PDA

View Full Version : History text books -- Texas Board of Education at work again


Questioninggeller
18th January 2010, 10:55 AM
It's not just creationism (http://ncse.com/news/2009/05/dont-mess-with-textbooks-004804) that the Texas Board of Education wants in public text books. The fight last week was about history:


History Lessened
Texas Tribune (http://www.texastribune.org/stories/2010/jan/15/history-lessened/)
By Brian Thevenot
‎Jan 15, 2010‎


The line in the proposed U.S. History high school curriculum seemed simple enough: “Explain actions taken by people from different racial, ethnic, gender and religious groups to expand economic opportunities and political rights in American society.”

But then State Board of Education member and former chair Don McLeroy, in one of a flurry of amendments at the board’s Friday meeting, wanted to axe the words “racial, ethnic, gender and religious” from that and another similar line. The move provoked deep emotions on a day when several members accused the conservative firebrand and others in his voting bloc of bending American history to suit a right-wing agenda and excising the nation’s history of oppression.

“It’s just redundant,” insisted McLeroy, arguing the standard already said “various groups.”

Other board members didn’t buy it. “It’s not redundant to me,” retorted board member Mavis Knight, who is African-American. “Because the racial and gender groups you are trying to strike overcame great obstacles to make great contributions. … This board is rewriting history, wanting to sanitize anything that might reflect negatively on our country.”
...
When board member Barbara Cargill backed McLeroy, arguing that such exploring of minority groups detracted from teaching students about “the melting pot,” Knight was momentarily speechless. “I need a moment ... I need to gather myself,” she told chair Gail Lowe, who thanked her for her decorum.

“You would have us think we’re in some kind of Utopia that didn’t exist,” Knight continued, after a pause. “Look at what ‘groups’ in society do to keep other ‘groups’ from achieving.You made laws. You burned down something called ‘Black Wall Street’ because you didn’t want them to achieve. … I’m sorry. I have to stop.”
...
Long before the board took up the standards this week, 16 board-appointed committees, largely consisting of educators, had pored over them in multiple daylong sessions. The board charged with high school U.S. history included McLeroy’s appointee, conservative gadfly Bill Ames, who had proposed a slew of right-leaning amendments that were shot down by his fellow committee members, all of them social studies educators. On Friday, McLeroy picked up where Ames left off, trumpeting many of the same additions and deletions Ames had proposed and the curriculum-writing committee had spurned.

McLeroy sought, for instance, to rehabilitate the reputation of red-hunting Senator Joseph McCarthy, adding a line to standards on McCarthyism reading: “and how the later release of the Venona papers confirmed suspicions of communist infiltrations of the U.S. government.” The amendment passed without objection. Another change that had been defeated in the curriculum writing committee, adding “legal and illegal” before “immigration,” also passed. In yet another victory for McLeroy, the board added a new standard describing “the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schlafly, the Contract with America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association.”

McLeroy and his fellow conservatives lost votes on other amendments, however. The board had an extended debate over McLeroy wanting to add conservative pundit William F. Buckley, Reagan foreign policy advisor Jeane Kirkpatrick, and former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich, among others. Board membver Rick Agosto then countered with an amendment to add liberal stalwart Ted Kennedy, which failed, causing Knight to offer another unsuccessful amendment adding “the Kennedy family.” But then McLeroy’s original proposal also got shot down, in another tie vote, which chairwoman Lowe again declined to break.

As the board was winding down on its social studies deliberations, board member Cynthia Dunbar sought to remove African American activist Marcus Garvey and attorney Clarence Darrow, a leader in the American Civil Liberties Union and the defense attorney in the Scopes Monkey Trial, the landmark case in which a teacher was fined for breaking the law mandating the teaching of creationism.

Most of the debate centered on Garvey. Dunbar argued that Garvey, a Jamaican who led back-to-Africa movement, should be removed because he wasn’t an American citizen. Board member Lawrence Allen pronounced that argument weak, as did some other members. “You may be well aware of Marcus Garvey’s back-to-Africa movement, but I don’t think many people are, or how significant his movement was to other movements that came after,” Allen said. “You’re saying we should take him out just because he wasn’t born here?”

“Yes, my concern is that he was born in Jamaica and was deported,” Dunbar answered.
...

Full: Texas Tribune (http://www.texastribune.org/stories/2010/jan/15/history-lessened/)

TragicMonkey
18th January 2010, 12:55 PM
Every winter, when it gets too cold here in Virginia for my liking, I think, "I should move to Texas". Then I hear something like this, and think "I can just buy a thicker scarf."

Praktik
18th January 2010, 12:58 PM
wow - its amazing how politicized education is in Texas... Im sure there are elements of politics that creep in everywhere but seriously, this is getting a bit crazy.

TragicMonkey
18th January 2010, 02:21 PM
wow - its amazing how politicized education is in Texas... Im sure there are elements of politics that creep in everywhere but seriously, this is getting a bit crazy.

For some reason, the market for school textbooks is biggest in Texas, so whatever the publishers need to do to sell there will affect their entire product line. So don't think that your kids in the blue states are entirely free from "Texas Editing"; chances are, they're using the same textbooks.

fitzgibbon
18th January 2010, 03:14 PM
Well, if I hear they edit History texts to say the States won the War of 1812, there's a gonna be trouble! :D

Praktik
18th January 2010, 03:21 PM
We turned your precious White House charcoal black once, don't make us do it again!!

fitzgibbon
18th January 2010, 03:24 PM
And whatever you may ask, we'll not take Detroit back! :)

(With all due apologies to any native Detroiters on the board)

Praktik
18th January 2010, 03:29 PM
That is perfectly fine, no customs when checking out the scions of Detroit house and techno?

I'm in! ;)

EDIT: oh ya, you guys can keep the Dakotas and the Carolinas.

lector
18th January 2010, 04:04 PM
For some reason, the market for school textbooks is biggest in Texas, so whatever the publishers need to do to sell there will affect their entire product line. So don't think that your kids in the blue states are entirely free from "Texas Editing"; chances are, they're using the same textbooks.

Not exactly (http://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-heard/archives/2010/01/18/texas-god-squaders-closer-to-national-textbook-domination), but you've got the right idea.

...when it comes to textbooks, what happens in Texas rarely stays in Texas. The reasons for this are economic: Texas is the nation’s second-largest textbook market and one of the few biggies where the state picks what books schools can buy rather than leaving it up to the whims of local districts, which means publishers that get their books approved can count on millions of dollars in sales. As a result, the Lone Star State has outsized influence over the reading material used in classrooms nationwide, since publishers craft their standard textbooks based on the specs of the biggest buyers.

TragicMonkey
18th January 2010, 04:11 PM
Meh, close enough. I am a veritable warehouse of almost-correctly-remembered trivia.

I'm also really good at pointing to actors in tv shows and saying "that was that guy who was in that thing, back in the eighties, you know, with the family? That lived in, a house? Remember?"

slingblade
18th January 2010, 04:27 PM
Meh, close enough. I am a veritable warehouse of almost-correctly-remembered trivia.

I'm also really good at pointing to actors in tv shows and saying "that was that guy who was in that thing, back in the eighties, you know, with the family? That lived in, a house? Remember?"

Or as we say in my house: "That one guy, with that one nose."

lector
18th January 2010, 09:51 PM
"Wasn't he on that detective show?"

Back to the topic, I just got lucky with a quick Google. It didn't seem right to me that TX was the biggest state market. Still doesn't seem right that they are the second biggest. What do they do, hold annual book burnings?

Travis
18th January 2010, 11:03 PM
Well, if I hear they edit History texts to say the States won the War of 1812, there's a gonna be trouble! :D

Are you implying the US "lost?":cool:

fitzgibbon
19th January 2010, 03:10 AM
Are you implying the US "lost?":cool:

Ooo, maybe a little face perhaps. That "mere matter of marching" thing was oh-so-over-the-top. :D

However, without Ol' Fuss 'n Feathers, it may well have gotten especially ugly.

ponderingturtle
19th January 2010, 04:54 AM
wow - its amazing how politicized education is in Texas... Im sure there are elements of politics that creep in everywhere but seriously, this is getting a bit crazy.

The thing is that Texas is the largest state that adopts high school text books on a state level. So it has an impact on the entire text book industry and not just an impact on Texas children.

ponderingturtle
19th January 2010, 04:56 AM
Are you implying the US "lost?":cool:

Hey we entirely failed in our goal of annexing Canada.

paiute
19th January 2010, 05:26 AM
The historian Page Smith (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Smith) wrote a most fascinating 8 volume American history. After determining that all contemporary sources had over 200 years been hopelessly shredded, blue-pencilled and bowdlerized by idiots such as the current Texas textbook board, he went back to original sources and produced a history in which all the character flaws, evil, sex, etc were put back into their proper places.

For instance, Lewis and Clark kept some pretty explicit notes about the ritual sex practices of the native tribes they encountered on their trip, but you won't find that information in any Texas history book.

fitzgibbon
19th January 2010, 08:57 AM
It always gets me how our predecessors didn't defecate, swear or have sex. No wonder it's so boring listening to our elders talk about the good ol' days. :)

Checkmite
19th January 2010, 09:06 AM
Well, I suppose we should be grateful that they didn't deliberate as to whether slavery as the cause of secession should've been "de-emphasized" lest neo-Confederates' feelings be hurt.

ponderingturtle
19th January 2010, 11:23 AM
Well, I suppose we should be grateful that they didn't deliberate as to whether slavery as the cause of secession should've been "de-emphasized" lest neo-Confederates' feelings be hurt.

But glossing over the role of slavery in the formation of the republic of texas would be a good thing right?

RenaissanceBiker
19th January 2010, 11:25 AM
For instance, Lewis and Clark kept some pretty explicit notes about the ritual sex practices of the native tribes they encountered on their trip, but you won't find that information in any Texas history book.

Why would they? Lewis and Clark didn't go to Texas.