Richard Gage Doesn't Believe There is any Legitimate Criticism of His Work

[JamesB]

Richard Gage, from Saturday on Kevin Barrett's radio show:

Barrett: How have the people who have tried to uphold the official version of 9/11 responded to this. You have had a fair amount of time now Richard going around giving talks all over the country, and the world, and you have drawn huge audiences everywhere from here to New Zealand. You have drawn the flak of the so called debunkers, people who are rather desparately trying to uphold the official story. At one point we were trying to have some 9/11 debates, between those of us on our side and somebody on the other side, and we never could find anyone on the other side willing to participate in these debates. What is your sense of what kind of opposition we have, do they have any valid points or are they completely blowing smoke? Have they alerted you to any weaknesses in your argument?

Gage: Well what they do is obscure what we are saying with our associations, or manufactured associations and calling us names like conspiracy theorists. What they don't do is look at the evidence that we provide clearly, and provide rational explanations as to where it might be coming from if it is not from explosive controlled demolition.

Now, the irony of going on Kevin Barrett's show and complaining about being smeared by "associations" is just too much.

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Gage: Well what they do is obscure what we are saying with our associations, or manufactured associations and calling us names like conspiracy theorists. What they don't do is look at the evidence that we provide clearly, and provide rational explanations as to where it might be coming from if it is not from explosive controlled demolition.

LOL! Evidence that doesn't exist isn't evidence at all. I've got something for Gage:

[Hokulele]

Huge audiences?

*Snork*

[angrysoba]

Has he done any work? I thought he just turned up with a slideshow of other people's long since debunked nonsense while on junkets "from here to New Zealand" and collected the cash. I suppose that's work of a kind. But if he hasn't produced any legitimate work then he can't expect criticism.

Anyway, the guy's lying. He gets called out all the time on how incoherent his "theories" are and he tells a different story each time to try and get out of it.

[Orphia Nay]

His work? He just regurgitates Griffin's bilge, and Griffin's been debunked from here till eternity.

ETA: When was the last time we heard from Griffin? When he was supporting Al Moussatadeq, the convicted terrorist. Gage is clutching at the straws in a pigsty.

[JoeyDonuts]

Richard Gage is to the scientific method what Kevin Trudeau is to consumer protection.

[bill smith]

Richard Gage, from Saturday on Kevin Barrett's radio show:



Now, the irony of going on Kevin Barrett's show and complaining about being smeared by "associations" is just too much.

I'm sure you would like some Truther input here. Am I right ?

[cyclonic]

Tricky dicky believes WTC 7 sucks, 'negative pressure' sucked smoke from WTC 6 and made it appear that WTC 7 was on fire.
this theory is the only one that he made up by himself as far as i know.

gage speaks at 5.15 min.
kMr3ZSL6l-4

WARNING! FOUL LANGUAGE AT THE END OF THE VIDEO.

[Grizzly Bear]

Tricky dicky believes WTC 7 sucks, 'negative pressure' sucked smoke from WTC 6 and made it appear that WTC 7 was on fire.
this theory is the only one that he made up by himself as far as i know.

gage speaks at 5.15 min.
kMr3ZSL6l-4

WARNING! FOUL LANGUAGE AT THE END OF THE VIDEO.

The variation may be unique to him but I've seen similar claims before from members here and from PP where the smoke from WTC7 was - according to them - from WTC 5 or 6.

[Mr.Herbert]

No words needed:

http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o233/CameronFox/GAGE1.jpg

[njslim]

Who can argue with the boxes - its what clutched it for me.....

[bill smith]

Tricky dicky believes WTC 7 sucks, 'negative pressure' sucked smoke from WTC 6 and made it appear that WTC 7 was on fire.
this theory is the only one that he made up by himself as far as i know.

gage speaks at 5.15 min.
kMr3ZSL6l-4

WARNING! FOUL LANGUAGE AT THE END OF THE VIDEO.

It's a pity Dylan felt strongly enough to swear. I don't really blame him but he should have been more restrained for the cameras.

[cyclonic]

No words needed:

http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o233/CameronFox/GAGE1.jpg


This intro song is just right.

DFVoencqfZw

[Grizzly Bear]

No words needed:

http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o233/CameronFox/GAGE1.jpg


are you serious? Is he still doing that gig?

[Mr.Herbert]

This intro song is just right.

DFVoencqfZw


:dl: :dl:

[Mr.Herbert]

are you serious? Is he still doing that gig?

In all fairness to the dolt, this was from May of 2008. (he repeated this in June of the same year with Mark Roberts)

[Alferd_Packer]

from Saturday on Kevin Barrett's radio show:


You can stop right there.

oZKcDAwO2Rw

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Richard Gage Doesn't Believe There is any Legitimate Criticism of His Work


Heh. I'm pretty sure Gene Ray feels the same way about his work, too.

[Drudgewire]

Heh. I'm pretty sure Gene Ray feels the same way about his work, too.


As does Scott Stapp of Creed. :p

[JoeyDonuts]

As does Scott Stapp of Creed. :p

You son of a bitch.

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8135/scottstapplookingstupid.jpg

I mean, just look at him.

I can only hope that picture is of him suddenly realizing what a hack he is and vomiting all over the place.

[beachnut]

Is Gage a traitor (protected by free speech), a terrorist apologist, a disrespectful idiot, a nut case, a fraud, a person who lies and takes money from dolts who agree with his moronic lies? The disease of terminal stupidity only strikes 1 out of 1,000 people who are dumbed down enough to agree with what Gage dishes out. Called terminal stupidity, TS™, Good NEWS, education cures TS™. As Gage claims the smoke pouring out of WTC7 is from other buildings, it is really bad Gage never talked to the FDNY about it, or found people who saw the fires and the building badly damaged by the WTC towers. Pathetic!

Gage's A-game. For 911 liars, 70 percent is close to 100 percent. And it appears 100 percent wrong, is the new right for 911 liars. A bunch of dolts could figure out 911, but not 911 truthliars who can't figure out anything about 911 save the date.

Gage offers no evidence, he spoons out idiotic ideas for those who can't think for themselves and can't see him as a fraud on 911. What happen, did Gage buy a franchise of stupid ideas from Jones and DRG?

Gage is the guy mommy told you about! Don't trust strangers, and Gage is the strange stranger mommy was hinting at.

I wonder if Gage is insane, has a brain problem, or is just a nasty disrespectful snake-oil salesman? With the few fringe conspracy theorist standing up for Gage and exposing their ignorance on many subjects and levels; they do so without evidence or knowledge and with complete disrespect to thsoe who died on 911 since they are evidence free and proved to be liars, supporters of liars, or just plan "dirt dumb stupid™".

In closing I list the massive pile of evidence Gage has:
1. {∅}

not even zero,

the special 911 liars math, rounds 70 percent to 100! sad

[Jono]

Well what they do is obscure what we are saying with our associations, or manufactured associations and calling us names like conspiracy theorists. What they don't do is look at the evidence that we provide clearly, and provide rational explanations as to where it might be coming from if it is not from explosive controlled demolition.


Right, so when faced with the fact that you are contradicting yourself, six ways from sunday, every now and then on the fundamentally crucial details is, what?... slander?

[Newtons Bit]

I don't believe that Richard Gage's work is legitimate, so there you go.

[bill smith]

In all fairness to the dolt, this was from May of 2008. (he repeated this in June of the same year with Mark Roberts)

I well remember Gravy's post after that debate. It was thoroughly enjoyable.

http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=3789539&postcount=128

[sadhatter]

Just another example of how it is impossible to prove anything ever to a conspiracy theorist.

Regardless of the evidence we show, it will always be branded as from big brother and therefore unusable.

How truthers cant see this is just a ploy by the big names to keep the cash flow flowing in is beyond me.

And as a final thought, i have still yet to receive an answer to the question i posed to conspiracy theorists. If all evidence to the contrary is always suspect, how could you possibly expect to be shown that your wrong in any part of your theory? I am not even saying your entire theory is wrong, but if one part is, how could you possibly ever be informed of your mistake when automatically all evidence that would show you made a mistake is discredited?

[tsig]

Is Gage a traitor (protected by free speech), a terrorist apologist, a disrespectful idiot, a nut case, a fraud, a person who lies and takes money from dolts who agree with his moronic lies? The disease of terminal stupidity only strikes 1 out of 1,000 people who are dumbed down enough to agree with what Gage dishes out. Called terminal stupidity, TS™, Good NEWS, education cures TS™. As Gage claims the smoke pouring out of WTC7 is from other buildings, it is really bad Gage never talked to the FDNY about it, or found people who saw the fires and the building badly damaged by the WTC towers. Pathetic!

Gage's A-game. For 911 liars, 70 percent is close to 100 percent. And it appears 100 percent wrong, is the new right for 911 liars. A bunch of dolts could figure out 911, but not 911 truthliars who can't figure out anything about 911 save the date.

Gage offers no evidence, he spoons out idiotic ideas for those who can't think for themselves and can't see him as a fraud on 911. What happen, did Gage buy a franchise of stupid ideas from Jones and DRG?

Gage is the guy mommy told you about! Don't trust strangers, and Gage is the strange stranger mommy was hinting at.

I wonder if Gage is insane, has a brain problem, or is just a nasty disrespectful snake-oil salesman? With the few fringe conspracy theorist standing up for Gage and exposing their ignorance on many subjects and levels; they do so without evidence or knowledge and with complete disrespect to thsoe who died on 911 since they are evidence free and proved to be liars, supporters of liars, or just plan "dirt dumb stupid™".

In closing I list the massive pile of evidence Gage has:
1. {∅}

not even zero,

the special 911 liars math, rounds 70 percent to 100! sad

I thought the full equation is 2/3 = 70% = 100%.

Where = means "approximately"

By extension we can prove that 0 = 1 so therefore no facts = facts and this full supports the truther position.:)

[tsig]

You son of a bitch.

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/8135/scottstapplookingstupid.jpg

I mean, just look at him.

I can only hope that picture is of him suddenly realizing what a hack he is and vomiting all over the place.

Looks like he's bowing to his own awesomeness so he and Gage have a lot in common.

[TheDaver]

He's either lying through his teeth or hopelessly deluded. No third possibility.