. Plus, meh, I can think up whole pages of reason and it won't even make a dent in the faith of someone like Kathy, but apparently just being gay makes one a candidate to be _the_ Antichrist and drive people away from Christ. Heck, it even makes baby jesus cry and I ain't got even a coo from 'im. It's not fair, I tell you ;)

I was starting to want to be gay too, goddammit. It sounds better than getting super-powers in the bible-thumpers' PR ;)

Sun Countess
29th May 2009, 07:40 AM
Darat, why must you fight your natural desires thusly? Unbridle them and appreciate the gifts of porn and prostitutes that God has bestowed upon you! ;)

Beerina
29th May 2009, 07:44 AM
I can't see what business it is of anyone else what my sexual orientation is!

Oh, God makes it his business. :mad:

He blew up a whole friggin' city just because people enjoyed the pleasures their bodies could give them, in ways this sexually repressed God didn't like.


I wonder what the people of Gomorrah were doing...

HansMustermann
29th May 2009, 07:56 AM
... but spared Lot, who had offered his virgin daughters to a mob to rape.

headscratcher4
29th May 2009, 08:17 AM
I can't see what business it is of anyone else what my sexual orientation is!

Suddenly, so much that was unclear is now clear.

Ashles
29th May 2009, 08:29 AM
Wow, they've 'outed' the devil.

BenBurch
29th May 2009, 08:31 AM
Somehow missed this topic; but see http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=144086

Hokulele
29th May 2009, 09:17 AM
I guess that is certainly evidence that the anti-christ won't be a lesbian.

JimBenArm
29th May 2009, 09:21 AM
I am straight, damn it!

Mrs. Hmmphries
29th May 2009, 09:27 AM
Isn't Perez Hilton the anti-christ?

BenBurch
29th May 2009, 10:09 AM
I guess that is certainly evidence that the anti-christ won't be a lesbian.

Hasn't he come and gone already?

Phrost
29th May 2009, 10:12 AM
Obviously the Anti-Christ is already President...

headscratcher4
29th May 2009, 10:15 AM
I'm fairly certain its one of Jon & Kate's plus 8.

Drudgewire
29th May 2009, 10:24 AM
This question has already been answered:


http://www.lethalwrestling.com/upload/clay_aiken.jpg

brodski
29th May 2009, 10:36 AM
Am I really the first poster to make the "get behind me satan" crack?

headscratcher4
29th May 2009, 10:37 AM
Am I really the first poster to make the "get behind me satan" crack?

yes, and you should be so proud to drag this otherwise dignified discussion into new depths....

blobru
29th May 2009, 11:12 AM
:confused: As an Alaskan, you'd think Pastor Ron would condemn not the vices of the Antichrist as homosexual, but what the price is of the antifreeze at Home Depot!

BenBurch
29th May 2009, 11:58 AM
Am I really the first poster to make the "get behind me satan" crack?

He said "crack!"

Ralph
29th May 2009, 01:50 PM
[QUOTE=Beerina;4759664


I wonder what the people of Gomorrah were doing...[/QUOTE]

Obviously engaging in the practice of gomorrahy......

Safe-Keeper
29th May 2009, 02:23 PM
In answering this question, it is important to assert the question does not originate with me, lest someone out there think that I am bringing some new doctrine out to bolster the political climate.Translation: relax, no original thoughts here. Had you scared for a second, didn't you?

But as the study of Bible prophecy includes verbiage as to the behavior of the one called “that Wicked” by Paul in II Thessalonians, it is not only a legitimate question to ask, but also one to answer.The what by who in the what?

While the word “homosexual” is not in the Bible, the behavior of those who practice homosexuality, and God’s estimation of them, very definitely is.Yes. I found it in there in the section that told you to stone to death rebellious kids, hate dolphins (they don't have scales, the abominable things) and stage a public stoning of whoever tries to convert you away from Judaism.

When the word came into existence I cannot tell you, but what we can say for sure is that when Noah Webster published his first dictionary in 1828, it was not included.Eh, dude, you don't need to consult dictionaries gathering dust to find out when words originated. You have the Internet. If it's good enough for your written works, surely it's good enough for research?

This means that homosexuality is a modern word invented to replace the word Noah Webster did include, sodomy, defined as a crime against nature. This is historical revisionism in action.Yes. They did it to "******", too. Very dishonourable.

Sodomy is defined in scripture by two things, the first being that of where it began: Sodom. In Genesis 13:13 we have the first mention of the men of Sodom, pronouncing that they “were wicked and sinners before the Lord exceedingly.” Their saga is continued in chapters 18 and 19 with their sin being so great that not only does God say that it “is very grievous,” but he himself comes down to destroy them with fire, the rubble of which still stands as a warning to us today.I'd call this history revisionism if it wasn't for the fact that Humpty-Dumpty here has redefined the term to mean "the addition and usage of words not endorsed by the 1928 Noah Webster Dictionary". I guess I can still call it a glorification of mass murder, though.

While the Genesis account does not graphically describe their sin, leading some to deny it as being the same as homosexuality, their sin is obviously just that by how it is described: lying with mankind as with womankind....like with... what? Er... hey, tell you what, if you give me your address, I'll send you some pictures you might be interested in. Women have this thing called a 'vagina' you'll want to learn more about, and sex with them is actually pretty different, both in experience and consequences, than what you're so fixated upon.

What other conclusion can be reached when they want to “know” the men who were in Lot’s house, the same word the Bible uses in Genesis 4 in relation to the conception of Cain?I dunno, stupid me thought it might be a sin to rape angels sent by god. Would the rape part be OK if it was chicks?

And that Lot himself understood their intentions is clear; not only did he call such behavior wicked, but he also offered his virgin daughters as substitutes...That's a yes, then.

...which the men of Sodom refused.So God destroyed Sodom because the Sodomites would rather rape grown men than children. Admit it, you get a hard-on whenever the RCC child abuse makes the news.

And one more thing:Oh no, please, make it stop.

Sodomy is the only sin for which God came down from heaven to destroy.Is this some new kind of Holocaust denial? Is the Great Flood Allied propaganda?

Though God dealt with many other sins in various ways, there is no other for which he came down from heaven to verify and destroy.Simply false. I dare say He killed more Isrealites in the wilderness with plagues and fire for minor offenses than he did Sodomites. You really may want to read this Bible of yours some day. I know it's boring for the Most Important Written Work Ever, and that boredom is a perfectly legitimate excuse for not familiarizing yourself with a book filled with knowledge which might mean the difference between eternal salvation and condemnation, but really, it's a real eye-opener. I promise.

In the New Testament, sodomy is declared to be “against nature.”You sure? Have you checked this against the 1928 dictionary? It might disagree, and you know how much we all hate it when it does that.

And of the men, Paul in Romans 1 says they leave “the natural use of the woman....” In effect, there is no greater sin against God than to reject how he made you, and no greater sin against women than to reject how God made them.So if I launch a holocaust that kills six million people, I'm still not as bad as someone who does someone in the ass.

But will the Antichrist be a homosexual?Really says something, doesn't it. We're talking about the end of the world. Earthquakes, stars falling from the sky like burning slingshots, a third of the Earth burning up, the mountains themselves attacking people, horrible beings appearing to rule the Earth... and all you're afraid of is that this guy is going to do people in the ass.

Having seen what the Bible says of sodomy, we have no further to look than the book of Daniel, chapter 11 to find our answer. It says, “Neither shall he [Antichrist] regard... the desire of women....” As I said at the onset, I am not the first to draw attention to this, but the verbiage is clear.So are the implications.

You heard it here first, guys, Jesus Christ was a fag:D!

From a lost perspective, the reason sex sells, pornography is profitable, and prostitution is “the world’s oldest profession” is mankind’s desire of women.Yeah, 'cause no one ever buys gay or lesbian porn. Righty.

From Christianity’s position, it is part of the glue for the bond of marriage and the propagation of a godly heritage. But homosexuality does not regard this — in their unbridled lusts they burn for their own gender.Thank God for that. All the kids up for adoption because of the unbridled lust of heterosexuals might just want to be adopted by someone.

But consider this: The time is ripe for such a leader. Indeed, it should not be surprising that the one who is against everything Biblical and Christian should be a partaker of so great a sin; there is no greater way to reject the Creator than to reject your gender and his design for it. And at what other time have we seen such perversion come out of the closets onto our streets, threatening violence if we do not accept their ways?

Is it any wonder that Revelation 13 says that this same Antichrist will make war with the saints of the tribulation, and overcome them? Are they not now readying themselves to make it illegal to “offend” them in any way, calling it hatred to preach against their sin? Is it because they love us? The time is ripe for such a man."We're not allowed to be ********, might as well end it all now".

But remember that sodomy is the one sin that God left heaven and came to earth to destroy.So when He came down all those other times He was after other things than Sin?

Could it be that this will be the predominate sin on earth when Christ descends from the clouds to fight against the armies of wickedness? And will it be just a coincidence that the Antichrist will be the very first occupant of the lake of fire, tasting eternal death 1,000 years before even the devil himself?[/quote]You know, it'd not have taken you that long to read the Bible. Jesus clearly says He's going to return within His generation. You know, 2000 years ago.

You be the judge.Careful, now. This Bible you may have heard about promises nasty consequences for people who think for themselves (http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/following_your_own_moral_compass/dt29_19.html). You may want to refrain from encouraging Sin in future articles.

Madalch
29th May 2009, 02:34 PM
Hasn't he come and gone already?

I'm not using that avatar anymore, but I'm still here.

Madalch
29th May 2009, 02:35 PM
Obviously engaging in the practice of gomorrahy......
Whatever that is, they caught gomorrhea from it.

Safe-Keeper
29th May 2009, 02:54 PM
I guess that is certainly evidence that the anti-christ won't be a lesbian.
Hasn't he come and gone already? True, that. He made the most disturbing jokes about the Pakistani secretary, and could never, even once, make a decent cup of coffee. I won't miss him.

Madalch
29th May 2009, 04:17 PM
Okay- the antichrist is supposed to be gay because the Bible says he shall not regard the desire of women. I'd take that to mean he's not interested in sex because he's got an Armageddon to prepare for.

So if you're hitting on a Christian babe, tell her you just want to make sure you're not really the antichrist.

Molinaro
29th May 2009, 04:26 PM
He said "crack!"

I couldn't get past that part either :o

Safe-Keeper
29th May 2009, 04:50 PM
While I can't find the video now, the Amazing Atheist on YouTube did an excellent piece on this. From memory:

TAA: How come your god can get away with so much evil? Hatred, genocide, injustice...?

Generic man with Southern accent: It ain't sin when god does it.

TAA: so God can do anything He wants. Can He be gay?

GMSA: But-- no, why would He...

TAA: Surely if God can do anything He wants, and it isn't Sin when He does it, He can do someone up the butt?

GMSA: what... but... :sputter: ...you're a sick [censored], you're gonna burn in Hell!

MINISTERofTRUTH
29th May 2009, 05:11 PM
George Walker Bush is not a homosexual.
The Bible says Bush is a 666 over and over again. See -> http://www.outersecrets.com/real/biblecode2.htm

BY THE WAY, no beliefs, nor a practice of trial and error, was used to uncover these Bible Codes. The Codes were released as an after the fact.

Robin
29th May 2009, 05:24 PM
I think that lesbians would be surprised to find that the term homosexuality is equivalent to sodomy.

And I think the majority of Christians would be surprised to learn that the sole purpose of the Incarnation was to deal with the issue of homosexuality.

If that was Jesus's only purpose then it is funny he did not mention the subject.

Still, it is worth noting that this idiot does not represent majority Christian views.

slingblade
29th May 2009, 06:57 PM
George Walker Bush is not a homosexual.
The Bible says Bush is a 666 over and over again. See -> http://www.outersecrets.com/real/biblecode2.htm

BY THE WAY, no beliefs, nor a practice of trial and error, was used to uncover these Bible Codes. The Codes were released as an after the fact.

Woot! Baloney! Where's the bread and mustard?


By the way, your codes are wrong. The Number of the Beast is 616, and that number refers to the Emperor Caligula.


...who is pretty dead.

JimBenArm
29th May 2009, 07:07 PM
George Walker Bush is not a homosexual.
The Bible says Bush is a 666 over and over again. See -> http://www.outersecrets.com/real/biblecode2.htm

BY THE WAY, no beliefs, nor a practice of trial and error, was used to uncover these Bible Codes. The Codes were released as an after the fact.
Bush is a 666? Bible code? Does Roger Jimmo know this over in the "666 solved" thread? Won't this violate his copyright or something?

Not that I'm trying to start a "Battle of the Woos" or anything.:wackytwitcy:

VanillaCone
29th May 2009, 07:41 PM
My question is: How did the Alaskans determine that the anti-Christ would be named Will?

elbe
29th May 2009, 08:27 PM
Obviously engaging in the practice of gomorrahy......

A practice so foul, so perverted, that a book already known for its graphic depictions (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=ezekiel+23:20) felt the need to omit it.

blobru
29th May 2009, 08:38 PM
My question is: How did the Alaskans determine that the anti-Christ would be named Will?


Greg the anti-Christ told them.

quarky
29th May 2009, 08:58 PM
If the anti-christ is gay, he'll lie about it. The anti-christ lies. An outed gay couldn't be the anti-christ unless he was secretly straight.

Lucian
29th May 2009, 09:51 PM
Did anyone else find it peculiar that he used the OT book of Daniel to "prove" that the Antichrist will be homosexual? Also, in the NRSV translation of Daniel 11:37, the passage is, "He shall pay no respect to the gods of his ancestors, or to the one beloved by women; he shall pay no respect to any other god, for he shall consider himself greater than all." So this mighty king (Antiochus, apparently)--not homosexual.

VanillaCone
29th May 2009, 11:08 PM
Greg the anti-Christ told them.

Maybe they're thinking Will the anti-Christ and Grace the anti-Virgin Mary?

What I'd really like to see is a flaming gay anti-Judas named Skittles. Now that would be worth the price of admission.

Sun Countess
29th May 2009, 11:17 PM
I just hope this means the pre-trib years will be fabulous. If the earth is gonna be remodeled, we're gonna need some good decorators.

:)

Doc Daneeka
29th May 2009, 11:22 PM
The Frontiersman, eh? I wonder how long it will take them to finally print up Rorschach's journal...

Roadtoad
29th May 2009, 11:26 PM
Further evidence those winter nights in Alaska a pretty long and boring if they have to turn to crap like this for entertainment.

And the women must be ugly...

joobz
30th May 2009, 09:31 AM
Am I really the first poster to make the "get behind me satan" crack?
You confused the word order.
It's supposed to be "Get me behind, Satan!"