PDA

View Full Version : UK super-taxes bank bonuses


Francesca R
9th December 2009, 05:46 AM
This is a vote-winner in the UK:

Banks hit by 50% tax on bonus payouts (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6284fdba-e4c3-11de-96a2-00144feab49a.html)

Darling unveils super-tax plans for bankers' bonuses (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8403249.stm)

No response yet on whether the Tories would keep it, though they are very likely to. Darling believes it may raise GBP 0.5 billion.

I think it is smart ("rebuild your capital base and you don't pay it; pay out and you do") and that banks will suck it up with no more than the usual amount of whining. I'm also glad I don't work for a bank any more.

(ETA--since it is applied on top of income tax, the effective taxation from these payments will be 70%)

Lothian
9th December 2009, 06:01 AM
This is a vote-winner in the UK:

Banks hit by 50% tax on bonus payouts (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6284fdba-e4c3-11de-96a2-00144feab49a.html)

Darling unveils super-tax plans for bankers' bonuses (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8403249.stm)

No response yet on whether the Tories would keep it, though they are very likely to. Darling believes it may raise GBP 0.5 billion.

I think it is smart ("rebuild your capital base and you don't pay it; pay out and you do") and that banks will suck it up with no more than the usual amount of whining. I'm also glad I don't work for a bank any more.

(ETA--since it is applied on top of income tax, the effective taxation from these payments will be 70%)ETA is not strictly true. It is not a tax on individuals (income tax). It is a tax on the employer (more akin to corporation tax).

I think many people will get no bonuses up to April 2010 then get an exceptional one off payment for their work in May 2010.

Francesca R
9th December 2009, 06:13 AM
I read it as April 2011 at first. It is indeed 2010 so "what the Tories would do" is rather moot.

However I can't believe it is as easy to avoid as simply delaying payment until 6/4/10.

Darat
9th December 2009, 06:21 AM
Heard someone on the radio (MP but missed name and party affiliation) saying that this was a waste of time as it would "only" raise £500 million...

Francesca R
9th December 2009, 06:28 AM
Actually the SWP (http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=19806) seem to think it is a waste of time!

Lothian
9th December 2009, 06:33 AM
I read it as April 2011 at first. It is indeed 2010 so "what the Tories would do" is rather moot.

However I can't believe it is as easy to avoid as simply delaying payment until 6/4/10.It is not due to be paid until 31 August 2010. Retrospective changes to the legislation are not unheard of. The Tories could easily stop it or......... say look at what those nasty Labourites taxmeisters did, We wouldn't have done it but now the treaty has been agreed there is no point in us having a referendum on the subject.

Lothian
9th December 2009, 06:34 AM
Actually the SWP (http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=19806) seem to think it is a waste of time!Gosh, shock horror.....and have we got a view from the RCP?

Darat
9th December 2009, 06:40 AM
Actually the SWP (http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=19806) seem to think it is a waste of time!


What you'd expect from that lot of right-wingers!

brodski
9th December 2009, 06:42 AM
Gosh, shock horror.....and have we got a view from the RCP?

If not why not contact Sence About Science for one?

Darat
9th December 2009, 06:44 AM
I waiting for the Tax-payers Alliance's letter of support to the Chancellor.

Lothian
9th December 2009, 06:56 AM
If not why not contact Sence About Science for one?I never knew that link.

I recall in my younger days fly posting a RCP event promoting a “Miss RCP wet T-shirt competition” later that evening.

The things I did for kicks.

commandlinegamer
9th December 2009, 07:02 AM
What annoys me is RBS' claim that their investment banking group is making oodles of profits. But that only applies because their massive loss making divisions are not considered 'core' business. I think the total operating loss is still about £4.6 billion, according to Robert Peston's blog. So how they can even consider rewarding people is beyond me.

Wudang
9th December 2009, 07:08 AM
Well it would depend on the bonus metrics. For example my 1st wife and I both worked for IBM in the UK in the early 90s. Her bonus was a pittance compared to mine as hers was based on the profit of IBM UK Holdings Ltd whereas mine was based on sales revenue for IBM's network software division. IBM UK was losing money but the corporate network software division was very profitable.
In the bank I work for the profit pot is tied to results for the group and then that pot is apportioned to different areas depending on their KPIs and so on. I guess their pot is tied to each divisions balance sheet.

Beerina
9th December 2009, 07:13 AM
Did these banks take money from the government recently? Otherwise the government should stay out of it.


“We hope it will be a disincentive for banks to pay bonuses,” said one Treasury official.

Welcome to a free country.

commandlinegamer
9th December 2009, 07:16 AM
Did these banks take money from the government recently? Otherwise the government should stay out of it.




Welcome to a free country.

The banks only survived because they were bailed out. We pwn them.

INRM
9th December 2009, 09:39 AM
I thought there were limits as to how much you can tax something...

geni
9th December 2009, 09:44 AM
I thought there were limits as to how much you can tax something...

Nope. Taxes of over 100% are unusal but they do turn up from time time.