What's new with Nano-thermite?

[parky76]

so what's new with the nano-thermite theory?

have the truthers submitted any samples to Chemists and Engineers at MIT, Princeton, CalTech, or Cornell?

whats taking them soo long?'

don't they want the truth?

I predict "nano-thermite" will be the final nail in the coffin of 9-11 truth.

[1337m4n]

so what's new with invisible pink unicorns?

[defaultdotxbe]

so what's new with invisible pink unicorns?
they now come in invisible blue and invisible purple

[Björn Toulouse]

they now come in invisible blue and invisible purple


and hornless varieties too.

[Juniversal]

so what's new with the nano-thermite theory?

have the truthers submitted any samples to Chemists and Engineers at MIT, Princeton, CalTech, or Cornell?

whats taking them soo long?'

don't they want the truth?

I predict "nano-thermite" will be the final nail in the coffin of 9-11 truth.Unfortunately there will be no "final nail in the coffin". Just as the pervasive moon landing and J.F.K conspiracy theories still exist. Might it fizzle out to the point of only having a few fringe individuals with a nice collection of tin foil caps (to a greater degree then today)? Of course. But i'm stating the obvious. People will believe what they want to believe regardless of available data and information to the contrary.

[Josarhus]

Since Steven Jones made comments about sending the dust samples to independent researchers, I asked Niles Harriet a few weeks back, if they had submitted the samples for independent tests, and what the result was.

He answered that it would be wonderful (his words) if others dared to examine the dust. Further more he wrote that at the moment those behind the nano paper all chipped in every time they needed to do some testing, because it cost money to lend the equipment necessary.
And finally he made a clear answer to the question: No, unfortunately no one dares to touch the dust samples so far.

He later on refused to say at what institutes or persons they have tried to get tests done.

So I’m quite sure that they never even tried to get independent tests done, and if they have, the results were not what they wanted. And I’m also quite sure, that they will have all kinds of excuses to avoid independent test from ever being conducted.

[~enigma~]

So I’m quite sure that they never even tried to get independent tests done, and if they have, the results were not what they wanted.
I'm sure if they get (or had) tests done the results will be essentially the same but the conclusion will not be the idiocy they preach. What is really embarrassing is that Kevin Ryan actually is a chemist and he buys into this and by doing so brings disrepute onto all of us chemists.

[T.A.M.]

Since Steven Jones made comments about sending the dust samples to independent researchers, I asked Niles Harriet a few weeks back, if they had submitted the samples for independent tests, and what the result was.

He answered that it would be wonderful (his words) if others dared to examine the dust. Further more he wrote that at the moment those behind the nano paper all chipped in every time they needed to do some testing, because it cost money to lend the equipment necessary.
And finally he made a clear answer to the question: No, unfortunately no one dares to touch the dust samples so far.

He later on refused to say at what institutes or persons they have tried to get tests done.

So I’m quite sure that they never even tried to get independent tests done, and if they have, the results were not what they wanted. And I’m also quite sure, that they will have all kinds of excuses to avoid independent test from ever being conducted.

I can GUARANTEE that Jones does not want ANYONE independently assessing his samples. It is all a charade.

TAM:)

[parky76]

So I’m quite sure that they never even tried to get independent tests done, and if they have, the results were not what they wanted. And I’m also quite sure, that they will have all kinds of excuses to avoid independent test from ever being conducted.

no doubt.

any tests that said "no thermite is present" were disregarded and the testers labeled as Mossad/CIA agents.

[Macgyver1968]

Well...I can't tell you whats new in Nanothermite. But I can tell you something new. The admin of Sciforums got sick of having to pour through all the muck of the 9/11 crap thread, and has decided this:

The 9/11 Conspiracy will no longer be discussed on this forum unless there is some startling new development, which doesn't come from a Truther but from the Government or Press representatives in regards to leaked information. Until that time, please vacate this forum if thats all you've got to talk about.

Hehe..I'm so happy! :)

[T.A.M.]

Well...I can't tell you whats new in Nanothermite. But I can tell you something new. The admin of Sciforums got sick of having to pour through all the muck of the 9/11 crap thread, and has decided this:



Hehe..I'm so happy! :)

got a link for that?

TAM:)

[Macgyver1968]

Here ya go TAM.

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=94415&page=7

[Grizzly Bear]

and hornless varieties too.
The optional front and back horns?

[Sword_Of_Truth]

so what's new with the nano-thermite theory?

The chief co-author (along with the usual gang of idiots) of the latest paper to not get peer reviewed has admitted the whole nano-thermite things is a basically a giant red herring and has gone back to the conventional explosives explosives theory (along with all its holes and drawbacks) to explain the WTC collapses.

There is already a thread for that here.
(http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=147725)

Speaking of which... what's new with redundant threads?

Should I start a new thread asking what's new with redundant threads?

Should I start two new threads asking what's new with redundant threads?

[parky76]

So what's new with this story? Nano-thermite at the WTC proven by any major universities in the USA?

Or did the truthers give up...again.

:p

[eirik]

so what's new with the nano-thermite theory?

have the truthers submitted any samples to Chemists and Engineers at MIT, Princeton, CalTech, or Cornell?

whats taking them soo long?'

don't they want the truth?

I predict "nano-thermite" will be the final nail in the coffin of 9-11 truth.

Yes. It actually does not explain anything, even if there WERE thermite in the dust. Because you would still need explosives, explain the planes and present a plausible narrative. Red herring.