PDA

View Full Version : Will truthers EVER BELIEVE a first responder?


Bobert
8th July 2009, 05:32 PM
I felt compelled to point out this thread over at ATS:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476290/pg2
"New Pentagon Video Detailing Actual Flight Path Over Naval Annex"
On page 2 a poster by the name of BigSarge posted the following
Long time reader, first time poster. Decided to say something here as this is a subject I have direct knowledge of.

While I have no idea if our Government was part of any conspiracy on 9/11, I can tell you 100% unequivically that it was an American Airlines (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476290/pg2#) plane that hit the Pentagon.

I can say this because at the time I was Soldier stationed at Ft. Myer, VA as a member of the US Army Honor Guard. We were conducting a funeral on 9-11-2001 in a section of Arlington cemetery that was right across from the Pentagon. We saw the plane come in from over the Naval Annex and seconds later watched the plane explode into the Pentagon. My group had been in the cemetery since early that morning and were unaware of the WTC attacks. We thought it was just a terrible accident.

For the week or so following, US Army Honor Guard Soldiers (myself included) were used to aid in recovery efforts inside the Pentagon. Essentially used for cleaning out all of the bodies and wreckage. I personally found suitcases, ID's, passports (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476290/pg2#), and PLANE PARTS. Specifically parts with American Airlines markings. Lastly, based on the number of bodies and body parts that we pulled out of there, I would find it very hard to believe that it was an empty plane with no passengers, but I guess it could be possible as none of them were identifiable.

Anyway, take what I say however you like. I'm only speaking from my experience and not employing ANY assumptions or any hearsay. Strictly WHAT I SAW with my own eyes.
also:

Yes, I personally saw them and personally helped the FBI mark them and bag them. We spent 7-10 days doing 12 hour shift rotations inside the Pentagon until all debris was cleared out. As you can imagine it was a mangled mess in there, and as we cleaned up we would find bodies and/or parts. Most were badly burned, especially in the location of where the fire burned the longest. But it was also knee deep waterhttp://kona.kontera.com/javascript/lib/imgs/grey_loader.gif
(http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476290/pg2#) inside from trying to estinguish the fire so there where many that were not totally burned.

They were also spread over a very wide area. I would say 1,000 square meters or so.
Obviously we don't know for sure one way or another if he telling the truth.
With that being said though what he says seems to be reasonable.
He is not making outrageous claims and I would imagine if one where to disagree with him they could do some simple research to verfiy some of what he is saying.
he is not attacking the truthers or in any way being rude or confrontational.
Of course though as that thread progresses SEVERAL truthers begin to doubt and question him and attacking him.
Of course our hero SPreston is one of them.
Based on the reaction to BigSarge I can see why truthers refuse to interview first responders....THEY WONT BELIEVE THEM ANYWAY!!!!!
If there are no pics of the plane they ask, "where are the pics?"
When shown pics of the plane they comment about how they look fake.
just insert any piece of evidence in the above and you would get the same response.
Can any of our resident truthers answer why it is you think your peers refuse to interview first responders?
This has probably already been asked before but that thread over at ATS just shows the level of disgrace for the victims/first responders that truthers display.
I know nothing is new along that front.
Lets say you want people to view you with an open mind, why attack the victims and first responders?
The DSM really needs a new category for mental illness simply called, "9-11 truther"

Bobert
8th July 2009, 05:34 PM
Isnt there a poster here that is an admin over at ATS?
How do you live with yourself after reading those DISGUSTING ATTACKS on BigSarge?

H'ethetheth
8th July 2009, 05:52 PM
I'll just respond to the thread title: Yes, of course they do. They believe every first responder that confirms what they already believe.

Thunder
8th July 2009, 06:16 PM
Truthers will accept the words of any first responder, any MSM reporter, any CIA agent, and any high governmental official, as long as that person tells them EXACTLY what they want to hear.

Otherwise, they are all just NWO/Mossad/Illuminato agents who will be tried for treason.

JoeyDonuts
8th July 2009, 08:21 PM
Well, he's obviously one of those Operation Blackbriar shills. Treadstone and all that.

defaultdotxbe
8th July 2009, 11:54 PM
also of note is that he would have been in a good position to see a flyover, had one happened

but hes military, so of course hes part of coverup

eromitlab
9th July 2009, 01:36 AM
Yes... if the first responder in question said "bomb" or "explosion". If not... well, they know the truth, but they're scared of the nWo taking away their pension.

Truthers will only really use first responders as part of an appeal to authority and/or emotion. They'll duck behind their "first responders are dying" and "they said the air was safe to breathe" shields to lend cover to their unseemly lies. Actually talking to the real heroes of 9/11 would blow not only the truther story, but their claim on 9/11 heroism, to dust. (But it's okay; they'll get a registered scientician that agrees with them already to analyze the dust and find trace elements of truth in it, then publish a paper about how they found trace elements of truth, therefore the dust is truth and the parties that blew it up are guilty of misprision of treason at the very least.)

progge
9th July 2009, 03:16 AM
I'll just respond to the thread title: Yes, of course they do. They believe every first responder that confirms what they already believe.

YouŽll find perfect examples for this observation in the particular thread mentioned in the OP, i.e. the reply posted on 26-6-2009 @ 01:45 PM by Craig Ranke CIT.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread476290/pg4

He [the flyover witness] didn't say 7 to 15 seconds.

He said 7 steps or "10 seconds tops".

However you can't hold a witness to mathematical preciseness about such a detail.

The point is that he saw the plane IMMEDIATELY after the explosion.

We will never know if it was really 3, 4, or 7 seconds or whatever.

Plus we know the speed of the the plane was MUCH slower than officially reported since expert aviation professional witnesses Sean Boger and Terry Morin are corroborated by William Middleton as describing it between 8 and 15 seconds from the Navy Annex to the Pentagon.

Even if we go with 8 seconds that is less than half the official speed of 460 knots which would only take 3.4 seconds.

Now this is such an obvious case of doublespeak in such a small number of sentences that I have a hard time to imagine the poster himself didnŽt realize it.

Bad_Doggie
9th July 2009, 04:20 AM
Based on the reaction to BigSarge I can see why truthers refuse to interview first responders....THEY WONT BELIEVE THEM ANYWAY!!!!!


I believe they do; and then pick out the bits that they like e.g. bomb, boom etc.

When you have a BELIEF that is so ingrained and have invested so much time convincing yourself that it is true it hurts to give it up.

Woof!

sylvan8798
9th July 2009, 08:58 AM
The worst thing is when the truther rationalizes his disbelief with statements like:

CIT TRUTHER: "He couldn't ACTUALLY see the crash from where he stood. He just assumed it crashed because that's what the perps told him happened."

CIT TRUTHER: "Anyone who didn't see the plane crash doesn't count, because they planted all that carp in the Pentagon during the night, and of course, the first responders couldn't tell if it was planted there or just flew in during a crash."

CIT TRUTHER: "He works for (or is connected to by any obscure thread whatsoever) the government or the media somehow, so his testimony is not valid." (discounting of course the obvious fact that most of THEIR so-called flyover witnesses ALSO work for the government or the media - hell is there anyone in DC who doesn't?)"

Bobert
9th July 2009, 11:24 AM
This seems reasonable:
We spent 7-10 days doing 12 hour shift rotations inside the Pentagon until all debris was cleared out.
Wow those super duper NWO ninjas are super duper powerful!
They were able to plant 7-10 days worth of planted debris in the course of an evening!!!
IF ONLY THE REST OF OUR GOVERNMENT were this productive!