Listen to Rand Paul's New Radio Ad Here!

[Galileo]

Listen to Rand Paul's New Radio Ad Here!

http://www.randpaul2010.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/randpaulradioad-disgr1.mp3

:k:

You will not spam, flood or otherwise post in a manner that disrupts the functioning of the Forum, this includes using disruptive formatting in your posts.

[Sword_Of_Truth]

I support Rand Pauls stance on keeping the Guantanamo Bay detention facility open and trying the islamic jihadists behind 9/11 in military courts.

[Cleon]

No.

[Galileo]

I support Rand Pauls stance on keeping the Guantanamo Bay detention facility open and trying the islamic jihadists behind 9/11 in military courts.

If you believe that.

[Galileo]

No.

Dick Cheney sticks nose in KY Senate race to back Rand Paul’s NeoCon opponent

On Trey Grayson’s campaign site today is a quote from former Vice President Dick Cheney:

“I’m a lifelong conservative, and I can tell the real thing when I see it. I have looked at the records of both candidates in the race, and it is clear to me that Trey Grayson is right on the issues that matter – both on fiscal responsibility and on national security.”

Indeed, Cheney– the man who helped construct the lies that sold the Iraq War, who endorses perpetual conflict and endless spending in order to maintain over 700 military bases overseas, and who still delusionally calls himself a “conservative”– came out in support of Trey Grayson, one of Rand Paul’s primary opponents.

As odd as it might seem that in modern America Dick Cheney, (or anyone from the Bush administration), might still have any credibility left to anyone after the ruinous legacy that they left behind, the Grayson campaign has proudly seized the endorsement, attempting to paint Rand Paul as weak on terrorism in the same way that the Neocon establishment tried to do to his father during the 2008 presidential election.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/dick-cheney-sticks-nose-in-ky-senate-race-to-back-rand-paul%E2%80%99s-neocon-opponent.html

[Cleon]

Dick Cheney sticks nose in KY Senate race to back Rand Paul’s NeoCon opponent.



http://www.prisonplanet.com/dick-cheney-sticks-nose-in-ky-senate-race-to-back-rand-paul%E2%80%99s-neocon-opponent.html

I don't care.

[Ladewig]

Listen to Rand Paul's New Radio Ad Here!

http://www.randpaul2010.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/randpaulradioad-disgr1.mp3

:k:

Dude, it's just a Senate seat for Kentucky. Get over it.

[Galileo]

Dude, it's just a Senate seat for Kentucky. Get over it.

Do you have any intelligent comments on the ad?

:eek:

[Galileo]

I don't care.

Does that mean you are conceding my point?

:confused:

[Sword_Of_Truth]

If you believe that.

Rand Paul does.

And he's good enough for you, isn't he?

[Brainster]

First rule of negative advertising is that you do it late in the campaign, because the mud has a tendency to generate a backlash. The primary in this case is not until May 18th, which means that Rand Paul jumped the gun by about 50 days.

BTW, have I mentioned that the San Antonio Spurs suck eggs and that Tim Duncan is a lousy player?

[Brainster]

If you believe that.

As Yogi Berra once said, you could look it up (http://www.randpaul2010.com/2009/11/rand-paul-try-convict-and-lock-up-terrorists-in-guantanamo/):

Leading United States Senate candidate Rand Paul today criticized the Obama administration’s decision to close the Guantanamo Bay detention center and try terrorism suspects in United States Civil Courts.

“Foreign terrorists do not deserve the protections of our Constitution,” said Dr. Paul. “These thugs should stand before military tribunals and be kept off American soil. I will always fight to keep Kentucky safe and that starts with cracking down on our enemies.”

Dr. Paul believes in strong national defense and thinks military spending should be our country’s top budget priority. He has also called for a Constitutional declaration of war with Afghanistan.

[Cleon]

Does that mean you are conceding my point?

:confused:

What point?

[dudalb]

Anyone note that somebody from Wisconsin is attacking Cheney for supporting a Candidate running for office in a state Cheney is not a resident of?
Oh, the Irony.

[Galileo]

First rule of negative advertising is that you do it late in the campaign, because the mud has a tendency to generate a backlash. The primary in this case is not until May 18th, which means that Rand Paul jumped the gun by about 50 days.

BTW, have I mentioned that the San Antonio Spurs suck eggs and that Tim Duncan is a lousy player?

You don't know anything about professional campaign strategy. You do negative ads early and often. Rand Paul knows what he is doing and you don't. Sore Loserman. You're just upset your candidate is getting his arse kicked.

:eye-poppi

[Galileo]

Rand Paul does.



n't.

:jaw-dropp

[Galileo]

What point?

The point I made about Rand Paul's point. You have conceded that Rand Paul is right.

:boxedin:

[Galileo]

As Yogi Berra once said, you could look it up (http://www.randpaul2010.com/2009/11/rand-paul-try-convict-and-lock-up-terrorists-in-guantanamo/):

Only a fool would believe everything that a politician says.

:covereyes

[Cleon]

The point I made about Rand Paul's point.

Telling people to listen to a radio ad is not making a point.


You have conceded that Rand Paul is right.

Er...No, no, I have not.

[Galileo]

Telling people to listen to a radio ad is not making a point.



Er...No, no, I have not.

You're just upset that your corrupt warmonger candidate is losing.

;)

[Cleon]

You're just upset that your corrupt warmonger candidate is losing.


Uh...No. I have no dog in that fight at all.

[tyr_13]

You don't know anything about professional campaign strategy. You do negative ads early and often. Rand Paul knows what he is doing and you don't. Sore Loserman. You're just upset your candidate is getting his arse kicked.

:eye-poppi

You're just upset that your corrupt warmonger candidate is losing.

;)

What the hell are you talking about? I don't think any of us here are from Kentucky. Besides that, opposing Paul doesn't mean supporting all his opposition. That's WAY too big a group to agree with completely.

So, fallacious all around. Good job.

[Galileo]

What the hell are you talking about? I don't think any of us here are from Kentucky. Besides that, opposing Paul doesn't mean supporting all his opposition. That's WAY too big a group to agree with completely.

So, fallacious all around. Good job.

You're just upset that Rand Paul is winning the election. Sour grapes.

:(

[Galileo]

What point?

Not anymore. Your dog was taken out a long time ago.

:crowded:

[Cleon]

Not anymore. Your dog was taken out a long time ago.


And which dog was that, exactly? I don't typically get involved in Kentucky elections. I'd be interested to know who I supported.

[tyr_13]

You're just upset that Rand Paul is winning the election. Sour grapes.

:(

No, I'm not. I don't care.

Again, your argument is completely fallacious. Try to reread what I said, and understand it. Next week, try to show that you understand it.

[ryanebelhar]

yLpi7JOv7pQ

[Galileo]

No, I'm not. I don't care.

Again, your argument is completely fallacious. Try to reread what I said, and understand it. Next week, try to show that you understand it.

You are upset. That's why you keep arguing with me.

:rolleyes:

[Galileo]

And which dog was that, exactly? I don't typically get involved in Kentucky elections. I'd be interested to know who I supported.

You support anybody who is not related to Ron Paul.

[Cleon]

You support anybody who is not related to Ron Paul.

I do? Well, that makes it pretty difficult to figure out who I'm going to vote for, as few politicians (especially here in Georgia) are related to Ron Paul.

[Galileo]

yLpi7JOv7pQ

That's a low blow. Neat that you cheer for it.

:jaw-dropp

[Galileo]

I do? Well, that makes it pretty difficult to figure out who I'm going to vote for, as few politicians (especially here in Georgia) are related to Ron Paul.

I had no trouble figuring it out.

:blush:

[Cleon]

I had no trouble figuring it out.


Any chance you'll tell me? I'm dying to know who I supported.

[Ladewig]

Do you have any intelligent comments on the ad?

:eek:

Fine. I have little respect for candidates who feel the need to tell me what is wrong with the other guy. I want to know what is good about the person paying for the commercial.

[tyr_13]

You are upset. That's why you keep arguing with me.

:rolleyes:

You believe you are psychic. That is why you think you're right.

That makes you doubly wrong.

[Sword_Of_Truth]

You're just upset that your corrupt warmonger candidate is losing.

;)

But you're happy that your corrupt warmonger candidate is winning?

Ummm... congratulations on getting your personal preferred corrupt warmonger?

[ryanebelhar]

That's a low blow. Neat that you cheer for it.

:jaw-dropp

I'd prefer Dan Mongairdo to win over the rest.

[Matthew Cline]

Rand Paul is a Truther? Hmmm:

On 9/11/2001, nineteen terrorists attacked us aboard commercial airliners. I’ll never forget coming out of an eye surgery and into a patient’s hospital room to see the attacks on television. I’ve never doubted who attacked us and have never wavered in calling for a response. In fact, I would have demanded a vote on Declaration of War with Afghanistan and voted for it. Furthermore, I think we made a mistake by waiting one and one half months to attack the terrorist bases.

From RandPaul2010.com (http://www.randpaul2010.com/2010/02/rand-responds-to-attacks/)

[Brainster]

Rand Paul is a Truther? Hmmm:



From RandPaul2010.com (http://www.randpaul2010.com/2010/02/rand-responds-to-attacks/)

Rand Paul routinely lies, according to Galileo. It's one of his admirable qualities.