View Full Version : Are the "Dummies" books going a tad overboard?
bozman
10th July 2010, 12:01 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v689/bozman007/dumm.png
Is it just me or the folks who make these "dummies" books going a bit too far?
Her Dark Star
10th July 2010, 12:04 PM
In what sense? From their point of view they're going to print anything they can make money from. Quantum physics is bandied about a lot in the media these days so probably a lot of people wouldn't mind knowing a little about it without trying to wade through the heavy stuff. Could probably find most of it out with google though :)
bozman
10th July 2010, 12:13 PM
I'm just saying that if you're studying Quantum Physics, you're probably not a "dummy." At least not the same caliber of dummy as the one reading "Algebra for Dummies." That's all. :D
John Jones
10th July 2010, 12:21 PM
It might mkae a good refresher book for those who studied quantum mechanics years ago.
HansMustermann
10th July 2010, 01:51 PM
I don't think they mean "Dummies" literally. "X for dummies" has just become an expression with a meaning of its own, rather than something pejorative.
Well, that's what I'm telling myself anyway. Otherwise I'd worry more about the link on Mod The Sims that says "Downloading for fraking idiots" :p
theprestige
10th July 2010, 02:07 PM
"An Overview of the Subject Matter for Non-Subject-Matter Experts Who Would Nevertheless Like to Have the First Clue About WTH is Going On".
Who cares what they call it, so long as the overview is both accurate and accessible?
I mean, it's not like anybody is arguing that a basic comprehension of the simpler concepts of quantum physics should be restricted only to the elite of theoretical-physics research.
Why not "Quantum Phsyics for Dummies"? Would the world be improved in some way if people didn't have the opportunity to read such a work?
bozman
10th July 2010, 03:10 PM
Why not "Quantum Phsyics for Dummies"? Would the world be improved in some way if people didn't have the opportunity to read such a work?
No need to get defensive there, dumby. My point was more along the lines of 'if you can study quantum physics, then you're probably no dumby,' right? Just an attempt at silliness, that's all.
rjh01
10th July 2010, 03:39 PM
I think the dummy's books are meant to be as basic as possible.
GrouchoMarxist
10th July 2010, 05:56 PM
No need to get defensive there, dumby. My point was more along the lines of 'if you can study quantum physics, then you're probably no dumby,' right? Just an attempt at silliness, that's all.
How big of a dummie must one be to fail at silliness?
Phsyically speaking, of coarse.
bozman
10th July 2010, 06:42 PM
How big of a dummie must one be to fail at silliness?
Phsyically speaking, of coarse.
About 6'3," I'd say.
Dorian Gray
10th July 2010, 06:54 PM
I cried because I was a dummy until I met a man who was a complete idiot.
GrouchoMarxist
11th July 2010, 12:11 AM
I cried because I was a dummy until I met a man who was a complete idiot.
There is someone for everyone.
I'm getting misty...
TubbaBlubba
11th July 2010, 05:45 AM
I seriously doubt it's possible to make a quantum physics for dummies book, it's a too complex subject and if you're simplifying it you're probably teaching things that are plain wrong.
Well, unless we're talking about this kind of quantum physics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0c5yClip4o
I love this clip.
Pikachu
11th July 2010, 01:34 PM
My daughter and I got the giggles in a bookshop when faced with "Tarot for Dummies". The assistant agreed with us...
Kaylee
11th July 2010, 02:13 PM
No need to get defensive there, dumby. My point was more along the lines of 'if you can study quantum physics, then you're probably no dumby,' right? Just an attempt at silliness, that's all.
I hear what you're saying bozman, and I agree.
But I think that the "Dummy Books" were always marketed tongue in cheek. After all, anyone who is geniunely interested in learning isn't really a dummy -- even if they are unfortunately misguided enough to want to learn about tarot cards (re above post).
FWIW, at first I thought you had photoshopped the jpeg. I was very surprised when I saw that it was a geniune title for sale.
TheSkepticCanuck
11th July 2010, 05:25 PM
After seeing "Sex for Dummies" for sale, nothing in the "for Dummies" line of books surprises me any more.
GrouchoMarxist
11th July 2010, 05:56 PM
After seeing "Sex for Dummies" for sale, nothing in the "for Dummies" line of books surprises me any more.
Acoustic Guitar for Dummies includes a guitar...
I Ratant
11th July 2010, 06:02 PM
ISTR seeing one "Betting on the horses for Dummies"... It had several hundred pages, when only one would be sufficient. :)
NotJesus
11th July 2010, 06:10 PM
After seeing "Sex for Dummies" for sale, nothing in the "for Dummies" line of books surprises me any more.
Stick it in. If she says, "Ow!" you're probably in the wrong hole. Back up and try again.
dudalb
11th July 2010, 08:59 PM
SOme of the Dummies books are really intended as a sort of "Cliff Notes" for the topics.
"LOgic for Dummies" for instance, is basically a quick review and reference for Symbolic Logic classes.
Alareth
11th July 2010, 09:26 PM
I don't know, the title of this one seems appropriate (http://www.dummies.com/store/product/Homeschooling-For-Dummies.productCd-0764508881.html)
gabeygoat
12th July 2010, 01:37 AM
i think it's fine. not everyone can be a specialist. i enjoy reading about quantum physics, but i'll never be a physicist. that doesn't mean i shouldn't learn anything about it at all.
TubbaBlubba
12th July 2010, 01:49 AM
i think it's fine. not everyone can be a specialist. i enjoy reading about quantum physics, but i'll never be a physicist. that doesn't mean i shouldn't learn anything about it at all.
If you actually want to LEARN something about quantum physics I suggest you read some of Feynman's litterature.
gabeygoat
12th July 2010, 02:00 AM
If you actually want to LEARN something about quantum physics I suggest you read some of Feynman's litterature.
have, and love it! he's a bit full of himself, but also well spoken and funny
Sideroxylon
12th July 2010, 02:26 AM
have, and love it! he's a bit full of himself, but also well spoken and funny
Add charismatic, effective educator, Nobel Prize winner but I see justified self confidence instead of full of himself.
Watch him here courtesy of Mr. Gates' generosity:
www.research.microsoft.com/apps/tools/tuva/index.html
TubbaBlubba
12th July 2010, 02:35 AM
have, and love it! he's a bit full of himself, but also well spoken and funny
Excellent, I'm currently making my way through Lectures on Physics vol. 1.
Sideroxylon: Oooooooooooh, amazing, I'm lyrical over that.
TragicMonkey
15th July 2010, 07:51 AM
I quite enjoyed Writing "for Dummies" Books for Dummies.
In the acknowledgments the author admitted to using Writing "Writing 'for Dummies' Books for Dummies" for Dummies.
AdMan
15th July 2010, 08:43 AM
I don't know, the title of this one seems appropriate (http://www.dummies.com/store/product/Homeschooling-For-Dummies.productCd-0764508881.html)
Personally, I think this one (http://www.dummies.com/store/product/The-Bible-For-Dummies.productCd-0764552961.html) is quite appropriate as well.
I think I might enjoy the one on quantum physics, however.
Ladewig
15th July 2010, 12:57 PM
In a galaxy far, far, away....
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4134/4792765735_7451955a24.jpg
KingMerv00
15th July 2010, 02:25 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v689/bozman007/dumm.png
Is it just me or the folks who make these "dummies" books going a bit too far?
Is that the new cover for "The Secret"?
LibraryLady
15th July 2010, 05:30 PM
I dislike the "Dummies" and "Idiots" books, although many of them are actually quite good.
Every time I recommend one to a patron, I feel like I'm calling him or her names. I apologize and assure them I do not think they are stupid.
Surely they could have thought of a less insulting title. :(
patchbunny
15th July 2010, 05:44 PM
I made this one as part of an MST3K fan production.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v728/patchbunny/LJ%20Posting/idiots1.jpg
P.J. Denyer
16th July 2010, 03:33 AM
Same vein as above, but I got very funny looks when 'Astrology for Dummies' had me laughing out loud in a Liverpool bookshop.
technoextreme
16th July 2010, 10:38 AM
I seriously doubt it's possible to make a quantum physics for dummies book, it's a too complex subject and if you're simplifying it you're probably teaching things that are plain wrong.
Well, unless we're talking about this kind of quantum physics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0c5yClip4o
I love this clip.
How the hell is it too complex? It isn't that difficult of a subject to the point where even I have contemplated doing something similar.
Roboramma
17th July 2010, 04:10 AM
I seriously doubt it's possible to make a quantum physics for dummies book, it's a too complex subject and if you're simplifying it you're probably teaching things that are plain wrong.
How is this not a simplification of the subject for laymen:
bozman
17th July 2010, 04:46 AM
I don't know, the title of this one seems appropriate (http://www.dummies.com/store/product/Homeschooling-For-Dummies.productCd-0764508881.html)
lol Great find. There must be quite a few of these I've never seen. I'll have to look around the site more.
TubbaBlubba
17th July 2010, 02:34 PM
How is this not a simplification of the subject for laymen:
Heh, fair enough.
On the other hand, he invented the diagrams he uses to demonstrate it, so he can do whatever he wants to with them.
What I'm opposed to is the enormous amount of media teaching patent nonsense as "quantum physics". You could put it this way, I suppose - Any decent lecture on quantum physics (beyond being nonsense) should leave the student not understanding.
Almo
18th July 2010, 12:41 AM
I seriously doubt it's possible to make a quantum physics for dummies book, it's a too complex subject and if you're simplifying it you're probably teaching things that are plain wrong.
Well, unless we're talking about this kind of quantum physics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0c5yClip4o
I love this clip.
:boggled:
Thanks for lowering my IQ.
Azimer the Mad
19th July 2010, 02:32 AM
Speaking of Feyman...
""If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."
Seemed appropriate for the topic.:D
MrBooglemaumau
20th July 2010, 12:24 AM
Same vein as above, but I got very funny looks when 'Astrology for Dummies' had me laughing out loud in a Liverpool bookshop.
I asked our local library if they had "Oyster sexing for Dummies",they didn't have THAT one.
NWO Sentryman
20th July 2010, 03:30 AM
Is there a time cube for dummies out yet?
luchog
31st July 2010, 11:26 PM
One of my personal favorites (http://godzillasmash.deviantart.com/art/Necronomicon-for-Dummies-99954982) -- note: may destroy your sanity.
Another of my favorites (http://i65.servimg.com/u/f65/14/85/76/49/4chanf10.jpg) -- note: will destroy your sanity.
TubbaBlubba
1st August 2010, 10:09 AM
Another of my favorites (http://i65.servimg.com/u/f65/14/85/76/49/4chanf10.jpg) -- note: will destroy your sanity.
OH GOD NO
WHY
WHY
WHY
This sadly reflects the current status of 4chan.
NWO Sentryman
2nd August 2010, 03:27 AM
Breaches of Rules 1 and 2 in literature? Then, Thou hast lost an eighth! :mad:
luchog
2nd August 2010, 05:14 AM
This sadly reflects the current status of 4chan.
You are aware it's a parody, and that no such book actually exists?
Or maybe it's part of the cancer killing /b/. :D
TubbaBlubba
2nd August 2010, 06:40 AM
You are aware it's a parody, and that no such book actually exists?
Or maybe it's part of the cancer killing /b/. :D
I was somewhat frightened for a moment, to be honest, but lated declared the credibility of its existance dubious.
Nevertheless, the fact that anyone went out of their way to create it...
Also, it's impossible to kill /b/, it never was anything. The problem is that the entire site is /b/ now.
luchog
6th August 2010, 04:37 AM
Also, it's impossible to kill /b/, it never was anything. The problem is that the entire site is /b/ now.
"The cancer killing /b/" is a long-running meme on the site. It's a joke, like pretty much everything else there.
TubbaBlubba
6th August 2010, 05:32 AM
Yes, but it's used in reference to the idea that /b/ was somehow once worth visiting. Of course, everything morphs and deforms rather rapidly whenever anonymous gets their hands on it.
A friend of mine once said; "4chan was nice when it was about smart people pretending to be stupid teenagers. Now they've been replaced by actual stupid teenagers."
luchog
6th August 2010, 06:51 AM
Yes, but it's used in reference to the idea that /b/ was somehow once worth visiting. Of course, everything morphs and deforms rather rapidly whenever anonymous gets their hands on it.
Anyone who thinks 4chan /b/ was ever worth visiting never actually spent time there.
dudalb
8th August 2010, 09:47 AM
OH GOD NO
WHY
WHY
WHY
This sadly reflects the current status of 4chan.
It's the inevitable status of 4chan. What else can you expect from a board where anything goes,given what basic human nature is like?
ZirconBlue
9th August 2010, 11:35 AM
The ". . . For Dummies" books typically give a very good introduction and overview to a topic. Often, I'll say something like "I wish they had a 'Music Theory for Dummies" book, only to find out that it actually does exist.
MLH1138
13th August 2010, 02:50 PM
I have a couple of "Dummies" books - Statistics for Dummies and Calculus for Dummies - which I've found very useful. I've never studied either subject formally and don't have the time now for adult education classes, but as a basic grounding and jumping off point I've found both very good.
uruk
3rd September 2010, 12:24 PM
I prefere the " X for the Brain Dead" series of books. More my speed.
© 2001-2009, James Randi Educational Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
vBulletin® v3.7.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.