View Full Version : CIT CULT getting a teate of their own medicine.
Bobert
14th August 2009, 04:43 PM
It seems Jenny Sparks who is a truther uncovered info about Craig.
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/company-vistor-melissa-data.html
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/cit-more-company-contacts-inspiriant.html
There seems to be a dissociation on Craigs part and his own behavior.
Craig has 22075 or whatever his handle is that seems to do nothing but uncover personal information on people and it then gets posted on the CIT CULT forum
Now Craig and the CIT CULT are getting a taste of their own medicine.
Needless to say when you visit the CIT CULT treefort Craig is not in the least bit happy about this.
To a normal sane person they would understand that what you dish out will eventually come back to bite you but not Craig.
I normally wouldn't support this type of behavior but the CIT CULT has been engaging in this type of behavior for so long that I dont feel bad for them.
twinstead
14th August 2009, 05:04 PM
Hmmm. truther infighting. What a concept
AJM8125
14th August 2009, 05:05 PM
Wait. A bunch boobs are getting a teate? How's that fair?
Bobert
14th August 2009, 06:09 PM
Wait. A bunch boobs are getting a teate? How's that fair?
Ohhhhhhh man not another typo.
stewieg
14th August 2009, 06:27 PM
Does anyone really expect anything to come of this? My guess is at the most he will get a slap on the wrist and told to stop using company time. It will just mean he will spend even more of his spare time on this bizzare fantasy of his.
David Wong
14th August 2009, 06:29 PM
Where do I nominate this for the best typo in the history of internet forums?
Brainster
14th August 2009, 06:57 PM
Jenny is easily as vile as Craig and Aldo; she may be the worst single human being in the 9-11 Truth Movement. She was the first Troofer I ever banned from commenting at SLC, and none of the antics she's pulled then have made me regret that move.
ElMondoHummus
14th August 2009, 08:01 PM
Look, I know schadenfreude at truthers fighting truthers can seem like a good thing, and shamefully, I've indulged in it too at times. But in spite of that, I'm not really sure this is something that should be celebrated. Conspiracy fantasists getting personal is a shameful, disgusting spectacle, and even though I fully agree that those guys shouldn't have been using their company resources to forward 9/11 conspiracy fantasy, it's just declassé to make the battle public. Even if it's happening to reprehensible personalities. Yes, I realize that Craig does it too, but that doesn't make it right, even when it's right back at him.
This should just be something that's allowed to pass quietly into obscurity. They're objectionable people, but at the same time they're just not that important.
Bobert
14th August 2009, 08:25 PM
sometimes its just best not to turn the other cheek.
dtugg
14th August 2009, 08:29 PM
I think the whole thing is hilarious.
Bobert
14th August 2009, 08:55 PM
Yes its definitely a wonderful soap opera
Bobert
16th August 2009, 08:21 PM
sometimes its just best not to turn the other cheek.
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/single/?p=309176&t=2134814
I don't believe in the death penalty or vengeance but some people just deserve to be punched repeatedly in the face.
To the OP...My guess?...A big rapid wall breaching kit ?... along with any other unidentified explosives...kind of like the "exit hole"...Hollywood style.
Ask the mannequin. He was there already.
http://netdet.ninjasquad.org/images/case1/flight77remains1.jpg
Do not post graphic images without the nsfw tags and do not hotlink images.
~enigma~
16th August 2009, 08:23 PM
sometimes its just best not to turn the other cheek.
You ever seen Erin? I would give her both cheeks and some more :)
Bobert
17th August 2009, 02:37 PM
sorry that was a graphic picture I should have not posted it.
Horatius
17th August 2009, 03:39 PM
sorry that was a graphic picture I should have not posted it.
Now apologize for your avatar!
Bobert
17th August 2009, 04:15 PM
now apologize for your avatar!
lol!
Never!
Lupie
17th August 2009, 08:37 PM
It seems Jenny Sparks who is a truther uncovered info about Craig.
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/company-vistor-melissa-data.html
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/cit-more-company-contacts-inspiriant.html
There seems to be a dissociation on Craigs part and his own behavior.
Craig has 22075 or whatever his handle is that seems to do nothing but uncover personal information on people and it then gets posted on the CIT CULT forum
Now Craig and the CIT CULT are getting a taste of their own medicine.
Needless to say when you visit the CIT CULT treefort Craig is not in the least bit happy about this.
To a normal sane person they would understand that what you dish out will eventually come back to bite you but not Craig.
I normally wouldn't support this type of behavior but the CIT CULT has been engaging in this type of behavior for so long that I dont feel bad for them.
These guys are a seriously odd pair. Craig, comes across as though he may have been a reasonable person at some point. He sounds intelligent, and thoughtful. Yet, he's bent on pushing this agenda of his, no matter the cost, and regardless of whatever possible allies he may permanently push away in his "burn the bridges" campaign.
Aldo on the other hand, seems to have absolutely no redeeming qualities whatsoever. His profane rants, and personal threats, are disgusting. I suppose Craig keeps him around because he see's him as "the muscle" behind their little cottage business. Reminds me of a dull want-to-be mafia enforcer type. He talks loud, and then tucks tail and runs. I understand they work together. Craig, most likely already employed, got the job for his cheerleader/enforcer. Mutually beneficial. Aldo probably has big bills, and Craig needs any kind of support he can get. Sad.
L.
T.A.M.
18th August 2009, 05:14 AM
Colonel Jenny ratting/attacking Craig Ranke?
That is kind of like Hitler hitting Vlad the Impaler with a crowbar.
TAM:)
newton3376
18th August 2009, 07:11 AM
sorry that was a graphic picture I should have not posted it.
Is that picture really from flight 77?
I don't think I have seen many actual photos of the 9-11 victims....
If it's real it's really sad.
16.5
18th August 2009, 07:15 AM
Is that picture really from flight 77?
I don't think I have seen many actual photos of the 9-11 victims....
If it's real it's really sad.
If its real? That is a trial exhibit from the Moussiani trial, it was judicially admitted into evidence after the defendants stipulated to its authenticity.
Bobert linked that photo from the latest mocking the victims thread over at LCF.
ElMondoHummus
18th August 2009, 07:30 AM
Is that picture really from flight 77?
I don't think I have seen many actual photos of the 9-11 victims....
If it's real it's really sad.
If its real? That is a trial exhibit from the Moussiani trial, it was judicially admitted into evidence after the defendants stipulated to its authenticity.
Bobert linked that photo from the latest mocking the victims thread over at LCF.
Unfortunately, it is most definitely a genuine picture. Like 16.5 said, it's from the Moussaoui evidence pool, which can be perused here (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html). The actual image is here (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200045.html) (Warning: Link is of a dead, burnt body).
Some of the other pieces of evidence on the above linked main page of evidence (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html) are uncomfortable and grisly. But they're genuine. While most of the links are rather mundane, the ones labeled "Viewer discretion is advised" are not, and people are well advised to consider whether they want to view them or not.
Grizzly Bear
18th August 2009, 07:34 AM
I'm sorry, but I really don't like discussing those pics... I feel like I'm treating the collapse of the towers trivially as it is when I discuss it, and I just don't like the idea of treating the people themselves in the same way. I wouldn't like the idea of having my relatives brandished like that outside of it being an absolutely necessity to deal with a court case. It's not something I'd be posting randomly on forums (even though the intention in posting them on here isn't malicious like it is on LC)
Pinch
18th August 2009, 07:40 AM
If its real? That is a trial exhibit from the Moussiani trial, it was judicially admitted into evidence after the defendants stipulated to its authenticity.
Bobert linked that photo from the latest mocking the victims thread over at LCF.
Get with the program, 16.5!! Don't you know, as our mutual friend Alpo has asserted, that the bodies found at the Pentagon were actually frozen cadavers shipped in the night before under cover of darkness?
Mr.Herbert
18th August 2009, 07:40 AM
Just following around the links, these truthers hate CIT. They do appear to be receiving the same treatment as no-planers.
I'm not sure if this has been posted here, but there is a web site (Blog)
CIT Watch (http://citwatch.blogspot.com/)
Keeping an Eye on Citizen Investigation Team
....Scott makes clear that while he finds the witness testimony interesting, he has never supported CIT's absurd flyover theory nor does he support their habit of vile ad hominem attacks on witnesses and activists.
Hilarious stuff.
DGM
18th August 2009, 08:05 AM
I'm sorry, but I really don't like discussing those pics... I feel like I'm treating the collapse of the towers trivially as it is when I discuss it, and I just don't like the idea of treating the people themselves in the same way. I wouldn't like the idea of having my relatives brandished like that outside of it being an absolutely necessity to deal with a court case. It's not something I'd be posting randomly on forums (even though the intention in posting them on here isn't malicious like it is on LC)
I agree! I also support the way ElMondoHummus respectfully hid the images. Personally I lost friends in the towers and no longer watch any videos containing the collapses.
That said I think that for respect of the victims we should adopt a policy of "view at your own discretion". Face it, we are not CSI uncovering new ground where analyzing and scrutinizing these images will bring forth any new insight.
Just my $.02
newton3376
18th August 2009, 11:10 AM
If its real? That is a trial exhibit from the Moussiani trial, it was judicially admitted into evidence after the defendants stipulated to its authenticity.
Bobert linked that photo from the latest mocking the victims thread over at LCF.
Gotcha....I didn't know the photos source.....the videos of people falling is enough to drive me to anger so I generally haven't gone looking for victim pics...
So I never saw that one before. Very sad and disturbing.
newton3376
18th August 2009, 11:12 AM
Unfortunately, it is most definitely a genuine picture. Like 16.5 said, it's from the Moussaoui evidence pool, which can be perused here (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html). The actual image is here (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200045.html) (Warning: Link is of a dead, burnt body).
Some of the other pieces of evidence on the above linked main page of evidence (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html) are uncomfortable and grisly. But they're genuine. While most of the links are rather mundane, the ones labeled "Viewer discretion is advised" are not, and people are well advised to consider whether they want to view them or not.
Again....I'm not a truther...
I've never seen those photos before....photos like these make me feel some very strong emotions....especially anger, so I don't go around looking for 9-11 victim pictures.
Bobert
18th August 2009, 12:15 PM
again sorry that I didn't place that picture as a link with a NSFW warning.
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 12:37 PM
Hehe...I just added myself to CIT's hit list :)
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=508&st=45&#entry2306124
Bobert
18th August 2009, 01:11 PM
That is BRILLIANT!
LOL wow Craig is desperate for attention today.
He already responded and started a thread for you to debate him in.
Ok since you showed up and proclaimed yourself a detractor/attacker....
Go ahead and give it your best shot.
Prove the plane was south of the citgo by refuting the evidence we present for a north side approach with independent verifiable evidence of greater strength.
Good luck!
WOW looks like he wants to meet you at the bike racks at 3pm!!!!!!
Mr.Herbert
18th August 2009, 01:20 PM
Hahahaa I just read that.
Alpo is looking for your last name. I guess he wants to know where you live... and raid your refrigerator!
Bobert
18th August 2009, 01:25 PM
LOL that Aldo sure does give CIT Watch all the ammo they need!
Grizzly Bear
18th August 2009, 01:44 PM
Hehe...I just added myself to CIT's hit list :)
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=508&st=45&#entry2306124
You did that for the lulz didn't you?
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 01:50 PM
Yeah..I thought it would be fun. :)
Bobert
18th August 2009, 01:50 PM
I dont know if you guys are aware or not but the NWO is offering 2 for 1 tickets to flavor flav to everyone who posts to that CIT CULT hit list thread. l
ElMondoHummus
18th August 2009, 01:51 PM
Again....I'm not a truther...
Oh, no, I wasn't saying you were. I was just stating that the pictures were genuine, and that it's unfortunate that they were so, that's all.
I've never seen those photos before....photos like these make me feel some very strong emotions....especially anger, so I don't go around looking for 9-11 victim pictures.
Agreed. I have some trouble looking at them myself. Which is why I gave the warning I did above. They're hard to look at. It's like the videos of the jumpers; you're watching the last moments of innocent people who's only mistake that day was to show up to work or their flight as expected. And that's hard to take. "Punch in the gut" doesn't come close to describing the feeling. There are times I just think of the links - not actually view them, but rather just think of those web pages - and the sensations of that day come back rather strong. The utter silence where I work while we watched the event on what was our videoconferencing TV (someone ran out and bought some rabbit ear antennas for it). The co-worker who left the room crying. Me and a buddy after work staring at the TV just saying "that was not right"... a sentence that may read as a total understatement, but is missing the flat heat and emotion we had. Yes... the more explicit evidence links are hard real to view. But they're genuine history.
A person doesn't necessarily need to actually see those images to acknowledge the reality of the day. But they need to acknowledge their existence. And fools who deny the images are beneath contempt.
Grizzly Bear
18th August 2009, 01:53 PM
I dont know if you guys are aware or not but the NWO is offering 2 for 1 tickets to flavor flav to everyone who posts to that CIT CULT hit list thread. l
EDIT: The NWO doesn't pay enough
sylvan8798
18th August 2009, 02:08 PM
It's like the videos of the jumpers; you're watching the last moments of innocent people who's only mistake that day was to show up to work or their flight as expected.
The people who claim the "jumper videos" were fakes are definitely on the bottom of the ct barrel. The underside of the bottom.
16.5
18th August 2009, 02:15 PM
Yeah..I thought it would be fun. :)
Ask them why they don't believe Frank Probst:
A Pentagon renovation worker and retired Army officer, he was inspecting newly installed telecommunications wiring inside the five-story, 6.5-million-square-foot building.
The tall, soft-spoken Probst had a 10 a.m. meeting. About 9:25 a.m., he stopped by the renovation workers' trailer just south of the Pentagon heliport. Someone had a television turned on in the trailer's break room that showed smoke pouring out of the twin towers in New York.
"The Pentagon would make a pretty good target," someone in the break room commented.
The thought stuck with Probst as he picked up his notebook and walked to the North Parking Lot to attend his meeting.
Probst took a sidewalk alongside Route 27, which runs near the Pentagon's western face. Traffic was at a standstill because of a road accident. Then, at about 9:35 a.m., he saw the airliner in the cloudless September sky.
American Airlines Flight 77 approached from the west, coming in low over the nearby five-story Navy Annex on a hill overlooking the Pentagon.
"He has lights off, wheels up, nose down," Probst recalled. The plane seemed to be accelerating directly toward him. He froze.
"I knew I was dead," he said later. "The only thing I thought was, 'Damn, my wife has to go to another funeral, and I'm not going to see my two boys again.'."
He dove to his right. He recalls the engine passing on one side of him, about six feet away.
The plane's right wing went through a generator trailer "like butter," Probst said. The starboard engine hit a low cement wall and blew apart.
BigAl
18th August 2009, 02:39 PM
It seems Jenny Sparks who is a truther uncovered info about Craig.
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/company-vistor-melissa-data.html
http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/cit-more-company-contacts-inspiriant.html
There seems to be a dissociation on Craigs part and his own behavior.
Craig has 22075 or whatever his handle is that seems to do nothing but uncover personal information on people and it then gets posted on the CIT CULT forum
Now Craig and the CIT CULT are getting a taste of their own medicine.
Needless to say when you visit the CIT CULT treefort Craig is not in the least bit happy about this.
To a normal sane person they would understand that what you dish out will eventually come back to bite you but not Craig.
I normally wouldn't support this type of behavior but the CIT CULT has been engaging in this type of behavior for so long that I dont feel bad for them.
I don't follow the CIT bunch and the no-planers at the Pentagon because I know that an entire Flight 77 and passengers was found inside the crash site.
Reading the above, it sounds like the CITers are not arguing that Flt77 didn't hit the Pentagon, it just didn't take the path that the standard story says did.
Did I get that right? What aspect of "inside job" that would prove, I dunno.
beachnut
18th August 2009, 03:24 PM
Yeah..I thought it would be fun. :) They missed the fact you implied jokes debunk CIT effectively; CIT is a joke.
... dirt dumb admin at CIT super nut case conspiracy club calls you out.
You said: "I'm more of a Lurker at Jref, not really a debunker..I crack more jokes than I do present evidence."
That seems to imply that you're not a serious researcher of the subject, does it not? If not (i.e. if you really claim to have thoroughly studied the evidence CIT has uncovered) then go to the debate thread and prove it.
Now you have to prove you can debunk their delusions? They are so dumb the admin don't know their own web site is based on lies and your jokes debunk their failed no evidence delusions. Sad there are more people who have idiotic ideas at CIT than the two failed investigators.
Wait the admin person at the CIT delusion suppository station is an "Investigangsta". Wowzer. No wonder he is upset with your jokes about his failed delusions. He is an Investigangsta! The CIT super-nano-admin are naturals at jokes. Is he a Ranke sock-puppet?
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 05:41 PM
Guess they didn't want me. Looks like I've been IP banned. I can't even view my own thread anymore.
Why would they invite me to a debate..even start a thread in my honor, and not even let me post anything? I expressed interest in their theory, and explained I had questions to ask about it. I was cordial, polite, and friendly...and I had some genuine questions to ask them.
Oh well...Geez...even Bill Smith can attest that when I'm actually discussing 9/11, instead of just joking around, that I'm always respectful to the person I'm speaking with.
I guess I'll try to email Craig and ask him why.
Hokulele
18th August 2009, 05:53 PM
Why would they invite me to a debate..even start a thread in my honor, and not even let me post anything?
Hmm, I wonder...
I expressed interest in their theory, and explained I had questions to ask about it. I was cordial, polite, and friendly...and I had some genuine questions to ask them.
Yep, that's exactly why. ;)
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 06:21 PM
Well, I sent Craig a polite email asking why I was banned. If you can still see that thread, please let me know if they update it...since I no longer can see it. :(
Hokulele
18th August 2009, 06:29 PM
The "debate" thread is pretty much just your question(s), and the HitList thread is just a comment stating satisfaction with continuing the debate in the debate thread. There is no mention of a ban, and your user name doesn't indicate that you have been banned or anything.
In other words, same ol' nuthin' going on over there.
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 06:41 PM
The "debate" thread is pretty much just your question(s), and the HitList thread is just a comment stating satisfaction with continuing the debate in the debate thread. There is no mention of a ban, and your user name doesn't indicate that you have been banned or anything.
In other words, same ol' nuthin' going on over there.
Thanks Hok, you rock.
Dang it...I spent my entire hour and a half ride home from work formulating my questions...and then I don't get to post them.
I got that "all dressed up and no where to go" kinda feeling...(sob...Hok..hand me some tissue)
Hokulele
18th August 2009, 06:44 PM
Hang on, I'll see if I can find some that hasn't been used.
Grizzly Bear
18th August 2009, 06:59 PM
Thanks Hok, you rock.
Dang it...I spent my entire hour and a half ride home from work formulating my questions...and then I don't get to post them.
I got that "all dressed up and no where to go" kinda feeling...(sob...Hok..hand me some tissue)
CIT
Board Message
Sorry, an error occurred. If you are unsure on how to use a feature, or don't know why you got this error message, try looking through the help files for more information.
The error returned was:
Sorry, you are not permitted to use this board
ETA: nhmmmmmmm.... Bricks have been absolutely crapped after seeing this message
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 07:03 PM
Update: I heard back from Craig. I wasn't banned. Apparently my home IP address is really close to some other IP banned person, so I got lumped in.
So were all good. I'll just post at work tomorrow and be a productive employee. :)
Hokulele
18th August 2009, 07:03 PM
If they wanted to IP ban me, they would have to block most of the commercial traffic in my state plus a good percentage of the largest educational network out here. Of course, that certainly isn't as impressive as Oliver managing to get an entire country IP blocked from the original Loose Change forum (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=1939069#post1939069).
Boone 870
18th August 2009, 07:19 PM
Guess they didn't want me. Looks like I've been IP banned. I can't even view my own thread anymore.
Oh, wow. In Craig's first response to your post he says, "since you are one of the VERY few jrefugees who have had the cajones to show up here, I'll start a debate thread for you in the discussion section."
Then he bans you...?
Not surprising, really. I signed up at PFT and in a thread with less than three pages, Craig and Aldo suggested that I be banned on four separate occasions. Then Cap'n FatHead stepped in with all of his glory and might and threatened to ban me if I didn't play 200 questions with the CITwins. So much for taking their "opposition" head-on.
Craig may have finally come to his senses and prevented himself from posting something as dumb as , again:
originally posted by Craig Ranke, CIT
Why have you ignored Darrell, Darius, and Donald since July of 2008?
Why have you been pretending like their corroborated accounts mean nothing?
Hmmmmm perhaps because they have a different skin color than you boone? Could that be it? If not that than what?? Please inform the readers.
Oh guess what? Erik Dihle is white and he perfectly corroborates them. [url=http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?s=&showtopic=16538&view=findpost&p=10767054]Source (]this[/url)
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 07:27 PM
Oh, wow. In Craig's first response to your post he says, "since you are one of the VERY few jrefugees who have had the cajones to show up here, I'll start a debate thread for you in the discussion section."
Then he bans you...?
Not surprising, really. I signed up at PFT and in a thread with less than three pages, Craig and Aldo suggested that I be banned on four separate occasions. Then Cap'n FatHead stepped in with all of his glory and might and threatened to ban me if I didn't play 200 questions with the CITwins. So much for taking their "opposition" head-on.
Craig may have finally come to his senses and prevented himself from posting something as dumb as , again:
[url=http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?s=&showtopic=16538&view=findpost&p=10767054]Source (]this[/url)
No...I was not banned...I repeat..I was not banned. You can burn Craig for alot of things...but not this one...purely a technical issue.
Horatius
18th August 2009, 07:33 PM
Update: I heard back from Craig. I wasn't banned. Apparently my home IP address is really close to some other IP banned person, so I got lumped in.
So were all good. I'll just post at work tomorrow and be a productive employee. :)
Drat, and here I was, all set with a "You should have worn a shirt" joke.
:mad:
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 07:45 PM
They fixed my IP issue, dang...what was I going to say again? :)
Bobert
18th August 2009, 07:52 PM
So easy to just use a proxy.
Bobert
18th August 2009, 07:57 PM
Oh Craig you are THE MASTER at baffling them with ********!
I suppose but we can't help the fact that people are in a psychological vortex of denial of the clear implications of the rock solid north side evidence.
Macgyver1968
18th August 2009, 08:28 PM
Well..i got to post my questions...let's see what kind of answer we get.
16.5
18th August 2009, 09:42 PM
I do enjoy it when the boys go crazy when you call their silly little theory, a "theory."
They just take things where the evidence leads them, except for, well lets just list the things that Craig wants you to take on faith:
1. a world psychological operation of mass murder.
2. a crime
3. powerful sociopaths who have the resources to commit... a crime of this nature.
4. Complete control of the damage to their own headquarters
5. and who was murdered down to surgical precision.
6. If it WAS Flight 77 it would be impossible to pull off the way they did in the area they did due to the complex topography and landscape making it so.
7.This is why only 125 people were killed inside the building when if any other part was actually hit by a plane, thousands would have died.
8. They could have easily commissioned the renovation contractors to create a couple of "top secret" rooms and even had them move a bunch of "top secret" crates full of plane parts in them and the contractors would have been none the wiser.
9. As far as decent sized pieces outside, there weren't many and they were suspiciously uncharred.
10. NONE of these pieces have been positively identified to Flt 77.
11. The semi-large pieces outside could have easily been planted during all the chaos.
Hmmm, no theory, huh?
Bobert
18th August 2009, 11:09 PM
Oh SNAP Macgyver1968 (http://forums.randi.org/member.php?u=30083) have you watched their videos yet?
The CIT CULT is now going into, "have you watched every second of every one of our videos" mode.
16.5
19th August 2009, 07:11 AM
By the way, now that we know the boys are watching, ask them when they intend to release their entire unedited videos on torrent like they promised and promised.
Ask them about Frank Probst.
Ask Aldo when he is going to "kick my teeth in." Hee hee!
Stellafane
19th August 2009, 10:34 AM
By the way, now that we know the boys are watching...
You say the CIT boys are watching? Good, because I have a very serious question for them: Do you guys know you're insane? I mean, you've got to have at least some inkling. Because this whole Pentagon flyover, it's not just your garden-variety MIHOP-level silliness. It's all-out, space-beam-and-faces-in-the-smoke, screaming raving looney crazy, with a huge dollop of stupid thrown in. Surely anyone with the mental wherewithal to remember to breathe once in a while would have enough self-awareness (however dim) to detect nuttiness of that mind-boggling magnitude...right?
EvilBiker
19th August 2009, 01:12 PM
You say the CIT boys are watching? Good, because I have a very serious question for them: Do you guys know you're insane? I mean, you've got to have at least some inkling. Because this whole Pentagon flyover, it's not just your garden-variety MIHOP-level silliness. It's all-out, space-beam-and-faces-in-the-smoke, screaming raving looney crazy, with a huge dollop of stupid thrown in. Surely anyone with the mental wherewithal to remember to breathe once in a while would have enough self-awareness (however dim) to detect nuttiness of that mind-boggling magnitude...right?
It's all about the Benjamins, dude.
And the Truth. Yes, the Truth. Our Truth.
Myself, I'm having a total howl over the following:
1. How the Pft site seems to have a reincarnating Chipin! patch which tends to attract a couple of bucks every 2 weeks. I get the impression that Captain Bob is seeding it like a beggar will put in a few coins into his tin can so it makes a noise when he shakes it.
2. The CIT hanger-on Dom keeps on starting threads over at LCF which garner little to no response from the truthers in general. He's really trying to get his Shanksville conspiracy off the ground, but it just does not seem to want to lift off.
scissorhands
19th August 2009, 03:21 PM
It's all about the Benjamins, dude.
And the Truth. Yes, the Truth. Our Truth.
Myself, I'm having a total howl over the following:
1. How the Pft site seems to have a reincarnating Chipin! patch which tends to attract a couple of bucks every 2 weeks. I get the impression that Captain Bob is seeding it like a beggar will put in a few coins into his tin can so it makes a noise when he shakes it.
2. The CIT hanger-on Dom keeps on starting threads over at LCF which garner little to no response from the truthers in general. He's really trying to get his Shanksville conspiracy off the ground, but it just does not seem to want to lift off.
Poor Dom, hes trying very hard to become a fullblown CIT CULT leader with his ridiculous Shanksville "research".
Ranke and Alpo keep ignoring him.
Maybe he needs to do some more witness interviews with leading questions, or harrass some flight 93 victims families about their loved ones final phone calls.
Bobert
19th August 2009, 04:03 PM
I still cant get over the whole idea of flight 77 flying over the pentagon but with that being said Aldo's notion that frozen cadavers were planted the night before just makes me giggle.
Oh yes and the remote contr5ol piloted flight 77 nutters are infiltrating the CIT CULT threads over at LCF.
They speculate that it could have been a smaller plane painted to look like flight 77 that was flown into the pentagon.
DGM
19th August 2009, 04:06 PM
I still cant get over the whole idea of flight 77 flying over the pentagon but with that being said Aldo's notion that frozen cadavers were planted the night before just makes me giggle.
Oh yes and the remote contr5ol piloted flight 77 nutters are infiltrating the CIT CULT threads over at LCF.
They speculate that it could have been a smaller plane painted to look like flight 77 that was flown into the pentagon.
"Frozen cadavers"? I shouldn't ask but, really?
NoZed Avenger
19th August 2009, 04:45 PM
"Frozen cadavers"? I shouldn't ask but, really?
Flee. That way lies madness.
Justin39640
19th August 2009, 05:32 PM
"Frozen cadavers"? I shouldn't ask but, really?
actually i watched something on the military history channel the other day
it was the story of the dead body the allies drifted over with fake documents, that the germans found and fell for (nice)
one of the problems they had was they couldnt freeze a cadaver, it had to be refrigerated
that gave about a 4 month window to get the mission ready (cause they had candidate cadavers)
they said if they froze the body it would have noticeable changes to the cell structure or something like that and that would blow the missions cover
so i would assume in 2001 any ME would be able to tell if a body was frozen or not
DGM
19th August 2009, 05:40 PM
actually i watched something on the military history channel the other day
it was the story of the dead body the allies drifted over with fake documents, that the germans found and fell for (nice)
one of the problems they had was they couldnt freeze a cadaver, it had to be refrigerated
that gave about a 4 month window to get the mission ready (cause they had candidate cadavers)
they said if they froze the body it would have noticeable changes to the cell structure or something like that and that would blow the missions cover
so i would assume in 2001 any ME would be able to tell if a body was frozen or not
And you might think the people working there might wonder why all these frozen dead people are there when they came to work that morning.:boggled: (or do they claim they were "in on it" too)
Bobert
19th August 2009, 05:57 PM
And you might think the people working there might wonder why all these frozen dead people are there when they came to work that morning.:boggled: (or do they claim they were "in on it" too)
No!!!!!
You see according to Craig's latest INSANITY the frozen cadavers could have been placed into the "secret rooms" that the contractors built
They could have easily commissioned the renovation contractors to create a couple of "top secret" rooms and even had them move a bunch of "top secret" crates full of plane parts in them and the contractors would have been none the wiser.It really takes a special kind of ********** in the head to come up with this crap.
ETA: In the past Craig claimed DIRECTLY on a radio program that the contractors were in on it and planted explosives.
Cl1mh4224rd
19th August 2009, 06:04 PM
My personal theory is that everything was stuffed into an extradimensional pocket. The explosion everyone witnessed was a Hollywood-type effect to cover up the quantum dynamite that ripped open this pocket, causing it to spew forth its contents.
There was no real investigation done, because it would have been discovered that the plane parts were actually from Flight 19 and the DNA was that of Jimmy Hoffa.
Pinch
19th August 2009, 06:10 PM
"Frozen cadavers"? I shouldn't ask but, really?
Alpo's comment is in this PfT link. (http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum//index.php?showtopic=13950)
The quote is thus:
The Pentagon was under “renovation” in the EXACT section that was allegedly hit by a jet filled with “passengers, luggage, and plane parts”. The “renovation” was scheduled for completion that week and there were lots of UNOCCUPIED spaces at the Pentagon. This would allow the perfect opportunity to plant incendiary devices or projectiles within or outside of the Pentagon and would allow them to plant even the most simple of things such as luggage and plane parts. The most puzzling would be passengers in seats, and again this could be a lie, a mistake, or they actually went so far as to plant a section of seats with cadavers waiting to be blown up or engulfed in flames. Obviously they were bringing in large pieces of equipment and furniture, so a large crate with freshly unfrozen cadavers being wheeled into an unoccupied room could go undetected the day before 9/11.
Seriously...one sick person. That one needs therapy for more than his eating disorder.
Scott Sommers
19th August 2009, 06:12 PM
So I join the JREFF because I have some questions about the social structure of TM beliefs. In fact, I was surprised that people who believe in this conspiracy crap are members and able to respond to my questions.
But it is has been interesting to me. I have learned that there are young American men who believe that no planes crashed into the WTC on 911. Some believe the WTC was destroyed by giant ray guns in space or undetectable nuclear weapons. The most prominent idea now is that a superduper super secret chemical explosive was used, but in fact, knowledge about this superduper super secret weapon is just as secret as knowledge about the big ray gun in space.
I learned that some members of the TM believe planeloads of people have been vanished without even a single trace. They left messages to their families but these have been faked and that probably their family members know about the vanishings and the faked messages and playing along. There are also members of the NYFD who on 911 pretended they didn't know the WTC was scheduled for demolition by the superduppy super secret weapons and let their friends, colleagues, or even relatives rush into the WTC and die.
And now I learn that cadavers were stored somewhere, stuffed full of fake ID, and then planted in the destroyed buildings or Pentagon crash to mislead investogators.
And they wonder why we call them truthtards.
Bobert
19th August 2009, 06:43 PM
Yet according to the CIT CULT members Marquis and Ranke they are victims who are being mistreated and marginalized by the MSM and members of the TM.
jaydeehess
20th August 2009, 12:21 PM
The plane obviously flew UNDER the Pentagon by using an alien tech which vibrated the constituent strings of the mass of the aircraft allowing it to slip through the structure and the earth and re-emerge in the Bermuda triangle.
I have in the past attempted to get the CiT to recognize this and the error of their ways, to no avail.<<sighs>>
Stellafane
20th August 2009, 02:08 PM
So I join the JREFF because I have some questions about the social structure of TM beliefs. In fact, I was surprised that people who believe in this conspiracy crap are members and able to respond to my questions.
But it is has been interesting to me. I have learned that there are young American men who believe that no planes crashed into the WTC on 911. Some believe the WTC was destroyed by giant ray guns in space or undetectable nuclear weapons. The most prominent idea now is that a superduper super secret chemical explosive was used, but in fact, knowledge about this superduper super secret weapon is just as secret as knowledge about the big ray gun in space.
I learned that some members of the TM believe planeloads of people have been vanished without even a single trace. They left messages to their families but these have been faked and that probably their family members know about the vanishings and the faked messages and playing along. There are also members of the NYFD who on 911 pretended they didn't know the WTC was scheduled for demolition by the superduppy super secret weapons and let their friends, colleagues, or even relatives rush into the WTC and die.
And now I learn that cadavers were stored somewhere, stuffed full of fake ID, and then planted in the destroyed buildings or Pentagon crash to mislead investogators.
And they wonder why we call them truthtards.
To paraphrase Barney Frank, arguing with Truthers is like arguing with a dining room table. A really stupid and demented dining room table.
DGM
20th August 2009, 02:12 PM
No!!!!!
You see according to Craig's latest INSANITY the frozen cadavers could have been placed into the "secret rooms" that the contractors built
It really takes a special kind of ********** in the head to come up with this crap.
ETA: In the past Craig claimed DIRECTLY on a radio program that the contractors were in on it and planted explosives.
OH..... K!!!!! That's all I can say.
Mr.Herbert
20th August 2009, 03:17 PM
ETA: In the past Craig claimed DIRECTLY on a radio program that the contractors were in on it and planted explosives.
I was the one on the radio and confronted Ranke about this. He didn't say definitely that they were in on it, but he said that they more than likely assisted in the supir duper majic twick. I don't have a link to the radio show, but there is a call out thread for me on the Pentacon website with a link to it.
Keep in mind that was a bout a year ago and Ranke promised to interview the contractors that were there during the renovation.
jaydeehess
20th August 2009, 04:30 PM
To paraphrase Barney Frank, arguing with Truthers is like arguing with a dining room table. A really stupid and demented dining room table.
I saw some of Mr.Frank's comments which you are paraphrasing. The man certainly has a quick wit. Too bad more politicians are not as good at saying what they mean.
carlitos
21st August 2009, 01:24 PM
Well..i got to post my questions...let's see what kind of answer we get.
They are looking for you over there...
jaydeehess
21st August 2009, 05:13 PM
Hehe...I just added myself to CIT's hit list :)
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=508&st=45&#entry2306124
<<sighs>> I guess I am not important enough yet..........
BTW, soooo that's the context of your picture. I had been curious about the forward lean.
Macgyver1968
22nd August 2009, 05:00 PM
So..i've been engaging the CIT boys...I came with nothing but respect, and civility. They ended up deleting my post that didn't fit their agenda.
Did i accept nothing anything less...of course not.
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=702&st=45&#entry2308392
Cl1mh4224rd
22nd August 2009, 05:09 PM
Hah. I believe the label "fascist pigs" applies...
Bobert
22nd August 2009, 06:04 PM
YOU DID view EVERY SINGLE SECOND.OF EVERY VIDEO the CIT CULT kids made,right?
Bobert
22nd August 2009, 06:17 PM
Aaaah poor widdle Waldo.
I don't think he is going to drink a,"40" with you now!
Macgyver1968
22nd August 2009, 06:38 PM
I've been really banned now. Guess Aldo couldn't handle me. ***** Pussy.
Justin39640
22nd August 2009, 07:55 PM
I've been really banned now. Guess Aldo couldn't handle me. ***** Pussy.
what did you expect
mental midgets were gonna act civil and rationally? lol
bje
22nd August 2009, 08:07 PM
So..i've been engaging the CIT boys...I came with nothing but respect, and civility. They ended up deleting my post that didn't fit their agenda.
Did i accept nothing anything less...of course not.
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=702&st=45&#entry2308392
Good job, Macgyver - I read the whole thread and had a good chuckle. You hit the obvious points, including the lack of eyewitnesses to a flyover. I've confronted them on that one aspect alone for almost 3 years and they cannot address it, and simply refuse to.
But I also note that they have now painted themselves into a corner even more on the lack of "flyover" eyewitnesses by using - for the first time - a photoshopped image representing the actual supposed flyover:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/thum_159394a90a10347d02.jpg (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=17388)
http://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/videos-htpio.html
This is the image at the beginning of their supplemental video, ""The Pentagon Flyover: How They Pulled It Off."
The image demonstrates the obvious: any "flyover" would have been easily visible from all around the Pentagon. Only from the perspective that CIT wants everyone to focus on only, that is from the approach side, would a "flyover" jet be obscured by an "explosion." However, the situation at the time is well documented with hundreds of people in traffic on the freeways, bridges, and in the parking lots all around the Pentagon. And not a single eyewitness or media report of any flyover???
And CIT made the mistake of representing it.
See the view shed analysis posted a year ago showing the geopgraphic area within a two-mile radius from which a person could see a jet 100 feet above the central courtyard:
http://forums.randi.org/imagehosting/thum_159394a90a3ada9143.jpg (http://forums.randi.org/vbimghost.php?do=displayimg&imgid=17389)
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread378783/pg50#pid4823797
Then watch CIT's video I linked to above and see how they skirted the issue, and stupidly misrepresented the actual altitude - by putting the C-130 in the place of their "decoy flyover" jet "...for anyone who may have seen the decoy jet fly away from the Pentagon."
CIT is participating in this NYC conference next month:
http://wedemandtransparency.com/
I think anyone that can go should do so - and let CIT know ahead of time that you will be there to ask them some "hard" questions about their lack of actual "flyover" eyewitnesses.
16.5
22nd August 2009, 09:36 PM
I've been really banned now. Guess Aldo couldn't handle me. ***** Pussy.
They banned you?
Wow, they really are wimps.
Anyhow, did you ever ask the Investaeater and his sidekicks when they are going to release the full unedited videos like they promised they would do?
Bobert
23rd August 2009, 04:16 AM
They are too busy fighting their various battles with other truth groups to be bothered with that promised release
Macgyver1968
23rd August 2009, 06:48 AM
And now they unbanned me again...I wish they would make up their mind. Oh well...I had my fun...and I did run into a friend of mine from another board, it was nice to talk with him again.
Childlike Empress
23rd August 2009, 06:48 AM
Col. Sparks has written a follow-up just for you
It was a bit of a surprise to find JREF interested
The Truth About 911truth: Welcome to the Meat Grinder (http://coljennysparks.blogspot.com/2009/08/truth-about-911truth-welcome-to-meat.html)
stewieg
23rd August 2009, 09:08 AM
Ranke and his pal Aldo are probably two of the more despicable truthers out there. Their habit of going after people who disagree with them is well known. Unfortanetly, or maybe fortanetly, for them most people have no idea who they are and could care less what they have to say. Have any of the people who they have gone after online lost their job or were shunned by friends and family? Does not seem to be the case.
And why is this, because they are two pathetic little trools who waste their time and money on paranoid fantasies.
EvilBiker
23rd August 2009, 03:12 PM
And now they unbanned me again...
You probably doubled their website hits...
Childlike Empress
27th August 2009, 08:49 PM
And now they unbanned me again...I wish they would make up their mind. Oh well...I had my fun...and I did run into a friend of mine from another board, it was nice to talk with him again.
Just read your exchange over there. Had my fun too. Hilarious. Went something like this:
MacGyver: Hey, it's me!
CIT: Hey MacGyver, wassup, wanna discuss our research?
MacGyver: Sure. So, your theory is bunk.
CIT: Well, we have facts and did try to build a theory on it. Do you know the facts?
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk.
CIT: Well, we appreciate you coming up with a better theory. Did you review the facts yet?
MacGyver: Well not really, i'll do.
CIT: Great, we're happy to discuss it.
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk. You SO HARD want to believe it.
CIT: Uhm, looked at the edivence yet?
MacGyver: Well, will take me some time, i have ADD and it's an 81 minutes video. But your theroy is bunk.
CIT: K, take your time and come back.
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk and it would be nice if you could break that lengthy video down to a youtube summary for me.
CIT: READ UP ON THE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU DISCUSS THEORIES!
MacGyver: Meh, your mean. And your theory sucks.
CIT gets angry
Stick to drinking at the pool.
16.5
27th August 2009, 08:54 PM
Just read your exchange over there. Had my fun too. Hilarious. Went something like this:
MacGyver: Hey, it's me!
CIT: Hey MacGyver, wassup, wanna discuss our research?
MacGyver: Sure. So, your theory is bunk.
CIT: Well, we have facts and did try to build a theory on it. Do you know the facts? BUT IT IS NOT A TERORY IT IS DA TWOOF!!!
DELETED POSTS
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk.
CIT: Well, we appreciate you coming up with a better theory. Did you review the facts yet?
MacGyver: Well not really, i'll do. BUT IT IS NOT A TERORY IT IS DA TWOOF!!!
CIT: Great, we're happy to discuss it.BUT IT IS NOT A TERORY IT IS DA TWOOF!!!
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk. You SO HARD want to believe it.
DELETED POSTS
CIT: Uhm, have you studied every single second of all of our fake videos?BUT IT IS NOT A TERORY IT IS DA TWOOF!!!
MacGyver: Well, will take me some time, i have ADD and it's an 81 minutes video. But your theroy is bunk.
DELETED POSTS
CIT: K, take your time and come back. BUT MAKE SURE YOU WATCH EVERY SINGLE SECOND.
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk and it would be nice if you could break that lengthy video down to a youtube summary for me.
DELETED POSTS
CIT: READ UP ON THE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU DISCUSS THEORIES!BUT IT IS NOT A TERORY IT IS DA TWOOF!!!
MacGyver: Meh, your mean. And your theory sucks.
CIT gets angry
Stick to drinking at the pool.
Fixed that for you!
CE, I had no idea that you were a Pentagon No Planer. Don't you wonder why so many Truthers HATE CIT?? Hmmm? I can't believe you called it a "theory" the Boys are going to be very very mad at you!!!! You sure you read the thread, Champ?
Tell you what, why don't you tell fatty and Peter Pan to release their unedited videos or STFU.
Or just go back to drinking the Kool Aid.
KTHXBY!
Justin39640
27th August 2009, 09:03 PM
Just read your exchange over there. Had my fun too. Hilarious. Went something like this:
MacGyver: Hey, it's me!
CIT: Hey MacGyver, wassup, wanna discuss our research?
MacGyver: Sure. So, your theory is bunk.
CIT: Well, we have facts and did try to build a theory on it. Do you know the facts?
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk.
CIT: Well, we appreciate you coming up with a better theory. Did you review the facts yet?
MacGyver: Well not really, i'll do.
CIT: Great, we're happy to discuss it.
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk. You SO HARD want to believe it.
CIT: Uhm, looked at the edivence yet?
MacGyver: Well, will take me some time, i have ADD and it's an 81 minutes video. But your theroy is bunk.
CIT: K, take your time and come back.
MacGyver: Your theory is bunk and it would be nice if you could break that lengthy video down to a youtube summary for me.
CIT: READ UP ON THE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU DISCUSS THEORIES!
MacGyver: Meh, your mean. And your theory sucks.
CIT gets angry
Stick to drinking at the pool.
hes right
its bunk
Childlike Empress
27th August 2009, 09:06 PM
Very clever responses, folks. Carry on.
16.5
27th August 2009, 09:10 PM
very clever responses, folks. Carry on.
deleted post
AJM8125
27th August 2009, 09:18 PM
Tell you what, why don't you tell fatty and Peter Pan to release their unedited videos or STFU.
Is it any wonder they want to kick your teeth in? Remind me never to cross you. I just about fell out of my chair from laughing.
Extra brutal!
:dl: X 10
Justin39640
27th August 2009, 09:21 PM
Is it any wonder they want to kick your teeth in? Remind me never to cross you. I just about fell out of my chair from laughing.
Extra brutal!
:dl: X 10
i had a good LOL at "Investaeater"
keep up the good work 16.5
UNLoVedRebel
27th August 2009, 09:22 PM
ALDO: Did you bring food?
MACGUYVER: No.
ALDO: You've been Banned.
Childlike Empress
27th August 2009, 09:24 PM
Removed breach of Rule 12
UNLoVedRebel
27th August 2009, 09:29 PM
Removed breach of Rule 12
What do you think of CIT's .........uhm....research. Is it up there with 9/11 Press for Truth and The Eternal Jew?
16.5
27th August 2009, 09:54 PM
Removed breach of Rule 12
Shortly Aldo will awake from his food coma (3 for 1 Buckets of Chicken Fried Steak tonight!) and will go into a rage that you DARED to call CIT's idiocy a "theory."
Expect to land on page 5 of "Faces to the Name" a/k/a Aldo's menu for after the revolution.
/I can't believe that you were that big of a sucker to fail to realize that the Tree Fort Boys completely edited out anything Remotely harmful to their stupid theory.
//Uh oh, I called it a Theory! Big trouble! Too bad they can't Investa-gangster-google 16.5, huh?
///Silly No Planers are Silly
Childlike Empress
27th August 2009, 09:56 PM
Keep it coming.
dtugg
27th August 2009, 10:01 PM
CE, do you think that keeping an enemies list with photos is acceptable behavior?
Personally, I think it's hilarious that the are so far gone that they resort to something like that. Hell, I gave them a picture of me and asked them to put it up (and they did).
16.5
27th August 2009, 10:05 PM
Keep it coming.
Hey CE, I was just over at the Loose Change Forums, and they had a very important review of Loose Change 2 and Half, The Half is for Half the Errors!
You should go check it out!
Just don't call it a Theory!
/I can't believe you fell for CIT's scam, sucker.
Childlike Empress
27th August 2009, 10:07 PM
@dtugg: Their names and faces are known. Given the amount of **** thrown at them, i have no problem with that "Face to the Name"-Thread. They've explained it several times. You only gave them your picture, you weren't able or williing to add anything of substance to the discussion, were you?
btw, your avatar looks like a glasshouse to me, kid.
Bobert
27th August 2009, 10:15 PM
Aldo is such a DJ
dtugg
27th August 2009, 10:15 PM
@dtugg: Their names and faces are known. Given the amount of **** thrown at them, i have no problem with that "Face to the Name"-Thread. They've explained it several times.
So you're as far gone as them. Thanks for clearing it up.
You only gave them your picture, you weren't able or williing to add anything of substance to the discussion, were you?
I used to beat up on their sock before he got banned. Their retarded "theory" is self debunking, so there isn't even a need for us to do it. I just did it because I think the whole thing is funny.
btw, your avatar looks like a glasshouse to me, kid.
You don't see a difference between maintaining a list w/pictures of your "enemies" and making fun of some asshat? You have problems.
16.5
27th August 2009, 10:17 PM
@dtugg: Their names and faces are known. Given the amount of **** thrown at them, i have no problem with that "Face to the Name"-Thread. They've explained it several times. You only gave them your picture, you weren't able or williing to add anything of substance to the discussion, were you?
btw, your avatar looks like a glasshouse to me, kid.
Aww, you sticking up for them? Lets take a look at Aldo's contribution to that thread shall we?
"What the **** ever chump, you ADD havin traitorous piece of ****. Get the **** on.
Be sure and look us up if we are ever in Dallas, we can make some 3X5 cards in crayon for you."
That folks is authentic "urban" gibberish, spoken by one hard core freaking software salesman.
Hey your hero is sparkling like a gem! Oh wait, never mind, he knocked a bowl of melted butter all over himself.
Lupie
27th August 2009, 10:53 PM
Aldo and Craig are so predictable, and so easily manipulated, that it's just hilarious. They should just have some universal filter on their ridiculous near-zero traffic site that blocks the word "theory". I swear, if you even begin to utter that word anywhere on their site, or within earshot in public, they both pitch a fit worthy of an Exorcist sequel. "It's not a THEORY! It's TROOF! NO DEBATE! WE HAVE EVIDENCE! YOU'LL SEE..."
Blah blah, well, you know. I'm waiting for Aldo to finally give up on his rather shaky career as a "whistleblower", and suddenly show up on some Jenny Craig weight loss infomercial at 2 am. I can hear him now-
"You WILL lose weight you treasonous blankety blank coward! Now, somebody give me a blanking doughnut and show me where the blanking buffet is blank-it!"
R.Mackey
27th August 2009, 11:07 PM
I have to say, I'm a little puzzled at Childlike's reaction.
I mean, I would agree that you guys seem to obsess over the Aldo and Craig Show much more than is healthy, and I've recommended for years that they should simply be ignored.
But on the other hand, she's frequently wondered (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=2064743#post2064743) about professional disinformation agents in the Truth Movement -- seemingly rational people with such fantastic stories that they "have" to be either barking mad, or being paid to act loopy, if you believe in that kind of thing (which I don't).
So here's what I don't get: If there's anyone who's "disinfo," it's these guys. A stupider theory (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=3966936#post3966936), or a more fervent defense thereof, is difficult to find.
What am I missing? Are they too crazy to be "disinfo," or what?
tuc0
28th August 2009, 12:08 AM
I also think a lot of people here are giving them exactly what they want: attention. I mean, they debunked themselves before even releasing their first video (and their 'How They did it' page is absolutely hilarious), so why bother so much? Is it because they love to get personal and give you an easy opportunity to exchange insults and arguments over nothing? Don't fat jokes ever get old?
Longfellow
28th August 2009, 09:25 AM
R.Mackey and tuc0's posts mirror my thoughts on this matter.
I must admit that every time I see a thread singling out the Citizen Investigation Team I have to shake my head. Why smart people waste time on charlatans and the willfully ignorant is beyond me. Those losers aren't worth the effort! When someone here starts a thread about what's going on there they are, in my opinion, validating the existence of the CIT.
This is the wrong message to send.
16.5
28th August 2009, 10:04 AM
I also think a lot of people here are giving them exactly what they want: attention. I mean, they debunked themselves before even releasing their first video (and their 'How They did it' page is absolutely hilarious), so why bother so much? Is it because they love to get personal and give you an easy opportunity to exchange insults and arguments over nothing? Don't fat jokes ever get old?
I was and am perfectly content to allow this thread to die, but when CE came in here slamming a JREF member and sticking up for those mutts, I felt it appropriate to point out the CE herself had been mislead by the sleaze merchants.
As far as "fat jokes," when we are talking about Aldo the Buffet Slayer, a/k/a "16.5's mom," the answer is NO!
However, my offer stands, as soon as the persistent internet fraudsters take down their "Faces to the Name" attack thread, I will charitably refuse to point out that, for example,
Aldo so fat, he just lost his job DJ'ing at the Old Country Buffet because they had to put speed bumps around the buffet.
He got a new one, yeah, Aldo so fat, he got a DJ job on the ice cream truck.
But he lost it, yeah it turned out that Aldo so fat he used a radar dish as an ice cream scoop.
He tried to get a job at MACY's, but Aldo so stupid, he went to the YMCA and told them they spelled their sign wrong.
Sunray Breaker
28th August 2009, 10:05 AM
Quick dumb unrelated question...How the hell do you put a quote at the bottom of your post window?
I tried and failed.
Longfellow
28th August 2009, 10:14 AM
Quick dumb unrelated question...How the hell do you put a quote at the bottom of your post window?
I tried and failed.
I don't know. But the Forum Help & Member Support (http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16) area would, I think, be the best place to ask. I think there's even a test section where you can fiddle around with the various features.
alienentity
28th August 2009, 11:04 AM
You mean like this?
Quick dumb unrelated question...How the hell do you put a quote at the bottom of your post window?
I tried and failed.
Bobert
28th August 2009, 12:58 PM
I have to say, I'm a little puzzled at Childlike's reaction.
I mean, I would agree that you guys seem to obsess over the Aldo and Craig Show much more than is healthy, and I've recommended for years that they should simply be ignored.
I don't think it is obsessing and there is only 1 thread about the CIT and infact this thread hadn't been posted to in over a week before being topped.
You could say the same thing about many other truther superstars such as Gage, Jones, etc etc etc. They pretty much should all be ignored.
I mean really 9-11 truth as a whole has failed miserably and in 7 years HASNT PRODUCED 1 CONVICTION as a result of their supposed evidence.
Their attempts to take action within the court system HAS FAILED MISERABLY.
Now we are left here at JREF with mostly truther trolls and anti-semites.
Bobert
28th August 2009, 12:59 PM
R.Mackey and tuc0's posts mirror my thoughts on this matter.
I must admit that every time I see a thread singling out the Citizen Investigation Team I have to shake my head. Why smart people waste time on charlatans and the willfully ignorant is beyond me. Those losers aren't worth the effort! When someone here starts a thread about what's going on there they are, in my opinion, validating the existence of the CIT.
This is the wrong message to send.
There is essentially only 1 thread about them that is active and in fact this thread was dead for a almost a week before it was topped. The other main CIT thread is dead as well.
Bobert
28th August 2009, 01:22 PM
BTW Ryan please stop being a DANGEROUS TOOL!!!!!!
:eek:
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=734
Macgyver1968
28th August 2009, 03:12 PM
Just read your exchange over there. Had my fun too. Hilarious. Went something like this:
MacGyver: Hey, it's me! I'm making fun of your "detractor list" by posting my pic on it.
CIT: Hey MacGyver, wassup, wanna discuss our research? Here..we'll set you up your little thread to debate.
MacGyver: Sure...Not really hear to debate your theory, but I do have some questions about it, since there are giant ***** holes in your theory.
CIT: Well, we have facts and did try to build a theory on it. Do you know the facts?
MacGyver: I know a little of your theory, for instance, you claim the plane parts and bodies were planted, when exactly did the insiders have the time to do that? Civilians were watching the scene the entire time.
CIT: The contractors doing the renovations in the building made secret hidden rooms big enough to hold the parts of a entire 767. Without anyone noticing. Did you review the facts yet?
MacGyver: Well not really, i'll try to watch your video. How did the insiders manage to spread the debris out on the lawn without anyone noticing?
CIT: (stundie worthy real quote) when you see photos of someone carrying "debris" across the yard how do you know they're picking up and not dropping off?
MacGyver: Really? Your kidding right?
CIT: Uhm, looked at the edivence yet?
MacGyver: Well, will take me some time, i have ADD and it's an 81 minutes video. But your theroy is bunk.
CIT: K, take your time and come back.
MacGyver: Your video is mind-numbingly dry, and only the devout could sit through the entirety of this time vampire... it would be nice if you could break that lengthy video down to a youtube summary for me.
CIT: READ UP ON THE EVIDENCE BEFORE YOU DISCUSS THEORIES!
MacGyver: Please quit deleting my posts.
CIT: Only if you stick to the evidence
Drunken Mac: @#$# you stop deleting my ^&^$'ing posts! You a @##'ing (kitty cat)
CIT gets angry and bans Mac, but then unbans him.
Mac: I'm sorry for calling you a kitty cat...
CIT: It's pointless to talk with this joker, he's not serious about our theory.
Mac: Your right, it's a waste of both of our times.
Stick to drinking at the pool.
Fixed that for you. :)
Thanks for the suggestion, I think I will have a drink at the pool this weekend.
Bobert
28th August 2009, 03:41 PM
Oh GOD NOOOOOOOO!!!!!
DONT DRINK AT THE POOL!!!!!!!!!!!
:eek::jaw-dropp:eek::jaw-dropp:eek::jaw-dropp
Well at least Aldo will eat all the food so you won't have to worry about that bloated feeling.
Justin39640
28th August 2009, 03:47 PM
I have to say, I'm a little puzzled at Childlike's reaction.
I mean, I would agree that you guys seem to obsess over the Aldo and Craig Show much more than is healthy, and I've recommended for years that they should simply be ignored.
But on the other hand, she's frequently wondered (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=2064743#post2064743) about professional disinformation agents in the Truth Movement -- seemingly rational people with such fantastic stories that they "have" to be either barking mad, or being paid to act loopy, if you believe in that kind of thing (which I don't).
So here's what I don't get: If there's anyone who's "disinfo," it's these guys. A stupider theory (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=3966936#post3966936), or a more fervent defense thereof, is difficult to find.
What am I missing? Are they too crazy to be "disinfo," or what?
c'mon
weve all had our fun at their expense lol link (http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=4804654#post4804654)
but i think its the worst kind of truther
greedy
i think they just went for an original angle to try and cash in on the truther cash cow
unfortunately for them
theyre just not smart enough to tell original from insanely stupid
in light of the recent videos that has a certain "engineer" all twisted
this would have been a better angle (IMO):
WTC had pre-planted hydraulic rams strategically placed to break apart the structure to initiate a gravity driven collapse.They were all over the building.
You didn't need many and were lost in the rubble or just looked like normal maintenance equipment and went unnoticed.
Chaney's wife's best friend's mother in-law plays internet bridge with the owner's wife of Porta-Power, a manufacturer of hydraulic rams. Bush's brother ran security... (we know that part)
Since they were remotely operated, it didn't matter much where the plane hit.
CONCRETE PROOF 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!!11!1!1!
fJLm5-be4LM
I wonder how long it will take before one of them runs with that angle lol
jaydeehess
28th August 2009, 06:02 PM
musing on the extent of the JREF response to the CiT are we?
Well, its probably directly related to the amount of time they spent here trying to push their carp. Let's call that variable T
It would also be related to the ridiculousness of their claim and the human reaction to ridiculousness is of course, to point it out. This is a non-linear relationship as once a claim gets so very ridiculous any well adjusted individual will dismiss it out of hand whereas something that is just a little ridiculous will be jumped on by all who hear it.
So there is a limit at which the response is minute, ie. approaching zero. So we have an inverse square relationship to the ridiculousness of a theory, call that variable R
throw in an unknown constant K (which after someone does a study could be found to be 1) and we get the amount of response, A
A=KT/R2
jhunter1163
29th August 2009, 03:27 AM
The only infraction I ever got on this forum was for writing a similar formula. I forget the terms, but the formula read something like "b(ol)l*c(ks)."
So be careful, Jay. ;)
Dave Rogers
29th August 2009, 04:49 AM
CIT: The contractors doing the renovations in the building made secret hidden rooms big enough to hold the parts of a entire 767.
Please, please try to find a cite for this. It's a perfect, made-to-measure Stundie.
Dave
Macgyver1968
29th August 2009, 07:13 AM
Please, please try to find a cite for this. It's a perfect, made-to-measure Stundie.
Dave
Me:
2. If the plane didn't hit the building, and an explosive was used to simulate the crash. Where did all of the plane debris come from? You can say "it was planted"...but exactly when did the insiders have the opportunity to plant all the plane parts inside the building? Obviously they couldn't have planted the parts before the crash, as there was no hole in the building, and people were working in that area. They couldn't have done it after the crash, as hundreds of witnesses were still in the area. So when exactly did they plant the plane debris?
Craig:
The damaged area had been under renovation for years and it was conveniently scheduled to be completed that very week.
This is why only 125 people were killed inside the building when if any other part was actually hit by a plane, thousands would have died.
They could have easily commissioned the renovation contractors to create a couple of "top secret" rooms and even had them move a bunch of "top secret" crates full of plane parts in them and the contractors would have been none the wiser.
As far as decent sized pieces outside, there weren't many and they were suspiciously uncharred.
Stellafane
29th August 2009, 08:04 AM
I have to admit, of all the insanity spewed forth by blindingly misnamed 9/11 Truth Movement, sitting at just about the bottom on the believability scale is the so-called Pentagon flyover theory. Really, it just utterly baffles me that anyone with a passing acquaintance with reality and sanity gives it even the remotest credibility, because nowhere can I think of an idea that is so easily and completely proven untrue.
To illustrate just how trivially the flyover thing can be vaporized into quarks, I'll cite a little parable: One time a king was touring the countryside, traveling from town to town in an effort to meet his subjects. Each village tried to outdo the other in its display of affection and celebration for the king's visit. These celebrations invariably included the time-honored tradition of gathering up all the cannons in town and firing them into the air as the king approached.
Well, the king's entourage arrived in this one hamlet, and there was plenty of music and cheering, but no cannons. The king's secretary immediately pulled the town's mayor aside and asked why there was no customary cannon fire. "Three reasons, Your Honor" the nervous mayor replied. "First, we loaned all our cannons to the neighboring town because they're preparing for a battle, so none are here at the moment..." The secretary, being a busy no-nonsense type of person, immediately interrupted the mayor with "In that case, never mind the other two reasons."
I'm reminded of that little story whenever I think of the CIT boys and their demented little flyover fantasy. Because I can imagine explaining to someone that there's perhaps 100 good reasons the flyover theory can be disproven to I'll-literally-bet-my-life-on-it certainty. I'd lead with "First, no eyewitnesses anywhere saw the plane fly away," to which my hypothetical but reasonable friend might well reply "Never mind all the other reasons!"
Bobert
29th August 2009, 03:15 PM
Crag is over at the CIT CULT bragging about all these independent news sources that are picking up their story.
This is what he wrote:
We just put out a press release regarding National Security Alert and the wide ranging endorsements we have received. Please help us spread the article to news agencies any way you can.
INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO PENTAGON ATTACK YIELDS ALARMING INFORMATION, GARNERS WIDE-RANGING ENDORSEMENTS
Here it is on OpEdNews:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/INDEPENDE...090825-917.html (http://www.opednews.com/articles/INDEPENDENT-INVESTIGATION-by-Craig-Ranke-090825-917.html)
It was also picked up on a local news site here:
News - N- Views (http://www.news-n-views.com/asp/articlenews.asp?place=0659587&issue_date=8/30/2009&edent=2167894&art_id=2560)
Notice that Craig states"also picked up on a local news site here"
http://www.news-n-views.com/asp/articlenews.asp?place=0659587&issue_date=8/30/2009&edent=2167894&art_id=2560
Interesting little tidbit I discovered.
The address for this "local" news source is NONE OTHER than the SAME ADDRESS Craig works at.
LOL
Also this tidbit of holocaust denial was posted over there today
It's now official - there's been no actual shortage of Holocaust survivors: 'The Israeli Prime Minister's office recently put the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million' (extract from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso, London and New York, 2000, p.83). Statement by Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus University of Ulster, December 5, 2005: "I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement is quite correct - not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war. Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."I believe that Craig is a complete sociopath.
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
In fact this local news source is nothing more than a site that displays stories linked from other news cites like the local OC Register newspaper.
The holocaust denier was a poster in the comments section NOT from Craig or Aldo although interestingly holocaust deniers seem to be following the CIT CULT around.
uk_dave
29th August 2009, 03:24 PM
What am I missing? Are they too crazy to be "disinfo," or what?
Oh didn't you know? Truly insane people do not exist/have access to the internets therefore any 'truther' who appears to be insane is merely a cunning ploy by the PTB in a futile attempt to discredit those sane, hardworking, peer reviewed, evidence based, popular 'truthers' who fight post fearlessly night and (sometimes) day (depending on school) to oppose the man and his many (6 billion and counting) minions.
Innit?
Bobert
29th August 2009, 04:17 PM
We all know that Ryan is a DANGEROUS TOOL!!!
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showtopic=734
jhunter1163
29th August 2009, 04:19 PM
What a pile of straw
CIT's stuff is a pile of something all right, but it ain't straw.
Justin39640
29th August 2009, 04:24 PM
Crag is over at the CIT CULT bragging about all these independent news sources that are picking up their story.
This is what he wrote:
Notice that Craig states"also picked up on a local news site here"
http://www.news-n-views.com/asp/articlenews.asp?place=0659587&issue_date=8/30/2009&edent=2167894&art_id=2560
Interesting little tidbit I discovered.
The address for this "local" news source is NONE OTHER than the SAME ADDRESS Craig works at.
LOL
Also this tidbit of holocaust denial was posted over there today
I believe that Craig is a complete sociopath.
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
In fact this local news source is nothing more than a site that displays stories linked from other news cites like the local OC Register newspaper.
The holocaust denier was a poster in the comments section NOT from Craig or Aldo although interestingly holocaust deniers seem to be following the CIT CULT around.
does it seem like he writes his press release like its some sort of unbiased news story from a 3rd party perspective?
LashL
29th August 2009, 05:30 PM
Interesting little tidbit I discovered.
The address for this "local" news source is NONE OTHER than the SAME ADDRESS Craig works at.
Heh - and the site at which it is hosted (news-n-views.com) is registered to Melissa Data.
Registrant:
Melissa Data Corp
22382 Avenida Empresa
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
United States
Administrative Contact:
Melissa, Ray johnm@Melissadata.com
Melissa Data Corp
22382 Avenida Empresa
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
United States
(888) 800-5478 Fax --
Technical Contact:
Group, IT ITgroup@Melissadata.com
Melissa Data Corp
22382 Avenida Empresa
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
United States
+1.9498583000 Fax --
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.MELISSADATA.COM
NS2.MELISSADATA.COM
jaydeehess
29th August 2009, 05:53 PM
The only infraction I ever got on this forum was for writing a similar formula. I forget the terms, but the formula read something like "b(ol)l*c(ks)."
So be careful, Jay. ;)
Hmmm,,, OK change the T to a P (for time Period) and its an anagram for an editorial comment on the CiT theory.
A=KP/R2
jhunter1163
29th August 2009, 06:32 PM
I wonder if a complaint to Mr. Melissa might get that item removed from that page.
Arus808
29th August 2009, 07:40 PM
I wonder if a complaint to Mr. Melissa might get that item removed from that page.
Oh please, by this point, where that little "press" release has been posted, you know they've condoned the crap he's posted.
By now, they would have done something, so its obvious that the company Craig works for, doesn't freaking care.
Bobert
30th August 2009, 03:44 PM
They will care when if "Melissa Data" is googled and they are associated with the CIT CULT crap OR when Ray sells MD.
Justin39640
31st August 2009, 08:34 AM
i got a question
was aldo or craig visibly active in the TM before they came out with their "investigation"?
Gamolon
31st August 2009, 08:55 AM
i got a question
was aldo or craig visibly active in the TM before they came out with their "investigation"?
Every time I hear "Aldo" I keep thinking of the group "Aldo Nova" and the song "Fantasy".
Coincidence?
:D
nicepants
31st August 2009, 09:49 AM
Hahahaa I just read that.
Alpo is looking for your last name. I guess he wants to know where you live... and raid your refrigerator!
If there's anything in your fridge you don't want him to touch, just make sure it's labled "Fat Free".
ETA: [removed]
My favorite quote in that thread was from Craig:
'logic' goes out the window when the crime you are investigating is a world psychological operation of mass murder
funk de fino
31st August 2009, 11:42 AM
world psychological operation of mass murder
Classic buffoonery!!
Mince
31st August 2009, 12:03 PM
Hmmm. truther infighting. What a concept
The cancer is eating itself.
nicepants
31st August 2009, 12:47 PM
The cancer is eating itself.
One of them is definitely doing a lot of eating....
Bobert
31st August 2009, 08:21 PM
Alrigh!!
Aldo is stalking people YET AGAIN!
I just got off the phone with James Dorman AKA jimd.
I clarified it was him. I asked if it was James Dorman of the prisonplanet forum. He confirmed it was.
I told him who I was and he just sat there quiet like a little coward. I asked him why he keeps labeling us disinfo. He still sat there quiet. Like he didn't know what to say.
He then asked me, "Can you read?"
I said yes I can but that doesn't negate the fact that he is wrong (raised voice crosstalk ensued)
Then he said "I don't have to explain anything because I don't have time to talk to mental patients, don't call me anymore" and hung up like the coward he is.
http://209.85.62.23/style_images/1/p_pm.gif (http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?act=Msg&CODE=04&MID=2)http://209.85.62.23/style_images/1/p_email.gif (http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?act=Mail&CODE=00&MID=2)
http://209.85.62.23/style_images/1/p_up.gif (javascript:scroll(0,0);)
Bobert
31st August 2009, 08:25 PM
Oh man now that 9-11 is close the CIT CULT nutiness will bloom once again!
In the past CIT CULT founder Craig Ranke used to state for all who could hear that he believed the passengers of flight 77 were executed at the airport in OH or were gassed while aboard the plane.
Over at LCF in the Pentagon forum we have more of this INSANITY from a new poster
The people on that plane most likely died before or shortly after something hit the pentagon. Ever heard of CDC. All it takes is someone to make a call to the pilots bring it too a new airport and off load all the people into a enclosed area to give them injections. And no one would think it would be strange. It happens some times. That is one idea on what happened. And don’t give me the "Too many people would be in on it to keep it quiet!" crap. Even the people handing out the injections may not even know what’s going on. Why tell them what flight number it was. Or give them any information other that they should do their job. That way only a very few at the top would be the ones to have the full scope of the plan. And if anyone starts to snoop around there’s always bound to be accidents. As for the plane even I don’t have a theory on that. All they need to do is distroy it some how.
Now we add the CDC to the NEVER ENDING list of people involved in MASS MURDER!
Reheat
31st August 2009, 09:33 PM
Now we add the CDC to the NEVER ENDING list of people involved in MASS MURDER!
I think this kind of demented sick garbage should not be reposted. It's not a Stundie, it's just sick crap. It's all over the twoofer world. Just allow it to die.
16.5
5th September 2009, 11:37 AM
Me:
Craig:
I visited the CULT site, and was surprised to see your thread was still going.
Man, those guys are very creepy weirdos.
"Assuming that you really did watch the full video giving it your undivided attention then yes, IF you keep it evidence-based and very civil."
YOUR undivided attention, or else!
Ask the Creep, the Buffet Slayer and the rest of the cult how Roberts alleged fly over exiting the South parking lot was missed by Morin, the guys at the CITGO and at ANC.
What a pack of maroons.
Havermayer
5th September 2009, 12:10 PM
I don't know who Craig is, or what "CIT" is referring to.
Childlike Empress
5th September 2009, 12:15 PM
This is the video in question
"National Security Alert" by Citizen Investigation Team
j5FhQc-LJ-o
Mr.Herbert
5th September 2009, 12:20 PM
I don't know who Craig is, or what "CIT" is referring to.
That's a good thing that you don't know the dolt.
CIT is a group of idiots. (yes group, Aldo is = to at least 3 people) They think a decoy jet flew over the Pentagon instead of flight 77 hitting it. They have also implicated pretty much every corporation in the United States as having a hand in it.
Edx
5th September 2009, 12:22 PM
CAn we PLEASE make a "truthers say the darnest things" website?
We can have a section with just CIT.
Now that would be something.
Bobert
5th September 2009, 02:22 PM
Go to googke video and search, "deniers speak".
Edx
5th September 2009, 02:44 PM
yea thats great but theres so much that we can use!!
Macgyver1968
6th September 2009, 08:11 PM
Your account has been temporarily suspended. This suspension is due to end on Mar 24 2032, 04:45 AM.
Well..thank god it's only a temporary ban. :)
Horatius
6th September 2009, 08:39 PM
Well..thank god it's only a temporary ban. :)
"Suspension", please!
Wouldn't want to go creating any Strawmen, would we?
A W Smith
6th September 2009, 09:08 PM
Well..thank god it's only a temporary ban. :)
Mar 24 2032, ???? that's about when those two jerks will get around to presenting their "evidence" to prosecutors. They have to keep you away till then.
Macgyver1968
6th September 2009, 09:17 PM
Mar 24 2032, ???? that's about when those two jerks will get around to presenting their "evidence" to prosecutors. They have to keep you away till then.
If I'm still talking about 9/11 in 2032....seriously..dude...take me out behind the shed and shoot me. It should sound something like this..."BLAM BLAM...Thud...BLAM BLAM BLAM BLAM..click click click..." :)
UNLoVedRebel
6th September 2009, 09:19 PM
Your account has been temporarily suspended. This suspension is due to end on Mar 24 2032, 04:45 AM.
Aldo must have the dates mixed up because that's the day his weight loss pills are set to kick in.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.