Very simple

[Pixie of key]

Dense and massive piece.

The slow time.

The beginning was a dense concentration of energy,

whose time was slow.

Therefore, the background radiation is very stretched. the radiation waves began to move less frequently.

Relative to existing energy-waves.

During the first stars, the energy was more frequent than the current stars.

During the first stars, the time was slow relative to the current time, the stars.

Therefore, the old light is known. generally redshifting

Old light waves came less frequently in relation to the existing light waves.

Space has always been there.

Space is not expanding or curving

The energy change of less high-density energy.

Even/also nucleus of atoms!


http://onesimpleprinciple.com/296

[Molinaro]

The so called tired light theory was considered long ago and shown not to agree with observations.

[Pixie of key]

The so called tired light theory was considered long ago and shown not to agree with observations.

Tired light? Whats that?

I say, also photons exploding all a time!

Space dont expanding!

You cant proof, space expanding!

Why space start expanding same time faster, when quasars born?

Quasars proof, energy start exploding faster about 6 billion years ago!

You have a total wron theorys!

Universe it is very very simple!

.

[Pastor Bentonit]

Weirdest Troll EVAR??!1oneeleven! This is some free-form poetry I can't even begin to parse. But I'd sure like a hit from Pixie's bong! :D

[Skamandros]

Yes all is simple

law of 3 was big bang

3 matter partickles neuron proton electron

3 times past now futur

3 waves elecromagitic directions as is the 3 space deminsons

dark enirgy infaltion energy and dark matter are three in one things

3 space deminsons are looped to tree time periods as is the flux of things

old light waves are tree in kinds of factiscs as are the 3 great galaxies.

_____________Gligor Makedonska studyd these thngs for all peple to understnad

[I Ratant]

...

_____________Gligor Makedonska studyd these thngs for all peple to understnad
.
And as so graphically demonstrated, has failed miserably.

[Mojo]

Two of them in the same thread!

[Molinaro]

old light waves are tree in kinds of factiscs as are the 3 great galaxies.

Please name the 3 great galaxies. Also, explain how they differ from the aproximately 100 billion not so great galaxies.

Thanks.

[Mojo]

Try these:
The tree galaxys are milky way, andromeda and M33
So finaly the good question. Other local galaxys are called dwarf galaxys and other galaxys seem big because of gavitational lensing and reflexions they are all dwrafs.
Androdmeda is the father and milky way is the son and M33 is the holly gohst. Jesus came to the milky way this is ttrue. Thank you.

[Kuko 4000]

Mojo :D

[Elizabeth I]

Skamandros is serious? I thought he was doing a parody of Pixie of Key.

[The Man]

Skamandros is serious? I thought he was doing a parody of Pixie of Key.


As serious as Pixie is and it seems also as well educated in the transcendental art of assumed physics. Now if we take Skamandros' notion about three being the 'secret of the universe' and combine that Pixie's ‘key’ notion about everything expanding. We then have an ever expanding 3 3 3 3 3 3 3as both the ‘secret’ and ‘key’ that is more then twice (since it is a 3) as incomprehensible and meaningless as either of those assertions alone. Of course the risk is, as always since each of those separate notions is already at the critical mass of incomprehensibility, that combining them could result in a catastrophic comprehensive collapse. Forming in and information black hole from which nothing discernable can escape or even enter.

[~enigma~]

As serious as Pixie is and it seems also as well educated in the transcendental art of assumed physics. Now if we take Skamandros' notion about three being the 'secret of the universe' and combine that Pixie's ‘key’ notion about everything expanding. We then have an ever expanding 3 3 3 3 3 3 3as both the ‘secret’ and ‘key’ that is more then twice (since it is a 3) as incomprehensible and meaningless as either of those assertions alone. Of course the risk is, as always since each of those separate notions is already at the critical mass of incomprehensibility, that combining them could result in a catastrophic comprehensive collapse. Forming in and information black hole from which nothing discernable can escape or even enter.For some reason this post gave me a really strong craving for pi :)

[The Man]

For some reason this post gave me a really strong craving for pi :)


Three different pieces or just one that swells up the more you eat it?

[Little 10 Toes]

That's very irrational.

[~enigma~]

Three different pieces or just one that swells up the more you eat it?
An infinite number of pieces that keep getting larger.

[Pixie of key]

The distance to Earth 10 light-years.

Moving almost at the speed of light towards the Earth and the Earth in one year, your time is spent on just one second.

Findings Globe and see the Earth rotating under the sun, you second.

When you measure what kind of trip Globe is moving under you per second, you will notice the earth moving a lot more than the speed of light.

This should not be possible in your theory appropriate. Still, this is your theory appropriate.

a contradiction!

[Pixie of key]

How this is possible?

You move almost light speed. You come closer and closer earth.

Yours time is going only one second and same time earth time is going one year.

You looking how earth to go around sun one time when going under one second.

When you look how long way earth move, you understund, earth move over light speed?

You say, nobody cant move over light speed and same time yours theory say, sometimes earth can move over light speed?

a contradiction!



?

[Pixie of key]

I can start move far away from earth and i can look earth all a time and i can turn back and i can look earth all a time.

When i come back, i move almost light speed and thats why my time is going under one second same time when earth to go around sun?

This should not be possible in your theory appropriate. Still, this is your theory appropriate?

a contradiction!

[The Man]

The distance to Earth 10 light-years.

Moving almost at the speed of light towards the Earth and the Earth in one year, your time is spent on just one second.

Findings Globe and see the Earth rotating under the sun, you second.

When you measure what kind of trip Globe is moving under you per second, you will notice the earth moving a lot more than the speed of light.

This should not be possible in your theory appropriate. Still, this is your theory appropriate.

a contradiction!



Your contradiction not in the theory appropriate.

Learn you theory appropriately, then false contradictions you assert not.

[Pixie of key]

Onesimpleprinciple model say, there mide be two (or more)energyconcentrations out side visible Universe and both exploding and emit energywaves who have nature of galaxys.

This green galaxys mide be from other energyconcentration that other!

Galaxies going green

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/45958#comment_45964



For galaxies, it’s not easy being green. Most of them appear blue or red from Earth.

Indeed, after combing through an online image bank of 1 million galaxies, volunteers for the Galaxy Zoo project have found a mere 250 galaxies with an unusual, greenish color. These compact bodies, dubbed the Green Peas, are only about one-tenth the size of the Milky Way.

Now, a team of astronomers working with the volunteers has discovered that the Green Peas are hamming it up, forming stars at an enormous rate — about 10 times faster than the Milky Way. Spectra of the galaxies taken by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey — the source of the online images — indicate that the greenish hue comes from the glow of ionized oxygen gas heated by newborn stars, says astronomer Carolin Cardamone of Yale University.


Do not repost entire articles. A link and a short excerpt (in a quote box) should be used instead.

[Molinaro]

I think Yoda needs to visit the Betty Ford Centre.

[~enigma~]

Your contradiction not in the theory appropriate.

Learn you theory appropriately, then false contradictions you assert not.
Yodaese?

[Pixie of key]

Mathematical function in which the space ship is approaching the Earth almost at the speed of light, when the ship's time is spent on just one second of Earth's year.

Means of people inside ships looking Earth and discover the earth rotating the sun.

How quickly Globe Solar rotate and how fast/quickly of the earth is?

I maintain that far more than the speed of light, and this should not be possible because the theory of relativity asserts that the speed of light can be exceeded!

[Skamandros]

Speed of light is:


\approx\dfrac{3(3^.3+1)^3(3^.3+1)^3(3^.3+1)^3}{3^. 3+1} m/s


so how is that uneverse not binded by the microwavs of 3 in the ricorertle of the dark energy?

[Ziggurat]

Speed of light is:


\approx\dfrac{3(3^.3+1)^3(3^.3+1)^3(3^.3+1)^3}{3^. 3+1} m/s


so how is that uneverse not binded by the microwavs of 3 in the ricorertle of the dark energy?

Speed of light is

\approx(2+1)(2^.(2^2+1))^{2^.2^2} m/s

Clearly, 2 is the key to everything.

[Third Eye Open]

I can start move far away from earth and i can look earth all a time and i can turn back and i can look earth all a time.

When i come back, i move almost light speed and thats why my time is going under one second same time when earth to go around sun?

This should not be possible in your theory appropriate. Still, this is your theory appropriate?

a contradiction!

Yes contradiction! This is only makes sense to think about distance. When you move one mile first you move one foot. When you move your finger one inch first in moves on millimeter. What is the smallest distance to move? This is planck distance.

But if this is the shortest distance, then how is it sense to move halfway? if something moves plack distanance in one second, where is it at one half second? it must be still at the start. as long as you can cut the time in half, and ask where is it, it makes not sense. Until you get to the shortest time, plack time.

You can move across the planck distance only in the planck time. one planck distance per planck time is equal the speed of light.

So you see, everything is always moving at the speed of light over planck distances. move, stop, move, stop, so at our eyes it looks like fluid motion.

This explains why we see light always at one speed, and why time dilations happen, and everything else.









(hows that for an off the cuff crazy theory?)

[Skamandros]

Speed of light is

\approx(2+1)(2^.(2^2+1))^{2^.2^2} m/s

Clearly, 2 is the key to everything.

THat is fales made up thing and is conjoining of concepts. . My formula is naturel method of showing power of 3 witch is the gensisis of evrything. No two is complet without the adition of the therd -- now no more silly things. See that univers as the speed of light comes to the galaxy from the CMB in all isoproper directions at the power of tree formula I showd you. Be content!

[Ziggurat]

THat is fales made up thing and is conjoining of concepts. My formula is naturel method of showing power of 3 witch is the gensisis of evrything.

Witch? Burn it! :broomstic

You really need to get your hands on a spell checker.

And maybe some psychoactive medication.

[The Man]

Yodaese?

Well, when on Dagobah...

[Skamandros]

Is better and more beutiful for speed of light:

\approx\dfrac{3(3^.3+\dfrac{3}{3})^3(3^.3+\dfrac{3 }{3})^3(3^.3+\dfrac{3}{3})^3}{3^.3+\dfrac{3}{3}} m/s

[Ziggurat]

Hey Skamandros, what's the speed of light in miles per hour?

[Ysidro]

I refuse to read the OP unless I can get it in haiku.

Or maybe limerick.

[portlandatheist]

I've learned so much today.

[Skamandros]

\approx\dfrac{3/3+3/3}{3}(3^.3+3/3)^3(3^.3+3/3)^3(3^.3+3/3)^3 miles/hour

[Hokulele]

Pff, the answer is clearly 4 (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=91495).

[Ziggurat]

\approx\dfrac{3/3+3/3}{3}(3^.3+3/3)^3(3^.3+3/3)^3(3^.3+3/3)^3 miles/hour

Congratulations. You've just discovered that you can approximate any number using only 3's. Which makes the whole exercise pointless, because you can do that with any number. Your approximation in mph is lower than the true value, and your approximation in m/s is higher than the true value. There is no significance to any of this. Except that you've got an obsessive disorder.

[The Man]

I refuse to read the OP unless I can get it in haiku.

Or maybe limerick.

Ok I’ll give that a shot.

A limerick for Pixie

There once was a Pixie in defiance
Of the physics which his notion lacks compliance
Claiming everything is expanding
Without any understanding
Of that which we call science

A haiku for Skamandros

Three is the secret
Which the universe does keep
Till one after two

[Raze]

For some reason this post gave me a really strong craving for pi :)

That's very irrational.

I saw this and nearly spit my mountain dew all over the screen...





Speed of light is:


\approx\dfrac{3(3^.3+1)^3(3^.3+1)^3(3^.3+1)^3}{3^. 3+1} m/s


so how is that uneverse not binded by the microwavs of 3 in the ricorertle of the dark energy?

Speed of light is

\approx(2+1)(2^.(2^2+1))^{2^.2^2} m/s

Clearly, 2 is the key to everything.

Is better and more beutiful for speed of light:

\approx\dfrac{3(3^.3+\dfrac{3}{3})^3(3^.3+\dfrac{3 }{3})^3(3^.3+\dfrac{3}{3})^3}{3^.3+\dfrac{3}{3}} m/s


:D:eye-poppi

Yeah... suffice to say I think I'm going to like it here...

[The Man]

Welcome to the forum Raze. I think you will not be disappointed.

[IMST]

3 matter partickles neuron proton electron

I suggest you use the first one to see if it might not go with the other two.

[Pixie of key]

math god = medicine man



Scientific experiment

Clock the solar system inside the space. Some people are Near the clock 2000 years and one day. The test, first they were firing rockets fireworks and open champagne indicate start of the experiment. Then they calculate how many times the hand rotate clock during the test

Fair-thousand light-years away in the experiment the participant to wait nearly one thousand years. accelerating pace nearly the speed of light, when her time is spent only one day to move one thousand light-years long way to go.

She believes her telescopes towards the future of information and notice of fireworks rockets near the clock, when he starts to count how many times the clock traveling clock.

Rotate hand attainment of those on board feels that an equal number of times the clock as the clock beside the attainment of those involved? If so, then the clock approaching Globe view has rotated the sun 2000 times in one day? quite a pace on earth?

The ship slows pace close to the clock and stop the clock in front.

Is that people thinking, who move, moving only one light-day length of the journey?

Does the Sun and the Globe he believes that during the trip from smaller?

Does the Sun and the Earth to grow the size of the expansion of his view when he slows down pace = spacechips?

How this relates to www.onesimpleprinciple.com model the universe?

Sorry my terrible english

[skullerello]

No,Pixie, Sun-globe and earth-clock all move different like farther from same.