PDA

View Full Version : United States Government Convicted of Treason, including Obama and SCOTUS


LightinDarkness
3rd July 2009, 12:49 AM
Gosh this summer seems to be full of woos for some reason.

Anyways, apparently the United States Government, including Barack Obama and the entire Surpeme Court, has been formally charged with treason! I don't know about you, but I seem to have missed this item on my nightly newscast.

And just who charged the government with treason? The Super American Grand Jury. Never heard of it? Thats because its not a real grand jury, its a body birthers made up and thus their charge of treason has no more weight than my declaring Alex Jones clinically insane and a threat to society (even though my declaration is likely to be more true):

http://yannone.blogspot.com/2009/07/united-states-government-is-charged.html

172 birther wingnuts worked for 10 days around the clock to come to the conclusion that Barack Obama cannot be President and thus charged him with treason. To bad they didn't spend 10 days doing any real research to find out he was born in Hawaii, eh?

Across the woo web orgasmic glee at this announcement is occurring. I don't usually use the word orgasmic to describe forum postings, but the sheer glee and happiness the woos are having over this fake "grand jury" whose charges have absolutely no weight in the law is huge. Here is the ATS spastic reaction:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread478222/pg1

LightinDarkness
3rd July 2009, 12:54 AM
Notably, Ron Paul and several other members of Congress were also "served" by this fake body for certifying the electoral college results, apparently. You can see where this leads: the legions of devoted Ron Paul cultists are going to get hysterical about this.

JoeyDonuts
3rd July 2009, 12:56 AM
Now all they need is an enforcement body to carry out their ruling and bring in the conspirators for trial.

Who's that gonna be?

LightinDarkness
3rd July 2009, 12:58 AM
Now all they need is an enforcement body to carry out their ruling and bring in the conspirators for trial.

Who's that gonna be?

Alex Jones with a bullhorn and a crowd of twoofers?

JoeyDonuts
3rd July 2009, 01:08 AM
They're probably picturing a scene like the last episode of Jericho.

But, yeah - AJ and some college kids/ex-hippies/Speidi is about all they're gonna get.

Caustic Logic
3rd July 2009, 01:17 AM
Who's gonna finish this program? Me! I already did it with Super-Duper Grand Common Law. Y'see, the "common law" hoax keeps you invested in artifical entities and from realizing the real power lies with you personally. I have simply declared all those served as guilty and currently in prison, serving various sentences. Go ahead and check, - the President and half of Congress are now behind bars.

And if not, then they are in violation of Super-Duper Grand Common Law, which will really make me mad.

Funniest things is the ATSers all "oh wow, we got them good..." "Ron Paul? This is all a smokescreen to get him..." Que? Who's "blowing up a bus to assinate one guy?"

CptColumbo
3rd July 2009, 04:14 AM
They're charging someone with commiting treason against a country that they believe he isn't a citizen of?

Isn't the fact that they are holding court and charging the US government with treason kinda treasonous itself?

Horatius
3rd July 2009, 06:03 AM
They're charging someone with commiting treason against a country that they believe he isn't a citizen of?




That was my thought as well. Shouldn't they have charged Obama with an act of war, or something?


A war he's apparently already won, btw! ;)

Cl1mh4224rd
3rd July 2009, 08:34 AM
Anyways, apparently the United States Government, including Barack Obama and the entire Surpeme Court, has been formally charged with treason!


Heh. Even the truthers' fake Grand Jury couldn't come to a decision.

Alferd_Packer
3rd July 2009, 10:24 AM
Typical birther idiocy.

But fun to watch.

Brainster
3rd July 2009, 11:49 AM
The Birthers are pathetic. I see that site is going with the "British Subject" gambit, which strikes me as even nuttier than the "born in Kenya" theory. As I pointed out last year when I first heard this nonsense, how many of the self-styled defenders of the Constitution have seen George W. Bush's birth certificate?

ETA: I see they served that moron Bachmann; she's just the type to hop on this bandwagon with her NAU nuttery and fear of the census.

dudalb
3rd July 2009, 11:55 AM
Now all they need is an enforcement body to carry out their ruling and bring in the conspirators for trial.

Who's that gonna be?


I have a candidate:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/thum_1884047a0f617f071f.jpg (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=10469)

Thunder
3rd July 2009, 12:14 PM
Now all they need is an enforcement body to carry out their ruling and bring in the conspirators for trial.

Who's that gonna be?

A small band of brave freedom fighters, otherwise known as "The Rebel Alliance".

And this shall be their symbol:

http://thm-a02.yimg.com/image/72a383e3d5bc96fa

1337m4n
3rd July 2009, 01:00 PM
Do they mean the ENTIRE government?

How the hell can you charge the ENTIRE government with...well, with anything?

The "government" is not a monolithic, self-aware entity, nor is it composed entirely of bigwigs. It consists of tens of thousands of individuals, most of whom have no higher positions of authority than sitting at a desk typing up spreadsheets.

What about the receptionist at the DMV who calls your number? He's technically a member of "the government". What about the guy who walks into restaurants and checks for roaches before stamping a health certificate? He's technically a member of "the government". What about the Army grunt who's fresh out of boot camp and doesn't have a high enough rank to give orders to anyone yet? He's technically a member of "the government".

How can the WHOLE GOVERNMENT be guilty of treason?

1337m4n
3rd July 2009, 01:10 PM
Do they mean the ENTIRE government?

How the hell can you charge the ENTIRE government with...well, with anything?

The "government" is not a monolithic, self-aware entity, nor is it composed entirely of bigwigs. It consists of tens of thousands of individuals, most of whom have no higher positions of authority than sitting at a desk typing up spreadsheets.

What about the receptionist at the DMV who calls your number? He's technically a member of "the government". What about the guy who walks into restaurants and checks for roaches before stamping a health certificate? He's technically a member of "the government". What about the Army grunt who's fresh out of boot camp and doesn't have a high enough rank to give orders to anyone yet? He's technically a member of "the government".

How can the WHOLE GOVERNMENT be guilty of treason?

My bad, after a read-through, it turns out they don't mean the ENTIRE government...they just mean Obama, the ENTIRE FBI (including desk receptionists?), the ENTIRE US District Courts (wtf?), the SCOTUS (how? their decisions are rarely ever unanimous, so why aren't they just charging, say, half of them?), the ENTIRE Pentagon (including janitors?), and a bunch of Congresspeople nobody's ever heard of.

The ridiculousness level has thus been downgraded from 10 to 9 (out of 10). I apologize for jumping to conclusions.

Aidoneus
3rd July 2009, 02:29 PM
The ridiculousness level has thus been downgraded from 10 to 9 (out of 10). I apologize for jumping to conclusions.

Typo, surely? You must mean out of 5?

Travis
3rd July 2009, 03:01 PM
Even if we were to suppose they were correct that Obama wasn't a citizen.....why then charge him with anything? Wouldn't it be enough to kick him out?

Zorglub
3rd July 2009, 03:15 PM
Do we know if they charged Barack Obama or BARACK OBAMA? Apparently there is a difference ;)

Horatius
3rd July 2009, 03:53 PM
Do we know if they charged Barack Obama or BARACK OBAMA? Apparently there is a difference ;)



My god, I think you've struck gold here! We should start spreading this question around the woo sites, and see how many fights we can start!

Zorglub
3rd July 2009, 04:09 PM
My god, I think you've struck gold here! We should start spreading this question around the woo sites, and see how many fights we can start!

Wouldn't that be true evil? Like REALLY evil? ...well it would also be tremendeously fun :)

Robster, FCD
3rd July 2009, 05:57 PM
These nuts don't need a real grand jury, they have already shown their willingness to take their warped view of justice into their own hands, as seen over and over in the last year. These people scare me

CptColumbo
3rd July 2009, 06:09 PM
172 birther wingnuts worked for 10 days around the clock to come to the conclusion that Barack Obama cannot be President and thus charged him with treason.
If you put 172 monkeys in a room with a typewriter for 10 days, what they wrote would make more sense than these guys...and the room would probably smell better too. :)

Brainster
3rd July 2009, 06:52 PM
Wow, that site is quite the cornucopia of nuttery:

Anti-Federal Reserve (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2009/06/jekyll-island-two.html).

McVeigh was a patsy (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2009/06/far-better-than-enemy-for-our-own-sake.html).

I think it's very plausible that the Murrah Building bombing was a false flag operation, too. McVeigh could have been set up to do it by the government itself, like the guy who set the Reichstag fire. As soon as Bill Clinton opened his mouth after the bombing, he was all about using that horrific event to push his agenda and to demonize those who hadn't done it.

Our evil invasion of Panama (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2005/09/panama-deception.html):

Included in this video are Professor Michael Parenti; Professor Peter Dale Scott;

Peter Dale Scott, also a 9-11 Troofer (http://www.peterdalescott.net/q.html).

Global warming is a scam (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2009/06/global-screwing.html).

You don't have to pay income tax! It's voluntary (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2006/10/how-to-keep-100-percent-of-your.html)!

And yes, his heroes are the two biggest idiots in Congress: Michelle Bachmann (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2009/06/great-awakening.html) and Ron Paul (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2009/06/freedom-health-care-not-commie-care.html). Note as well that the Ronulans turned up in the comments section of that post on the "Grand Jury" "Presentment" to denounce angrily that Dr. Paul was served. How dare he imply that Ron Paul is anything less than perfect!

Travis
3rd July 2009, 06:52 PM
Remember the fake trial they had in San Diego? That was hilarious. I think there is a thread about it around someplace.

Brainster
3rd July 2009, 07:13 PM
Remember the fake trial they had in San Diego? That was hilarious. I think there is a thread about it around someplace.

I covered it here (http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2007/05/what-we-have-here-is-failure-to-indict.html). Not sure where the JREF thread is on it.

Detailed summary here (http://web.archive.org/web/20071110074059/http://www.911researchers.com/node/538).

Thunder
3rd July 2009, 08:11 PM
You don't have to pay income tax! It's voluntary (http://yannone.blogspot.com/2006/10/how-to-keep-100-percent-of-your.html)!



paying Federal income taxes isn't "voluntary".

Its treason!!! All who pay their federal income taxes are traitorous sheep!!

;)

1337m4n
3rd July 2009, 10:43 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pentagon#Services

The Pentagon has many of its own fast food operations, including Subway, McDonald's, Dunkin' Donuts, Panda Express, Starbucks, Sbarro, among others.

Pentagon – SERVED

Oh, the puns I could make.


Anyway, the point I was trying to make, is they seem to suggest that the ENTIRE Pentagon should be guilty of treason...which includes a guy whose job it is to dip french fries in grease. My oh my.

deRoy
5th July 2009, 04:49 PM
This kind of thing makes my head spin.

Travis
5th July 2009, 09:08 PM
This kind of thing makes my head spin.

Be prepared to have that happen a lot if you hang out around here.

dropzone
6th July 2009, 12:09 AM
Be prepared to have that happen a lot if you hang out around here.Honest to God, if you allow it your head will go all sorts of ways. But if deroy has not already questioned it, we are stuck with the Truthers insisting that we are neither smart nor understanding of an argument that is NOT nonsensical, but that he has bought into the conversation the claims of the Non-Truthers, and are therefore a sheep.

Trust me, bro, it's better to not be an idiot than it is to be accused of being a sheep, especially since the "non-sheep" are idiots without a rhetorical leg to stand on incorrect.