I need a title to my 9/11 conspiracy book

[Luntoc]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.

[FineWine]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.


I suggest Lies for Truth and the Liars Who Tell Them.

[Dumb All Over]

How about "Batguano Crazy: 9/11 Twoof".

[Praktik]

A little more on the angle you're taking would be helpful

how about: "9/11: Conspiracy and Delusion in Modern America"

or "9/11 Was an Inside Job! ...and other nuttery..."

"9/11: How otherwise intelligent people get it so wrong"

or "9/11: How the Conspiracy Theories get it wrong"

or "9/11 Conspiracies: Myth-Making in 21st century America"

or "Conspiracy and 9/11, a Critical Analysis"

[MG1962]

Requiem for a movement

[calebprime]

Bukkaked with teh Stupid

[240-185]

"Loose Change, or Money Change?"
"Sofia Mysteries"
"Zero... evidence of an inside job on 9/11"
"David Ray Griffin: Not as funny as Peter Griffin from Family Guy"

etc, etc, etc...

[Dumb All Over]

Luntoc, what is your book about exactly? What is your take on the word "theories"? Do any of the theories stand up under scrutiny? When and by whom will it be published? Will it be available for sale? Any extra info will be most helpful.

[Luntoc]

or "Conspiracy and 9/11, a Critical Analysis"

I like that one. That one, as of right now, is number one on my list. Thanks man.:)

[Justin39640]

Luntoc, what is your book about exactly? What is your take on the word "theories"? Do any of the theories stand up under scrutiny? When and by whom will it be published? Will it be available for sale? Any extra info will be most helpful.

i hate using the term "theory" when it comes to the "truth?" movement

a theory to me implies an educated guess (hence why NIST's report is a theory basted on a lot of facts)

the TM's ideas are anything but educated in my book ;)

[Luntoc]

Luntoc, what is your book about exactly? What is your take on the word "theories"? Do any of the theories stand up under scrutiny? When and by whom will it be published? Will it be available for sale? Any extra info will be most helpful.

It's about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and why that is all they have, a bunch of theories.

It should be out by November at the latest.

I have two choices of publishing companies but as soon as I pick one I will let you know.

Yes. And please buy so I can make the big bucks.:D

[Justin39640]

hey how about

TRUTH?

[JimBenArm]

luse branes

[CptColumbo]

"The Dyspepsia of the 'Twoof' Movement"

That way they'll buy it, because you know they won't know what the word means and won't look it up.

[T.A.M.]

debunking debunking 9/11 debunking.

TAM;)

[alexi_drago]

Axiom

with or without 9/11 somewhere.

Goodluck with the book.

[Dumb All Over]

It's about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and why that is all they have, a bunch of theories.
How do 9/11 theories differ from, say, the Theory of Evolution, or Gravitational Theory?

It should be out by November at the latest.

I have two choices of publishing companies but as soon as I pick one I will let you know.

Yes. And please buy so I can make the big bucks.:D
Cool!

[Praktik]

It's about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and why that is all they have, a bunch of theories.

It should be out by November at the latest.

I have two choices of publishing companies but as soon as I pick one I will let you know.

Yes. And please buy so I can make the big bucks.:D

if you use my title send me a copy!

[Justin39640]

heres a quickie cover i made using my title and another

http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/1275/covertruth.jpg

[Comsat Angel]

"So Far Down The Rabbit Hole That The Bunnies Are Kangaroos"

[timhau]

"9/11: How otherwise intelligent people get it so wrong"


or

"9/11: How otherwise stupid people get it wrong, too"

[Brainster]

Debunking Debunking 9-11 Debunking
Not the New Pearl Harbor
9-11: An Umpire
Revisiting the New Pearl Harbor Revisited
Basket Cases: The 9-11 "Truthers" Revealed

[Björn Toulouse]

(De)basements of Truth

[sylvan8798]

A little more on the angle you're taking would be helpful

how about: "9/11: Conspiracy and Delusion in Modern America"

or "9/11 Was an Inside Job! ...and other nuttery..."

"9/11: How otherwise intelligent people get it so wrong"

or "9/11: How the Conspiracy Theories get it wrong"

or "9/11 Conspiracies: Myth-Making in 21st century America"

or "Conspiracy and 9/11, a Critical Analysis"

These seem rather dry and academic. Since the phenom is world-wide, the title shouldn't contain the word "america" imho.

This would be great, but too bad already used: www.amazon.com/gp/product/0465092756 "Not Even Wrong"

If you're not familiar with the phrase, it comes from a quote by Wolfgang Pauli about a science paper which was apparently quite bad, and about which he supposedly said "That's not right. It's not even wrong." www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

The phrase is one that suits 9/11 ct's perfectly.

[TriskettheKid]

The Hole Truth

or

Everything But the Truth

or

Paranoia Overdrive

ETA:

Or, more simply:

TruthTM

Or if you want to take a parting shot:

The TruthTM Movement

[Gnu World Order]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.


Ummm, write the book first. A title should suggest itself. If you get to the end and still can't come up with a title, rewrite it.

[Carll68]

If you understand the publishing world in the least, you understand that there is now way a book that has not even been assigned a publisher would be in circulation by November 09.

Not happening.

Generally 12 to 18 months is the window for actual publication.

This chap is pulling your legs.

[T.A.M.]

"Truth Inc. - How a group of nuts commandeered a word"

TAM;)

[Luntoc]

If you understand the publishing world in the least, you understand that there is now way a book that has not even been assigned a publisher would be in circulation by November 09.

Not happening.

Generally 12 to 18 months is the window for actual publication.

This chap is pulling your legs. I've been working on it for several months now. I should be done with it by the end of this month and probaly won't be out till November. Or says my agent.

[Dumb All Over]

Luntoc, have you ever written anything before? Have any of your previous works ever been published?

Thanks,
DAO

[fezzic]

How about:

"Anything is Possible: September 11, 2001 Conspiracy Theories"

or maybe:

"September 11, 2001 Conspiracy Theories"
subtitle: "Anything is possible when you don't have to prove it"

:)

[MikeW]

"Truth, lies, and the hijacking of 9/11"

[scratchy]

"911, idiots and outcasts
A closer look on contemporay conspiracy theories and how loneliness and bitter thoughts selfperpetuate"

[coalesce]

"911 Sandwiches Short Of A Picnic."

Michael

[Bad_Doggie]

How to make a buck from the gullible-For Dummies!

Woof!

[MarkyX]

9/11 and other conspiracy theories: Proof that you don't need proof!

[newton3376]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.

What is the point of this book?

What could you possibly say in terms of debunking that would be anything new?

I could write the ultimate debunking book myself.....

It would consist of 2 chapters...

Chapter one:
several links to various debunking websites, a link to the NIST reports, links to other papers on the collapse like Bazant etc, links to the hardfire debates, and probably a few links to some forums including this one....

Chapter two:
quotes from truthers with photos

Chapter three:
evidence for an inside job

And thats it.....that would be the whole book in 2 chapters.

Including the title page, table of contents, and index I figure it would be like 10 pages max.....

[VespaGuy]

If you understand the publishing world in the least, you understand that there is now way a book that has not even been assigned a publisher would be in circulation by November 09.

Not happening.

Generally 12 to 18 months is the window for actual publication.

This chap is pulling your legs.

Seconded.

Something doesn't smell right...

[Dog Town]

I would be hesitant to suggest a title, without knowing how you handled the topic. Care to provide us with some content?


PS:
This sounds like BS, to me as well.

[Carll68]

I've been working on it for several months now. I should be done with it by the end of this month and probaly won't be out till November. Or says my agent.

Keep dreaming.

You will soon discover that, generally, the people who contribute to this forum will rarely fall for a fairy tale like this.

Since you are not even done with your 'book'...and your MS had not even been submitted, proven by the fact that you have stated you have not even chosen a publisher..or, more importantly, one has not chosen you... You have ZERO percent chance of getting this work in circulation by November 2009

Please stop the delusional con..you are embarrassing yourself....

[Gravy]

"I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now"

"The only I've ever considered any consideration is..."

"Anyone got any names I could title my book."

"probaly"

"Or says my agent."Unless you are new to the English language, go away, you semiliteratus, and do not darken our doorway again.



p.s.: That's not a suggested book title.

[HeyLeroy]

They don't even qualify as theories:

Theory
Most people use the word theory to mean uncertainty, guesswork, or a rough idea, but in science it has a different meaning. A scientific theory explains facts or phenomena that have been shown to be true by repeated independent tests and experiments. An educated guess in science is called a hypothesis.

Scientific theories are not laws, which describe phenomena thought to be invariable. Theories are generally used to describe why certain laws work. For example, the law of gravity is known to be true for falling bodies, but how and why it works is explained by Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity. Einstein's theory was accepted as true only after repeated experimentation and observation. Yet not even laws are absolute. They are rarely overturned, but they may be amended should new data warrant it."

--Maia Weinstock

[Bobert]

Seconded.

Something doesn't smell right...
Yes I smell something too and its getting pretty deep in here.

[Dumb All Over]

How about "Hit and Run: CT's Who Jump Into Internet Forums, Lie, Then Disappear".



(Jeez, I should write that one.)

[BigBird]

debunking debunking 9/11 debunking.

TAM;)

Every time I see Debunking 9/11 debunking, I wonder what they would call it if someone debunked it, and always come back to that.... got a good laugh... thanks!

[Justin39640]

Every time I see Debunking 9/11 debunking, I wonder what they would call it if someone debunked it, and always come back to that.... got a good laugh... thanks!
is there a moronic singularity?

[atecom]

Well whether the OP was lying or not, I still want to see good names for Possible Debunking books. TAM took the one I had in mind.

'9/11 Truth: Freedom of Thought or Freedom from Thought?'

[Klimax]

Well whether the OP was lying or not, I still want to see good names for Possible Debunking books. TAM took the one I had in mind.

'9/11 Truth: Freedom of Thought or Freedom from Thought?'

Or:
9/11 Truth: Freedom from Brain?
Subtitle:Brain is on its way to Alpha Centauri

Or

9/11 Truth: Brain is no longer.

[chillzero]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.

Is your book written in the same .... style as this OP?

[Oliver]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.


What about: "the nameless 9/11 book"?
Or: "Name this book" like in "Steal this movie"
Maybe: "The book whose name shall not be mentioned"
Or even: "The book I still haven't come up with a name for it"

Actually, I would buy the latter one just because the funny title. :p

[Brainster]

If you understand the publishing world in the least, you understand that there is now way a book that has not even been assigned a publisher would be in circulation by November 09.

Well, there is Lulu (http://www.lulu.com/). Of course he does claim to have an "agent".

[Dumb All Over]

How funny! I had to Google the word "semiliteratus". Lo' and behold, the first entry to pop up is a reference to this very thread!

I still don't know what semiliteratus means.:o

[newton3376]

How funny! I had to Google the word "semiliteratus". Lo' and behold, the first entry to pop up is a reference to this very thread!

I still don't know what semiliteratus means.:o

Here is an example of "semiliteratus"...

The only I've ever considered any consideration is

That's a really good example of "semiliteratus"....

[Pardalis]

The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it.

Yeah, it sounds like what Creationists say about the theory of evolution. Not a good title, it could easily backfire.

[Macgyver1968]

How funny! I had to Google the word "semiliteratus". Lo' and behold, the first entry to pop up is a reference to this very thread!

I still don't know what semiliteratus means.:o

LOL!!! So did I!! and got the same thing. Then I looked at the word a little closer...semi-literatus ...semi-literate.

It means the boy don't read or write that thar good.

[cludgie]

'One flew over the Pentagon' or 'One flew north of the CITGO'

[Evilgiraffe]

Dude, where my thermite?

[Stellafane]

It's pretty obvious this "book" is largely imaginary, but it's fun to suggest titles anyway:

"A Confederacy of Dunces" (taken, but the author won't mind)
"The League of Extraordinary Idiots"

[Justin39640]

Dude, where my thermite?

haha classic
love it

ETA: that sounds like it could be a Gravy video title lol

[Wolrab]

"Handling the 9/11 'Truth' Movement"
or
"Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Exploiting for Cash, 3,117 Burned, Crushed, and Dismembered Innocent Victims of a Terrorist Attack, but Were Afraid to Ask

[Foolmewunz]

Didn't He Whose Name Must Not Be Spoken show up once as Author or something similar? Also had an agent and no book.

[Bobert]

Funny that he hasnt been back to this thread yet he has started other threads.

[bill smith]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.

What about:- (Regarding 9/11 discussions on forums)

'' 9/11: The Docusoap with the sting in the tail ''

[bill smith]

What about:- (Regarding 9/11 discussions on forums)

'' 9/11: The Docusoap with the sting in the tail ''

Or maybe

'' 9/11: The Docusoap that just won't quit ''

[Audible Click]

It's about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and why that is all they have, a bunch of theories.

It should be out by November at the latest.

I have two choices of publishing companies but as soon as I pick one I will let you know.

Yes. And please buy so I can make the big bucks.:D

Will you be publishing your book on Kindle?

[parky76]

"9/11: How da Joos did it and why Zionist=Satan".

[Magenta]

Setting aside the question over the bona fides of the OP...

I like this angle:

I suggest Lies for Truth and the Liars Who Tell Them.


How about Telling Lies for Truth: The Irrationality of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

I'm appalled (but no longer surprised) at the behaviour of people who purport to want the "Truth" yet routinely engage in misinterpretation of evidence, quote mining, obfuscation, evasion and arguments from ignorance.

[bill smith]

"9/11: How da Joos did it and why Zionist=Satan".
I know you are Jewish Parky. You told me before. Why are you apparently trying to elicit comments that could be construed as anti-Jewish ? Why wuold we concern ourselves with any possible Israeli connection at this point ? (I assume that 'Jewish' and 'Isreali ' have pretty uch the same meaning for you ) That kind of political thing can come later after we break the official story.

[Foolmewunz]

I know you are Jewish Parky. You told me before. Why are you apparently trying to elicit comments that could be construed as anti-Jewish ? Why wuold we concern ourselves with any possible Israeli connection at this point ? (I assume that 'Jewish' and 'Isreali ' have pretty uch the same meaning for you ) That kind of political thing can come later after we break the official story.

It's all about you, Bill? Maybe Parky's talking to the OP - it's HIS thread after all, regardless that you're trying to hijack yet another one.

Off-topic. Take it elsewhere.

[GwionX]

" BONEHEAD "

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v226/gwion/morans6ab-1.jpg

~Trials and Tribulations of the American Simpleton~



(hey, sex sells)

[orphia nay]

It's pretty obvious this "book" is largely imaginary, but it's fun to suggest titles anyway:

"A Confederacy of Dunces" (taken, but the author won't mind)
"The League of Extraordinary Idiots"

I agree, although he could just have a good editor lined up to correct his grammar, punctuation, etc.

"Batcraptastic: The 9/11 Truth Movement."

[bill smith]

' 9/11: The Silence of the Shills '

[Klimax]

' 9/11: The Silence of the Shills '

9/11: Shouting of idiots.

[newton3376]

' 9/11: The Silence of the Shills '

Define a shill please...

[johnny karate]

' 9/11: The Silence of the Shills '

Only because bill is already using "The FDNY Took Part in Mass Murder on 9/11 and Other Pants-Crappingly Crazy Things I Think".

[johnny karate]

Define a shill please...

I would suppose that would be anyone stupid enough not to believe the FDNY are domestic terrorists.

[bill smith]

Define a shill please...

In my book a 'Shill' in the context of 9/11 debunking is an agent of the government placed on forums to fight the government side . But there is a second and much more numerous kind of unpaid citizen Shill that I call a ''Sap'. These are in my opinion people who cannot bear he thought that the American governemt did this to it's own people and will do anything to avoid believing it. Cognitive dissonance is the moral coward's friend. A sub-category of 'Saps' are the truly stupid.

So I suppose he title should have read

'silence of the Shills 'n Saps '

This is from Mike Rivero.

"Most people prefer to believe their leaders are just and fair even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all."

[johnny karate]

Does Mike Rivero also believe the FDNY are treasonous murderers, or is that something you came up with independently?

[Bobert]

Does Mike Rivero also believe the FDNY are treasonous murderers, or is that something you came up with independently?
Much easier to just put some of these troll scumbags on ignore.

[George152]

A thicket of kooks

[Bobert]

Is this like a pop-up type of a book?

[newton3376]

In my book a 'Shill' in the context of 9/11 debunking is an agent of the government placed on forums to fight the government side .

First of all.....there are no government agents that are assigned to debunk truthers...

Also....what exactly is an "agent of the government"?

Which Intel agency does he/she work for?
Do you even know what the various Intel agencies actually do (there are 17 of them)?

But there is a second and much more numerous kind of unpaid citizen Shill that I call a ''Sap'. These are in my opinion people who cannot bear he thought that the American governemt did this to it's own people and will do anything to avoid believing it. Cognitive dissonance is the moral coward's friend. A sub-category of 'Saps' are the truly stupid.

Let me explain something to you...

People who work in the government or for government contractors....especially those involved in DoD work (like military or intelligence) are well aware that our government has corruption in it.

But those people also know much better than you what the government is and is not capable of actually pulling off.....and unlike you they live in the freaking real world instead of the fairy tale land that you hail from.

Those people get up and go to work every day and do their jobs trying to keep our country safe from those who would harm us. These are ordinary people doing an extraordinary job....they have families, hopes for the future, kids in school, mortage and car payments, etc.

The way you truthers talk about them...as if they are part of some massive conspiracy to cover up the killing of thousands of civilians....you have no idea what the hell you are talking about cause you are some damn arm chair quarterback throwing insults around accusing people you don't know of murder.

You know nothing about these issues so why don't you climb down from that mountain of stupid you have climbed and just shut the hell up?

[T.A.M.]

There is a 3rd type bill. I will call them "sensible normal people". These are people who ****ing hate to see stupid turd morons promote falsehoods and make unfounded, evidenceless accusations of murder, and do so unabated because of the freedom the internet gives them. These people (the normal ones) do not need to get paid, because they derive their satisfaction from revealing to onlookers, the snake oil salesman for what he is...an abhorrent, deserving of scorn, charlatan.

TAM:)

[Mr.D]

In my book

But do you have a publisher for it?

[bill smith]

First of all.....there are no government agents that are assigned to debunk truthers...

Also....what exactly is an "agent of the government"?

Which Intel agency does he/she work for?
Do you even know what the various Intel agencies actually do (there are 17 of them)?



Let me explain something to you...

People who work in the government or for government contractors....especially those involved in DoD work (like military or intelligence) are well aware that our government has corruption in it.

But those people also know much better than you what the government is and is not capable of actually pulling off.....and unlike you they live in the freaking real world instead of the fairy tale land that you hail from.

Those people get up and go to work every day and do their jobs trying to keep our country safe from those who would harm us. These are ordinary people doing an extraordinary job....they have families, hopes for the future, kids in school, mortage and car payments, etc.

The way you truthers talk about them...as if they are part of some massive conspiracy to cover up the killing of thousands of civilians....you have no idea what the hell you are talking about cause you are some damn arm chair quarterback throwing insults around accusing people you don't know of murder.

You know nothing about these issues so why don't you climb down from that mountain of stupid you have climbed and just shut the hell up?

The way you talk a person would think that we did not know for 100% certain sure that the governmment has programs for engaging bloggers on social media sites just like this one. Given that this site may be one of the more important forums for 9/11 discussions here is no reason at all for us not to believe tht a large percentage of the debunkers we encounter are paid agents of the government.

[Justin39640]

The way you talk a person would think that we did not know for 100% certain sure that the governmment has programs for engaging bloggers on social media sites just like this one. Given that this site may be one of the more important forums for 9/11 discussions here is no reason at all for us not to believe tht a large percentage of the debunkers we encounter are paid agents of the government.

LMAO
im gonna call the labor board
i havnt gotten my 1st check yet lol

anyone? lmao

oofa talk about paranoid

when you say "the government"
which one are you talking about

theres about 30 countries (guess) represented on this forum alone

seeing youre not a US citizen i guess that means you think the UK pays debunkers?

[bill smith]

LMAO
im gonna call the labor board
i havnt gotten my 1st check yet lol

anyone? lmao

oofa talk about paranoid

when you say "the government"
which one are you talking about

theres about 30 countries (guess) represented on this forum alone

seeing youre not a US citizen i guess that means you think the UK pays debunkers?

You flatter yourself Justin.If you notice I named more than one category of debunker.

[dtugg]

The way you talk a person would think that we did not know for 100% certain sure that the governmment has programs for engaging bloggers on social media sites just like this one. Given that this site may be one of the more important forums for 9/11 discussions here is no reason at all for us not to believe tht a large percentage of the debunkers we encounter are paid agents of the government.

I think that you're a paid agent of the government. Your job, of course, is to make twoofers like like morons, and I must say you do an excellent job. I mean, there is no way that you actually believe the stuff that you say. Right?

[Justin39640]

You flatter yourself Justin.If you notice I named more than one category of debunker.

you should see my categorization of truthers

youre pretty low in "copy & paste" category
regurgitating stuff you dont, cant, or want to understand

pretty much you bottomfeed off other wackos emails and websites
you have no thoughts of your own and its pretty obvious

(like how all of a sudden youre talkin about parts a and c like you understand it lmao)

[Homeland Insurgency]

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book. I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far. The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it. So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.

hmmmmm....?

Let me try.


Duh duh dubunking for duh duh duh dummies

Burn this book

The art of bowing to authority

I can't support my theory so please give me something else to debunk

Wait... this is a comic book right?

[bill smith]

hmmmmm....?

Let me try.


Duh duh dubunking for duh duh duh dummies

Burn this book

The art of bowing to authority

I can't support my theory so please give me something else to debunk

Wait... this is a comic book right?

I just love it. What better and more accurate name could there be for for the debunking book than that. lol

'Debunking for Dummies'....It just rolls off the tongue.

A bestseller in the jref bookshop.

[Alt+F4]

The way you talk a person would think that we did not know for 100% certain sure that the governmment has programs for engaging bloggers on social media sites just like this one. Given that this site may be one of the more important forums for 9/11 discussions here is no reason at all for us not to believe tht a large percentage of the debunkers we encounter are paid agents of the government.

So JREF members making fun of people like Craig and Aldo is what is holding the "truth movement" back from obtaining a new investigation, getting at "the truth"?

I guess everytime someone makes a silly Photoshop pic of the CIT guys Bush and Cheney are one step farther away from being arrested for treason.

[Homeland Insurgency]

I just love it. What better and more accurate name could there be for for the debunking book than that. lol

'Debunking for Dummies'....It just rolls off the tongue.

A bestseller in the jref bookshop.

Thanks. I just hope he gives me a cut and it's not Monopoly money.

[johnny karate]

Perhaps Homeland Insurgency and bill smith could get together and write "How the FDNY and Interpol Conspired to Help George Bush Achieve Global Domination: A Laughably Convoluted Explanation for the Big, Scary World We Don't Fully Understand".

[newton3376]

The way you talk a person would think that we did not know for 100% certain sure that the governmment has programs for engaging bloggers on social media sites just like this one. Given that this site may be one of the more important forums for 9/11 discussions here is no reason at all for us not to believe tht a large percentage of the debunkers we encounter are paid agents of the government.

First of all...

You never answered my question. So what's your answer?

And secondly....

What the hell would you know about government "agents" anyway?

You know nothing....they aren't even called "agents" or "spies" in real life anyway...that's Hollywood crap. Stop talking about stuff you know nothing about.

[Homeland Insurgency]

Perhaps Homeland Insurgency and bill smith could get together and write "How the FDNY and Interpol Conspired to Help George Bush Achieve Global Domination: A Laughably Convoluted Explanation for the Big, Scary World We Don't Fully Understand".

Sounds like you already have a handle on it Johnny. Run with it. Just change the names to protect the innocent. You wouldn't want to get sued for slander now.

[johnny karate]

Sounds like you already have a handle on it Johnny. Run with it. Just change the names to protect the innocent. You wouldn't want to get sued for slander now.

Unfortunately, I lack that special brand of crazy irrationality to really make it work. I'll leave it to the experts.

[Homeland Insurgency]

Unfortunately, I lack that special brand of crazy irrationality to really make it work. I'll leave it to the experts.

And I was gonna pre-order.

[bill smith]

First of all...

You never answered my question. So what's your answer?

And secondly....

What the hell would you know about government "agents" anyway?

You know nothing....they aren't even called "agents" or "spies" in real life anyway...that's Hollywood crap. Stop talking about stuff you know nothing about.

Apparently the in-house terminology is 'propaganda asset' .

[Stellafane]

Is this like a pop-up type of a book?

To be more conguent with the Truther mindset, I'm thinking it'll be more a "connect the dots" book.

[bill smith]

Thanks. I just hope he gives me a cut and it's not Monopoly money.

Actually I think your 'Duh-duh-debunking for duh-duh-Dummies ' is even better.

[newton3376]

Apparently the in-house terminology is 'propaganda asset' .

Nope that's not what they are called...

In other words...you have no freaking idea and you don't know anything about these topics. Typical truther crap.

[9/11-investigator]

So if anyone can help me I would appreciate it.

Sure, no sweat.

Ok guys I've been working on my book about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and for about 5 months now and I still haven't come up with a name for it. Anyone got any names I could title my book.

Are you sure you want to do this to yourself? If you cannot come up with a title in 5 months, how many decades will it take to produce the first paragraph?

I've asked several friends here at home and nothing so far.

You seem to be surrounded by dullards.

The only I've ever considered any consideration is "9/11:Why the conspiracy theories are just that, theories" That is the best I've been able to come up with and I really don't like it.

You are right not to like what you have came up with so far.

Here a few suggestions:

- How to bluff your way into 9/11 debunking and keep your thermite dry

- Archie Debunker goes to Hollywood - Life and Times of someone who should have stayed home

- PNACking your way into the New World Order - 9/11 debunking crash course in 24 hours

- 101 Debunker survival tips - How to cope with a new world after the truth has come out

You are encouraged to take your pick on the condition that you will not send me your book in any circumstance!

[UNLoVedRebel]

My suggestions:

- The Eternal Truther

- On the Orgins of Truthers by Means of Moronic Selection or The Preservation of favored Truthers in the struggle for attention

- Idiot's guide to staying a virgin for life: Lessons from the Truth Movement

- Why you should not enroll at the University of YouTube

- 911 Truth: A Mormon's paradise

[TexasJack]

How about This Is a Lie, And That's the Truth: The Movement That Is

[bill smith]

To be more conguent with the Truther mindset, I'm thinking it'll be more a "connect the dots" book.

What about '' 9/11: Connecting the Plots ''


'' '' A Most Unusual Operation '' by Faye Kanus

[cyclonic]

"9/11truth and other fantasies"

[Dog Town]

The only thing that would fill enough pages, is a list of twoofers with IQs under 80. It would be all of them, world wide. I'm sure you wouldn't even have to double space.

My suggestion:
911 Twoofer, or lost in an ocean of shiny objects!

[deep]

How about: An Objective Analysis of Popular 9/11 Conspiracy Theories ?

[UNLoVedRebel]

Popular 9/11 conspiracy theories is an oxymoron.

[Stellafane]

How about: An Objective Analysis of Popular 9/11 Conspiracy Theories ?

That's actually pretty good, except for the word "popular" which implies that more than a handful of people have even heard of them.

ETA: Dang, UNLoVedRebel got here first...

[Dog Town]

How about: An Objective Analysis of Popular 9/11 Conspiracy Theories ?

WoW! You really do, suck at this!

[deep]

That's actually pretty good, except for the word "popular" which implies that more than a handful of people have even heard of them.


Thanks for the feedback. I've penned a second revision:

An Objective Analysis of Unpopular 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

I think it could be a winner.. hope everyone likes it.

[Justin39640]

Thanks for the feedback. I've penned a second revision:

An Objective Analysis of Unpopular 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

I think it could be a winner.. hope everyone likes it.

ah inspiration:

9/11 Truth
Pull Up Your Boots, it's Getting Deep

[thought_fugitive]

Thanks for the feedback. I've penned a second revision:

An Objective Analysis of Unpopular 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

I think it could be a winner.. hope everyone likes it.

True as it may apparently be, using an adjective like "unpopular" in your title is not objective, especially considering how two suggestions from posters here resulted in a complete about-haste in the term being used.

[chillzero]

No further response from our budding author?

[Audible Click]

Maybe he's struggling with the first word of the first paragraph of his book?

[9/11-investigator]

Or forgotten what the topic was about...

[newton3376]

No further response from our budding author?

"budding"

ROFL

[Disbelief]

To be more conguent with the Truther mindset, I'm thinking it'll be more a "connect the dots" book.

That would be a bad idea, as they always come up with the wrong picture.

[dafydd]

It's about the 9/11 conspiracy theories and why that is all they have, a bunch of theories.

It should be out by November at the latest.

I have two choices of publishing companies but as soon as I pick one I will let you know.

Yes. And please buy so I can make the big bucks.:D

Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them?

Anyone can pick a publishing company,has a publishing company picked you?