PDA

View Full Version : Organic vs. Conventional Agriculture


Greg_in_CO
11th August 2009, 09:43 AM
Cue the anecdotal accounts (i.e. "I recently switched to all organic produce and it immediately cured my asthma, arthritis, scurvy, etc.") in 3. . . 2. . . 1 . . .

Marquis de Carabas
11th August 2009, 10:25 AM
I recently switched back to conventionally grown produce and it cured my smug self-righteousness.

Greg_in_CO
11th August 2009, 10:42 AM
I recently switched back to conventionally grown produce and it cured my smug self-righteousness.

:)

Safe-Keeper
11th August 2009, 10:43 AM
Merge with the thread in Science;)?

Nah, never mind, I'm personally fine with a thread here, too.

paximperium
11th August 2009, 10:45 AM
"I recently switched from beer to 100 proof hard liqueur and it immediately made me more drunk."

tyr_13
11th August 2009, 03:32 PM
"I switched from evil corporate synthetic penicillin to all natural penicillin and it immediately made me vomit."

Safe-Keeper
11th August 2009, 03:51 PM
Sorry, saw now that there'd been a new (very well-made) podcast on organic foods. I wondered why there was a new thread here all of a sudden:).

tyr_13
14th August 2009, 08:27 PM
Wow, the comments on this podcast on Brian's site are... colorful.

I wish they would all come here and actually debate the topic.

Safe-Keeper
19th August 2009, 11:51 AM
Is this sub-forum an "official" Skeptoid forum, or more of a "fan" deal? Because I'm wondering if Brian couldn't just slap down a link leading here at the end of each podcast, in addition to letting viewers comment.

tyr_13
19th August 2009, 08:32 PM
It's the 'official' Skeptoid forum. He said it at the end of one or two of his episodes I remember. It's how I found this site in the first place.

Thanks again Mr. Dunning.

blc303
20th August 2009, 02:19 PM
Hi

This is my first post here. Sorry but it has to be slightly negative

While I usually agree with the tone of every podcast, I always have a slight problem with the details. This time I really want to set the record straight.

I agree with most of the points made in the Organic Farming episode, I have to disagree with something.

Brian said, “To make synthetic fertilizer, we start with nitrogen, which we extract from the atmosphere. This process is infinitely sustainable and produces no waste.”

Well, yes. And no. There is more than enough nitrogen (78%) in the atmosphere to keep up production, well, basically, forever. No problem.

Ah, but the waste question?

The “Haber-Bosch” process, used to extract usable nitrogen out of the atmosphere, is hardly wasteless. I would recommend the excellent book “The Alchemy of Air” from Thomas Hager for anyone interested. He quotes statistics that the production of “fixed nitrogen” (ammonia) makes up 1% of the world’s energy consumption (Hardcover, 2008, p 271).

Whether this is worse that cow paddies, with the appropriate amount of methane, is beyond my comprehension and research. But no waste. Sorry. CO2 is a problem.

.There is a not to be denied amount of CO2 produced from ‘non-natural’ fertiliser. A better attacking point would have been the comparison. Carbon Dioxide vs. Methane produced by those very loved natural fertilizer producers (cows/farts).

Never the less, the comment “no waste” is REALLY wrong.

Just wanted to set the record straight.

PS. I would have sent this as a personal message, but as I see it, Brian would prefer it here.

On the other hand he says “Many young people and students have never before been presented with the tools for critical thinking. “ So there it is.

tyr_13
20th August 2009, 09:03 PM
Welcome to the boards.

Aepervius
20th August 2009, 09:34 PM
Cue the anecdotal accounts (i.e. "I recently switched to all organic produce and it immediately cured my asthma, arthritis, scurvy, etc.") in 3. . . 2. . . 1 . . .

I switched to organic and it cured me of having a full wallet ;).

tyr_13
23rd August 2009, 08:28 PM
.There is a not to be denied amount of CO2 produced from ‘non-natural’ fertiliser. A better attacking point would have been the comparison. Carbon Dioxide vs. Methane produced by those very loved natural fertilizer producers (cows/farts).



Well it is worth noting that Brian did mention the fact that we simply don't have enough 'natural' sources to provide us with the need fertilizer.

Even if we did have enough horse/cow/etc crap to be used, the harvesting method would still likely produce a lot of CO2, not to mention methane. It is similar to the problem with local produce.

And no, to those of you thinking it, simply having the cows **** in the field that you're going to use next year for corn doesn't work well enough.