View Full Version : Bomb-sniffing dogs and the "power down"
GlennB
23rd July 2009, 02:26 AM
Runlikell has had a rough ride so far, it's fair to say. And I have time to spare before hitting the beach, so may I take some work off his hands by anticipating his next spam question ...
Was the disappearance of the bomb-sniffing dogs somehow linked to the WTC 'power-down'. Did they pee on vital electrical circuits, get zapped and actually cause the power-down? Please provide links for me to ignore, as I can't be arsed to find my own ignorable linkies.
Hokulele
23rd July 2009, 02:29 AM
Oooo, do "pull-it" next.
Or the put options.
TruthersLie
23rd July 2009, 02:31 AM
no
missing 2.3 trillion
hijackers still alive
Hokulele
23rd July 2009, 02:33 AM
Fat Osama?
Architect
23rd July 2009, 03:20 AM
Amazing fireproof steel.
JoeyDonuts
23rd July 2009, 03:28 AM
IMI-manufactured dustification thermate Hutchison hush-a-booms.
Justin39640
23rd July 2009, 07:14 AM
his next thread "have you read the paper on active thermitic material?"
Stellafane
23rd July 2009, 07:16 AM
C'mon, no guts no glory: space beams, holograms, and Pentagon flyovers.
Horatius
23rd July 2009, 07:46 AM
Fat Osama?
He's already alluded to this, in asking how we know that the videos show the real Osama.
runlikell
23rd July 2009, 08:03 AM
Runlikell has had a rough ride so far, it's fair to say. And I have time to spare before hitting the beach, so may I take some work off his hands by anticipating his next spam question ...
Was the disappearance of the bomb-sniffing dogs somehow linked to the WTC 'power-down'. Did they pee on vital electrical circuits, get zapped and actually cause the power-down? Please provide links for me to ignore, as I can't be arsed to find my own ignorable linkies.
LOL, I didn't realize that bomb sniffing dogs were trained to smell nano-thermite! Hahaha. Just kidding!
Space beams? Holograms? I believe in the scientic method. And you, it seems, believe that attacking people with false beleifs is somehow productive. That's insanity according to Einstein.
Amazing how much time you guys dedicate to attacking those who you disagree with.
Didi it ever occur to you that the most effective way to convince someone of you beliefs, is by being nice?
Oh that's right, hostility is the only way to go, because you are too insecure to have a mature, civil discussion with an intellectual inferior.
Oh where oh where can I show up to lick your shoes clean, oh superior internet know it alls?
~enigma~
23rd July 2009, 08:06 AM
attacking people with false beleifs is somehow productive. That's insanity according to Einstein.
Quote please.
twinstead
23rd July 2009, 08:14 AM
LOL, I didn't realize that bomb sniffing dogs were trained to smell nano-thermite! Hahaha. Just kidding!
Space beams? Holograms? I believe in the scientic method. And you, it seems, believe that attacking people with false beleifs is somehow productive. That's insanity according to Einstein.
Amazing how much time you guys dedicate to attacking those who you disagree with.
Didi it ever occur to you that the most effective way to convince someone of you beliefs, is by being nice?
Oh that's right, hostility is the only way to go, because you are too insecure to have a mature, civil discussion with an intellectual inferior.
Oh where oh where can I show up to lick your shoes clean, oh superior internet know it alls?
You should get a thicker skin. The folks here have been called every name in the book by people whom they don't agree with--shill, sheeple, Bush lover, Jew lover, neocon, you name it, even suggesting that they get paid to "debunk" 911 conspiracists. It makes somebody defensive when one comes on the forum with the same "just asking questions" start; they've seen it a thousand times, from both the extreme right and the extreme left (you see, this is an ideological and world view issue and nothing more, no matter what you think).
I agree sometimes the folks here, and I as well, can sometimes forget our manners, but believe me we get just as much or more than we give.
GlennB
23rd July 2009, 08:31 AM
Didi it ever occur to you that the most effective way to convince someone of you beliefs, is by being nice?
How about providing evidence in the hope that the 'someone' will have the courtesy to consider it? I'm pretty sure few lawyers will do an effective job by just 'being nice to the jury', for example.
Anyhooo - the "put options" .... I'm pretty sure that when the bomb dogs got zapped and took out the WTC electrics, a transient current spike could have hit Wall Street, triggering automatic computerised "put" trades on already fragile airline shares. Three 9/11 myths down in one event .....
kookbreaker
23rd July 2009, 08:33 AM
Amazing how much time you guys dedicate to attacking those who you disagree with.
You misunderstand. I disagree with folks about how city taxes should be handled, I disagree with people on this forum on what bike products are the best value.
What you truthers bring is an abomination and twisting of reality that must be countered, otherwise it leads to people living and thinking 'wrong'.
Didi it ever occur to you that the most effective way to convince someone of you beliefs, is by being nice?
When someone is honest and not being disingenuous, they actually get treated quite nicely around here. Ask a real question, and not answering with pathetic attempts at pwnage gets you the short end of the stick around here
Oh that's right, hostility is the only way to go, because you are too insecure to have a mature, civil discussion with an intellectual inferior.
Oh where oh where can I show up to lick your shoes clean, oh superior internet know it alls?
Boo-hoo, boo-hoo-hoo-hoo. You weren't some seeker of knowledge being wronged by the mean JREF, you were an already convinced troofer trying to score ownage points and you got overwhelmed.
alienentity
23rd July 2009, 08:50 AM
<snip>
Space beams? Holograms? I believe in the scientic method. And you, it seems, believe that attacking people with false beleifs is somehow productive. That's insanity according to Einstein.
Amazing how much time you guys dedicate to attacking those who you disagree with.
<snip>
Oh where oh where can I show up to lick your shoes clean, oh superior internet know it alls?
You got questions? There are probably answers to them, either in various threads here or on other websites.
Here's one really useful, important site that you ought to visit:
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/home
You may have noticed, under the JREF 'conspiracy theories' section, a 'resources for debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories' section.
http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php?catid=18
Please, before you post again here, take the time to read thru these and other resources. If you still have some legit questions after doing so, by all means post them in an appropriate thread.
But if you do post again, at least try to stay on topic.
Pretty please with sugar on top.:D
beachnut
23rd July 2009, 09:46 AM
... Amazing how much time you guys dedicate to attacking those who you disagree with...
It is amazing how many lies you posted in less than 24 hours. No one is attacking you, they are attacking your lies you post freely and without thinking about it. You find lies on the Internet and repeat them; refuted lies and delusions. What is next?
Where did Einstein say this?
... attacking people with false beleifs is somehow productive. That's insanity according to Einstein. ... The false beliefs are your ideas and those other ideas are the people who share you overall big picture on 911. Your ideas on 911 are false = false beliefs.
You repeat the lies of a movement with space beams and other fantasy ideas the same as all your fantasy ideas on 911. Your ideas on 911 are false so you are in the same club with insane idea people.
The better real quote from Einstein is this for your posts.
Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen. Albert Einstein, There is hope for you because you tired to quote Einstein instead of Hitler.
~enigma~
23rd July 2009, 12:53 PM
Quote please.
So much for being polite to the now self proven liar.
alienentity
23rd July 2009, 12:57 PM
Quote please.
CHIRP CHIRP CHIRP...
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/304704a4d70e9467cb.jpg (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=16839)
AJM8125
23rd July 2009, 01:27 PM
I wonder how long this thread will go on before the mods make the decision to pull it.
twinstead
23rd July 2009, 01:35 PM
I wonder how long this thread will go on before the mods make the decision to pull it.
You mean destroy it with CD?
AJM8125
23rd July 2009, 01:40 PM
You mean destroy it with CD?
You don't really think they're going to yank it down with cables, do you?
Sword_Of_Truth
23rd July 2009, 01:48 PM
LOL, I didn't realize that bomb sniffing dogs were trained to smell nano-thermite! Hahaha. Just kidding!
They aren't trained to smell adamantium or mithril either.
Unsecured Coins
23rd July 2009, 02:02 PM
They aren't trained to smell adamantium or mithril either.
That's because you have to go to Outlands and get the skill. Add ons help, but geez man, 1 gold and 23 silver is a harsh price to pay, unless you use some of the one trillion dollars in gold we stole from underneath the towers.
or reply to goldspamming in trade. either or.
defaultdotxbe
23rd July 2009, 02:02 PM
LOL, I didn't realize that bomb sniffing dogs were trained to smell nano-thermite! Hahaha. Just kidding!
they are trained to find incendiary devices, thermite is an incendiary so i dont see why they wouldnt be able to find it
Sword_Of_Truth
23rd July 2009, 02:46 PM
That's because you have to go to Outlands and get the skill. Add ons help, but geez man, 1 gold and 23 silver is a harsh price to pay, unless you use some of the one trillion dollars in gold we stole from underneath the towers.
or reply to goldspamming in trade. either or.
Thorium sells better, at the moment. Not even the chinese are mining it. Silithus hives are overflowing with the stuff and the bugs that gaurd it go down like sacks of wet turd to level 80s.
I'm getting 40 to 50 gold a stack just for straight ore, compared to 14 per stack of saronite.
Macgyver1968
23rd July 2009, 03:07 PM
I am new to the 911 truth movement and am truth-curious.
I have a few questions, that I hope you will answer.
1. Why on god's green earth would anyone place demo charges in a building in the same spot they planned on crashing a plane at 500mph?
2. Why would any bother to go to the trouble of wiring a building for demo...then crash a plane into it?
3. Why is it so hard to get that last little bit of mayo out of the jar?
:)
Unsecured Coins
23rd July 2009, 03:13 PM
I am new to the 911 truth movement and am
3. Why is it so hard to get that last little bit of mayo out of the jar?
:)
Loose Change - The Final Dab
FineWine
23rd July 2009, 07:00 PM
Oooo, do "pull-it" next.
Or the put options.
No, no, no! Not "pull it"! Please, Lord, not "pull it"! I'd rather do "no-planes" than "pull it.' Anything but "pull it"!
eromitlab
23rd July 2009, 08:31 PM
How about "they spent $100 million to investigate Clinton's blowjob and only $4 million to investigate 9/11." Jesse Ventura said it, it must be true! Plus, unlike most of the junk truthers pull out, it's new*.
*- The argument itself is not new, of course; the $4 million dollar figure that Ventura made up and never cited before saying it on Corporate Main Stream Control Media and thereby making it fact is new.
Justin39640
23rd July 2009, 08:33 PM
Loose Change - The Final Dab
the final dub?
LashL
23rd July 2009, 09:34 PM
Oh where oh where can I show up to lick your shoes clean, oh superior internet know it alls?
Commerce Court West at 199 Bay Street, Toronto would be convenient. It is at the corner of Bay and King. Take the escalator to the right of the main entrance on Bay, down to the P.A.T.H. then turn to your left at the bottom of the escalator. Walk about 30 yards, and on your right, you will see a shoeshine station. I am quite sure that the lovely woman who operates the business will be happy to let you lick my shoes from there, so pick a date and time. :D
A W Smith
23rd July 2009, 10:02 PM
Commerce Court West at 199 Bay Street, Toronto would be convenient. It is at the corner of Bay and King. Take the escalator to the right of the main entrance on Bay, down to the P.A.T.H. then turn to your left at the bottom of the escalator. Walk about 30 yards, and on your right, you will see a shoeshine station. I am quite sure that the lovely woman who operates the business will be happy to let you lick my shoes from there, so pick a date and time. :D
Toronto has a Port Authority Trans Hudson? :)
Travis
24th July 2009, 01:31 AM
You Sheepling Sheeple are just so Sheepiling in your Sheeplary.
Hokulele
24th July 2009, 01:41 AM
, he said, sheepishly.
Aitch
24th July 2009, 02:58 AM
Baa!
U8DFwb3zlDk
TruthersLie
24th July 2009, 10:05 AM
No he will bring up
flight 93 was shot down by that pilot.
5 dancing israelis
the US trained the hijackers
jaydeehess
24th July 2009, 01:49 PM
You should get a thicker skin. The folks here have been called every name in the book by people whom they don't agree with--shill, sheeple, Bush lover, Jew lover, neocon, you name it, even suggesting that they get paid to "debunk" 911 conspiracists. It makes somebody defensive when one comes on the forum with the same "just asking questions" start; they've seen it a thousand times, from both the extreme right and the extreme left (you see, this is an ideological and world view issue and nothing more, no matter what you think).
I agree sometimes the folks here, and I as well, can sometimes forget our manners, but believe me we get just as much or more than we give.
You forgot "leftist gatekeeper"
jaydeehess
24th July 2009, 01:57 PM
I am new to the 911 truth movement and am truth-curious.
I have a few questions, that I hope you will answer.
1. Why on god's green earth would anyone place demo charges in a building in the same spot they planned on crashing a plane at 500mph?
Good question. I have mentioned this to Homeland Insecurity(the poster, I'm not pokoing fun at the agency) but so far I don't think he saw my inquiry or he would have adressed it.
2. Why would any bother to go to the trouble of wiring a building for demo...then crash a plane into it?
Good question, maybe after the first WTC bombing its too hard for terrorists to get explosives so TPTB had to have another cover story? I admit I'm making this up as I go along, but that's pretty much apropos for the tM
3. Why is it so hard to get that last little bit of mayo out of the jar?
:)
Finally , a question I can answer. It has to do with the relationship between the diameter of the opening and the width of one's hand, as well as the topography of the bottom of the jar compared to the shape and maleability of the device you are using to remove that last bit of sandwhich ambrosia.
jaydeehess
24th July 2009, 02:00 PM
Toronto has a Port Authority Trans Hudson? :)
http://www3.ttc.ca/
Perhaps LashL was simply using a term that would be recognized by the other poster?
eromitlab
24th July 2009, 03:02 PM
Toronto has a Port Authority Trans Hudson? :)
http://www.toronto.ca/path/
Toronto's PATH is a network of underground walkways downtown, kind of an underground mall. Pretty handy considering how messy it gets on the surface sometimes. (I say as an occasional visitor, not as a native.)
Macgyver1968
24th July 2009, 03:04 PM
Oooo, do "pull-it" next....
Is this close enough?
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i41/macgyver1968a/kitty2.jpg
jaydeehess
24th July 2009, 03:15 PM
http://www.toronto.ca/path/
Toronto's PATH is a network of underground walkways downtown, kind of an underground mall. Pretty handy considering how messy it gets on the surface sometimes. (I say as an occasional visitor, not as a native.)
ahhh my bad as I had searched the TTC site for what path was and came up with references to bus stops "at Path" but no explanation as to what the H that meant.
LashL
24th July 2009, 08:53 PM
Perhaps LashL was simply using a term that would be recognized by the other poster?
No, I wasn't, actually. The PATH in Toronto is a huge subterranean shopping mall, something like 25 or more kms long, with more than a thousand stores, etc. It connects numerous office towers and one can stay out of the rain or snow quite nicely while navigating the downtown core. :)
ETA: Oops. I didn't notice that this thread continued on to another page when I wrote that above. Disregard, as it has already been pointed out and acknowledged. :)
dropzone
24th July 2009, 10:34 PM
they are trained to find incendiary devices, thermite is an incendiary so i dont see why they wouldnt be able to find itI hate to give ANY SUPPORT WHATSOEVER to the Truthers, but they are trained to find incendiary devices. "Nanothermite" is rust and aluminum. Both of which are EXTRAORDINARILY common in wrecked buildings.
doobiedoright
25th July 2009, 08:48 AM
they are trained to find incendiary devices, thermite is an incendiary so i dont see why they wouldnt be able to find it
If it emits a smell k9's can be trained to find it!
Interesting little factoid........K9's have testified in German courts!
defaultdotxbe
25th July 2009, 04:47 PM
I hate to give ANY SUPPORT WHATSOEVER to the Truthers, but they are trained to find incendiary devices. "Nanothermite" is rust and aluminum. Both of which are EXTRAORDINARILY common in wrecked buildings.
thermite still needs something to ignite it, you can just put a sack of rust and aluminum somewhere and hope it goes off, dogs would be able to smell the ignition device
also, powdered alumuminum and rust might smell different to a dog, who knows
ive tried to find information about whether bomb sniffing dogs specifically can or are trained to find thermite, but all i get from google is truther rants
Hokulele
25th July 2009, 10:56 PM
ive tried to find information about whether bomb sniffing dogs specifically can or are trained to find thermite, but all i get from google is truther rants
Why on earth would a bomb-sniffing dog be trained to find thermite? Only in Trutherworld is it possible to demolish something with that substance. I would guess that most law enforcement agencies are more worried about things that are actually known to work in the real world than fantasy devices.
ETA: I do not mean to suggest that you are supporting such a theory, personally. It just struck me as kind of a strange idea to pursue.
defaultdotxbe
26th July 2009, 03:34 AM
Why on earth would a bomb-sniffing dog be trained to find thermite? Only in Trutherworld is it possible to demolish something with that substance. I would guess that most law enforcement agencies are more worried about things that are actually known to work in the real world than fantasy devices.
ETA: I do not mean to suggest that you are supporting such a theory, personally. It just struck me as kind of a strange idea to pursue.
well most sources i find indicate the dogs are trained to find explosives, accelerants (IE gasoline) and incendiaries (thermite is an incendiary)
and it doesnt matter if it can destroy a building, a bombs that fits in a briefcase probably cant destroy a building, but it cause damage, start fires, and ultimately hurt people, so it makes sense to me that its not something you want to allow to get into your building, and thus something the dogs would be trained to sniff out
doobiedoright
27th July 2009, 08:32 AM
well most sources i find indicate the dogs are trained to find explosives, accelerants (IE gasoline) and incendiaries (thermite is an incendiary)
and it doesnt matter if it can destroy a building, a bombs that fits in a briefcase probably cant destroy a building, but it cause damage, start fires, and ultimately hurt people, so it makes sense to me that its not something you want to allow to get into your building, and thus something the dogs would be trained to sniff out
It would not be wise to disclose everything a k9 can or cannot sniff out.
However please remember it is not only what a person is caring that gives bad intentions away.
Adrenalin can be mans worst enemy!
tsig
27th July 2009, 09:56 AM
LOL, I didn't realize that bomb sniffing dogs were trained to smell nano-thermite! Hahaha. Just kidding!
Space beams? Holograms? I believe in the scientic method. And you, it seems, believe that attacking people with false beleifs is somehow productive. That's insanity according to Einstein.
Amazing how much time you guys dedicate to attacking those who you disagree with.
Didi it ever occur to you that the most effective way to convince someone of you beliefs, is by being nice?
Oh that's right, hostility is the only way to go, because you are too insecure to have a mature, civil discussion with an intellectual inferior.
Oh where oh where can I show up to lick your shoes clean, oh superior internet know it alls?
Nice quit the race years ago.
tsig
27th July 2009, 10:01 AM
How about providing evidence in the hope that the 'someone' will have the courtesy to consider it? I'm pretty sure few lawyers will do an effective job by just 'being nice to the jury', for example.
Anyhooo - the "put options" .... I'm pretty sure that when the bomb dogs got zapped and took out the WTC electrics, a transient current spike could have hit Wall Street, triggering automatic computerised "put" trades on already fragile airline shares. Three 9/11 myths down in one event .....
They trained the dogs to fly the planes then used electronic shock collars to force them to crash the planes.
tsig
27th July 2009, 10:04 AM
You don't really think they're going to yank it down with cables, do you?
Nah they'll just exercise their put option.
ETA: Day late
tsig
27th July 2009, 10:10 AM
I am new to the 911 truth movement and am truth-curious.
I have a few questions, that I hope you will answer.
1. Why on god's green earth would anyone place demo charges in a building in the same spot they planned on crashing a plane at 500mph?
2. Why would any bother to go to the trouble of wiring a building for demo...then crash a plane into it?
3. Why is it so hard to get that last little bit of mayo out of the jar?
:)
Use a spatula.
For the mayo.
doobiedoright
28th July 2009, 09:04 AM
They trained the dogs to fly the planes then used electronic shock collars to force them to crash the planes.
Crap you busted me!
Great now all the wackos are going to blame me!
It sure was not easy to get them to hold the stick in their paws!
Tritonics rule!
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.