se7ensnakes
12th July 2009, 09:38 PM
What is the biggest conspiracy of all time? A conspiracy so big that it robs from nearly every person on the planet. It is the ability of banks to just create money out of nothing. Since most of the money is digital they just create money using a few keystrokes in a computer. This system exchanges labor, houses, companies, hard goods for a few computer bookkeeping entries. Creating money by banks is a matter of law and it is therefore not secret, it just not allowed to come under the radar of the general public. The general public is allowed to know about Brad and Anjelina, or Michael Jackson or Brittany Spears, but no information about who creates the money in circulation.
What more, if you go directly to the people on the street and tell them about banks creating money out of thin air, it really does not sink in, they give you a stare no different than when you tell a cow that she is soon going to be slaughtered and eaten. In order for the population to really understand the significance of this it needs to be beaten into their heads everyday for an entire year. Then and only then will some of them start to get it. The only problem is that the bank owners, with their immense wealth won't let that happen.
You and I have to work for money but someone comes along and sets up a legal system where he and his buddies could just create money out of nothing. Imagine, a contractor who has to buy supplies and labor to build a house, but all a bank has to do is enter a few keystrokes on a computer and if the borrower does not service the loan and the house goes into foreclosure, the banks gets the house. But the bank did no work at all, other than just a few bookkeeping entries. With a system like that, what chance does a country have for any kind of political and financial freedom?
The banks just donated 200 million dollars in campaign contributions to certain congressmen that suppose to investigate financial institutions. You need money to run for office, and banks are able to conjure money. How much money did you give to the Obama or the McCain campaign? Did you give them free exposure through television, newspaper and radio? Do you seriously think that all of those million of dollars given in campaign contributions has no affect on the way that the president is going to treat certain issues?
Besides the political, the bankers subvert our educational system. Imagine millions of people living out their lives not knowing how money is put in circulation, or what a federal reserve note is. Additionally, I have debated the issue of the income tax in this forum and I have yet to find one single individual in this forum that understand what the income tax is. It is true you get cute little comical entries when you debate. Sometimes you get frustrated individuals who want to just “squash” you. In the end you get nothing substantial that will lead you to believe that the people in this forum actually understand. Some of the people in this forum rambled about the 16th Amendment without actually bothering to look at what the supreme court actually said. Additionally the people in this forum made quotes from publications that have no constitutional / supreme court reference. Most of these publications actually run contrary to the constitution / supreme court therefore they could not defend the quotes. Their only hope of “winning” the debate is if you get as confuse as they are.
It is impossible to argue that this general confusion and ignorance is purely coincidental. Moreover there are educated individuals writing out these publications. They can, just as I can, easily read the constitution / supreme court. What more, once you learn the definition of certain key words it is rather simple and straight forward. The logic of the supreme court justices' decision about the income tax becomes known with obvious clarity. You realize then and there that someone is deliberately trying to obfuscate the issue of the income tax.
The banking system in this country was modeled after the bank of england and so the bankers understood that in order to service the upcoming national debt they needed money directly from the people, hence the income tax is complementary to the federal reserve act. Once in a while you meet someone who has some kind of degree in economics, and they will tell you that fractional reserve banking was design to expand wealth by letting liquidity help entrepreneurs, help expand businesses, blah, blah blah. They will tell you, using mumbo jumbo fancy sounding words that really just try to hide the fact that someone, some private business scam the government to give them the legal right to create money out of nothing.
Perhaps the most important thing everyone needs to realize is that our monetary system was not born out of representatives being voted in to debate monetary reform, rather it was the result of very wealthy private interest pulling the strings to pass certain laws. They saw how well the scam worked in Europe so they wanted to pull it off here. Now what was the last time you voted in the chairman of the board of governors. Yet it is this board of governors who are going to determine the amount of your bills, and if you are going to have a job tomorrow. What was the last time that you had to choose candidates that promoted 100% reserve banking vs fractional reserve banking. Were we even given a chance? What about the open market committee meetings? Did you ever see one on CSPAN? What about education? Why is monetary theory avoided in high school? Go around the country and ask cashiers if they accept federal reserve notes. Most of them will tell you that they don't. Cashiers don't even know what Federal Reserve notes are! "Am sorry we don't accept federal reserve notes." How can you possibly have representatives in government looking out for our financial welfare when the population does not even know the issues?
The Federal Reserve central bank just uses the government to write and enforce laws.. This mean that if you are a bank and are part of the bank cartel you have to abide by certain rules. Since it is a banking cartel, that is a group of private companies who have a monopoly on this money creation system, they wanted to bring in the government for the purpose of enforcing laws that restrict members. Imagine if one bank decides to expand credit by using comparative low interest rates, thereby making the money creation scam more obvious to the general public. Since the banks don't loan money but just create money, imagine if a bank decided to have no interest and would, in fact, just pay the borrower a certain amount of money, some kind of rebate if you will. The interbank competition will become fierce and inflation will just sky rocket and the scam will become obvious to the general public.
The Central Bank also controls the interest rate, or rather how hard or easy it would be to borrow money. Easy and hard money produces predictable results, as human nature has not changed for hundreds of years. This allows those with privilege information to sell and buy at just the right time. Recessions are scientifically controlled. Sell sell sell during the boom and buy buy buy during the burst, picking up corporations, real estate on the bankrupt cheap. When the Chase Bank shows profit, it goes to the pockets of whomever owns the bank, but when Chase Bank loose money, it tries to compensate using public money, or by inflating the currency so that our weekly wages is worth less. Is that a scam or what?
The Federal Reserve Central Bank also does certain things such as guaranteeing deposits. If I play the stock market why can the government guarantee my return? Does the federal government actually have the constitutional right to use public money to help one business group and not another? Am not talking about bailouts, I am talking about on a year to year basis.
Most of the money is in digital format, but what will happen if everyone came in and wanted to withdraw from the banks? The federal reserve central bank will follow with an emergency money infusion. This will save the bank's face but you will need barrel full of money to buy a bread loaf. If banks become insolvent the whole economic system will come crashing down. This will not happen if people were educated about monetary theory and voted accordingly. Banks then will just be another business providing a service for gain and lost. But alas this is not the case.
In the 1800s banks in this country learned that staying under the radar was very important. They could not have the media keeping the people generally informed. There is no money creation education in any of our public high schools. Newspapers and Television rarely mention it. I don't need to see any of the schools curriculum to know that there is a lack education in monetary theory. All I need to do is to ask graduates if they know what fractional reserve banking is, or perhaps what is the difference between a United States Note and a Federal Reserve Note.
It is absurdly impossible to argue that there is no intelligent design to the national debt now in the trillions, or the powerful American corporations, or households and individuals indebtedness to financial institutions that supposedly do nothing more than vault money. You simply cannot argue that all this indebtedness happened purely by chance, and more importantly that this debt-money system is the best for the general financial welfare of the people, corporations and government. If you take the legal power away from these counterfeiting institutions, do you think they will just quietly go away. They control so many corporations will they protest by collapsing the economy and plunging the nation into deep economic chaos? This is a type of treasonous act. They tried it in the 1800s, will they try it again? This is indeed the biggest conspiracy of all...Hence Mega-conspiracy.
What more, if you go directly to the people on the street and tell them about banks creating money out of thin air, it really does not sink in, they give you a stare no different than when you tell a cow that she is soon going to be slaughtered and eaten. In order for the population to really understand the significance of this it needs to be beaten into their heads everyday for an entire year. Then and only then will some of them start to get it. The only problem is that the bank owners, with their immense wealth won't let that happen.
You and I have to work for money but someone comes along and sets up a legal system where he and his buddies could just create money out of nothing. Imagine, a contractor who has to buy supplies and labor to build a house, but all a bank has to do is enter a few keystrokes on a computer and if the borrower does not service the loan and the house goes into foreclosure, the banks gets the house. But the bank did no work at all, other than just a few bookkeeping entries. With a system like that, what chance does a country have for any kind of political and financial freedom?
The banks just donated 200 million dollars in campaign contributions to certain congressmen that suppose to investigate financial institutions. You need money to run for office, and banks are able to conjure money. How much money did you give to the Obama or the McCain campaign? Did you give them free exposure through television, newspaper and radio? Do you seriously think that all of those million of dollars given in campaign contributions has no affect on the way that the president is going to treat certain issues?
Besides the political, the bankers subvert our educational system. Imagine millions of people living out their lives not knowing how money is put in circulation, or what a federal reserve note is. Additionally, I have debated the issue of the income tax in this forum and I have yet to find one single individual in this forum that understand what the income tax is. It is true you get cute little comical entries when you debate. Sometimes you get frustrated individuals who want to just “squash” you. In the end you get nothing substantial that will lead you to believe that the people in this forum actually understand. Some of the people in this forum rambled about the 16th Amendment without actually bothering to look at what the supreme court actually said. Additionally the people in this forum made quotes from publications that have no constitutional / supreme court reference. Most of these publications actually run contrary to the constitution / supreme court therefore they could not defend the quotes. Their only hope of “winning” the debate is if you get as confuse as they are.
It is impossible to argue that this general confusion and ignorance is purely coincidental. Moreover there are educated individuals writing out these publications. They can, just as I can, easily read the constitution / supreme court. What more, once you learn the definition of certain key words it is rather simple and straight forward. The logic of the supreme court justices' decision about the income tax becomes known with obvious clarity. You realize then and there that someone is deliberately trying to obfuscate the issue of the income tax.
The banking system in this country was modeled after the bank of england and so the bankers understood that in order to service the upcoming national debt they needed money directly from the people, hence the income tax is complementary to the federal reserve act. Once in a while you meet someone who has some kind of degree in economics, and they will tell you that fractional reserve banking was design to expand wealth by letting liquidity help entrepreneurs, help expand businesses, blah, blah blah. They will tell you, using mumbo jumbo fancy sounding words that really just try to hide the fact that someone, some private business scam the government to give them the legal right to create money out of nothing.
Perhaps the most important thing everyone needs to realize is that our monetary system was not born out of representatives being voted in to debate monetary reform, rather it was the result of very wealthy private interest pulling the strings to pass certain laws. They saw how well the scam worked in Europe so they wanted to pull it off here. Now what was the last time you voted in the chairman of the board of governors. Yet it is this board of governors who are going to determine the amount of your bills, and if you are going to have a job tomorrow. What was the last time that you had to choose candidates that promoted 100% reserve banking vs fractional reserve banking. Were we even given a chance? What about the open market committee meetings? Did you ever see one on CSPAN? What about education? Why is monetary theory avoided in high school? Go around the country and ask cashiers if they accept federal reserve notes. Most of them will tell you that they don't. Cashiers don't even know what Federal Reserve notes are! "Am sorry we don't accept federal reserve notes." How can you possibly have representatives in government looking out for our financial welfare when the population does not even know the issues?
The Federal Reserve central bank just uses the government to write and enforce laws.. This mean that if you are a bank and are part of the bank cartel you have to abide by certain rules. Since it is a banking cartel, that is a group of private companies who have a monopoly on this money creation system, they wanted to bring in the government for the purpose of enforcing laws that restrict members. Imagine if one bank decides to expand credit by using comparative low interest rates, thereby making the money creation scam more obvious to the general public. Since the banks don't loan money but just create money, imagine if a bank decided to have no interest and would, in fact, just pay the borrower a certain amount of money, some kind of rebate if you will. The interbank competition will become fierce and inflation will just sky rocket and the scam will become obvious to the general public.
The Central Bank also controls the interest rate, or rather how hard or easy it would be to borrow money. Easy and hard money produces predictable results, as human nature has not changed for hundreds of years. This allows those with privilege information to sell and buy at just the right time. Recessions are scientifically controlled. Sell sell sell during the boom and buy buy buy during the burst, picking up corporations, real estate on the bankrupt cheap. When the Chase Bank shows profit, it goes to the pockets of whomever owns the bank, but when Chase Bank loose money, it tries to compensate using public money, or by inflating the currency so that our weekly wages is worth less. Is that a scam or what?
The Federal Reserve Central Bank also does certain things such as guaranteeing deposits. If I play the stock market why can the government guarantee my return? Does the federal government actually have the constitutional right to use public money to help one business group and not another? Am not talking about bailouts, I am talking about on a year to year basis.
Most of the money is in digital format, but what will happen if everyone came in and wanted to withdraw from the banks? The federal reserve central bank will follow with an emergency money infusion. This will save the bank's face but you will need barrel full of money to buy a bread loaf. If banks become insolvent the whole economic system will come crashing down. This will not happen if people were educated about monetary theory and voted accordingly. Banks then will just be another business providing a service for gain and lost. But alas this is not the case.
In the 1800s banks in this country learned that staying under the radar was very important. They could not have the media keeping the people generally informed. There is no money creation education in any of our public high schools. Newspapers and Television rarely mention it. I don't need to see any of the schools curriculum to know that there is a lack education in monetary theory. All I need to do is to ask graduates if they know what fractional reserve banking is, or perhaps what is the difference between a United States Note and a Federal Reserve Note.
It is absurdly impossible to argue that there is no intelligent design to the national debt now in the trillions, or the powerful American corporations, or households and individuals indebtedness to financial institutions that supposedly do nothing more than vault money. You simply cannot argue that all this indebtedness happened purely by chance, and more importantly that this debt-money system is the best for the general financial welfare of the people, corporations and government. If you take the legal power away from these counterfeiting institutions, do you think they will just quietly go away. They control so many corporations will they protest by collapsing the economy and plunging the nation into deep economic chaos? This is a type of treasonous act. They tried it in the 1800s, will they try it again? This is indeed the biggest conspiracy of all...Hence Mega-conspiracy.