View Full Version : Have you seen this probably new fake video?
sebbiel
29th April 2010, 04:37 AM
BKzydlj0v20
Horatius
29th April 2010, 04:50 AM
Just watched it now. No one will be surprised that it contains one major inconsistency just within the video.
In the later part of the video, he says that the security cam footage of the Pentagon plane actually shows a "dust trail" following the missile. However, in his "aerial shot" of the missile, no such dust trail can be seen.
And while we're at it, doesn't the existence of an aerial shot of the Pentagon disprove the Truthers' assertions that any plane that flies close to the Pentagon is shot down by some automated AA system?
Sabrina
29th April 2010, 05:14 AM
[twoofer mode]well they can shut it off when they want to! They're just trying to pull the wool over our eyes! Wake up sheeple!!11!1!eleventy!!1![/twoofer mode]
ETA: Never mind that this idea would immediately beg the question, "if they can shut it off in order to get aerial shots, what makes you think they wouldn't shut it off in order to carry out the dastardly plot you are accusing them of in the first place?"
McHrozni
29th April 2010, 05:23 AM
In the later part of the video, he says that the security cam footage of the Pentagon plane actually shows a "dust trail" following the missile. However, in his "aerial shot" of the missile, no such dust trail can be seen.
That would be because his areal shots of something hitting the Pentagon are fake. A poor and crude fake, to be precise :)
McHrozni
sebbiel
29th April 2010, 05:53 AM
I did some research and found this (and already presented this on polish forum as Aquila):
Stalls from this fake video:
http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/7910/fake2.jpg
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/3922/fake1g.jpg
(Cruise missile painted like AA airplane).
Now look here:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-86c.htm
and see photos on that website:
http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/4162/calcm990330f3588h002.jpg
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/981/agm86apiiop101141200.jpg
The same photos - what do you think - which ones were photoshopped? :D
Panoply_Prefect
29th April 2010, 07:52 AM
You gotta love the "truth-movement".
Horatius
29th April 2010, 08:07 AM
That would be because his areal shots of something hitting the Pentagon are fake. A poor and crude fake, to be precise :)
McHrozni
Well, yeah, that was kind of where I was gong with that.
Edx
29th April 2010, 08:48 AM
wow I wonder how they live with themselves with these fakes lol
twinstead
29th April 2010, 08:51 AM
I'm still trying to figure out how a cruise missile painted like an airliner would have fooled anybody anyway
FreshHat
29th April 2010, 09:04 AM
I'm still trying to figure out how a cruise missile painted like an airliner would have fooled anybody anyway
Perhaps it was part of a fiendish plot to put the blame on the Lilliputians.
Nursedan
29th April 2010, 09:15 AM
Where's the explosion in the aerial shot? Embarrasingly bad fake.:jaw-dropp
Mangoose
29th April 2010, 11:53 AM
I saw the original fake explosion video two years ago on Youtube, which got one-star and had many comments about what a waste of time it was to watch it. BTW, the aerial view is clearly pre-2001 because it has the old heliport tower in the image.
The fake Photoshopped missile is hilarious -- it's like the guy who built his Noah's ark replica to show how massive it was, when in reality it beggers disbelief at how tiny it really is.
Oh, and I am so sick at people sticking Requiem for a Tower into their videos....it gets old.
Bell
29th April 2010, 12:02 PM
Remember THIS (http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=8587298712435481780) piece of fakery?
And the Truthers dare accusing the government of faking evidence?
Edx
29th April 2010, 05:05 PM
Remember THIS (http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=8587298712435481780) piece of fakery?
And the Truthers dare accusing the government of faking evidence?
And the thing with this stuff is that it must have take them many hours to do it.
sheeplesnshills
29th April 2010, 05:33 PM
Oh, and I am so sick at people sticking Requiem for a Tower into their videos....it gets old.
I actually really like the tune.....but yes, its grossly overused by the truther scum.
tfk
29th April 2010, 05:53 PM
I stumbled on this link (http://www.bike-forums.com/rec-motorcycles/re-wtc-towers-case-controlled-demolition-82-203.html#post66039) from back in 2008, in which a poster named "Al Dykes" claimed that the famous "Firemen making phone call on street corner & large blast goes off (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5473538148606824512)" was a fake.
Does anyone know if there is any truth to this claim?
I went looking for a thread, but came up blank.
Thanks.
Tom
Edx
29th April 2010, 06:06 PM
I actually really like the tune.....but yes, its grossly overused by the truther scum.
I used to like it.
:)
Edx
29th April 2010, 06:07 PM
I stumbled on this link (http://www.bike-forums.com/rec-motorcycles/re-wtc-towers-case-controlled-demolition-82-203.html#post66039) from back in 2008, in which a poster named "Al Dykes" claimed that the famous "Firemen making phone call on street corner & large blast goes off (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5473538148606824512)" was a fake.
Does anyone know if there is any truth to this claim?
I went looking for a thread, but came up blank.
Thanks.
Tom
Didn't Mike obtain the original documentary it was in though?
http://www.911myths.com/index.php/A_WTC7_explosion_video
So I guess it would have had to have been made before that if it was.
Edx
29th April 2010, 06:08 PM
ignore!
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.