View Full Version : Why dont we see body parts at WTC?
911kongen
13th October 2009, 03:06 PM
I know this is a gruesome question, but a truther asked me this. We have picture of dead people at pentagon, but not at WTC. Why is this? Two planes hit WTC, and bodyparts would be spread all over down town manhattan. But nobody took pictures of anything?
A W Smith
13th October 2009, 03:11 PM
I know this is a gruesome question, but a truther asked me this. We have picture of dead people at pentagon, but not at WTC. Why is this? Two planes hit WTC, and bodyparts would be spread all over down town manhattan. But nobody took pictures of anything?
see the moussaoui trial exhibits (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html). There are photographs of body parts strewn all over west street taken before the towers collapsed.
Macgyver1968
13th October 2009, 03:17 PM
It's called having respect for the dead. People generally don't publically publish photos like that out of respect for the grieving families. Something, I'm sure your truther wouldn't understand.
Thunder
13th October 2009, 03:17 PM
I know this is a gruesome question, but a truther asked me this. We have picture of dead people at pentagon, but not at WTC. Why is this? Two planes hit WTC, and bodyparts would be spread all over down town manhattan. But nobody took pictures of anything?
please tell me this truther is not suggesting nobody died at the WTC.
please tell me this truther has some sense of decency left.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 03:24 PM
please tell me this truther is not suggesting nobody died at the WTC.
please tell me this truther has some sense of decency left.
No planes and no dead! Crazy I know... I was thinking that its no pictures of this because of respect.. Like that french camera guy not filming the burning victims. But then we have the pictures from Pentagon...
KDLarsen
13th October 2009, 03:24 PM
I know this is a gruesome question, but a truther asked me this. We have picture of dead people at pentagon, but not at WTC. Why is this? Two planes hit WTC, and bodyparts would be spread all over down town manhattan. But nobody took pictures of anything?
Why on earth would they be all over down town Manhattan?
Most of the people killed at WTC, died when the towers collapsed, and the few who died prior to that - and who were at the ground level - weren't really in a position to be filmed anyway. In fact, I'm fairly sure that Jules Naudet was the only person with a camera allowed access to the WTC complex after the first tower was struck. And his comments on filming dead people can be heard in the 9/11 film.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 03:26 PM
see the moussaoui trial exhibits (http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution.html). There are photographs of body parts strewn all over west street taken before the towers collapsed.
Tried to look at the link you gave me, but I cant find any pictures showing dead peoples or bodyparts. Just a picture showing som dots that can be jumpers.. I know its the jumpers, but thats not what a truther is going to say!
911kongen
13th October 2009, 03:28 PM
They found bodyparts on bankers trust building something like 7 years after 911! So I think bodyparts was spread all over downtown..
KDLarsen
13th October 2009, 03:30 PM
They found bone fragments, which could have been blown over when the towers collapsed.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 03:32 PM
You dont think the planes can have dont that?
ktesibios
13th October 2009, 03:34 PM
They do exist- three were entered into evidence in the Moussaoui trial. If you want to, you can probably find them for yourself with ordinary Google-fu.
They don't show anything recognizable as human.
T.A.M.
13th October 2009, 03:39 PM
I know this is a gruesome question, but a truther asked me this. We have picture of dead people at pentagon, but not at WTC. Why is this? Two planes hit WTC, and bodyparts would be spread all over down town manhattan. But nobody took pictures of anything?
ask him what he means by "we have pictures of?" the fact is, there are likely hundreds of pictures of the dead at the WTC, but they are not for public consumption, nor should they be.
Also, while you are at it, tell the person he is a gruesome, morbid, asswipe for wanting to see such things.
DGM
13th October 2009, 03:44 PM
I'm confused as why you (or anyone) would dignify him with a response. Express your disgust and move on.
Unsecured Coins
13th October 2009, 03:47 PM
where is this truther asking you this?
Pardalis
13th October 2009, 03:48 PM
I know this is a gruesome question, but a truther asked me this. We have picture of dead people at pentagon, but not at WTC. Why is this? Two planes hit WTC, and bodyparts would be spread all over down town manhattan. But nobody took pictures of anything?
It is a gruesome question, it's also a stupid question.
Does he really need to see what's under these flags to know that thousands of people died there?
http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a154/perdalis/0901061431_M_wtc_dec_body.jpg
Seriously, how old is this truther friend of yours? 12? If he wants to see gore there are plenty of movies to satisfy his lust for it, no need to desecrate the memory of real people.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 03:50 PM
ask him what he means by "we have pictures of?" the fact is, there are likely hundreds of pictures of the dead at the WTC, but they are not for public consumption, nor should they be.
Also, while you are at it, tell the person he is a gruesome, morbid, asswipe for wanting to see such things.
His logic is that we see dead people at pentagon.. why not at WTC? Why can they not show dead people at WTC, but just at pentagon. His conclusion is that its because nobody died at WTC!! :boggled:
triforcharity
13th October 2009, 03:50 PM
Tell him to go **** himself, and that he is a sick SOB. That is quite possibly the most disgusting thing that the TM has ever asked.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 03:51 PM
where is this truther asking you this?
Norwegian forum..
Unsecured Coins
13th October 2009, 04:00 PM
link
DavidJames
13th October 2009, 04:07 PM
His logic is that we see dead people at pentagon.. why not at WTC? Why can they not show dead people at WTC, but just at pentagon. His conclusion is that its because nobody died at WTC!! :boggled:People like that are mentally ill. Maybe it's a permanent condition or a temporary one brought on by rage against the machine syndrome. Best to just leave them wallow in their insanity.
geni
13th October 2009, 04:07 PM
The area was kinda evacuated so opportunities to take pics will have been somewhat limited. The majority of the human remains tended to be in rather small bits which limits their value as evidence so those takeing photos for official purposes would have been unlikely to take many either.
Pardalis
13th October 2009, 04:16 PM
I'm sure there are alot of gruesome pictures that have never been released, and never will be, and that's fine with me.
Sorry truthers, you're going to have to satisfy your juvenile need to see gore elsewhere.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 04:21 PM
I'm sure there are alot of gruesome pictures that have never been released, and never will be, and that's fine with me.
Sorry truthers, you're going to have to satisfy your juvenile need to see gore elsewhere.
Thats what i told him! But he says that no pictures is proof that there are no dead.. :mad:
Unsecured Coins
13th October 2009, 04:21 PM
link
NoZed Avenger
13th October 2009, 04:25 PM
Thats what i told him! But he says that no pictures is proof that there are no dead.. :mad:
OMG. Someone is stupid on the internet.
This. Can. Not. Stand.
Seriously, this guy is far too removed from reality to take seriously, even by trvther standards.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 04:27 PM
link
Its on a debate forum, on pvt. They often contact me on pvt.. Same thing on youtube. Its probably because of my videos I think! I have a new one now that I think will make some truthers really mad! :D
Audible Click
13th October 2009, 04:28 PM
Its on a debate forum, on pvt. They often contact me on pvt.. Same thing on youtube. Its probably because of my videos I think! I have a new one now that I think will make some truthers really mad! :D
What is "pvt"?
Trojan
13th October 2009, 04:28 PM
His logic is that we see dead people at pentagon.. why not at WTC? Why can they not show dead people at WTC, but just at pentagon. His conclusion is that its because nobody died at WTC!! :boggled:
He's too stupid and ignorant to be allowed access to a computer.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 04:29 PM
OMG. Someone is stupid on the internet.
This. Can. Not. Stand.
Seriously, this guy is far too removed from reality to take seriously, even by trvther standards.
Many truthers think Obama is Anti Christ! :jaw-dropp Nothing shocks me when its truthers speaking!
geni
13th October 2009, 04:31 PM
I'm sure there are alot of gruesome pictures that have never been released, and never will be, and that's fine with me.
I doubt it. Perhaps a few of the jumpers but by that point most non goverment personel had been moved clear of the building. If such photos did exist within the media world they would likely have been published in the some the less respectable european press.
Audible Click
13th October 2009, 04:31 PM
I'm shocked that this person would want to look at pictures of body parts. Oh and he's a cretin, can't forget that.
Unsecured Coins
13th October 2009, 04:32 PM
post screen caps then.
geni
13th October 2009, 04:32 PM
I'm shocked that this person would want to look at pictures of body parts.
Welcome to teh interwebs. Expect to feel that a lot.
ElMondoHummus
13th October 2009, 04:33 PM
Thats what i told him! But he says that no pictures is proof that there are no dead.. :mad:
Unfortunately, the only publicly available images I'm aware of are unidentifiable. The ones in the Moussaoui trial evidence roster are either from far away, or are
... I'm sorry, but there's no easy way to put this: They are just lumps of flesh. Here's one example; warning: Link is to a page with an image of this
http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200011.html
If any others exist, I'm unaware of them. The only other photo of a dead person I can think of doesn't count because it's of a person struck by debris, not a person inside the buildings or the jets (it's the famous one of Catholic Priest Father Mychal Judge being carried away by firefighters after being hit by debris).
Audible Click
13th October 2009, 04:35 PM
Welcome to teh interwebs. Expect to feel that a lot.
Well I hang out in this sub forum alot so I suppose that sooner or later some moronic truther would shock me.
Pardalis
13th October 2009, 04:37 PM
I doubt it. Perhaps a few of the jumpers but by that point most non goverment personel had been moved clear of the building. If such photos did exist within the media world they would likely have been published in the some the less respectable european press.
I know someone who worked for Radio-Canada on the day of 9/11, and he told me he saw things that were edited out that were never shown to the public.
I think it's fairly common practice, the investigators release only a minute part of their material to the media, and the media itself filters out the graphic content. Only a fraction of that material manages to leak out in sites like "rotten" and other teen shock sites. I'm sure the FBI photographs used in the Moussaoui trial are the tip of the iceberg.
If the public had access to what the police, firefighters and first responders see on a daily basis, we'd all go mad.
Unsecured Coins
13th October 2009, 04:45 PM
no screencaps?
allow me to call bovine feces on this until I get some evidence this exchange is even taking place
CompusMentus
13th October 2009, 04:45 PM
Unfortunately, the only publicly available images I'm aware of are unidentifiable.
This is a little vague, sorry.
I remember seeing a disturbing picture on the internet of a 9/11 victim, it was a severed human head inside a WTC box girder. I came across it on a site about a company that supplied small robotic machines to remotely search at GZ in amongst the debris. Don't asked me to search for it I really don't want to see anything like it again.
Compus
Mangoose
13th October 2009, 04:49 PM
But nobody took pictures of anything?
I know that this may be a little hard for a truther to understand, but the sum total of all knowledge and evidence isn't on the internet. Weird, isn't it? I mean, it is perfectly reasonable that if any photo is ever taken, it automatically winds up on the internet. Could it possibly be that such photos, due to their gruesome nature, and for respect for the dead, and owing to a sense of basic human dignity and sympathy to the victims, are not generally posted online? Of course, they have appeared on Ogrish at times in the past and some photos were released as part of the Moussaoui trial. Some have appeared in the Library of Congress online archive. And some have even been published in book form, such as the severed leg on p. 264 of Here Is New York.
But he says that no pictures is proof that there are no dead..
Your friend is blithering idiot. Best to just leave him be.
stilicho
13th October 2009, 04:53 PM
no screencaps?
allow me to call bovine feces on this until I get some evidence this exchange is even taking place
I second your motion of shenanigans.
ElMondoHummus
13th October 2009, 04:53 PM
This is a gruesome topic, I know, but I say the following in order to inform: I get the distinct impression that human remains at the WTC were far less identifiable as such. There was a tremendous amount of energy involved in the collapse, and while some people were lucky in the extreme and survived in the rubble, others unfortunately were subject to those extreme forces, with predictable results. I recall reading a story where a family was contacted by the teams doing the post mortems and told that portions of an organ for one of their family members was identified. Reading NYTimes stories like these two:
Link (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CEED6163DF937A15751C0A9639C8B 63)
Link (http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E04E2DE1E3FF930A35757C0A9639C8B 63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1)
... reinforce that impression. Add to that the sheer size of the site, as well as the sheer amount of rubble lying about, and I can easily see photographers going more for the epic impact of the vistas of rubble, and less for the closeups of victims.
Now, I would guess that many images of remains exist above and beyond what's been released to the public. Remember: The NYPD Crime Scene Units were there, and as the book Report from Ground Zero told us:
"At Ground Zero the CSU is responsible for photographing the site, recovering physical evidence, documenting body parts and any other physical evidence like weapons or a wallet, manning the temporary morgue at the site (as well as the city morgue up on 28th Street), inspecting debris that leaves the site, and inspecting debris as it gets sifted out at Staten Island. ...All evidence is documented– airplane parts were essential to the beginning investigation, but now they look for hair, fibers, glass particles, semen, ballistics. ...We ID every part. Pillars and beams are swiped for hair, tissue and blood, evaporated body evidence. We have two police officers with mortuary degrees, and they are either in the medical examiner's office or the police lab, because you must be a sworn police officer to take evidence.
If you step on a fly ten times there will be nothing left. And here we have no couches, no computers, no chairs, no glass. Any small trace of anything is evidence. Anything to bring closure to the families. Human body part, clothing, jewelry, equipment and tools, anything. If there ever is a trial, we will be prepared. We've been here from day 1, and we'll be there well after the regular police officers go home, when everyone is packed up and gone." (p. 326-327)
(taken from Gravy's page (http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/groundzerocleanup%2Cfreshkillssortingopera))
Anyway, I'd bet that among the plethora of evidence the NYPD CSU gathered, there are probably quite a few photographs of remains. The problem is, since they're reserving them for trials, I don't think they'd release them even under an FOIA request. I'll leave that last for Lashl or someone else here to comment on, since I don't know what's requestable and what's not, but my point is that I'd imagine there are many photographs that aren't out in public yet. My belief and nothing but, I admit, but I think it's a reasonably logical one to draw.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 04:54 PM
no screencaps?
allow me to call bovine feces on this until I get some evidence this exchange is even taking place
Are you a truther? I have never taken screencaps, and dont know how! Pvt is suppose to be a private conversation. So im not sure if i would take a screencaps of it anyway! If my goal was to lie, I could make a fake one! So a screencaps means nothing.. I was just looking for an answer to a question I could not answer, and not find an answer to.
Anyway, its in norwegian! You speak norwegian?
geni
13th October 2009, 04:54 PM
I know someone who worked for Radio-Canada on the day of 9/11, and he told me he saw things that were edited out that were never shown to the public.
Videos of jumpers impacting the ground exist yes. You can find them on liveleak (well probably I've not actualy watched the things) if you really wish to but photos are a different matter. They didn't manage to lock down the photos of Diana's death. If the media had pics I would have expected some of them to be published by someone by now.
I think it's fairly common practice, the investigators release only a minute part of their material to the media, and the media itself filters out the graphic content. Only a fraction of that material manages to leak out in sites like "rotten" and other teen shock sites. I'm sure the FBI photographs used in the Moussaoui trial are the tip of the iceberg.
They should have more from the pentagon but the WTC? The Naudet Brothers documenty has a firefighter mention that the largest item they found in the wreckage was half a phone. There was a mention of an intact body but they were aparently far from common.
If the public had access to what the police, firefighters and first responders see on a daily basis, we'd all go mad.
I belive that Ogrish used to specilise in such things. Not sure who's taken over.
ElMondoHummus
13th October 2009, 04:54 PM
This is a little vague, sorry.
I remember seeing a disturbing picture on the internet of a 9/11 victim, it was a severed human head inside a WTC box girder. I came across it on a site about a company that supplied small robotic machines to remotely search at GZ in amongst the debris. Don't asked me to search for it I really don't want to see anything like it again.
Compus
Oh Lord... that's an image that can haunt you. I don't think I want to see it either.
Mangoose
13th October 2009, 04:54 PM
If any others exist, I'm unaware of them.
There are close-up photos of some of the jumpers (I assume) that have appeared on Ogrish and elsewhere. In my last post, I mentioned one horrible photo of a badly savaged leg lying in the street that was published in Here Is New York. Maybe the image is in the online archive but it's definitely in the book. I recall also seeing many years ago a severed hand or arm, that might've been on Ogrish too.
Unsecured Coins
13th October 2009, 05:05 PM
Are you a truther? I have never taken screencaps, and dont know how! Pvt is suppose to be a private conversation. So im not sure if i would take a screencaps of it anyway! If my goal was to lie, I could make a fake one! So a screencaps means nothing.. I was just looking for an answer to a question I could not answer, and not find an answer to.
Anyway, its in norwegian! You speak norwegian?
i know people who do. for the rest of your post...
bull:rule10
911kongen
13th October 2009, 05:18 PM
i know people who do. for the rest of your post...
bull:rule10
Well, its not! I guess you are a truther. I know the truthers game! I was just in a debate with a truther. He did not believe my wife was taking a phd in cancer.. so I made a deal. I show you proof of it to a truther (a person I think is not crazy). He said Ok. The other truther then said I was right, but then the truther did not believe me or the other truther! :D
I have got a lot of threats form truthers. So I dont whant them to know my real name. So no, im not going to download a program to try to convince a truther what some other truther have said. I know that game! Anyway, the theory about WTC hologram is old. Its not really strange some one still believes this! Whats the point in proving something that is proven?
Cl1mh4224rd
13th October 2009, 05:20 PM
ask him what he means by "we have pictures of?" the fact is, there are likely hundreds of pictures of the dead at the WTC, but they are not for public consumption, nor should they be.
There's at least one picture... on some website... of... one of the jumpers... I'm not sure if that's the kind of evidence this lunatic is looking for, but I'm certainly not going to try and find it on purpose.
What is "pvt"?
I'm assuming it means "private", as in this conversation he's referring to is taking place through private messages on another forum.
Unsecured Coins
13th October 2009, 05:27 PM
apparently you are not familiar with me. that's painfully obivous. and believe it or not, you don't need fancy programs to do a screen cap. here's a lesson.
Go to the screen in question.
Place your left pinky finger on the CTRL key. If you cannot find that, look under the shift button. Also, there is one on the right side as well. Use the right pinky for that one
If you have used the left pinky to hold down the CTRL button, use your right index finger (the one between the thumb and middle finger) to press the Prt Scr button right next to the F12 button.
Open the MS Paint. If you are on a MAC, use whatever the hell comes on those infernal pieces of monkey crap.
Go to Edit
Select Paste
Edit out the parts you don't want by applying the color black to said areas that contain personal information.
Save As whatever name you like
Go to Photobucket.com
If you have an existing account, input your information to log in. If you do not, registration is easy and free!
Upload the picture of the screen cap to your account.
post the IMG url into the reply box of this thread.
click on post reply.
magically, your image will appear in your post.
Do you need a video presentation or does that cover it?
triforcharity
13th October 2009, 05:39 PM
Thats what i told him! But he says that no pictures is proof that there are no dead.. :mad:
Tell him to come talk to me. I saw lots of body parts prior to the collapses. Even more so after them. Right after we got there, they were documented and removed. So, this is why you won't see many before the collapse.
Oh, and tell him, I won't be very friendly with him. Just give him a fair warning. Tell him he is free to email me at matthew@911firefighters.org
At least I think they were removed. Lord knows, I wasn't looking at the body parts.
Myron Proudfoot
13th October 2009, 05:54 PM
I am sure I saw some gruesome pics of body parts. might it have been on an Italian debunkers site?? I'm sorry, i don't want to do a Google search...
911kongen
13th October 2009, 06:02 PM
apparently you are not familiar with me. that's painfully obivous. and believe it or not, you don't need fancy programs to do a screen cap. here's a lesson.
Go to the screen in question.
Place your left pinky finger on the CTRL key. If you cannot find that, look under the shift button. Also, there is one on the right side as well. Use the right pinky for that one
If you have used the left pinky to hold down the CTRL button, use your right index finger (the one between the thumb and middle finger) to press the Prt Scr button right next to the F12 button.
Open the MS Paint. If you are on a MAC, use whatever the hell comes on those infernal pieces of monkey crap.
Go to Edit
Select Paste
Edit out the parts you don't want by applying the color black to said areas that contain personal information.
Save As whatever name you like
Go to Photobucket.com
If you have an existing account, input your information to log in. If you do not, registration is easy and free!
Upload the picture of the screen cap to your account.
post the IMG url into the reply box of this thread.
click on post reply.
magically, your image will appear in your post.
Do you need a video presentation or does that cover it?
Well, it did not work! :jaw-dropp Check if you wrote something wrong? Then maby I will be a nice boy and show this to you, but I did promise not to do things like this again. Like I did to prove my wife was a phd in cancer.
But im wondering... you know many people have believed and still believes in the hologram theory. Whats the point in proving someone did it in norwegian? You dont even speak norwegian! :boggled: Wow I almost convinced my self to just ignore you.
Well, im going to bed now, the time here is 02.00! Or do you need me to make a screencap of that to!? :D
911kongen
13th October 2009, 06:05 PM
Tell him to come talk to me. I saw lots of body parts prior to the collapses. Even more so after them. Right after we got there, they were documented and removed. So, this is why you won't see many before the collapse.
Oh, and tell him, I won't be very friendly with him. Just give him a fair warning. Tell him he is free to email me at matthew@911firefighters.org
At least I think they were removed. Lord knows, I wasn't looking at the body parts.
I have given him your mail! But truthers never do any good research, so dont expect him to write to you.. but if he does.. dont blame me! :(
Grizzly Bear
13th October 2009, 06:22 PM
Do I really want to think about what condition I'd be in if I had had 30 floors collapse on top of me and then get caught in the collapse of the remaining 80 floors? I'm not quite that morbid :\
Thunder
13th October 2009, 06:29 PM
It would be very interesting if the Truthers started to argue that no one died at the WTC. Very interesting indeed.
njslim
13th October 2009, 06:31 PM
Been over this with some truther trolls at ABOVE TOP SECRET - when posted references
to FF/rescue workers finding body in aircraft seat from AA 77. Demanded PICTURES of
the bodies. Of course if pictures were available would find some other excuse....
Remember hearing that many FF remains were recovered more or less intact do to their
bunker gear protecting the body.
In museum on Liberty ST have torn FDNY bunker coat recovered from site
Algebra34
13th October 2009, 06:38 PM
I know this is a gruesome question, but a truther asked me this. We have picture of dead people at pentagon, but not at WTC. Why is this? Two planes hit WTC, and bodyparts would be spread all over down town manhattan. But nobody took pictures of anything?
There were plenty of bodies. I saw a website once of groundzero that showed jumpers split open on the sidewalk, body parts, burnt corpses, the whole deal. I remember one shot of just this lone bare foot lying on the sidewalk. I have no desire to hunt the particulair site down now or if it's even there anymore or ever look at it again for that matter, but I'll bet pictures can be found with a little searching if that's what you want.
No matter who you believe did 9/11 there were bodies/parts.
Myron Proudfoot
13th October 2009, 06:45 PM
There were plenty of bodies. I saw a website once of groundzero that showed jumpers split open on the sidewalk, body parts, burnt corpses, the whole deal. I remember one shot of just this lone bare foot lying on the sidewalk. I have no desire to hunt the particulair site down now or if it's even there anymore or ever look at it again for that matter, but I'll bet pictures can be found with a little searching if that's what you want.
No matter who you believe did 9/11 there were bodies/parts.
that sounds like the site I saw... ugh..
Pardalis
13th October 2009, 06:53 PM
They should have more from the pentagon but the WTC? The Naudet Brothers documenty has a firefighter mention that the largest item they found in the wreckage was half a phone. There was a mention of an intact body but they were aparently far from common.
And if you remember that documentary, the Naudet brothers specifically mention they decided not to show some of the things they've seen.
T.A.M.
13th October 2009, 07:51 PM
Well, it did not work! :jaw-dropp Check if you wrote something wrong? Then maby I will be a nice boy and show this to you, but I did promise not to do things like this again. Like I did to prove my wife was a phd in cancer.
But im wondering... you know many people have believed and still believes in the hologram theory. Whats the point in proving someone did it in norwegian? You dont even speak norwegian! :boggled: Wow I almost convinced my self to just ignore you.
Well, im going to bed now, the time here is 02.00! Or do you need me to make a screencap of that to!? :D
I think the reason there is doubt, is probably due to your MO. From my reading of a lot of your posts, you present many typical truther arguments, in the form of,
"What do you think of this theory", INSERT THEORY HERE, followed by, "...because some truther argued that this was the case".
You rarely, that I can see, ever link to where on the internet, if anywhere, this alleged truther made such an argument.
This is a skeptics forum, and a subforum where on MANY an occasion someone has presented things similarly, only to turn out to be a truther in hiding as a supposed debunker, but getting his arguments across in such a way.
I am not saying that this is the case with you, but when you continue to present truther theories, in the context of "a truther is arguing this with me" without providing any evidence (screen caps, links, etc...) of such, people will tend to be skeptical.
TAM:)
BigAl
13th October 2009, 07:53 PM
They should have more from the pentagon but the WTC? The Naudet Brothers documenty has a firefighter mention that the largest item they found in the wreckage was half a phone.
And if you saw the film, you'd know that the quote was a combination of hyperbole and, probably emotional exhaustion.
Cl1mh4224rd
13th October 2009, 08:08 PM
There were plenty of bodies. I saw a website once of groundzero that showed jumpers split open on the sidewalk, body parts, burnt corpses, the whole deal. I remember one shot of just this lone bare foot lying on the sidewalk. I have no desire to hunt the particulair site down now or if it's even there anymore or ever look at it again for that matter, but I'll bet pictures can be found with a little searching if that's what you want.
No matter who you believe did 9/11 there were bodies/parts.
that sounds like the site I saw... ugh..
Probably the same one I stumbled upon, too. I only saw one picture and stared in horror for a bit before I gathered my wits enough to close my entire browser. :(
Hokulele
13th October 2009, 08:31 PM
Ghouls. Ugh.
willhaven
13th October 2009, 08:53 PM
Just show them the pictures and videos of people jumping from the building.
AJM8125
13th October 2009, 09:07 PM
Just show them the pictures and videos of people jumping from the building.
Were it so simple.
Fires didn't burn long or hot enough. Therefore no reason to jump. Therefore jumpers were fake.
There's quite a few things in the world that'll make me forget I'm a gentleman. The above troofer logic is very near the top of the list.
dropzone
13th October 2009, 09:54 PM
I have a dear friend who is only called in when remains are fairly recognizable, and she ended up relying on DNA evidence. The PEOPLE (emphasized on purpose) who died on 9/11, whether in the crash, in the fire, or in the collapse, did not die gracefully or honorably, but as people who wished they had another way out. Some chose to jump, and if your sick friend makes the slightest effort he can see what happens to a human body that drops 1000'. Others went down with the towers, hoping to the last that they would be spared the final torment we all saw: their bodies put through a meat grinder of collapsing concrete and steel.
Your friend is sick. Please tell him that for us, who mourn the dead of 09/11/01.
911kongen
13th October 2009, 11:37 PM
I think the reason there is doubt, is probably due to your MO. From my reading of a lot of your posts, you present many typical truther arguments, in the form of,
"What do you think of this theory", INSERT THEORY HERE, followed by, "...because some truther argued that this was the case".
You rarely, that I can see, ever link to where on the internet, if anywhere, this alleged truther made such an argument.
This is a skeptics forum, and a subforum where on MANY an occasion someone has presented things similarly, only to turn out to be a truther in hiding as a supposed debunker, but getting his arguments across in such a way.
I am not saying that this is the case with you, but when you continue to present truther theories, in the context of "a truther is arguing this with me" without providing any evidence (screen caps, links, etc...) of such, people will tend to be skeptical.
TAM:)
Thats because I use this forum to get answers to questions I dont know the whole answer to! Yeah, im a truther that have made over 20 youtubevideos about how sick they are! :boggled: You are spot on! :rolleyes: Thats to Unsecured coins..
I understand that people are skeptic, but I dont see the point in taking screencaps of someones saying in norwegian forum that they think Obama is Anti Christ, no body died at WTC, death ray destroyed WTC or that WTC never has existed! Truthers have said all of this to me in debate... im not going to take screencaps of this in norwegian and put on here!
Im using this forum when im stuck on a subject... Im not going to prove that some one has asked me this, or said it on a norwegian forum! Espessaly if its on a privat forum..
911kongen
13th October 2009, 11:39 PM
I have a dear friend who is only called in when remains are fairly recognizable, and she ended up relying on DNA evidence. The PEOPLE (emphasized on purpose) who died on 9/11, whether in the crash, in the fire, or in the collapse, did not die gracefully or honorably, but as people who wished they had another way out. Some chose to jump, and if your sick friend makes the slightest effort he can see what happens to a human body that drops 1000'. Others went down with the towers, hoping to the last that they would be spared the final torment we all saw: their bodies put through a meat grinder of collapsing concrete and steel.
Your friend is sick. Please tell him that for us, who mourn the dead of 09/11/01.
He is not my friend. Just an idiot hating my youtubevideos!
sylvan8798
14th October 2009, 05:15 AM
Why does this guy sound so strangely like Heiwa?
MRC_Hans
14th October 2009, 06:37 AM
Are you a truther? I have never taken screencaps, and dont know how! Pvt is suppose to be a private conversation. So im not sure if i would take a screencaps of it anyway! If my goal was to lie, I could make a fake one! So a screencaps means nothing.. I was just looking for an answer to a question I could not answer, and not find an answer to.
Hit [shift/print scrn], the key is usually right of the F12 key. Paste into e.g. MS paint, crop ad needed, save as .jpg.
Anyway, its in norwegian! You speak norwegian?Ikke noet problem!
Hans
MRC_Hans
14th October 2009, 06:42 AM
I think the reason there is doubt, is probably due to your MO. From my reading of a lot of your posts, you present many typical truther arguments, in the form of,
"What do you think of this theory", INSERT THEORY HERE, followed by, "...because some truther argued that this was the case".
You rarely, that I can see, ever link to where on the internet, if anywhere, this alleged truther made such an argument.
This is a skeptics forum, and a subforum where on MANY an occasion someone has presented things similarly, only to turn out to be a truther in hiding as a supposed debunker, but getting his arguments across in such a way.
I am not saying that this is the case with you, but when you continue to present truther theories, in the context of "a truther is arguing this with me" without providing any evidence (screen caps, links, etc...) of such, people will tend to be skeptical.
TAM:)Exactly! You know, if it qacks like a duck .....
Also, it is pretty bad taste to ask others for evidence, without presenting any of your own. Not only bad taste, but typical truther taste.
Actually, I remember reading other posts by 911kongen, and wondering exactly where he stood.
Hans
911kongen
14th October 2009, 08:00 AM
Exactly! You know, if it qacks like a duck .....
Also, it is pretty bad taste to ask others for evidence, without presenting any of your own. Not only bad taste, but typical truther taste.
Actually, I remember reading other posts by 911kongen, and wondering exactly where he stood.
Hans
Har du sett youtube-siden min? As you can read in this thread, many different opinions on why we dont see pictures of it. Personaly, I could not answer this question, but I knew the question was stupid. It was so stupid I did not know the answer. Many different answers in this thread.. so I guess I was not the only one! But the different is that I was honest, I said I dont know why! But it has garanteed a very logic explanation.. so not to give a wrong answer I turned to JREF.
I guess the best explanation is from the firefighter. Thank you!
Dumb All Over
14th October 2009, 12:01 PM
Thats because I use this forum to get answers to questions I dont know the whole answer to! Yeah, im a truther that have made over 20 youtubevideos about how sick they are! :boggled: You are spot on! :rolleyes: Thats to Unsecured coins..
I understand that people are skeptic, but I dont see the point in taking screencaps of someones saying in norwegian forum that they think Obama is Anti Christ, no body died at WTC, death ray destroyed WTC or that WTC never has existed! Truthers have said all of this to me in debate... im not going to take screencaps of this in norwegian and put on here!
Im using this forum when im stuck on a subject... Im not going to prove that some one has asked me this, or said it on a norwegian forum! Espessaly if its on a privat forum..
The point is that a lot of us, myself included, simply don't believe you. The easiest way to be believed is to back up your claims with evidence.
So, please indulge us. Let's see those screen caps. And by all means, please link to the videos you've made. Otherwise, I'll have a hard time believing anything you say from this point on.
leonAzul
14th October 2009, 01:29 PM
And by all means, please link to the videos you've made.
No mystery there:
http://www.youtube.com/user/911Kongen
First hit on this query:
http://www.google.com/search?q=911kongen
You're welcome…
911kongen
14th October 2009, 02:02 PM
No mystery there:
http://www.youtube.com/user/911Kongen
First hit on this query:
http://www.google.com/search?q=911kongen
You're welcome…
Nice job! :)
911kongen
14th October 2009, 02:04 PM
The point is that a lot of us, myself included, simply don't believe you. The easiest way to be believed is to back up your claims with evidence.
So, please indulge us. Let's see those screen caps. And by all means, please link to the videos you've made. Otherwise, I'll have a hard time believing anything you say from this point on.
And whats the point in you believing me? If you think im a truther, your problem, not mine! :rolleyes:
triforcharity
14th October 2009, 07:04 PM
Har du sett youtube-siden min? As you can read in this thread, many different opinions on why we dont see pictures of it. Personaly, I could not answer this question, but I knew the question was stupid. It was so stupid I did not know the answer. Many different answers in this thread.. so I guess I was not the only one! But the different is that I was honest, I said I dont know why! But it has garanteed a very logic explanation.. so not to give a wrong answer I turned to JREF.
I guess the best explanation is from the firefighter. Thank you!
Also, take into consideration that the scene going on that day was 1000' in the air, not on the ground. The focal point was up there, not on the ground. That could also explain some of the reasons.
Just don't forget that some media outlets have some respect for things like this. Most would not even begin to post it. Somme may not have of even downloaded it off the camera.
dropzone
14th October 2009, 07:12 PM
And if you remember that documentary, the Naudet brothers specifically mention they decided not to show some of the things they've seen.Though those people ablaze in the lobby could be heard in the background. And the sickly explosion sounds of jumpers hitting the sidewalk. Watching the reactions at each jumper's death of the high-ranking firemen manning the command center, guys who had worked their way up through the ranks and who could be assumed to have seen pretty much every horror, was moving. :(
triforcharity
14th October 2009, 07:18 PM
I threw up. Literally.
dropzone
14th October 2009, 07:24 PM
And that, folks, says it all. :eek:
And why I didn't follow my friend into forensic anthropology.
911kongen
15th October 2009, 03:53 AM
I threw up. Literally.
Were you filmed in any videos taken that day? How did you survive? THANK YOU FOR DOING A GREAT JOB THAT DAY!
Panoply_Prefect
15th October 2009, 07:58 AM
Are you a truther? I have never taken screencaps, and dont know how! Pvt is suppose to be a private conversation. So im not sure if i would take a screencaps of it anyway! If my goal was to lie, I could make a fake one! So a screencaps means nothing.. I was just looking for an answer to a question I could not answer, and not find an answer to.
Anyway, its in norwegian! You speak norwegian?
I do, I could easily translate.
EDIT: Doh, someone beat me to it.
triforcharity
15th October 2009, 08:24 AM
Were you filmed in any videos taken that day? How did you survive? THANK YOU FOR DOING A GREAT JOB THAT DAY!
I am in a few of them. Not sure which ones. I know one news crew filed me for a minute or so, don't remember which one.
I survived by the luck of the Irish. And, I could run really fast.
You're welcome, but I am not a hero. But, I did have the pleasure of working with 343 of them.
MRC_Hans
15th October 2009, 08:39 AM
Har du sett youtube-siden min? As you can read in this thread, many different opinions on why we dont see pictures of it. Personaly, I could not answer this question, but I knew the question was stupid. It was so stupid I did not know the answer. Many different answers in this thread.. so I guess I was not the only one! But the different is that I was honest, I said I dont know why! But it has garanteed a very logic explanation.. so not to give a wrong answer I turned to JREF.
I guess the best explanation is from the firefighter. Thank you!Nej, det har jeg ikke. Jeg søger helst ikke beviser for noget på youtube. Men vi har før haft besøg af truthere, som lod som om de var skeptikere, men prøvede at bringe skeptikere i miskredit med deres opførsel. Jeg tror det er det, som truthere kalder 'disinfo agents'.
By acting in an ambiguous way, you will rouse suspicion. You can choose to live with that, but don't act surprised.
Hans
911kongen
15th October 2009, 09:54 AM
Nej, det har jeg ikke. Jeg søger helst ikke beviser for noget på youtube. Men vi har før haft besøg af truthere, som lod som om de var skeptikere, men prøvede at bringe skeptikere i miskredit med deres opførsel. Jeg tror det er det, som truthere kalder 'disinfo agents'.
By acting in an ambiguous way, you will rouse suspicion. You can choose to live with that, but don't act surprised.
Hans
På hvilke måte setter jeg debunkere i dårlig lys da? Det er jo en truther som har kommet med denne håpløse påstanden...
Uansett, om noen tror jeg er en truther selv om jeg har laget 20 youtubevideoer om hvor syke disse er, ja så får det være deres problem. Da sliter de med å være sykelig skeptiske.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.